Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Tumour stage distribution and survival of malignant melanoma in Germany 2002–2011

Authors: Olaf Schoffer, Stefanie Schülein, Gerlinde Arand, Hans Arnholdt, Dieter Baaske, Ralf C. Bargou, Nikolaus Becker, Matthias W. Beckmann, Yves Bodack, Beatrix Böhme, Tayfun Bozkurt, Regine Breitsprecher, Andre Buchali, Elke Burger, Ulrike Burger, Klaus Dommisch, Gudrun Elsner, Karin Fernschild, Ulrike Flintzer, Uwe Funke, Michael Gerken, Hubert Göbel, Norbert Grobe, Vera Gumpp, Lucie Heinzerling, Lana Raffaela Kempfer, Alexander Kiani, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, Sabine Klöcking, Ute Kreibich, Katrin Knabner, Peter Kuhn, Stine Lutze, Uwe Mäder, Tanja Maisel, Jan Maschke, Martin Middeke, Andreas Neubauer, Antje Niedostatek, Anabelle Opazo-Saez, Christoph Peters, Beatrice Schell, Gerhard Schenkirsch, Harald Schmalenberg, Peter Schmidt, Constanze Schneider, Birgit Schubotz, Anika Seide, Paul Strecker, Sabine Taubenheim, Matthias Wackes, Steffen Weiß, Claudia Welke, Carmen Werner, Christian Wittekind, Jörg Wulff, Heike Zettl, Stefanie J. Klug

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Over the past two decades, there has been a rising trend in malignant melanoma incidence worldwide. In 2008, Germany introduced a nationwide skin cancer screening program starting at age 35. The aims of this study were to analyse the distribution of malignant melanoma tumour stages over time, as well as demographic and regional differences in stage distribution and survival of melanoma patients.

Methods

Pooled data from 61 895 malignant melanoma patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2011 and documented in 28 German population-based and hospital-based clinical cancer registries were analysed using descriptive methods, joinpoint regression, logistic regression and relative survival.

Results

The number of annually documented cases increased by 53.2% between 2002 (N = 4 779) and 2011 (N = 7 320). There was a statistically significant continuous positive trend in the proportion of stage UICC I cases diagnosed between 2002 and 2011, compared to a negative trend for stage UICC II. No trends were found for stages UICC III and IV respectively. Age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.97–0.97), sex (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.25), date of diagnosis (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04–1.06), ‘diagnosis during screening’ (OR 3.24, 95% CI 2.50–4.19) and place of residence (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.16–1.30) had a statistically significant influence on the tumour stage at diagnosis. The overall 5-year relative survival for invasive cases was 83.4% (95% CI 82.8–83.9%).

Conclusions

No distinct changes in the distribution of malignant melanoma tumour stages among those aged 35 and older were seen that could be directly attributed to the introduction of skin cancer screening in 2008.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Cancer in Germany 2009/2010. 9th ed. Berlin: Robert Koch Institute and the Association of Population-based cancer registries in Germany (GEKID); 2013. Cancer in Germany 2009/2010. 9th ed. Berlin: Robert Koch Institute and the Association of Population-based cancer registries in Germany (GEKID); 2013.
4.
go back to reference Geller AC, Zhang Z, Sober AJ, Halpern AC, Weinstock MA, Daniels S, et al. The first 15 years of the American Academy of Dermatology skin cancer screening programs: 1985–1999. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:34–41.CrossRefPubMed Geller AC, Zhang Z, Sober AJ, Halpern AC, Weinstock MA, Daniels S, et al. The first 15 years of the American Academy of Dermatology skin cancer screening programs: 1985–1999. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:34–41.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Robert Koch-Institut (RKI). Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes [Federal Health Reporting]. Issue 22: Skin Cancer. Berlin: RKI; 2004. Robert Koch-Institut (RKI). Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes [Federal Health Reporting]. Issue 22: Skin Cancer. Berlin: RKI; 2004.
6.
go back to reference Eisemann N, Waldmann A, Nolte S, Katalinic A. Population-based Benefits of Skin Cancer Screening. Melanoma Lett. 2012;30:1–5. Eisemann N, Waldmann A, Nolte S, Katalinic A. Population-based Benefits of Skin Cancer Screening. Melanoma Lett. 2012;30:1–5.
7.
go back to reference Robert Koch-Institut (RKI). Zahlen und Trends aus der Gesundheitsberichterstattung [Figures and Trends from Federal Health Reporting]. GBE kompakt. Berlin: RKI; 2012. Robert Koch-Institut (RKI). Zahlen und Trends aus der Gesundheitsberichterstattung [Figures and Trends from Federal Health Reporting]. GBE kompakt. Berlin: RKI; 2012.
8.
go back to reference Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians). Press Release 2010 - Erste Bilanz zum Hautkrebsscreening liegt vor [Initial Assessment of Skin Cancer Screening]. KVS-Mitteilungen Heft 7-8. Dresden: Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Sachsen; 2010. Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians). Press Release 2010 - Erste Bilanz zum Hautkrebsscreening liegt vor [Initial Assessment of Skin Cancer Screening]. KVS-Mitteilungen Heft 7-8. Dresden: Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Sachsen; 2010.
9.
go back to reference Breitbart EW, Waldmann A, Nolte S, Capellaro M, Greinert R, Volkmer B, et al. Systematic skin cancer screening in Northern Germany. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66:201–11.CrossRefPubMed Breitbart EW, Waldmann A, Nolte S, Capellaro M, Greinert R, Volkmer B, et al. Systematic skin cancer screening in Northern Germany. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66:201–11.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference International Union Against Cancer (UICC), Wittekind C, Sobin LH. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 6th ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2002. International Union Against Cancer (UICC), Wittekind C, Sobin LH. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 6th ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2002.
12.
go back to reference Fritz A, Percy C, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM, Whelan S. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. 3rd Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000. Fritz A, Percy C, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM, Whelan S. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. 3rd Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
13.
go back to reference Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med. 2000;19:335–51.CrossRefPubMed Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med. 2000;19:335–51.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Agresti A. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. New York: Wiley; 1984. Agresti A. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. New York: Wiley; 1984.
15.
go back to reference Efron B. Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. Ann Stat. 1979;7:1–26.CrossRef Efron B. Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. Ann Stat. 1979;7:1–26.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2002. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2002.
17.
go back to reference van Buuren S. Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. Stat Methods Med Res. 2007;16:219–42.CrossRefPubMed van Buuren S. Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. Stat Methods Med Res. 2007;16:219–42.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Aalen OO. Nonparametric inference for a family of counting processes. Ann Stat. 1978;6:701–26.CrossRef Aalen OO. Nonparametric inference for a family of counting processes. Ann Stat. 1978;6:701–26.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ederer F, Heise H. Instructions to IBM 650 programmers in processing survival computations - methodological note No. 10 - end results section. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 1959. Ederer F, Heise H. Instructions to IBM 650 programmers in processing survival computations - methodological note No. 10 - end results section. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 1959.
20.
go back to reference Schoffer O, Niedostatek A, Klug SJ. Estimation of Relative Survival Based on Cancer Registry Data. Rev Bioinforma Biom. 2013;2:77–82. Schoffer O, Niedostatek A, Klug SJ. Estimation of Relative Survival Based on Cancer Registry Data. Rev Bioinforma Biom. 2013;2:77–82.
21.
go back to reference Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. Statistical analysis of failure time data. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2002.CrossRef Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. Statistical analysis of failure time data. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2002.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Borgan O, Liestol K. A Note on Confidence Interval and Bands for the Survival data: theory, empirical evaluation, computational realization and applications. Scand J Stat. 1990;18:35–41. Borgan O, Liestol K. A Note on Confidence Interval and Bands for the Survival data: theory, empirical evaluation, computational realization and applications. Scand J Stat. 1990;18:35–41.
23.
go back to reference Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. Statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: Wiley; 1980. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. Statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: Wiley; 1980.
24.
go back to reference Carpenter JR, Kenward MG. Multiple Imputation and its Application. Chichester: Wiley; 2013.CrossRef Carpenter JR, Kenward MG. Multiple Imputation and its Application. Chichester: Wiley; 2013.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Erdmann F, Lortet-Tieulent J, Schuz J, Zeeb H, Greinert R, Breitbart EW, et al. International trends in the incidence of malignant melanoma 1953–2008--are recent generations at higher or lower risk? Int J Cancer. 2013;132:385–400.CrossRefPubMed Erdmann F, Lortet-Tieulent J, Schuz J, Zeeb H, Greinert R, Breitbart EW, et al. International trends in the incidence of malignant melanoma 1953–2008--are recent generations at higher or lower risk? Int J Cancer. 2013;132:385–400.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Criscione VD, Weinstock MA. Melanoma thickness trends in the United States, 1988–2006. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:793–7.CrossRefPubMed Criscione VD, Weinstock MA. Melanoma thickness trends in the United States, 1988–2006. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:793–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Baade P, Meng X, Youlden D, Aitken J, Youl P. Time trends and latitudinal differences in melanoma thickness distribution in Australia, 1990–2006. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:170–8.CrossRefPubMed Baade P, Meng X, Youlden D, Aitken J, Youl P. Time trends and latitudinal differences in melanoma thickness distribution in Australia, 1990–2006. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:170–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Nieto A, Ruiz-Ramos M, Abdel-Kader L, Conde M, Camacho F. Gender differences in rising trends in cutaneous malignant melanoma in Spain, 1975–98. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148:110–6.CrossRefPubMed Nieto A, Ruiz-Ramos M, Abdel-Kader L, Conde M, Camacho F. Gender differences in rising trends in cutaneous malignant melanoma in Spain, 1975–98. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148:110–6.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
go back to reference Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Neyman N, Altekruse SF, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975–2010. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2013. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Neyman N, Altekruse SF, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975–2010. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2013.
31.
go back to reference Dryden R, Williams B, McCowan C, Themessl-Huber M. What do we know about who does and does not attend general health checks? Findings from a narrative scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:723.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dryden R, Williams B, McCowan C, Themessl-Huber M. What do we know about who does and does not attend general health checks? Findings from a narrative scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:723.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Gondos A, Arndt V, Holleczek B, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Brenner H. Cancer survival in Germany and the United States at the beginning of the 21st century: an up-to-date comparison by period analysis. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:395–400.CrossRefPubMed Gondos A, Arndt V, Holleczek B, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Brenner H. Cancer survival in Germany and the United States at the beginning of the 21st century: an up-to-date comparison by period analysis. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:395–400.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Hiripi E, Gondos A, Emrich K, Holleczek B, Katalinic A, Luttmann S, et al. Survival from common and rare cancers in Germany in the early 21st century. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:472–9.CrossRefPubMed Hiripi E, Gondos A, Emrich K, Holleczek B, Katalinic A, Luttmann S, et al. Survival from common and rare cancers in Germany in the early 21st century. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:472–9.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Balch CM, Buzaid AC, Soong SJ, Atkins MB, Cascinelli N, Coit DG, et al. Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3635–48.PubMed Balch CM, Buzaid AC, Soong SJ, Atkins MB, Cascinelli N, Coit DG, et al. Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3635–48.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Downing A, Yu XQ, Newton-Bishop J, Forman D. Trends in prognostic factors and survival from cutaneous melanoma in Yorkshire, UK and New South Wales, Australia between 1993 and 2003. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:861–6.CrossRefPubMed Downing A, Yu XQ, Newton-Bishop J, Forman D. Trends in prognostic factors and survival from cutaneous melanoma in Yorkshire, UK and New South Wales, Australia between 1993 and 2003. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:861–6.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Tryggvadottir L, Gislum M, Hakulinen T, Klint A, Engholm G, Storm HH, et al. Trends in the survival of patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma of the skin in the Nordic countries 1964–2003 followed up to the end of 2006. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:665–72.CrossRefPubMed Tryggvadottir L, Gislum M, Hakulinen T, Klint A, Engholm G, Storm HH, et al. Trends in the survival of patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma of the skin in the Nordic countries 1964–2003 followed up to the end of 2006. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:665–72.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference de Vries E, Houterman S, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Nijsten T, van de Schans SA, Eggermont AM, et al. Up-to-date survival estimates and historical trends of cutaneous malignant melanoma in the south-east of The Netherlands. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1110–6.CrossRefPubMed de Vries E, Houterman S, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Nijsten T, van de Schans SA, Eggermont AM, et al. Up-to-date survival estimates and historical trends of cutaneous malignant melanoma in the south-east of The Netherlands. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1110–6.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D, et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE--5-a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:23–34.CrossRefPubMed De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D, et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE--5-a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:23–34.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Joosse A, de Vries E, Eckel R, Nijsten T, Eggermont AM, Holzel D, et al. Gender differences in melanoma survival: female patients have a decreased risk of metastasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131:719–26.CrossRefPubMed Joosse A, de Vries E, Eckel R, Nijsten T, Eggermont AM, Holzel D, et al. Gender differences in melanoma survival: female patients have a decreased risk of metastasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131:719–26.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Lasithiotakis K, Leiter U, Meier F, Eigentler T, Metzler G, Moehrle M, et al. Age and gender are significant independent predictors of survival in primary cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 2008;112:1795–804.CrossRefPubMed Lasithiotakis K, Leiter U, Meier F, Eigentler T, Metzler G, Moehrle M, et al. Age and gender are significant independent predictors of survival in primary cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 2008;112:1795–804.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Scoggins CR, Ross MI, Reintgen DS, Noyes RD, Goydos JS, Beitsch PD, et al. Gender-related differences in outcome for melanoma patients. Ann Surg. 2006;243:693–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scoggins CR, Ross MI, Reintgen DS, Noyes RD, Goydos JS, Beitsch PD, et al. Gender-related differences in outcome for melanoma patients. Ann Surg. 2006;243:693–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
go back to reference de Vries E, Nijsten TE, Visser O, Bastiaannet E, van Hattem S, Janssen-Heijnen ML, et al. Superior survival of females among 10,538 Dutch melanoma patients is independent of Breslow thickness, histologic type and tumor site. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:583–9.CrossRefPubMed de Vries E, Nijsten TE, Visser O, Bastiaannet E, van Hattem S, Janssen-Heijnen ML, et al. Superior survival of females among 10,538 Dutch melanoma patients is independent of Breslow thickness, histologic type and tumor site. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:583–9.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Jansen L, Gondos A, Eberle A, Emrich K, Holleczek B, Katalinic A, et al. Cancer survival in Eastern and Western Germany after the fall of the iron curtain. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27:689–93.CrossRefPubMed Jansen L, Gondos A, Eberle A, Emrich K, Holleczek B, Katalinic A, et al. Cancer survival in Eastern and Western Germany after the fall of the iron curtain. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27:689–93.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Tumour stage distribution and survival of malignant melanoma in Germany 2002–2011
Authors
Olaf Schoffer
Stefanie Schülein
Gerlinde Arand
Hans Arnholdt
Dieter Baaske
Ralf C. Bargou
Nikolaus Becker
Matthias W. Beckmann
Yves Bodack
Beatrix Böhme
Tayfun Bozkurt
Regine Breitsprecher
Andre Buchali
Elke Burger
Ulrike Burger
Klaus Dommisch
Gudrun Elsner
Karin Fernschild
Ulrike Flintzer
Uwe Funke
Michael Gerken
Hubert Göbel
Norbert Grobe
Vera Gumpp
Lucie Heinzerling
Lana Raffaela Kempfer
Alexander Kiani
Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
Sabine Klöcking
Ute Kreibich
Katrin Knabner
Peter Kuhn
Stine Lutze
Uwe Mäder
Tanja Maisel
Jan Maschke
Martin Middeke
Andreas Neubauer
Antje Niedostatek
Anabelle Opazo-Saez
Christoph Peters
Beatrice Schell
Gerhard Schenkirsch
Harald Schmalenberg
Peter Schmidt
Constanze Schneider
Birgit Schubotz
Anika Seide
Paul Strecker
Sabine Taubenheim
Matthias Wackes
Steffen Weiß
Claudia Welke
Carmen Werner
Christian Wittekind
Jörg Wulff
Heike Zettl
Stefanie J. Klug
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2963-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Cancer 1/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine