Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation

Authors: Justin Newton Scanlan, Nicola Hancock, Anne Honey

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The time following discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation is a high risk period. Rates of hospital readmission are high and there is increased risk for homelessness and suicide. Transitional and post-discharge support programs have demonstrated positive results in terms of enhanced wellbeing, improved connection with community-based services and, in some cases, reductions in hospital re-admission. This paper reports on the outcomes of a peer-delivered post-discharge support program.

Methods

The program involved peer workers (individuals with their own lived experience of mental illness and recovery) providing individualised practical and emotional support to individuals for six to eight weeks following discharge from an inpatient psychiatric unit. Outcomes measures included self-reported mental health recovery, personal wellness and self-reported re-admission rates. Process and satisfaction measures were also collected and semi-structured follow-up interviews were completed with consenting participants.

Results

The program provided support for a total of 64 individuals, 38 of whom consented to participate in the evaluation. Participants reported improvements in terms of functional and clinical recovery and in the areas of intellectual, social and psychological wellness. Participants self-report of hospital readmissions suggested that there was a reduction in hospital bed days following engagement with the program. Themes from the follow up interviews included: Easing the transition to the “real world”; Practical and individualised support; Someone to talk to; Positive qualities of the worker, Workers’ lived experience was a positive thing, and It wasn’t long enough.

Conclusion

Overall, evaluation data suggest that the program supported positive outcomes for participants in terms of recovery, wellbeing and hospital avoidance. Participant feedback suggested that the use of support workers with their own lived experience of mental illness was a particularly powerful aspect of the program.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Tomita A, Lukens EP, Herman DB. Mediation analysis of critical time intervention for persons living with serious mental illnesses: assessing the role of family relations in reducing psychiatric rehospitalization. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2014;37(1):4–10. doi:10.1037/prj0000015.CrossRefPubMed Tomita A, Lukens EP, Herman DB. Mediation analysis of critical time intervention for persons living with serious mental illnesses: assessing the role of family relations in reducing psychiatric rehospitalization. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2014;37(1):4–10. doi:10.​1037/​prj0000015.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kidd SA, Virdee G, Mihalakakos G, McKinney C, Feingold L, Collins A, Davidson L, Weingarten R, Maples N, Velligan D. The welcome basket revisited: testing the feasibility of a brief peer support intervention to facilitate transition from hospital to community. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2016;39(4):335–42. doi:10.1037/prj0000235.CrossRefPubMed Kidd SA, Virdee G, Mihalakakos G, McKinney C, Feingold L, Collins A, Davidson L, Weingarten R, Maples N, Velligan D. The welcome basket revisited: testing the feasibility of a brief peer support intervention to facilitate transition from hospital to community. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2016;39(4):335–42. doi:10.​1037/​prj0000235.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lawn S, Smith A, Hunter K. Mental health peer support for hospital avoidance and early discharge: an Australian example of consumer driven and operated service. J Ment Health. 2008;17:498–508. doi:10.1080/09638230701530242.CrossRef Lawn S, Smith A, Hunter K. Mental health peer support for hospital avoidance and early discharge: an Australian example of consumer driven and operated service. J Ment Health. 2008;17:498–508. doi:10.​1080/​0963823070153024​2.CrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Gill K. New moves: targeting physical and mental well-being in people with mental illness. Health Issues. 2012;108:18–23. Gill K. New moves: targeting physical and mental well-being in people with mental illness. Health Issues. 2012;108:18–23.
10.
go back to reference Hancock N, Scanlan JN, Bundy AC, Honey A. Recovery assessment scale - domains and stages (RAS-DS) manual. Version 2. Sydney: University of Sydney; 2016. Hancock N, Scanlan JN, Bundy AC, Honey A. Recovery assessment scale - domains and stages (RAS-DS) manual. Version 2. Sydney: University of Sydney; 2016.
11.
go back to reference Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: SAGE; 2014. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: SAGE; 2014.
17.
go back to reference Cleary M, Freeman A, Hunt GE, Walter G. Patient and carer perceptions of need and associations with care-giving burden in an integrated adult mental health service. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006;41:208–14. doi:10.1007/s00127-005-0017-z.CrossRefPubMed Cleary M, Freeman A, Hunt GE, Walter G. Patient and carer perceptions of need and associations with care-giving burden in an integrated adult mental health service. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006;41:208–14. doi:10.​1007/​s00127-005-0017-z.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hancock N, Scanlan JN, Gillespie J, Smith-Merry J, Chen I. Partners in Recovery program evaluation: changes in unmet needs and recovery. Aust Health Rev. 2017; doi:10.1071/AH17004. Hancock N, Scanlan JN, Gillespie J, Smith-Merry J, Chen I. Partners in Recovery program evaluation: changes in unmet needs and recovery. Aust Health Rev. 2017; doi:10.​1071/​AH17004.
22.
go back to reference Trachtenberg M, Parsonage M, Shepherd G, Boardman J. Peer support in mental health care: is it good value for money? London: Centre for Mental Health; 2013. Trachtenberg M, Parsonage M, Shepherd G, Boardman J. Peer support in mental health care: is it good value for money? London: Centre for Mental Health; 2013.
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation
Authors
Justin Newton Scanlan
Nicola Hancock
Anne Honey
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1469-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Psychiatry 1/2017 Go to the issue