Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Outcomes identified and prioritised by consumers of Partners in Recovery: a consumer-led study

Authors: Shifra Waks, Justin Newton Scanlan, Bridget Berry, Richard Schweizer, Nicola Hancock, Anne Honey

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recovery oriented service provisions means focusing on outcomes that are important to consumers themselves rather than to clinicians or services. Partners in Recovery (PIR) is an Australia-wide initiative designed to provide service coordination and brokerage for individuals with severe and persistent mental illness. One PIR service engaged a consumer-led research team to evaluate the service from the perspective of consumers. This consumer-led study was established to explore PIR consumers’ perceptions of outcomes they achieved through their involvement with PIR.

Methods

Data were collected through semi-structured interviews exploring participants’ views about and experiences with PIR. Data analysis occurred simultaneously with data collection using constant comparative analysis.

Results

Twenty consumers participated. They reported experiencing valued outcomes in six domains: feeling supported; feeling more hopeful and positive about the future; improved mental clarity, focus and order in life; getting out of the house and engaging in positive activity; having a better social life; and improved physical health.

Conclusions

Exploring outcomes achieved by PIR consumers, from their own perspective provides a nuanced understanding of the contribution these programs can have in supporting individuals’ recovery. Findings from this study highlight the kinds of outcomes consumers achieve when engaged with service coordination and brokerage services. Findings also suggest that outcome measures used in these types of services should focus on recovery outcomes as well as met and unmet needs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Department of Health and Ageing: National mental health report: tracking progress of mental health reform in Australia 1993–2011. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2013. Department of Health and Ageing: National mental health report: tracking progress of mental health reform in Australia 1993–2011. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2013.
2.
go back to reference Wallace A, Kurti L. Partners in Recovery Evaluation and Monitoring Project. Final annual report 2013–14. Urbis: Australia; 2014. Wallace A, Kurti L. Partners in Recovery Evaluation and Monitoring Project. Final annual report 2013–14. Urbis: Australia; 2014.
3.
go back to reference Young SL, Praskova A, Hayward N, Patterson S. Attending to physical health in mental health services in Australia: a qualitative study of service users’ experiences and expectations. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2017;25:602–11. doi:10.1111/hsc.12349.CrossRef Young SL, Praskova A, Hayward N, Patterson S. Attending to physical health in mental health services in Australia: a qualitative study of service users’ experiences and expectations. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2017;25:602–11. doi:10.​1111/​hsc.​12349.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Department of Health and Ageing. Partners in Recovery (PIR). Coordinated support and flexible funding for people with severe, persistent mental illness and complex needs initiative. In: Program guidelines for the engagement of PIR organisations 2012–13 to, vol. 2015–16. Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra; 2012. Department of Health and Ageing. Partners in Recovery (PIR). Coordinated support and flexible funding for people with severe, persistent mental illness and complex needs initiative. In: Program guidelines for the engagement of PIR organisations 2012–13 to, vol. 2015–16. Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra; 2012.
6.
go back to reference Sutton K, Isaacs AN, Dalziel K, Maybery D. Roles and competencies of the support facilitator in Australia’s recovery-oriented mental health initiative: a qualitative study from Gippsland, Victoria. Aust Health Rev. 2017;41:91–7. doi:10.1071/AH15183. CrossRef Sutton K, Isaacs AN, Dalziel K, Maybery D. Roles and competencies of the support facilitator in Australia’s recovery-oriented mental health initiative: a qualitative study from Gippsland, Victoria. Aust Health Rev. 2017;41:91–7. doi:10.​1071/​AH15183.​ CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Strategy NMH. A national framework for recovery-oriented mental health services: guide for practitioners and providers. Commonwelath of Australia: Canberra, ACT; 2013. Strategy NMH. A national framework for recovery-oriented mental health services: guide for practitioners and providers. Commonwelath of Australia: Canberra, ACT; 2013.
9.
go back to reference Young SL, Ensing DS. Exploring recovery from the perspective of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 1999;22:219–31. doi:10.1037/h0095240.CrossRef Young SL, Ensing DS. Exploring recovery from the perspective of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 1999;22:219–31. doi:10.​1037/​h0095240.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Slade M, Thornicroft G, Loftus L, Phelan M, Wykes T. CAN: Camberwell assessment of need. London: Gaskell; 1999. Slade M, Thornicroft G, Loftus L, Phelan M, Wykes T. CAN: Camberwell assessment of need. London: Gaskell; 1999.
11.
go back to reference Wallace A, Kurti L, Wise P, Hudson S, Griffiths C. Partners in Recovery: annual report 2014–2015. Urbis: Australia; 2015. Wallace A, Kurti L, Wise P, Hudson S, Griffiths C. Partners in Recovery: annual report 2014–2015. Urbis: Australia; 2015.
12.
go back to reference Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research: choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. SAGE: Los Angeles; 2013. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research: choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. SAGE: Los Angeles; 2013.
13.
14.
go back to reference Ghisoni M, Wilson CA, Morgan K, Edwards B, Simon N, Langley E, Rees H, Wells A, Tyson PJ, Thomas P, et al. Priority setting in research: user led mental health research. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2017;3. doi:10.1186/s40900-016-0054-7. Ghisoni M, Wilson CA, Morgan K, Edwards B, Simon N, Langley E, Rees H, Wells A, Tyson PJ, Thomas P, et al. Priority setting in research: user led mental health research. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2017;3. doi:10.​1186/​s40900-016-0054-7.
15.
go back to reference National Consumer and Carer Forum: Consumer and carer participation policy: a framework for the mental health sector. Canberra: National Consumer and Carer Forum; 2004. National Consumer and Carer Forum: Consumer and carer participation policy: a framework for the mental health sector. Canberra: National Consumer and Carer Forum; 2004.
18.
go back to reference QSR: NVivo 11 qualitative data analysis software. In.: QSR International Pty Ltd; 2015. QSR: NVivo 11 qualitative data analysis software. In.: QSR International Pty Ltd; 2015.
19.
go back to reference Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967.
20.
go back to reference Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: SAGE; 2014. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: SAGE; 2014.
23.
28.
go back to reference MacKeith J, Burns S. The recovery star: user guide, second edn. London: mental health providers. Forum. 2010; MacKeith J, Burns S. The recovery star: user guide, second edn. London: mental health providers. Forum. 2010;
29.
30.
go back to reference Cleary M, Freeman A, Hunt GE, Walter G. Patient and carer perceptions of need and associations with care-giving burden in an integrated adult mental health service. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006;41:208–14. doi:10.1007/s00127-005-0017-z.CrossRefPubMed Cleary M, Freeman A, Hunt GE, Walter G. Patient and carer perceptions of need and associations with care-giving burden in an integrated adult mental health service. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006;41:208–14. doi:10.​1007/​s00127-005-0017-z.CrossRefPubMed
32.
35.
go back to reference Hancock N, Scanlan JN, Gillespie JA, Smith-Merry J, Yen I. Partners in Recovery program evaluation: changes in unmet needs and recovery. Aust Health Rev. 2017. doi:10.1071/AH17004. Hancock N, Scanlan JN, Gillespie JA, Smith-Merry J, Yen I. Partners in Recovery program evaluation: changes in unmet needs and recovery. Aust Health Rev. 2017. doi:10.​1071/​AH17004.
40.
go back to reference Copic V, Deane FP, Crowe TP, Oades LG. Hope, meaning and responsibility across stages of recovery for individuals living with an enduring mental illness. Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling. 2011;17:61–73. doi:10.1375/jrc.17.2.61.CrossRef Copic V, Deane FP, Crowe TP, Oades LG. Hope, meaning and responsibility across stages of recovery for individuals living with an enduring mental illness. Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling. 2011;17:61–73. doi:10.​1375/​jrc.​17.​2.​61.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Outcomes identified and prioritised by consumers of Partners in Recovery: a consumer-led study
Authors
Shifra Waks
Justin Newton Scanlan
Bridget Berry
Richard Schweizer
Nicola Hancock
Anne Honey
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1498-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Psychiatry 1/2017 Go to the issue