Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Ultrasound | Research article

The application of prenatal ultrasound in the diagnosis of congenital duodenal obstruction

Authors: Chan Yin, Lili Tong, Mingxiang Ma, Xiaoqun Tan, Guoliang Luo, Zhihui Fei, Dan Nie

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this research is to summarize the prenatal ultrasound characteristics of congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO), especially in the diagnosis of duodenal diaphragm and annular pancreas. At present, few researchers have summarized the specific ultrasound features of duodenal diaphragm and annular pancreas.

Methods

In this study, a retrospective analysis of 40 patients diagnosed with CDO between January 2016 and December 2019 was carried out. Data on the diagnosis, ultrasound images and outcomes of the patients were gathered, and the features of the patients were analyzed.

Results

The results showed that there were 17 patients (42.5%) of congenital duodenal diaphragm, all with a ‘rat tail’ sign on the ultrasound images. Moreover, there were 4 patients (10.0%) of CDO caused by annular pancreas, all with a ‘pliers’ sign on the ultrasound images. We summarized the imaging features of the ‘rat tail’ sign and the ‘pliers’ sign.

Conclusion

The main conclusion of this study was that the ‘rat tail’ sign could be used as an indirect ultrasound feature to diagnose duodenal diaphragm. The ‘pliers’ sign could be used as a direct ultrasound feature in the diagnosis of annular pancreas in CDO.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chen Q, Gao Z, Tou J, Qian Y, Li M, Xiong Q, Shu Q. Congenital duodenal obstruction in neonates: a decade’s experience from one center. World J Pediatr. 2014;10(3):238–44.CrossRef Chen Q, Gao Z, Tou J, Qian Y, Li M, Xiong Q, Shu Q. Congenital duodenal obstruction in neonates: a decade’s experience from one center. World J Pediatr. 2014;10(3):238–44.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lawrence MJ, Ford WD, Furness ME, Hayward T, Wilson T. Congenital duodenal obstruction: early antenatal ultrasound diagnosis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2000;16(5–6):342–5.CrossRef Lawrence MJ, Ford WD, Furness ME, Hayward T, Wilson T. Congenital duodenal obstruction: early antenatal ultrasound diagnosis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2000;16(5–6):342–5.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kilbride H, Castor C, Andrews W. Congenital duodenal obstruction: timing of diagnosis during the newborn period. J Perinatol. 2010;30(3):197–200.CrossRef Kilbride H, Castor C, Andrews W. Congenital duodenal obstruction: timing of diagnosis during the newborn period. J Perinatol. 2010;30(3):197–200.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zhou C, Li H, Lang P, et al. The relationship between prenatal Ultrasonographic findings and prognosis in congenital duodenal obstruction. Chin Ultrasound Med. 2017;33(09):813–5. Zhou C, Li H, Lang P, et al. The relationship between prenatal Ultrasonographic findings and prognosis in congenital duodenal obstruction. Chin Ultrasound Med. 2017;33(09):813–5.
5.
go back to reference Escobar MA, Ladd AP, Grosfeld JL, West KW, Rescorla FJ, Scherer LR III, Engum SA, Rouse TM, Billmire DF. Duodenal atresia and stenosis: long-term follow-up over 30 years. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(6):867–71.CrossRef Escobar MA, Ladd AP, Grosfeld JL, West KW, Rescorla FJ, Scherer LR III, Engum SA, Rouse TM, Billmire DF. Duodenal atresia and stenosis: long-term follow-up over 30 years. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(6):867–71.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim JY, You JY, Chang KH, Choi S, Oh S, Seo J, Roh C, Kim J. Association between prenatal Sonographic findings of duodenal obstruction and adverse outcomes. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(9):1931–8.CrossRef Kim JY, You JY, Chang KH, Choi S, Oh S, Seo J, Roh C, Kim J. Association between prenatal Sonographic findings of duodenal obstruction and adverse outcomes. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(9):1931–8.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Burjonrappa S, Crete E, Bouchard S. Comparative outcomes in intestinal atresia: a clinical outcome and pathophysiology analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;27(4):437–42.CrossRef Burjonrappa S, Crete E, Bouchard S. Comparative outcomes in intestinal atresia: a clinical outcome and pathophysiology analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;27(4):437–42.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Parulekar SG. Sonography of normal fetal bowel. J Ultrasound Med. 1991;10(4):211–20.CrossRef Parulekar SG. Sonography of normal fetal bowel. J Ultrasound Med. 1991;10(4):211–20.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Huang F, Huang P. Fetal and pediatric ultrasonography: People’s Health Press; 2008. Huang F, Huang P. Fetal and pediatric ultrasonography: People’s Health Press; 2008.
10.
go back to reference Duan X, Li H, Chen W, et al. Value of high-frequency ultrasound in the diagnosis of neonates with annular pancreas. Chin Ultrasound Med. 2014;30(8):760–2. Duan X, Li H, Chen W, et al. Value of high-frequency ultrasound in the diagnosis of neonates with annular pancreas. Chin Ultrasound Med. 2014;30(8):760–2.
11.
go back to reference Li S. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal malformation: Sci Press; 2017. Li S. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal malformation: Sci Press; 2017.
12.
go back to reference Yang B, He F, He Q, Wang Z, Fang Q, Zhong W, Wang H. Diagnostic value of the acute angle between the prestenotic and poststenotic duodenum in neonatal annular pancreas. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(6):2902–9.CrossRef Yang B, He F, He Q, Wang Z, Fang Q, Zhong W, Wang H. Diagnostic value of the acute angle between the prestenotic and poststenotic duodenum in neonatal annular pancreas. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(6):2902–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hata K, Hata T, Kitao M. Ultrasonographic identification and measurement of the human fetal pancreas in utero. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1988;26(1):61–4.CrossRef Hata K, Hata T, Kitao M. Ultrasonographic identification and measurement of the human fetal pancreas in utero. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1988;26(1):61–4.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cai C, Chai A, Dong L. Ultrasound research status of fetal pancreas development. Chin J Interv Imaging Ther. 2018;15(11):701–3. Cai C, Chai A, Dong L. Ultrasound research status of fetal pancreas development. Chin J Interv Imaging Ther. 2018;15(11):701–3.
15.
go back to reference Singh M, Richards C, Bowen JC. Does Down syndrome affect the outcome of congenital duodenal obstruction? Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20(8):586–9.CrossRef Singh M, Richards C, Bowen JC. Does Down syndrome affect the outcome of congenital duodenal obstruction? Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20(8):586–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Niramis R, Anuntkosol M, Tongsin A, Mahatharadol V. Influence of Down’s syndrome on management and outcome of patients with congenital intrinsic duodenal obstruction. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45(7):1467–72.CrossRef Niramis R, Anuntkosol M, Tongsin A, Mahatharadol V. Influence of Down’s syndrome on management and outcome of patients with congenital intrinsic duodenal obstruction. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45(7):1467–72.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chang C. Ultrasound in gynecology and obstetrics: People’s Health Press; 2010. Chang C. Ultrasound in gynecology and obstetrics: People’s Health Press; 2010.
Metadata
Title
The application of prenatal ultrasound in the diagnosis of congenital duodenal obstruction
Authors
Chan Yin
Lili Tong
Mingxiang Ma
Xiaoqun Tan
Guoliang Luo
Zhihui Fei
Dan Nie
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03078-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020 Go to the issue