Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

The effects of oral and topical corticosteroid in rabbit corneas

Authors: Kaoru Araki-Sasaki, Osamu Katsuta, Hidetoshi Mano, Takashi Nagano, Masatsugu Nakamura

Published in: BMC Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To determine the most effective route of administration of corticosteroids in the treatment of ocular surface disease, by characterizing the difference between oral prednisolone and topical dexamethasone administration using an animal model.

Methods

Pharmacokinetic analyses determined the corticosteroid concentrations in the normal ocular tissues of rabbits after oral or topical administration of corticosteroids using LC-MS/MS. In wound healing analyses, the area of the epithelial defect created by keratectomy using a 6-mm trephine was calculated with an image analyzer using an orally or topically steroid-administrated animal model. The average size of basal epithelial cells, the frequency of mitotic basal epithelial cells, the number of squamous cells, and the number of hypertrophic stromal fibroblasts were determined in the enucleated corneal tissues after wound closure.

Results

By slit lamp examination, no remarkable differences were observed between orally and topically administered groups. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed that the distribution of dexamethasone after topical administration was superior to that after oral administration in the cornea. In contrast, both concentrations of corticosteroid applied topically and orally were similar with regards to AUCs (area under the concentration-time curve) in the conjunctiva. Although the healing rate was slower in the topical group, all corneas were almost healed within 96 h in the wound healing analysis. According to the histological analyses of epithelial cells, the average basal cell size was larger, the frequency of mitotic basal cells was greater, and the number of squamous epithelial cell layers was lower in the topically administered group although all of these differences were with no statistical significance. However, the number of hypertrophic stromal fibroblasts in the topically administered group was significantly lower than that in the orally administered group.

Conclusions

There are different distributions and effects between orally and topically administered corticosteroids on the ocular surface. The data may provide the useful information in selecting the appropriate route of corticosteroid application for the treatment of ocular surface disease.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Wilhelmus KR. Indecision about corticosteroids for bacterial keratitis. An evidence-based update. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:835–44.CrossRefPubMed Wilhelmus KR. Indecision about corticosteroids for bacterial keratitis. An evidence-based update. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:835–44.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Srinivasan M, Lalitha P, Mahalakshmi R, et al. Corticosteroids for bacterial corneal ulcers. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:198–202.CrossRefPubMed Srinivasan M, Lalitha P, Mahalakshmi R, et al. Corticosteroids for bacterial corneal ulcers. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:198–202.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Srinivasan M, Mascarenhas J, Rajaraman R, Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial Group, et al. Corticosteroids for bacterial keratitis. The steroids for corneal ulcers trial (SCUT). Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:143–50.CrossRefPubMed Srinivasan M, Mascarenhas J, Rajaraman R, Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial Group, et al. Corticosteroids for bacterial keratitis. The steroids for corneal ulcers trial (SCUT). Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:143–50.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Blair J, Hodge W, Al-Ghamdi S, et al. Comparison of antibiotic-only and antibiotic-steroid combination treatment in corneal ulcer patients: double-blinded randomized clinical trial. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011;46:40–5.CrossRefPubMed Blair J, Hodge W, Al-Ghamdi S, et al. Comparison of antibiotic-only and antibiotic-steroid combination treatment in corneal ulcer patients: double-blinded randomized clinical trial. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011;46:40–5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Srinivasan M, Mascarenhas J, Rajaraman R, Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial Group, et al. The steroids for corneal ulcers trial (SCUT): secondary 12-month clinical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Ophthal. 2014;157:327–33.CrossRefPubMed Srinivasan M, Mascarenhas J, Rajaraman R, Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial Group, et al. The steroids for corneal ulcers trial (SCUT): secondary 12-month clinical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Ophthal. 2014;157:327–33.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tomas-Barveran S, Fagerholm P. Influence of topial treatment on epithelial wound healing and pain in the early postoperative period following photorefractive keratectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999;77:135–8.CrossRef Tomas-Barveran S, Fagerholm P. Influence of topial treatment on epithelial wound healing and pain in the early postoperative period following photorefractive keratectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999;77:135–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Barba KR, Samy A, Lai C, et al. Effect of topical anti-inflammatory drugs on corneal and limbal wound healing. J Cat Ref Surg. 2000;26:893–7.CrossRef Barba KR, Samy A, Lai C, et al. Effect of topical anti-inflammatory drugs on corneal and limbal wound healing. J Cat Ref Surg. 2000;26:893–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Flueckiger F, Kodjikian L, Halberstadt M, et al. An ex-vivo, whole-globe porcine model of corneoepithelail wound healing tested using immunomoculatory drugs. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21:367–75.CrossRefPubMed Flueckiger F, Kodjikian L, Halberstadt M, et al. An ex-vivo, whole-globe porcine model of corneoepithelail wound healing tested using immunomoculatory drugs. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21:367–75.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Yulek F, Ozdek S, Gurelik G, et al. Effect of topical steroids on corneal epithelial healing after vitreoretinal surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84:319–22.CrossRefPubMed Yulek F, Ozdek S, Gurelik G, et al. Effect of topical steroids on corneal epithelial healing after vitreoretinal surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84:319–22.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Engel LS, Callegan MC, Hobden JA, et al. Effectiveness of specific antibiotic/steroid combinations for therapy of experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis. Curr Eye Res. 1995;14:229–34.CrossRefPubMed Engel LS, Callegan MC, Hobden JA, et al. Effectiveness of specific antibiotic/steroid combinations for therapy of experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis. Curr Eye Res. 1995;14:229–34.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Leibowitz HM, Kupferman A. Topically administered corticosteroids. Effect on antibiotic-treated bacterial keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:1287–90.CrossRefPubMed Leibowitz HM, Kupferman A. Topically administered corticosteroids. Effect on antibiotic-treated bacterial keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:1287–90.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Leibowitz HM, Kupferman A. Drug interaction in the eye. Concurrent corticosteroid-antibiotic therapy for inflammatory keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95:682–5.CrossRefPubMed Leibowitz HM, Kupferman A. Drug interaction in the eye. Concurrent corticosteroid-antibiotic therapy for inflammatory keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95:682–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Drobbin MT, Phelan ST, Antonelli PJ. Dexamethasone does not alter in vitro antibacterial efficacy of gentamicin. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136:769–72.CrossRefPubMed Drobbin MT, Phelan ST, Antonelli PJ. Dexamethasone does not alter in vitro antibacterial efficacy of gentamicin. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136:769–72.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The effects of oral and topical corticosteroid in rabbit corneas
Authors
Kaoru Araki-Sasaki
Osamu Katsuta
Hidetoshi Mano
Takashi Nagano
Masatsugu Nakamura
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0339-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2016 Go to the issue