Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Development and psychometric properties of the client’s assessment of treatment scale for supported accommodation (CAT-SA)

Authors: Sima Sandhu, Helen Killaspy, Joanna Krotofil, Peter McPherson, Isobel Harrison, Sarah Dowling, Maurice Arbuthnott, Sarah Curtis, Michael King, Gerard Leavey, Geoff Shepherd, Stefan Priebe

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are important for evaluating mental health services. Yet, no specific PROM exists for the large and diverse mental health supported accommodation sector. We aimed to produce and validate a PROM specifically for supported accommodation services, by adapting the Client’s Assessment of Treatment Scale (CAT) and assessing its psychometric properties in a large sample.

Methods

Focus groups with service users in the three main types of mental health supported accommodation services in the United Kingdom (residential care, supported housing and floating outreach) were conducted to adapt the contents of the original CAT items and assess the acceptability of the modified scale (CAT-SA). The CAT-SA was then administered in a survey to service users across England. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Convergent validity was tested through correlations with subjective quality of life and satisfaction with accommodation, as measured by the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA).

Results

All seven original items of the CAT were regarded as relevant to appraisals of mental health supported accommodation services, with only slight modifications to the wording required. In the survey, data were obtained from 618 clients. The internal consistency of the CAT-SA items was 0.89. Mean CAT-SA scores were correlated with the specific accommodation item on the MANSA (r s  = 0.37, p˂.001).

Conclusions

The content of the CAT-SA has relevance to service users living in mental health supported accommodation. The findings from our large survey show that the CAT-SA is acceptable across different types of supported accommodation and suggest good psychometric properties. The CAT-SA appears a valid and easy to use PROM for service users in mental health supported accommodation services.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Evans C, Connell J, Barkham M, Margison F, McGrath G, Mellor-Clark J, et al. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:51–60.CrossRefPubMed Evans C, Connell J, Barkham M, Margison F, McGrath G, Mellor-Clark J, et al. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:51–60.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Department of Health. Guidance on the Routine Collection of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). London: Department of Health; 2009. Department of Health. Guidance on the Routine Collection of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). London: Department of Health; 2009.
3.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick R. Patient-reported outcomes: opportunities and challenges. London: Medical Research Council; 2009. Fitzpatrick R. Patient-reported outcomes: opportunities and challenges. London: Medical Research Council; 2009.
4.
go back to reference National Association of Patient Participation. Promoting quality and responsiveness. Walton on Thames. Surrey: National Association for Patient Participation; 2009. National Association of Patient Participation. Promoting quality and responsiveness. Walton on Thames. Surrey: National Association for Patient Participation; 2009.
5.
go back to reference The Patient Association. Your experience counts: patient experience survey. Harlow, Middlesex: The Patient Association; 2009. The Patient Association. Your experience counts: patient experience survey. Harlow, Middlesex: The Patient Association; 2009.
6.
go back to reference United States Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcomes measures: use in medical product development to support labelling claims. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; 2006. United States Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcomes measures: use in medical product development to support labelling claims. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; 2006.
7.
go back to reference McCabe R, Saidi M, Priebe S. Patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2007;50:s21–8.CrossRefPubMed McCabe R, Saidi M, Priebe S. Patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2007;50:s21–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Group. An overview of patient-reported outcome measures for people with anxiety and depression: report for the Department of Health. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2009. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Group. An overview of patient-reported outcome measures for people with anxiety and depression: report for the Department of Health. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2009.
9.
go back to reference Reininghaus U, McCabe R, Burns T, Croudace T, Priebe S. Measuring patients' views: a bifactor model of distinct patient-reported outcomes in psychosis. Psychol Med. 21;41:277–89. Reininghaus U, McCabe R, Burns T, Croudace T, Priebe S. Measuring patients' views: a bifactor model of distinct patient-reported outcomes in psychosis. Psychol Med. 21;41:277–89.
10.
go back to reference Reininghaus U, Priebe S. Measuring patient-reported outcomes in psychosis: conceptual and methodological review. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201:262–7.CrossRefPubMed Reininghaus U, Priebe S. Measuring patient-reported outcomes in psychosis: conceptual and methodological review. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201:262–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ashton T, Hempenstall C. Research into the financial benefits of the supporting people programme: report for the Department for Communities and Local Government. London: Capgemini; 2009. Ashton T, Hempenstall C. Research into the financial benefits of the supporting people programme: report for the Department for Communities and Local Government. London: Capgemini; 2009.
12.
go back to reference Strategy MH. National Survey of Investment in Mental Health Services. London: Department of Health; 2011/12. p. 2012. Strategy MH. National Survey of Investment in Mental Health Services. London: Department of Health; 2011/12. p. 2012.
13.
go back to reference Fakhoury W, Priebe S. The process of deinstitutionalization: an international overview. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2002;15:187–92.CrossRef Fakhoury W, Priebe S. The process of deinstitutionalization: an international overview. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2002;15:187–92.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fakhoury W, Priebe S. Deinstitutionalization and reinstitutionalization: major changes in the provision of mental healthcare. Psychiatry. 2007;6:313–16.CrossRef Fakhoury W, Priebe S. Deinstitutionalization and reinstitutionalization: major changes in the provision of mental healthcare. Psychiatry. 2007;6:313–16.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Department of Health. The national service framework for mental health. London: Department of Health; 1999. Department of Health. The national service framework for mental health. London: Department of Health; 1999.
18.
go back to reference Department of Community and Local Government. Research into the effectiveness of floating support services for the supporting reople programme. London: Final Report Communities and Local Government; 2006. Department of Community and Local Government. Research into the effectiveness of floating support services for the supporting reople programme. London: Final Report Communities and Local Government; 2006.
19.
go back to reference Statistics N. Community care statistics: supported residents (adults). London: The Information Centre, Part of the Government Statistical Service; 2006. Statistics N. Community care statistics: supported residents (adults). London: The Information Centre, Part of the Government Statistical Service; 2006.
20.
go back to reference Brunt D, Tibblin L. Supported housing and housing support for the psychiatrically disabled: background, policies, practises and current changes. Aotearoa NZ Soc Work. 2011;23:54–65. Brunt D, Tibblin L. Supported housing and housing support for the psychiatrically disabled: background, policies, practises and current changes. Aotearoa NZ Soc Work. 2011;23:54–65.
21.
go back to reference Carpenter M. Residential placement for chronic psychiatric patients: a review and evaluation of the literature. Schizophr Bull. 1978;4:384–98.CrossRef Carpenter M. Residential placement for chronic psychiatric patients: a review and evaluation of the literature. Schizophr Bull. 1978;4:384–98.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fakhoury W, Murrey A, Shepherd G, Priebe S. Research in supported housing. Soc Psych Psych Epid. 2002;37:301–15.CrossRef Fakhoury W, Murrey A, Shepherd G, Priebe S. Research in supported housing. Soc Psych Psych Epid. 2002;37:301–15.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Johnson R. Pervasive interactions: a purposive best evidence review with methodological observations on the impact of housing circumstances and housing interventions on adult mental health and well-being. Housing, Care and Support. 2013;16:32–49.CrossRef Johnson R. Pervasive interactions: a purposive best evidence review with methodological observations on the impact of housing circumstances and housing interventions on adult mental health and well-being. Housing, Care and Support. 2013;16:32–49.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nelson G. Housing for people with serious mental illness: approaches, evidence and transformative change. J Sociol Soc Welfare. 2010;37:123–46. Nelson G. Housing for people with serious mental illness: approaches, evidence and transformative change. J Sociol Soc Welfare. 2010;37:123–46.
26.
go back to reference Johnson R, Griffiths C, Nottingham T. At home? Mental health issues arising in social housing. London: NIMHE; 2006. Johnson R, Griffiths C, Nottingham T. At home? Mental health issues arising in social housing. London: NIMHE; 2006.
27.
go back to reference Priebe S, Saidi M, Want A, Mangalore R, Knapp M. Housing services for people with mental disorders in England: patient characteristics, care provision and costs. S Soc Psych Psych Epid. 2009;44:805–14.CrossRef Priebe S, Saidi M, Want A, Mangalore R, Knapp M. Housing services for people with mental disorders in England: patient characteristics, care provision and costs. S Soc Psych Psych Epid. 2009;44:805–14.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Priebe S, Gruyters T. Patients’ and caregivers’ initial assessments of treatment predicting hospitalisation. Schizophr Bull. 1995;21:87–94.CrossRefPubMed Priebe S, Gruyters T. Patients’ and caregivers’ initial assessments of treatment predicting hospitalisation. Schizophr Bull. 1995;21:87–94.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kallert TW, Priebe S, McCabe R, Kiejna A, Rymaszewska J, Nawka P, et al. Are day hospitals effective for acutely ill psychiatric patients? a european multicentre randomised controlled trial. J Clin Psych. 2007;68:278–87.CrossRef Kallert TW, Priebe S, McCabe R, Kiejna A, Rymaszewska J, Nawka P, et al. Are day hospitals effective for acutely ill psychiatric patients? a european multicentre randomised controlled trial. J Clin Psych. 2007;68:278–87.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Priebe S, Barnicot K, McCabe R, Kiejna A, Nawka P, Raboch J, et al. Patients' subjective initial response and the outcome of inpatient and day hospital treatment. Eur Psychiat. 2011;26:408–13.CrossRef Priebe S, Barnicot K, McCabe R, Kiejna A, Nawka P, Raboch J, et al. Patients' subjective initial response and the outcome of inpatient and day hospital treatment. Eur Psychiat. 2011;26:408–13.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Katsakou C, Bowers L, Amos T, Morriss R, Rose D, Wykes T, et al. Coercion and treatment satisfaction among involuntary patients. Psychiat Serv. 2010;61:286–92.CrossRef Katsakou C, Bowers L, Amos T, Morriss R, Rose D, Wykes T, et al. Coercion and treatment satisfaction among involuntary patients. Psychiat Serv. 2010;61:286–92.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Priebe S, Katsakou C, Amos T, Leese M, Morriss R, Rose D, et al. Patients’ views and readmissions 1 year after involuntary hospitalisation. B J Psychiat. 2009;194:49–54.CrossRef Priebe S, Katsakou C, Amos T, Leese M, Morriss R, Rose D, et al. Patients’ views and readmissions 1 year after involuntary hospitalisation. B J Psychiat. 2009;194:49–54.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Richardson M, Katsakou C, Torres-González F, Onchev G, Kallert T, Priebe S. Factorial validity and measurement equivalence of the clients assessment of treatment scale for psychiatric inpatient care - a study in three european countries. Psychiat Res. 2011;118:156–60.CrossRef Richardson M, Katsakou C, Torres-González F, Onchev G, Kallert T, Priebe S. Factorial validity and measurement equivalence of the clients assessment of treatment scale for psychiatric inpatient care - a study in three european countries. Psychiat Res. 2011;118:156–60.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, Evans S. Application and results of the Manchester short assessment of quality if life (MANSA). Int J Soc Psychiatr. 1999;45:7–12.CrossRef Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, Evans S. Application and results of the Manchester short assessment of quality if life (MANSA). Int J Soc Psychiatr. 1999;45:7–12.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ. Test validation. In: Thorndike RL, editor. Educational Measurement. Washington DC: American Council on Education; 1971. p. 443–507. Cronbach LJ. Test validation. In: Thorndike RL, editor. Educational Measurement. Washington DC: American Council on Education; 1971. p. 443–507.
36.
go back to reference Priebe S, Saidi M, Kennedy J, Glover G. How to select representative geographical areas in mental health service research: a method to combine different selection criteria. Soc Psych Psych Epid. 2008;43:1004–7.CrossRef Priebe S, Saidi M, Kennedy J, Glover G. How to select representative geographical areas in mental health service research: a method to combine different selection criteria. Soc Psych Psych Epid. 2008;43:1004–7.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Karow A, Wittman L, Schöttle D, Schäfer I, Lambert M. The assessment of quality of life in clinical practice in patients with schizophrenia. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2014;16:185–95.PubMedCentralPubMed Karow A, Wittman L, Schöttle D, Schäfer I, Lambert M. The assessment of quality of life in clinical practice in patients with schizophrenia. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2014;16:185–95.PubMedCentralPubMed
38.
go back to reference Priebe S, Reininghaus U, McCabe R, Burns T, Eklund M, Hansson L, et al. Factors influencing subjective quality of life in patients with schizophrenia and other mental disorders: a pooled analysis. Schizophr Res. 2010;121:251–8.CrossRefPubMed Priebe S, Reininghaus U, McCabe R, Burns T, Eklund M, Hansson L, et al. Factors influencing subjective quality of life in patients with schizophrenia and other mental disorders: a pooled analysis. Schizophr Res. 2010;121:251–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychpmetrika. 1951;297–334. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychpmetrika. 1951;297–334.
40.
go back to reference Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? an examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78:98–104.CrossRef Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? an examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78:98–104.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development and psychometric properties of the client’s assessment of treatment scale for supported accommodation (CAT-SA)
Authors
Sima Sandhu
Helen Killaspy
Joanna Krotofil
Peter McPherson
Isobel Harrison
Sarah Dowling
Maurice Arbuthnott
Sarah Curtis
Michael King
Gerard Leavey
Geoff Shepherd
Stefan Priebe
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0755-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Psychiatry 1/2016 Go to the issue