Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Care | Research article

Detailed registration of care in midwifery practices in the Netherlands: an opportunity for research within a healthy pregnant population

Authors: A. Pouwels, P. Offerhaus, A. Merkx, B. Zeegers, M. J. Nieuwenhuijze

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Research in maternity care is often conducted in mixed low and high-risk or solely high-risk populations. This limits generalizability to the low-risk population of pregnant women receiving care from Dutch midwives. To address this limitation, 24 midwifery practices in the Netherlands bring together routinely collected data from medical records of pregnant women and their offspring in the VeCaS database. This database offers possibilities for research of physiological pregnancy and childbirth. This study explores if the pregnant women in VeCaS are a representative sample for the national population of women who receive primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands.

Methods

In VeCaS we selected a low risk population in midwife-led care who gave birth in 2015. We compared population characteristics and birth outcomes in this study cohort with a similarly defined national cohort, using Chi Square and two side t-test statistics. Additionally, we describe some birth outcomes and lifestyle factors.

Results

Midwifery practices contributing to VeCaS are spread over the Netherlands, although the western region is underrepresented. For population characteristics, the VeCaS cohort is similar to the national cohort in maternal age (mean 30.4 years) and parity (nulliparous women: 47.1% versus 45.9%). Less often, women in the VeCaS cohort have a non-Dutch background (15.7% vs 24.4%), a higher SES (9.9% vs 23.7%) and live in an urbanised surrounding (4.9% vs 24.8%). Birth outcomes were similar to the national cohort, most women gave birth at term (94.9% vs 94.5% between 37 + 0–41+ 6 weeks), started labour spontaneously (74.5% vs 75.5%) and had a spontaneous vaginal birth (77.4% vs 77.6%), 16.9% had a home birth. Furthermore, 61.1% had a normal pre-pregnancy BMI, and 81.0% did not smoke in pregnancy.

Conclusions

The VeCaS database contains data of a population that is mostly comparable to the national population in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands. Therefore, the VeCaS database is suitable for research in a healthy pregnant population and is valuable to improve knowledge of the physiological course of pregnancy and birth. Representativeness of maternal characteristics may be improved by including midwifery practices from the urbanised western region in the Netherlands.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Van Haaren-ten Haken TM, Hendrix MJC, Nieuwenhuijze MJ, Budé L, de Vries RG, Nijhuis JG. Preferred place of birth: characteristics and motives of low-risk nulliparous women in the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2012;28:609–18.CrossRef Van Haaren-ten Haken TM, Hendrix MJC, Nieuwenhuijze MJ, Budé L, de Vries RG, Nijhuis JG. Preferred place of birth: characteristics and motives of low-risk nulliparous women in the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2012;28:609–18.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Offerhaus PM, Hukkelhoven CWPM, de Jonge A, van der Pal-de Bruin KM, Scheepers PL, Lagro-Janssen AL. Persisting rise in referrals during labor in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands. Birth. 2013;40(3):192–201.CrossRef Offerhaus PM, Hukkelhoven CWPM, de Jonge A, van der Pal-de Bruin KM, Scheepers PL, Lagro-Janssen AL. Persisting rise in referrals during labor in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands. Birth. 2013;40(3):192–201.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Offerhaus PM, Geerts C, de Jonge A, Hukkelhoven CWPM, Twisk JWR, Lagro-Janssen ALM. Variation in referrals to secondary obstetrician-led care among primary midwifery care practices in the Netherlands: a nationwide cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2015;15:42.CrossRef Offerhaus PM, Geerts C, de Jonge A, Hukkelhoven CWPM, Twisk JWR, Lagro-Janssen ALM. Variation in referrals to secondary obstetrician-led care among primary midwifery care practices in the Netherlands: a nationwide cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2015;15:42.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cronie D, Rijnders M, Buitendijk S. Diversity in the scope and practice of hospital-based midwives in the Netherlands. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2012;57:469–75.CrossRef Cronie D, Rijnders M, Buitendijk S. Diversity in the scope and practice of hospital-based midwives in the Netherlands. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2012;57:469–75.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference van Andel W, Guldenmond T, Faqiri F. SCP Statusscores 2014. Den Haag: SCP; 2016. van Andel W, Guldenmond T, Faqiri F. SCP Statusscores 2014. Den Haag: SCP; 2016.
7.
go back to reference CBS StatLine. [Lifestyle and prevention: gender, age, personal characteristics 2014–2015.] Leefstijl en preventief: geslacht, leeftijd, persoonskenmerken 2014–2015. [updated 2018 May 31; cited 2019 December 5]. Available from: https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline. CBS StatLine. [Lifestyle and prevention: gender, age, personal characteristics 2014–2015.] Leefstijl en preventief: geslacht, leeftijd, persoonskenmerken 2014–2015. [updated 2018 May 31; cited 2019 December 5]. Available from: https://​opendata.​cbs.​nl/​statline.
Metadata
Title
Detailed registration of care in midwifery practices in the Netherlands: an opportunity for research within a healthy pregnant population
Authors
A. Pouwels
P. Offerhaus
A. Merkx
B. Zeegers
M. J. Nieuwenhuijze
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03053-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020 Go to the issue