Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Improving adherence to colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines: results of a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Mariko Carey, Robert Sanson-Fisher, Finlay Macrae, Emilie Cameron, David Hill, Catherine D’Este, Christopher Doran

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors are at increased risk of developing the disease again. Surveillance guidelines are aimed at maximising the early detection of recurring or new cancers and pre-cancerous polyps. The frequency and type of surveillance recommended depends on the type of treatment for the initial CRC, the extent of colonoscopic investigation prior to treatment and the results of previous surveillance tests. This paper aimed to test the effect of a paper–based educational intervention to improve adherence to colonoscopy following treatment for colorectal cancer.

Methods

People with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer within the last 10 months, aged ≥18 and English speaking were recruited through a population-based cancer registry in Australia. Participants were randomly allocated to either the intervention or control. Participants completed an interview at baseline. Self-reported participation in colonoscopy was obtained at 12 month followup by survey. Those allocated to the control received a generic pamphlet on colorectal cancer treatment; while intervention participants received a letter which provided specific information about guideline recommendations for surveillance colonoscopy. Rates of guideline adherence were compared between groups. The guideline recommendations for the timing of surveillance colonoscopy changed part way through the study. This change occurred after all intervention materials had been sent, but prior to all participants completing the 12 month follow up. Post hoc analyses were conducted to assess adherence to the new guidelines.

Results

Of the 767 participants, 604 (79%) had had surgery, had stage I – III disease and completed the baseline interview within 12 months of diagnosis (intervention = 305; control = 299). There was no significant difference between those adherent to surveillance colonoscopy guidelines, in the control (67, 27%) and intervention groups (80, 31%) at followup (difference = 4.3% (95%CI:-3.7%, 12%), χ 2(1df) = 1.09, P = 0.296). Overall, 246 (49%) participants were adherent to the new guidelines, compared to 147 (29%) adherent to the old guidelines.

Conclusions

Results indicate the paper-based educational intervention is not effective in improving adherence to colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines for colonoscopy.

Trial registration number

ACTRN12609000628​246 Registration date: 28/07/2009
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yusoff IF, Hoffman NE, Ee HC. Colonoscopic surveillance after surgery for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(1-2):3–7.CrossRefPubMed Yusoff IF, Hoffman NE, Ee HC. Colonoscopic surveillance after surgery for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(1-2):3–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rodríguez-Moranta F, et al. Postoperative Surveillance in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Who Have Undergone Curative Resection: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized. Controlled Trial Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006;24(3):386–93.CrossRefPubMed Rodríguez-Moranta F, et al. Postoperative Surveillance in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Who Have Undergone Curative Resection: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized. Controlled Trial Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006;24(3):386–93.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Australian Cancer Network Colorectal Cancer Guidelines Revision Committee, Guidelines for the Prevention, Early Detection and Management of Colorectal Cancer. The Cancer Council Australia and Australian Cancer Network. 2005: Sydney Australian Cancer Network Colorectal Cancer Guidelines Revision Committee, Guidelines for the Prevention, Early Detection and Management of Colorectal Cancer. The Cancer Council Australia and Australian Cancer Network. 2005: Sydney
4.
go back to reference Cancer Council Australia Colonoscopy Surveillance Working Party. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Surveillance Colonoscopy - in adenoma follow-up; following curative resection of colorectal cancer; and for cancer surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease. Sydney: Cancer Council Australia; 2011. Cancer Council Australia Colonoscopy Surveillance Working Party. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Surveillance Colonoscopy - in adenoma follow-up; following curative resection of colorectal cancer; and for cancer surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease. Sydney: Cancer Council Australia; 2011.
5.
go back to reference Bampton PA, Sandford JJ, Young GP. Applying evidence-based guidelines improves use of colonoscopy resources in patients with a moderate risk of colorectal neoplasia. Med J Aust. 2002;176(4):155–7.PubMed Bampton PA, Sandford JJ, Young GP. Applying evidence-based guidelines improves use of colonoscopy resources in patients with a moderate risk of colorectal neoplasia. Med J Aust. 2002;176(4):155–7.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Singh A, Kuo YF, Goodwin JS. Many patients who undergo surgery for colorectal cancer receive surveillance colonoscopies earlier than recommended by guidelines. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(1):65–72. e1.CrossRefPubMed Singh A, Kuo YF, Goodwin JS. Many patients who undergo surgery for colorectal cancer receive surveillance colonoscopies earlier than recommended by guidelines. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(1):65–72. e1.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Kruse GR, et al. Overuse of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(3):277–83.CrossRefPubMed Kruse GR, et al. Overuse of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(3):277–83.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Boolchand V, et al. Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(9):654–9.CrossRefPubMed Boolchand V, et al. Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(9):654–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Krist AH, et al. Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists’ recommendation. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(6):471–8.CrossRefPubMed Krist AH, et al. Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists’ recommendation. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(6):471–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Saini SD, et al. Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?: results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43(6):554–8.CrossRefPubMed Saini SD, et al. Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines?: results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43(6):554–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ayanian JZ, et al. Physician reminders to promote surveillance colonoscopy for colorectal adenomas: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(6):762–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ayanian JZ, et al. Physician reminders to promote surveillance colonoscopy for colorectal adenomas: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(6):762–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Carey M, et al. Improving adherence to surveillance and screening recommendations for people with colorectal cancer and their first degree relatives: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1):1.CrossRef Carey M, et al. Improving adherence to surveillance and screening recommendations for people with colorectal cancer and their first degree relatives: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1):1.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rubin D. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1987.CrossRef Rubin D. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1987.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2009. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2009.
16.
go back to reference Michie S, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Quality and safety in health care. 2005;14(1):26–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Michie S, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Quality and safety in health care. 2005;14(1):26–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Everett T, et al. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. 2011. The Cochrane Library.CrossRef Everett T, et al. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. 2011. The Cochrane Library.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Young PE, et al. Early detection of colorectal cancer recurrence in patients undergoing surgery with curative intent: current status and challenges. J Cancer. 2014;5(4):262–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Young PE, et al. Early detection of colorectal cancer recurrence in patients undergoing surgery with curative intent: current status and challenges. J Cancer. 2014;5(4):262–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Grol R, et al. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ : British Medical Journal. 1998;317(7162):858–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grol R, et al. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ : British Medical Journal. 1998;317(7162):858–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Jacobs LA. Health beliefs of first-degree relatives of individuals with colorectal cancer and participation in health maintenance visits: a population-based survey. Cancer Nurs. 2002;25(4):251–65.CrossRefPubMed Jacobs LA. Health beliefs of first-degree relatives of individuals with colorectal cancer and participation in health maintenance visits: a population-based survey. Cancer Nurs. 2002;25(4):251–65.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Short PF, Vasey JJ, Tunceli K. Employment pathways in a large cohort of adult cancer survivors. Cancer. 2005;103(6):1292–301.CrossRefPubMed Short PF, Vasey JJ, Tunceli K. Employment pathways in a large cohort of adult cancer survivors. Cancer. 2005;103(6):1292–301.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Improving adherence to colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines: results of a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Mariko Carey
Robert Sanson-Fisher
Finlay Macrae
Emilie Cameron
David Hill
Catherine D’Este
Christopher Doran
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3095-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Cancer 1/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine