Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Care | Research article

Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women’s experiences

Authors: J. F. M. van den Heuvel, C. J. Teunis, A. Franx, N. M. T. H. Crombag, M. N. Bekker

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hospital admission during pregnancy complications is considered to be an event of significant impact. Besides conventional in-clinic maternal and fetal monitoring, recent technologies enable home-based telemonitoring with self-measurements in high risk pregnancy. This study is part of a feasibility pilot to explore the usability and acceptability of telemonitoring and aims to gain insight in the experiences and preferences of high risk pregnant women concerning the novel strategy of telemonitoring, opposed to women who were hospitalized in pregnancy.

Methods

Using secured Facebook Groups, we conducted four online focus groups: two focus groups with women who were admitted during pregnancy (n = 11) and two with women who received home telemonitoring in the pilot phase (n = 11). The qualitative data were analyzed thematically.

Results

Four major themes emerged from both participant groups: [1] care experience, [2] emotions regarding pregnancy, [3] privacy and [4] impact on daily life. Different views were reported on all four themes, resulting in a direct comparison of experiences during hospitalization and telemonitoring. Most admitted patients reported a growing sense of boredom and anxiety during their clinical admission. Lack of privacy on ward was a great concern, as it affected their contact with hospital staff and family. This issue was not reported amongst telemonitored women. These participants still felt like a patient at times but responded that the comfort of their own home and bed was pleasant. Only a minority of telemonitored participants reported being anxious at times at home, while not having a physician or nurse nearby. Being at home resulted in less travel time for partners or family for hospital visits, which had its positive effects on family life.

Conclusions

Telemonitoring of a high-risk pregnancy provides an innovative manner to monitor fetal and maternal condition from home. Compared to the experiences of hospital admission in high risk pregnancy, it allows women to be in a comforting and private environment during an anxious time in their lives. As future studies should further investigate the safety and cost effectiveness of this novel strategy, women’s views on the preference of telemonitoring need to be taken into consideration.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cauldwell M, Dos Santos F, Steer PJ, et al. Pregnancy in women with congenital heart disease. BMJ. 2018;360:k478.CrossRef Cauldwell M, Dos Santos F, Steer PJ, et al. Pregnancy in women with congenital heart disease. BMJ. 2018;360:k478.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Piccoli GB, Cabiddu G, Attini R, et al. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(8):2011–22.CrossRef Piccoli GB, Cabiddu G, Attini R, et al. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(8):2011–22.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK, et al. Births: provisional data for 2016. In: Vital statistics rapid release, no 2. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics. p. 2017. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK, et al. Births: provisional data for 2016. In: Vital statistics rapid release, no 2. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics. p. 2017.
4.
go back to reference Queenan JT. Management of High-Risk Pregnancy: John Wiley and sons ltd; 2012. Queenan JT. Management of High-Risk Pregnancy: John Wiley and sons ltd; 2012.
5.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE Guideline CG107 Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management. 2010 (updated in 2011). Accessed 15 Nov 2018. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE Guideline CG107 Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management. 2010 (updated in 2011). Accessed 15 Nov 2018.
6.
go back to reference RCOG. Green-top Guideline No.31 - The Investigation and Management of the Small–for–Gestational–Age Fetus. 2014. RCOG. Green-top Guideline No.31 - The Investigation and Management of the Small–for–Gestational–Age Fetus. 2014.
7.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE Guideline NG25 preterm labour and birth. 2015. Accessed 15 Nov 2018. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE Guideline NG25 preterm labour and birth. 2015. Accessed 15 Nov 2018.
8.
go back to reference Leichtentritt RD, Blumenthal N, Elyassi A, et al. High-risk pregnancy and hospitalization: the women's voices. Health Soc Work. 2005;30(1):39–47.CrossRef Leichtentritt RD, Blumenthal N, Elyassi A, et al. High-risk pregnancy and hospitalization: the women's voices. Health Soc Work. 2005;30(1):39–47.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mercer RT, Ferketich SL. Stress and social support as predictors of anxiety and depression during pregnancy. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1988;10(2):26–39.CrossRef Mercer RT, Ferketich SL. Stress and social support as predictors of anxiety and depression during pregnancy. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1988;10(2):26–39.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rubarth LB, Schoening AM, Cosimano A, et al. Women's experience of hospitalized bed rest during high-risk pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012;41(3):398–407.CrossRef Rubarth LB, Schoening AM, Cosimano A, et al. Women's experience of hospitalized bed rest during high-risk pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012;41(3):398–407.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lederman RP, Boyd E, Pitts K, et al. Maternal development experiences of women hospitalized to prevent preterm birth. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2013;4(4):133–8.CrossRef Lederman RP, Boyd E, Pitts K, et al. Maternal development experiences of women hospitalized to prevent preterm birth. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2013;4(4):133–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kent RA, Yazbek M, Heyns T, et al. The support needs of high-risk antenatal patients in prolonged hospitalisation. Midwifery. 2015;31(1):164–9.CrossRef Kent RA, Yazbek M, Heyns T, et al. The support needs of high-risk antenatal patients in prolonged hospitalisation. Midwifery. 2015;31(1):164–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res. 2001;3(2):e20 PMID: 11720962.CrossRef Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res. 2001;3(2):e20 PMID: 11720962.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference van den Heuvel JF, Groenhof TK, Veerbeek JH, et al. eHealth as the next-generation perinatal care: an overview of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6):e202.CrossRef van den Heuvel JF, Groenhof TK, Veerbeek JH, et al. eHealth as the next-generation perinatal care: an overview of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6):e202.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schramm K, Lapert F, Nees J, et al. Acceptance of a new non-invasive fetal monitoring system and attitude for telemedicine approaches in obstetrics: a case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298(6):1085–93.CrossRef Schramm K, Lapert F, Nees J, et al. Acceptance of a new non-invasive fetal monitoring system and attitude for telemedicine approaches in obstetrics: a case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298(6):1085–93.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Boatin AA, Wylie B, Goldfarb I, et al. Wireless fetal heart rate monitoring in inpatient full-term pregnant women: testing functionality and acceptability. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0117043.CrossRef Boatin AA, Wylie B, Goldfarb I, et al. Wireless fetal heart rate monitoring in inpatient full-term pregnant women: testing functionality and acceptability. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0117043.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chung Y, de Greeff A, Shennan A. Validation and compliance of a home monitoring device in pregnancy: microlife WatchBP home. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2009;28(3):348–59.CrossRef Chung Y, de Greeff A, Shennan A. Validation and compliance of a home monitoring device in pregnancy: microlife WatchBP home. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2009;28(3):348–59.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tuttas CA. Lessons learned using web conference technology for online focus group interviews. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(1):122–33.CrossRef Tuttas CA. Lessons learned using web conference technology for online focus group interviews. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(1):122–33.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Thrul J, Belohlavek A, Hambrick D, et al. Conducting online focus groups on Facebook to inform health behavior change interventions: two case studies and lessons learned. Internet Interv. 2017;9:106–11.CrossRef Thrul J, Belohlavek A, Hambrick D, et al. Conducting online focus groups on Facebook to inform health behavior change interventions: two case studies and lessons learned. Internet Interv. 2017;9:106–11.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Byatt N, Hicks-Courant K, Davidson A, et al. Depression and anxiety among high-risk obstetric inpatients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014;36(6):644–9.CrossRef Byatt N, Hicks-Courant K, Davidson A, et al. Depression and anxiety among high-risk obstetric inpatients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014;36(6):644–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kerner RYY, Belkin A, Ben-Haroush A, Zeevi B, Hod M. Maternal self-administered fetal heart rate monitoring and transmission from home in high-risk pregnancies. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2004;84(1):33–9.CrossRef Kerner RYY, Belkin A, Ben-Haroush A, Zeevi B, Hod M. Maternal self-administered fetal heart rate monitoring and transmission from home in high-risk pregnancies. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2004;84(1):33–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rauf Z, O'Brien E, Stampalija T, et al. Home labour induction with retrievable prostaglandin pessary and continuous telemetric trans-abdominal fetal ECG monitoring. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e28129.CrossRef Rauf Z, O'Brien E, Stampalija T, et al. Home labour induction with retrievable prostaglandin pessary and continuous telemetric trans-abdominal fetal ECG monitoring. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e28129.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference O'Brien E, Rauf Z, Alfirevic Z, et al. Women's experiences of outpatient induction of labour with remote continuous monitoring. Midwifery. 2013;29(4):325–31.CrossRef O'Brien E, Rauf Z, Alfirevic Z, et al. Women's experiences of outpatient induction of labour with remote continuous monitoring. Midwifery. 2013;29(4):325–31.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lanssens, et al. Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey. JMIR. 2019;21(4):e10887.PubMed Lanssens, et al. Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey. JMIR. 2019;21(4):e10887.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Overdijkink SB, Velu AV, Rosman AN, et al. The usability and effectiveness of Mobile health technology-based lifestyle and medical intervention apps supporting health care during pregnancy: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(4):e109.CrossRef Overdijkink SB, Velu AV, Rosman AN, et al. The usability and effectiveness of Mobile health technology-based lifestyle and medical intervention apps supporting health care during pregnancy: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(4):e109.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rasekaba TM, Furler J, Blackberry I, et al. Telemedicine interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;110(1):1–9.CrossRef Rasekaba TM, Furler J, Blackberry I, et al. Telemedicine interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;110(1):1–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of Telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(2):154–61.CrossRef Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of Telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(2):154–61.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, et al. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016242.CrossRef Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, et al. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016242.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Iribarren SJ, Cato K, Falzon L, et al. What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0170581.CrossRef Iribarren SJ, Cato K, Falzon L, et al. What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0170581.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Lucivero F, Jongsma KR. A mobile revolution for healthcare? Setting the agenda for bioethics. J Med Ethics. 2018;44(10):685–9.CrossRef Lucivero F, Jongsma KR. A mobile revolution for healthcare? Setting the agenda for bioethics. J Med Ethics. 2018;44(10):685–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women’s experiences
Authors
J. F. M. van den Heuvel
C. J. Teunis
A. Franx
N. M. T. H. Crombag
M. N. Bekker
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2779-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020 Go to the issue