Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Effect of maternal birth positions on duration of second stage of labor: systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Marta Berta, Helena Lindgren, Kyllike Christensson, Sollomon Mekonnen, Mulat Adefris

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It is believed that giving birth in an upright position is beneficial for both mother and the infant for several physiologic reasons. An upright positioning helps the uterus to contract more strongly and efficiently, the baby gets in a better position and thus can pass through the pelvis faster. Upright and lateral positions enables flexibility in the pelvis and facilitates the extension of the outlet. Before implementing a change in birthing positions in our clinics we need to review evidences available and context valid related to duration of second stage of labor and birthing positions. Therefore this review aimed to examine the effect of maternal flexible sacrum birth position on duration of second stage of labor.

Method

The research searched articles using bibliographical Databases: Medline/PUBMED, SCOPUS, Google scholar and Google. All study designs were considered while investigating the impact of maternal flexible sacrum birthing positioning in relation duration of second stage of labor. Studies including laboring mothers with normal labor and delivery. A total of 1985 women were included in the reviewed studies. We included both qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Results

We identified 1680 potential citations, of which 8 articles assessed the effect of maternal upright birth positioning on the reduction during the duration of second stage of labor. Two studies were excluded because of incomplete reports for meta analysis. The result suggested a reduction in duration of second stage of labor among women in a flexible sacrum birthing position, with a mean duration from 3.2–34.8. The pooled weighted mean difference with random effect model was 21.118(CI: 11.839–30.396) minutes, with the same significant heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 96.8%, p < 000).

Conclusion

The second stage duration was reduced in cases of a flexible sacrum birthing position. Even though the reduction in duration varies across studies with considerable heterogeneity, laboring women should be encouraged to choose her comfortable birth position. Researchers who aim to compare different birthing positions should consider study designs which enable women to choose birthing position.

Prospero registration number

Literature
1.
go back to reference Roberts JE. The “push” for evidence: management of the second stage. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2002;47:2–15.CrossRef Roberts JE. The “push” for evidence: management of the second stage. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2002;47:2–15.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gizzo S, Di Gangi S, Noventa M, Bacile V, Zambon A, Nardelli GB. Women’s choice of positions during labour: return to the past or a modern way to give birth? A cohort study in Italy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014. Gizzo S, Di Gangi S, Noventa M, Bacile V, Zambon A, Nardelli GB. Women’s choice of positions during labour: return to the past or a modern way to give birth? A cohort study in Italy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014.
3.
go back to reference Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, Styles C. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8. Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, Styles C. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8.
4.
go back to reference Hanson L. Second-stage labor care: challenges in spontaneous bearing down. J Perinat Neonat Nur. 2009;23(1):31–9.CrossRef Hanson L. Second-stage labor care: challenges in spontaneous bearing down. J Perinat Neonat Nur. 2009;23(1):31–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Simkin PPOM. Nonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor: systematic reviews of five methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5 Suppl Nature):S131–59.CrossRef Simkin PPOM. Nonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor: systematic reviews of five methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5 Suppl Nature):S131–59.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Caldeyro-Barcia RN-GL, Cibils LA, Alvarez H, Poseiro JJPS, et al. Effect of position changes in theintensity and frequency of uterine contractions during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1960;80(2):284–90.CrossRef Caldeyro-Barcia RN-GL, Cibils LA, Alvarez H, Poseiro JJPS, et al. Effect of position changes in theintensity and frequency of uterine contractions during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1960;80(2):284–90.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Abitbol MM. Supine position in labor and associated fetal heart rate changes. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 1985;65(4):481–6. Abitbol MM. Supine position in labor and associated fetal heart rate changes. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 1985;65(4):481–6.
8.
go back to reference Kibuka M, Thornton JG. Position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:Cd008070.PubMed Kibuka M, Thornton JG. Position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:Cd008070.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Lindgren HE, Brink Å, Klingberg-Allvin M. Fear causes tears-perineal injuries in home birth settings. A Swedish interview study. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 2011;11(1):6. Lindgren HE, Brink Å, Klingberg-Allvin M. Fear causes tears-perineal injuries in home birth settings. A Swedish interview study. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 2011;11(1):6.
10.
go back to reference Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ, Shehmar M. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online). 2012;5. Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ, Shehmar M. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online). 2012;5.
11.
go back to reference Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ, Vogel JP. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5. Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ, Vogel JP. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5.
12.
go back to reference Porritt K, Gomersall J, Lockwood C. Study selection and critical appraisal: the steps following the literature search in a systematic review. Am J Nurs. 2014;114(6):47–52.CrossRef Porritt K, Gomersall J, Lockwood C. Study selection and critical appraisal: the steps following the literature search in a systematic review. Am J Nurs. 2014;114(6):47–52.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference JB. I. Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual: 2014 edition. Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2014. JB. I. Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual: 2014 edition. Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2014.
14.
go back to reference Liberati A, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6. Liberati A, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6.
15.
go back to reference Moola S. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): the Joanna Briggs Institute's approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13:163–9.CrossRef Moola S. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): the Joanna Briggs Institute's approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13:163–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gupta JK, Brayshaw EM, Lilford RJ. An experiment of squatting birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1989;30(3):217–20.CrossRef Gupta JK, Brayshaw EM, Lilford RJ. An experiment of squatting birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1989;30(3):217–20.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Moraloglu O, Kansu-Celik H, Tasci Y, Karakaya BK, Yilmaz Y, Cakir E, et al. The influence of different maternal pushing positions on birth outcomes at the second stage of labor in nulliparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(2):245–9.CrossRef Moraloglu O, Kansu-Celik H, Tasci Y, Karakaya BK, Yilmaz Y, Cakir E, et al. The influence of different maternal pushing positions on birth outcomes at the second stage of labor in nulliparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(2):245–9.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Marttila M, Kajanoja P, Ylikorkala O. Maternal half-sitting position in the second stage of labor. J Perinat Med. 1983;11(6):286–9.CrossRef Marttila M, Kajanoja P, Ylikorkala O. Maternal half-sitting position in the second stage of labor. J Perinat Med. 1983;11(6):286–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Thilagavathy G. Maternal birthing position and outcome of labor; 2012. Thilagavathy G. Maternal birthing position and outcome of labor; 2012.
20.
go back to reference Dabral A, Pawar P, Bharti R, Kumari A, Batra A, Arora R. Upright kneeling position during second stage of labor: a pilot study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obst Gynecol. 2018;7(2):401–7.CrossRef Dabral A, Pawar P, Bharti R, Kumari A, Batra A, Arora R. Upright kneeling position during second stage of labor: a pilot study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obst Gynecol. 2018;7(2):401–7.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dénakpo J, Lokossou A, Tonato-Bagnan JA, Alao J, Hounkpatin B, Komongui DG, et al. L’accouchement en position libre peut-il être une solution de rechange à l’accouchement en position classique dans les salles de naissance en Afrique: résultats d’une étude prospective à Cotonou au Bénin. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34(10):947–53.CrossRef Dénakpo J, Lokossou A, Tonato-Bagnan JA, Alao J, Hounkpatin B, Komongui DG, et al. L’accouchement en position libre peut-il être une solution de rechange à l’accouchement en position classique dans les salles de naissance en Afrique: résultats d’une étude prospective à Cotonou au Bénin. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34(10):947–53.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Simarro M, Espinosa JA, Salinas C, Ojea R, Salvadores P, Walker C, et al. A prospective randomized trial of postural changes vs passive supine lying during the second stage of labor under epidural analgesia. Med Sc. 2017;5(1):5. Simarro M, Espinosa JA, Salinas C, Ojea R, Salvadores P, Walker C, et al. A prospective randomized trial of postural changes vs passive supine lying during the second stage of labor under epidural analgesia. Med Sc. 2017;5(1):5.
23.
go back to reference Mathew A, Nayak S, Vandana K, Hegde N, Kumari S, Hegde M. A comparative study on effect of ambulation and birthing ball on maternal and newborn outcome among primigravida mothers in selected hospitals in Mangalore. Nitte University Journal of Health Science. 2012;2(2):2–5. Mathew A, Nayak S, Vandana K, Hegde N, Kumari S, Hegde M. A comparative study on effect of ambulation and birthing ball on maternal and newborn outcome among primigravida mothers in selected hospitals in Mangalore. Nitte University Journal of Health Science. 2012;2(2):2–5.
24.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Report of the Technical Working Group on Care in normal birth (in press). 1996. World Health Organization. Report of the Technical Working Group on Care in normal birth (in press). 1996.
25.
go back to reference Zaibunnisa Z, Ara F, Ara B, Kaker P, Aslam M. Child birth. Professional Med J. 2015;22(04):390–4. Zaibunnisa Z, Ara F, Ara B, Kaker P, Aslam M. Child birth. Professional Med J. 2015;22(04):390–4.
26.
go back to reference Lie C, Keen R, DiFranco J, Amis D, Albers L. # 5: non-supine (eg, upright or side-lying) positions for birth. J Perinat Educ. 2004;13(2):30.CrossRef Lie C, Keen R, DiFranco J, Amis D, Albers L. # 5: non-supine (eg, upright or side-lying) positions for birth. J Perinat Educ. 2004;13(2):30.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of maternal birth positions on duration of second stage of labor: systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Marta Berta
Helena Lindgren
Kyllike Christensson
Sollomon Mekonnen
Mulat Adefris
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2620-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2019 Go to the issue