Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Repeatability and reproducibility of applanation resonance tonometry: a cross-sectional study

Authors: Laura Ottobelli, Paolo Fogagnolo, Paolo Frezzotti, Stefano De Cillà, Elena Vallenzasca, Maurizio Digiuni, Ruggiero Paderni, Ilaria Motolese, Simone Alex Bagaglia, Eduardo Motolese, Luca Rossetti

Published in: BMC Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To assess repeatability (intra-observer variability) and reproducibility (inter-operator variability) of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements with servo-controlled Bioresonator Applanation Resonance Tonometry (ART) and to evaluate possible influential factors.

Methods

The study included 178 patients (115 glaucoma and 63 controls; one eye per subject). IOP was measured once with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and twice by ART (ART1, ART2), in randomized sequence, by a single operator to assess intra-operator variability. Each ART measurement consisted on 3 readings. To assess inter-operator variability 2 evaluators performed 2 measurements each (in random order) on the same patient. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed by the coefficient of variation (CoV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

In the entire cohort, ART1 was 0.4 ± 2.2 mmHg (−7.0 to 5.7 mmHg) higher than ART2 (p = 0.03) regardless of test order. Intra-operator CoV was 7.0% ± 6.3%, and ICC was 0.80-0.92. Inter-operator CoV ranged between 5.7% ± 6.1% and 8.2% ± 7.2%, and ICC between 0.86 and 0.97. ART1 and 2 were respectively 1.7 ± 3.1 and 1.3 ± 3.1 mmHg higher than GAT (p < 0.01). Test-retest difference with ART fell within ±1 mmHg in 41% of cases, within ±2 mmHg in 70%, within ±3 mmHg in 85%. 15% had a test-retest difference higher than ± 3 mmHg; Bland-Altman 95% intervals of confidence were −3.9 and +4.6 mmHg. Results were unaffected by age, diagnosis, central corneal thickness, keratometry, operator, randomization sequence.

Conclusions

In most cases ART repeatability and reproducibility were high, with no differences due to patients’ characteristics. ART measurements overestimated GAT by a mean of 1.3-1.7 mmHg.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rivera JL, Bell NP, Feldman RM. Risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma progression: what we know and what we need to know. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19:102–6.CrossRefPubMed Rivera JL, Bell NP, Feldman RM. Risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma progression: what we know and what we need to know. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19:102–6.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Eklund A, Hallberg P, Lindén C, Lindahl OA. An applanation resonator sensor for measuring intraocular pressure using combined continuous force and area measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3017–24.CrossRefPubMed Eklund A, Hallberg P, Lindén C, Lindahl OA. An applanation resonator sensor for measuring intraocular pressure using combined continuous force and area measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3017–24.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hallberg P, Eklund A, Bäcklund T, Lindén C. Clinical evaluation of applanation resonance tonometry: a comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:88–93.CrossRefPubMed Hallberg P, Eklund A, Bäcklund T, Lindén C. Clinical evaluation of applanation resonance tonometry: a comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:88–93.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1975;53:34–43.CrossRef Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1975;53:34–43.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38:1–30.CrossRefPubMed Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38:1–30.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:146–55.CrossRefPubMed Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:146–55.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Eklund A, Bergh A, Lindahl OA. A catheter tactile sensor for measuring hardness of soft tissue: measurement in a silicone model and in an in vitro human prostate model. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1999;37:618–24.CrossRefPubMed Eklund A, Bergh A, Lindahl OA. A catheter tactile sensor for measuring hardness of soft tissue: measurement in a silicone model and in an in vitro human prostate model. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1999;37:618–24.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Eklund A, Bäcklund T, Lindahl OA. A resonator sensor for measurement of intraocular pressure-evaluation in an in vitro pig-eye model. Physiol Meas. 2000;21:355–67.CrossRefPubMed Eklund A, Bäcklund T, Lindahl OA. A resonator sensor for measurement of intraocular pressure-evaluation in an in vitro pig-eye model. Physiol Meas. 2000;21:355–67.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hallberg P. Applanation Resonance Tonometry for Intraocular Pressure Measurement. PhD thesis. Umeå: Umeå University; 2006. Hallberg P. Applanation Resonance Tonometry for Intraocular Pressure Measurement. PhD thesis. Umeå: Umeå University; 2006.
10.
go back to reference Hallberg P, Eklund A, Santala K, Koskela T, Lindahl O, Lindén C. Underestimation of intraocular pressure after photorefractive keratectomy: a biomechanical analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44:609–18.CrossRefPubMed Hallberg P, Eklund A, Santala K, Koskela T, Lindahl O, Lindén C. Underestimation of intraocular pressure after photorefractive keratectomy: a biomechanical analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44:609–18.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Eklund A, Lindén C, Bäcklund T, Andersson BM, Lindahl OA. Evaluation of applanation resonator sensors for intra-ocular pressure measurement: results from clinical and in vitro studies. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2003;41:190–7.CrossRefPubMed Eklund A, Lindén C, Bäcklund T, Andersson BM, Lindahl OA. Evaluation of applanation resonator sensors for intra-ocular pressure measurement: results from clinical and in vitro studies. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2003;41:190–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hallberg P, Santala K, Linden C, Lindahl OA, Eklund A. Comparison of Goldmann applanation and applanation resonance tonometry in a biomicroscope- based in vitro porcine eye model. J Med Eng Tech. 2006;30:345–52.CrossRef Hallberg P, Santala K, Linden C, Lindahl OA, Eklund A. Comparison of Goldmann applanation and applanation resonance tonometry in a biomicroscope- based in vitro porcine eye model. J Med Eng Tech. 2006;30:345–52.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hallberg P, Lindén C, Lindahl OA, Bäcklund T, Eklund A. Applanation resonance tonometry for intraocular pressure in humans. Physiol Meas. 2004;25:1053–65.CrossRefPubMed Hallberg P, Lindén C, Lindahl OA, Bäcklund T, Eklund A. Applanation resonance tonometry for intraocular pressure in humans. Physiol Meas. 2004;25:1053–65.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Jóhannesson G, Hallberg P, Eklund A, Lindén C. Introduction and clinical evaluation of servo-controlled applanation resonance tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90:677–82.CrossRefPubMed Jóhannesson G, Hallberg P, Eklund A, Lindén C. Introduction and clinical evaluation of servo-controlled applanation resonance tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90:677–82.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hallberg P, Lindén C, Bäcklund T, Eklund A. Symmetric sensor for applanation resonance tomometry of the eye. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44:54–60.CrossRefPubMed Hallberg P, Lindén C, Bäcklund T, Eklund A. Symmetric sensor for applanation resonance tomometry of the eye. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44:54–60.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Brusini P. Repeatability and accuracy of applanation resonance tonometry in healthy subjects and patients with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:e66–73.CrossRefPubMed Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Brusini P. Repeatability and accuracy of applanation resonance tonometry in healthy subjects and patients with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:e66–73.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Fogagnolo P, Orzalesi N, Ferreras A, Rossetti L. The circadian curve of intraocular pressure: can we estimate its characteristics during office hours? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2209–15.CrossRefPubMed Fogagnolo P, Orzalesi N, Ferreras A, Rossetti L. The circadian curve of intraocular pressure: can we estimate its characteristics during office hours? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2209–15.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Fogagnolo P, Rossetti L, Mazzolani F, Orzalesi N. Circadian variations in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:24–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fogagnolo P, Rossetti L, Mazzolani F, Orzalesi N. Circadian variations in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:24–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas. 1973;33:613–9.CrossRef Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas. 1973;33:613–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Fogagnolo P, Figus M, Frezzotti P, Iester M, Oddone F, Zeppieri M, et al. Test-retest variability of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude for dynamic contour tonometry: a multicentre study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:419–23.CrossRefPubMed Fogagnolo P, Figus M, Frezzotti P, Iester M, Oddone F, Zeppieri M, et al. Test-retest variability of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude for dynamic contour tonometry: a multicentre study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:419–23.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Cook JA, Botello AP, Elders A, Fathi Ali A, Azuara-Blanco A, Fraser C, et al. Systematic review of the agreement of tonometers with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1552–7.CrossRefPubMed Cook JA, Botello AP, Elders A, Fathi Ali A, Azuara-Blanco A, Fraser C, et al. Systematic review of the agreement of tonometers with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1552–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Salim S, Du H, Wan J. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements and Assessment of Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility With the Portable ICare Rebound Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Glaucoma Patients. J Glaucoma. 2013;22:325–9.CrossRefPubMed Salim S, Du H, Wan J. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements and Assessment of Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility With the Portable ICare Rebound Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Glaucoma Patients. J Glaucoma. 2013;22:325–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wang AS, Alencar LM, Weinreb RN, Tafreshi A, Deokule S, Vizzeri G, et al. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Goldmann Applanation, Dynamic Contour, and Ocular Response Analyzer Tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2013;22:127–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang AS, Alencar LM, Weinreb RN, Tafreshi A, Deokule S, Vizzeri G, et al. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Goldmann Applanation, Dynamic Contour, and Ocular Response Analyzer Tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2013;22:127–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Cheng J, Salam T, Russell PJ, Heath DG, Kotecha A. Dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer performance in a developing world setting: intraocular pressure measurement acquisition and precision. J Glaucoma. 2013;22:736–9.CrossRefPubMed Cheng J, Salam T, Russell PJ, Heath DG, Kotecha A. Dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer performance in a developing world setting: intraocular pressure measurement acquisition and precision. J Glaucoma. 2013;22:736–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Weinreb RN, Brandt JD, Garway-Heath D, Medeiros FA. Intraocular pressure: Measurement of intraocular pressure. World Glaucoma Association 4th Consensus Meeting; Ft Lauderdale, FL. 2007. Weinreb RN, Brandt JD, Garway-Heath D, Medeiros FA. Intraocular pressure: Measurement of intraocular pressure. World Glaucoma Association 4th Consensus Meeting; Ft Lauderdale, FL. 2007.
27.
go back to reference Tai LY, Khaw KW, Ng CM, Subrayan V. Central corneal thickness measurements with different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry. Cornea. 2013;32:766–71.CrossRefPubMed Tai LY, Khaw KW, Ng CM, Subrayan V. Central corneal thickness measurements with different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry. Cornea. 2013;32:766–71.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Amano S, Honda N, Amano Y, Yamagami S, Miyai T, Samejima T, et al. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning-slit corneal topography. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:937–41.CrossRefPubMed Amano S, Honda N, Amano Y, Yamagami S, Miyai T, Samejima T, et al. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning-slit corneal topography. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:937–41.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Iester M, Telani S, Brusini P, Rolle T, Fogagnolo P, Martini E, et al. Central corneal thickness and glaucoma treatment: an Italian multicenter cross-sectional study. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2013;29:469–73.CrossRefPubMed Iester M, Telani S, Brusini P, Rolle T, Fogagnolo P, Martini E, et al. Central corneal thickness and glaucoma treatment: an Italian multicenter cross-sectional study. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2013;29:469–73.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Iester M, Telani S, Frezzotti P, Manni G, Uva M, Figus M, et al. Differences in central corneal thickness between the paired eyes and the severity of the glaucomatous damage. Eye (Lond). 2012;26:1424–30.CrossRef Iester M, Telani S, Frezzotti P, Manni G, Uva M, Figus M, et al. Differences in central corneal thickness between the paired eyes and the severity of the glaucomatous damage. Eye (Lond). 2012;26:1424–30.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Fogagnolo P, Capizzi F, Orzalesi N, Figus M, Ferreras A, Rossetti L. Can mean central corneal thickness and its 24-hour fluctuation influence fluctuation of intraocular pressure? J Glaucoma. 2010;19:418–23.CrossRefPubMed Fogagnolo P, Capizzi F, Orzalesi N, Figus M, Ferreras A, Rossetti L. Can mean central corneal thickness and its 24-hour fluctuation influence fluctuation of intraocular pressure? J Glaucoma. 2010;19:418–23.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Repeatability and reproducibility of applanation resonance tonometry: a cross-sectional study
Authors
Laura Ottobelli
Paolo Fogagnolo
Paolo Frezzotti
Stefano De Cillà
Elena Vallenzasca
Maurizio Digiuni
Ruggiero Paderni
Ilaria Motolese
Simone Alex Bagaglia
Eduardo Motolese
Luca Rossetti
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0028-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2015 Go to the issue