Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Study protocol

Colorectal cancer health services research study protocol: the CCR-CARESS observational prospective cohort project

Authors: José M. Quintana, Nerea Gonzalez, Ane Anton-Ladislao, Maximino Redondo, Marisa Bare, Nerea Fernandez de Larrea, Eduardo Briones, Antonio Escobar, Cristina Sarasqueta, Susana Garcia-Gutierrez, Urko Aguirre, for the REDISSEC-CARESS/CCR group

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancers are one of the most common forms of malignancy worldwide. But two significant areas of research less studied deserve attention: health services use and development of patient stratification risk tools for these patients.

Methods

Design: a prospective multicenter cohort study with a follow up period of up to 5 years after surgical intervention. Participant centers: 22 hospitals representing six autonomous communities of Spain. Participants/Study population: Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer that have undergone surgical intervention and have consented to participate in the study between June 2010 and December 2012. Variables collected include pre-intervention background, sociodemographic parameters, hospital admission records, biological and clinical parameters, treatment information, and outcomes up to 5 years after surgical intervention. Patients completed the following questionnaires prior to surgery and in the follow up period: EuroQol-5D, EORTC QLQ-C30 (The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire) and QLQ-CR29 (module for colorectal cancer), the Duke Functional Social Support Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Barthel Index. The main endpoints of the study are mortality, tumor recurrence, major complications, readmissions, and changes in health-related quality of life at 30 days and at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years after surgical intervention.
Statistical analysis: In relation to the different endpoints, predictive models will be used by means of multivariate logistic models, Cox or linear mixed-effects regression models. Simulation models for the prediction of discrete events in the long term will also be used, and an economic evaluation of different treatment strategies will be performed through the use of generalized linear models.

Discussion

The identification of potential risk factors for adverse events may help clinicians in the clinical decision making process. Also, the follow up by 5 years of this large cohort of patients may provide useful information to answer different health services research questions.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02488161. Registration date: June 16, 2015.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Center MM, Jemal A, Smith RA, Ward E. Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:366–78.CrossRefPubMed Center MM, Jemal A, Smith RA, Ward E. Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:366–78.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gellad ZF, Provenzale D. Colorectal cancer: national and international perspective on the burden of disease and public health impact. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2177–90.CrossRefPubMed Gellad ZF, Provenzale D. Colorectal cancer: national and international perspective on the burden of disease and public health impact. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2177–90.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991;78:355–60.CrossRefPubMed Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991;78:355–60.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Richards CH, Leitch FE, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. A systematic review of POSSUM and its related models as predictors of post-operative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1511–20.CrossRefPubMed Richards CH, Leitch FE, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. A systematic review of POSSUM and its related models as predictors of post-operative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1511–20.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Moonesinghe SR, Mythen MG, Das P, Rowan KM, Grocott MP. Risk stratification tools for predicting morbidity and mortality in adult patients undergoing major surgery: qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:959–81.CrossRefPubMed Moonesinghe SR, Mythen MG, Das P, Rowan KM, Grocott MP. Risk stratification tools for predicting morbidity and mortality in adult patients undergoing major surgery: qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:959–81.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Montazeri A. Quality of life data as prognostic indicators of survival in cancer patients: an overview of the literature from 1982 to 2008. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Montazeri A. Quality of life data as prognostic indicators of survival in cancer patients: an overview of the literature from 1982 to 2008. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference McNair AG, Whistance RN, Forsythe RO, Rees J, Jones JE, Pullyblank AM, et al. Synthesis and summary of patient-reported outcome measures to inform the development of a core outcome set in colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17:O217–29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McNair AG, Whistance RN, Forsythe RO, Rees J, Jones JE, Pullyblank AM, et al. Synthesis and summary of patient-reported outcome measures to inform the development of a core outcome set in colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17:O217–29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Jorgensen ML, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Optimal delivery of colorectal cancer follow-up care: improving patient outcomes. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015;6:127–38.PubMedPubMedCentral Jorgensen ML, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Optimal delivery of colorectal cancer follow-up care: improving patient outcomes. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015;6:127–38.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Hill LB, O’Connell JB, Ko CY. Colorectal cancer: epidemiology and health services research. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2006;15:21–37.CrossRefPubMed Hill LB, O’Connell JB, Ko CY. Colorectal cancer: epidemiology and health services research. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2006;15:21–37.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Freund KM, Battaglia TA, Calhoun E, Dudley DJ, Fiscella K, Paskett E, et al. National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: methods, protocol, and measures. Cancer. 2008;113:3391–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Freund KM, Battaglia TA, Calhoun E, Dudley DJ, Fiscella K, Paskett E, et al. National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: methods, protocol, and measures. Cancer. 2008;113:3391–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Ara R, Basarir H, Keetharuth AD, Barbieri M, Weatherly HL, Sculpher MJ, et al. Are policy decisions on surgical procedures informed by robust economic evidence? A systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30:381–93.CrossRefPubMed Ara R, Basarir H, Keetharuth AD, Barbieri M, Weatherly HL, Sculpher MJ, et al. Are policy decisions on surgical procedures informed by robust economic evidence? A systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30:381–93.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Fenlon D, Richardson A, Addington-Hall J, Smith P, Corner J, Winter J, et al. A cohort study of the recovery of health and wellbeing following colorectal cancer (CREW study): protocol paper. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fenlon D, Richardson A, Addington-Hall J, Smith P, Corner J, Winter J, et al. A cohort study of the recovery of health and wellbeing following colorectal cancer (CREW study): protocol paper. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Esteva M, Ramos M, Cabeza E, Llobera J, Ruiz A, Pita S, et al. Factors influencing delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a study protocol. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Esteva M, Ramos M, Cabeza E, Llobera J, Ruiz A, Pita S, et al. Factors influencing delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a study protocol. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. American Joint Committee on Cancer: AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2016. Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. American Joint Committee on Cancer: AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2016.
15.
go back to reference Lopez-Abente G, Ardanaz E, Torrella-Ramos A, Mateos A, Delgado-Sanz C, Chirlaque MD. Changes in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality trends in Spain. Ann Oncol. 2010;21 Suppl 3:iii76–82.PubMed Lopez-Abente G, Ardanaz E, Torrella-Ramos A, Mateos A, Delgado-Sanz C, Chirlaque MD. Changes in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality trends in Spain. Ann Oncol. 2010;21 Suppl 3:iii76–82.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hightower CE, Riedel BJ, Feig BW, Morris GS, Ensor Jr JE, Woodruff VD, et al. A pilot study evaluating predictors of postoperative outcomes after major abdominal surgery: physiological capacity compared with the ASA physical status classification system. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:465–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hightower CE, Riedel BJ, Feig BW, Morris GS, Ensor Jr JE, Woodruff VD, et al. A pilot study evaluating predictors of postoperative outcomes after major abdominal surgery: physiological capacity compared with the ASA physical status classification system. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:465–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81–4.CrossRefPubMed Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81–4.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Badia X, Roset M, Montserrat S, Herdman M, Segura A. [The Spanish version of EuroQol: a description and its applications. European Quality of Life scale]. Med Clin (Barc). 1999;112 Suppl 1:79–85. Badia X, Roset M, Montserrat S, Herdman M, Segura A. [The Spanish version of EuroQol: a description and its applications. European Quality of Life scale]. Med Clin (Barc). 1999;112 Suppl 1:79–85.
21.
go back to reference Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–76.CrossRefPubMed Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–76.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Arraras JI, Arias F, Tejedor M, Pruja E, Marcos M, Martinez E, et al. The EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) quality of life questionnaire: validation study for Spain with head and neck cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2002;11:249–56.CrossRefPubMed Arraras JI, Arias F, Tejedor M, Pruja E, Marcos M, Martinez E, et al. The EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) quality of life questionnaire: validation study for Spain with head and neck cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2002;11:249–56.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Whistance RN, Conroy T, Chie W, Costantini A, Sezer O, Koller M, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:3017–26.CrossRefPubMed Whistance RN, Conroy T, Chie W, Costantini A, Sezer O, Koller M, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:3017–26.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Arraras JI, Suarez J, Arias d, V, Vera R, Asin G, Arrazubi V, et al. The EORTC quality of life questionnaire for patients with colorectal cancer: EORTC QLQ-CR29 validation study for spanish patients. Clin Transl Oncol. 2011;13:50–6.CrossRefPubMed Arraras JI, Suarez J, Arias d, V, Vera R, Asin G, Arrazubi V, et al. The EORTC quality of life questionnaire for patients with colorectal cancer: EORTC QLQ-CR29 validation study for spanish patients. Clin Transl Oncol. 2011;13:50–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.CrossRefPubMed Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Quintana JM, Padierna A, Esteban C, Arostegui I, Bilbao A, Ruiz I. Evaluation of the psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003;107:216–21.CrossRefPubMed Quintana JM, Padierna A, Esteban C, Arostegui I, Bilbao A, Ruiz I. Evaluation of the psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003;107:216–21.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Broadhead WE, Gehlbach SH, de Gruy FV, Kaplan BH. The Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire. Measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Med Care. 1988;26:709–23.CrossRefPubMed Broadhead WE, Gehlbach SH, de Gruy FV, Kaplan BH. The Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire. Measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Med Care. 1988;26:709–23.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Bellon Saameno JA, Delgado SA, Luna del Castillo JD, Lardelli CP. [Validity and reliability of the Duke-UNC-11 questionnaire of functional social support]. Aten Primaria. 1996;18:153–63.PubMed Bellon Saameno JA, Delgado SA, Luna del Castillo JD, Lardelli CP. [Validity and reliability of the Duke-UNC-11 questionnaire of functional social support]. Aten Primaria. 1996;18:153–63.PubMed
29.
go back to reference MAHONEY FI, BARTHEL DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.PubMed MAHONEY FI, BARTHEL DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Cabanero-Martinez MJ, Cabrero-Garcia J, Richart-Martinez M, Munoz-Mendoza CL. The Spanish versions of the Barthel index (BI) and the Katz index (KI) of activities of daily living (ADL): a structured review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009;49:e77–84.CrossRefPubMed Cabanero-Martinez MJ, Cabrero-Garcia J, Richart-Martinez M, Munoz-Mendoza CL. The Spanish versions of the Barthel index (BI) and the Katz index (KI) of activities of daily living (ADL): a structured review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009;49:e77–84.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell IG. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA. 1997;277:488–94.CrossRefPubMed Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell IG. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA. 1997;277:488–94.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:710–8.CrossRefPubMed Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:710–8.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Von EE, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7.CrossRef Von EE, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Moons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, Ioannidis JP, Macaskill P, Steyerberg EW, et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:W1–73.CrossRefPubMed Moons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, Ioannidis JP, Macaskill P, Steyerberg EW, et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:W1–73.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Colorectal cancer health services research study protocol: the CCR-CARESS observational prospective cohort project
Authors
José M. Quintana
Nerea Gonzalez
Ane Anton-Ladislao
Maximino Redondo
Marisa Bare
Nerea Fernandez de Larrea
Eduardo Briones
Antonio Escobar
Cristina Sarasqueta
Susana Garcia-Gutierrez
Urko Aguirre
for the REDISSEC-CARESS/CCR group
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2475-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Cancer 1/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine