Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Few women receive a specific explanation of a stillbirth - an online survey of women’s perceptions and thoughts about the cause of their baby’s death

Authors: Berit Höglund, Ingela Rådestad, Ingegerd Hildingsson

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In Sweden, three to four out of every 1000 pregnancies end in stillbirth each year. The aim of this study was to investigate whether women who had experienced stillbirth perceived that they had received an explanation of the death and whether they believed that healthcare professionals were responsible for the death of the baby.

Methods

An online survey of 356 women in Sweden who had experienced a stillbirth from January 2010 to April 2014. A mixed-methods approach with qualitative content analysis was used to examine the women’s responses.

Results

Nearly half of the women (48.6%) reported that they had not received any explanation as to why their babies had died. Of the women who reported that they had received an explanation, 84 (23.6%) had a specific explanation, and 99 (27.8%) had a vague explanation. In total, 73 (30.0%) of the 243 women who answered the question “Do you believe that healthcare personnel were responsible for the stillbirth?” stated Yes. The women reported that the healthcare staff had not acknowledged their intuition that the pregnancy was proceeding poorly. Furthermore, they perceived that the staff met them with nonchalance and arrogance. Additionally, the midwife had ignored or normalised the symptoms that could indicate that their pregnancy was proceeding poorly. Some women added that neglect and avoidance among the healthcare staff could have led to a lack of monitoring, which could have been crucial for the outcome of the pregnancy.

Conclusions

Half of the women surveyed reported that they had not received an explanation of their baby’s death, and more than one-fourth held healthcare professionals responsible for the death.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Rowland A, Goodnight WH. Fetal loss: addressing the evaluation and supporting the emotional needs of parents. J Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2009;54:241–8.CrossRef Rowland A, Goodnight WH. Fetal loss: addressing the evaluation and supporting the emotional needs of parents. J Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2009;54:241–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference McPherson E. Discovering the cause of stillbirth. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2013;25:152–6.CrossRef McPherson E. Discovering the cause of stillbirth. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2013;25:152–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rådestad I, Nordin C, Steineck G, Sjögren B. A comparison of women’s memories of care during pregnancy, labour and delivery after stillbirth or live birth. Midwifery. 1998;14:111–7.CrossRef Rådestad I, Nordin C, Steineck G, Sjögren B. A comparison of women’s memories of care during pregnancy, labour and delivery after stillbirth or live birth. Midwifery. 1998;14:111–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Stormdal Bring H, Hulthén Varli IA, Kublickas M, Papadogiannakis N, Pettersson K. Causes of stillbirth at different gestational ages in singleton pregnancies. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2014;93:86–92.CrossRef Stormdal Bring H, Hulthén Varli IA, Kublickas M, Papadogiannakis N, Pettersson K. Causes of stillbirth at different gestational ages in singleton pregnancies. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2014;93:86–92.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Frøen JF, Smith GC, Gibbons K, Coory M, Gordon A, Ellwood D, McIntyre HD, Fretts R, Ezzati M. major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income Countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011; 16;377(9774):1331–1340. Review. Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Frøen JF, Smith GC, Gibbons K, Coory M, Gordon A, Ellwood D, McIntyre HD, Fretts R, Ezzati M. major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income Countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011; 16;377(9774):1331–1340. Review.
7.
go back to reference Efkarpidis S, Alexopoulos E, Kean L, Liu D, Fay T. Case-control study of factors associated with intrauterine fetal deaths. Medscape Gen Med. 2004;27(6):53. Efkarpidis S, Alexopoulos E, Kean L, Liu D, Fay T. Case-control study of factors associated with intrauterine fetal deaths. Medscape Gen Med. 2004;27(6):53.
10.
go back to reference Varli IH, Petersson K, Bottinga R, Bremme K, Hofsjö A, Holm M, Holste C, Kublickas M, Norman M, Pilo C, Roos N, Sundberg A, Wolff K. Papadogiannakis. The Stockholm classification of stillbirth Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(11):1202–12.CrossRef Varli IH, Petersson K, Bottinga R, Bremme K, Hofsjö A, Holm M, Holste C, Kublickas M, Norman M, Pilo C, Roos N, Sundberg A, Wolff K. Papadogiannakis. The Stockholm classification of stillbirth Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(11):1202–12.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hällgren Granheim U, Lundman B. Kvalitativ innehållsanalys. In: Granskär M, Höglund-Nielsen B, editors. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård (2nd ed., pp. 187–201). Lund: Studentlitteratur AB; 2012. Hällgren Granheim U, Lundman B. Kvalitativ innehållsanalys. In: Granskär M, Höglund-Nielsen B, editors. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård (2nd ed., pp. 187–201). Lund: Studentlitteratur AB; 2012.
14.
go back to reference Schreier M. Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: SAGE publications Ltd; 2012. Schreier M. Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: SAGE publications Ltd; 2012.
15.
go back to reference Smith GC, Fretts RC. Stillbirth. Lancet. 2007;370:1715–25 Epub 2007/11/21.CrossRef Smith GC, Fretts RC. Stillbirth. Lancet. 2007;370:1715–25 Epub 2007/11/21.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Erlandsson K, Lindgren H, Davidsson-Bremborg A, Rådestad I. Womens’s premonitions priorto the death of their baby in utero and how they deal with the feeling that their baby may be unwell. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:28–33.CrossRef Erlandsson K, Lindgren H, Davidsson-Bremborg A, Rådestad I. Womens’s premonitions priorto the death of their baby in utero and how they deal with the feeling that their baby may be unwell. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:28–33.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Trulsson O, Rådestad I. The silent child-mothers’ experiences before, during, and after stillbirth. Birth. 2004;31:189–95.CrossRef Trulsson O, Rådestad I. The silent child-mothers’ experiences before, during, and after stillbirth. Birth. 2004;31:189–95.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Georgsson S, Linde A, Pettersson K, Nilsson R, Rådestad I. To be taken seriously and receive rapid and adequate care - Womens' requests when they consult health care for reduced fetal movements. Midwifery. 2016;40:102–8.CrossRef Georgsson S, Linde A, Pettersson K, Nilsson R, Rådestad I. To be taken seriously and receive rapid and adequate care - Womens' requests when they consult health care for reduced fetal movements. Midwifery. 2016;40:102–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Few women receive a specific explanation of a stillbirth - an online survey of women’s perceptions and thoughts about the cause of their baby’s death
Authors
Berit Höglund
Ingela Rådestad
Ingegerd Hildingsson
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2289-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2019 Go to the issue