Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Societal attitude and behaviours towards women with disabilities in rural Nepal: pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood

Authors: Hridaya R. Devkota, Maria Kett, Nora Groce

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study reviews the attitudes and behaviours in rural Nepalese society towards women with disabilities, their pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood. Society often perceives people with disabilities as different from the norm, and women with disabilities are frequently considered to be doubly discriminated against. Studies show that negative perceptions held in many societies undervalue women with disabilities and that there is discomfort with questions of their control over pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood, thus limiting their sexual and reproductive rights. Public attitudes towards women with disabilities have a significant impact on their life experiences, opportunities and help-seeking behaviours. Numerous studies in the global literature concentrate on attitudes towards persons with disabilities, however there have been few studies in Nepal and fewer still specifically on women.

Methods

A qualitative approach, with six focus group discussions among Dalit and non-Dalit women without disabilities and female community health volunteers on their views and understandings about sexual and reproductive health among women with disabilities, and 17 face-to-face semi-structured interviews with women with physical and sensory disabilities who have had the experience of pregnancy and childbirth was conducted in Rupandehi district in 2015. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated into English before being analysed thematically.

Results

The study found negative societal attitudes with misconceptions about disability based on negative stereotyping and a prejudiced social environment. Issues around the marriage of women with disabilities, their ability to conceive, give birth and safely raise a child were prime concerns identified by the non-disabled study participants. Moreover, many participants with and without disabilities reported anxieties and fears that a disabled woman’s impairment, no matter what type of impairment, would be transmitted to her baby, Participants – both disabled and non-disabled, reported that pregnancy and childbirth of women with disabilities were often viewed as an additional burden for the family and society. Insufficient public knowledge about disability leading to inaccurate blanket assumptions resulted in discrimination, rejection, exclusion and violence against women with disabilities inside and outside their homes. Stigma, stereotyping and prejudice among non-disabled people resulted to exclusion, discrimination and rejection of women with disabilities. Myths, folklore and misconceptions in culture, tradition and religion about disability were found to be deeply rooted and often cited as the basis for individual beliefs and attitudes.

Conclusion

Women with disabilities face significant challenges from family and society in every sphere of their reproductive lives including pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood. There is a need for social policy to raise public awareness and for improved advocacy to mitigate misconception about disability and promote disabled women’s sexual and reproductive rights.
Literature
1.
go back to reference WHO, The World Bank. World report on disability. New York; 2011. WHO, The World Bank. World report on disability. New York; 2011.
2.
go back to reference UN. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol. 2006. UN. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol. 2006.
3.
go back to reference Hosseinpoor AR, Williams JAS, Gautam J, Posarac A, Officer A, Verdes E, et al. Socioeconomic inequality in disability among adults: a multicountry study using the world health survey. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(7):1278–86.CrossRef Hosseinpoor AR, Williams JAS, Gautam J, Posarac A, Officer A, Verdes E, et al. Socioeconomic inequality in disability among adults: a multicountry study using the world health survey. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(7):1278–86.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Arcella S, Curado L, Edwards M, Fingleton M, Kasat V, Lusas CG, et al. A situational analysis of the Sexual and reproductive health of women with disabilities. 2009. Arcella S, Curado L, Edwards M, Fingleton M, Kasat V, Lusas CG, et al. A situational analysis of the Sexual and reproductive health of women with disabilities. 2009.
8.
go back to reference Shrestha E, Nilsson A. Mainstreaming disability in the new development paradigm: evaluation of Norwegian support to promote the rights of persons with disabilities (Nepal country report); 2012. Shrestha E, Nilsson A. Mainstreaming disability in the new development paradigm: evaluation of Norwegian support to promote the rights of persons with disabilities (Nepal country report); 2012.
9.
go back to reference GoN/MoWCSW. National Policy and plan of action on disability. Kathmandu; 2006. GoN/MoWCSW. National Policy and plan of action on disability. Kathmandu; 2006.
12.
go back to reference Namasivayam A, Osuorah DC, Syed R, Antai D. The role of gender inequities in women’s access to reproductive health care : a population-level study of Namibia, Kenya, Nepal, and India. Int J Womens Health. 2012;4:351–64.PubMedPubMedCentral Namasivayam A, Osuorah DC, Syed R, Antai D. The role of gender inequities in women’s access to reproductive health care : a population-level study of Namibia, Kenya, Nepal, and India. Int J Womens Health. 2012;4:351–64.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Goffman E. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. In: First Touc. New York: Simon and Schuster (Originally published by Prentice-Hall Inc.); 1963. Goffman E. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. In: First Touc. New York: Simon and Schuster (Originally published by Prentice-Hall Inc.); 1963.
16.
go back to reference Link BG, Phelan JC. Conceptualizing Stigma. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27(Lewis 1998):363–85.CrossRef Link BG, Phelan JC. Conceptualizing Stigma. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27(Lewis 1998):363–85.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Brodwin MG, Frederick PC. Sexuality and Societal beliefs regarding persons living with disabilities. J Rehabil. 2010;76(4):37–41. Brodwin MG, Frederick PC. Sexuality and Societal beliefs regarding persons living with disabilities. J Rehabil. 2010;76(4):37–41.
19.
go back to reference Simkhada PP, Shyangdan D, van Teijlingen ER, Kadel S, Stephen J, Gurung T. Women’s knowledge of and attitude towards disability in rural Nepal. Disabil Rehabil 2012;35(June 2012):1–8. Simkhada PP, Shyangdan D, van Teijlingen ER, Kadel S, Stephen J, Gurung T. Women’s knowledge of and attitude towards disability in rural Nepal. Disabil Rehabil 2012;35(June 2012):1–8.
20.
go back to reference Westbrook MT, Legge V, Penny M. Attitudes towards disabilities in a multicultural society. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36(5):615–23.CrossRef Westbrook MT, Legge V, Penny M. Attitudes towards disabilities in a multicultural society. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36(5):615–23.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kopala M, Keitel M. Handbook of counseling women. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2003. p. 1–635. Kopala M, Keitel M. Handbook of counseling women. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2003. p. 1–635.
24.
go back to reference GoN/NPC/CBS. National population and housing census 2011 (national report). Vol. 01. 2012. GoN/NPC/CBS. National population and housing census 2011 (national report). Vol. 01. 2012.
25.
go back to reference Sharma P, Guha-Khasnobis B, Raj Khanal D. Nepal human development report 2014: Beyond Geography, Unlocking Human Potential. In: Luchsinger G, editor. . Kathmandu: Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission & United Nations Development Programme; 2014. p. 126. Sharma P, Guha-Khasnobis B, Raj Khanal D. Nepal human development report 2014: Beyond Geography, Unlocking Human Potential. In: Luchsinger G, editor. . Kathmandu: Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission & United Nations Development Programme; 2014. p. 126.
28.
go back to reference GoN/NPC/CBS. National population and housing census 2011 (village development committee/municipality). Vol 02. 2012. GoN/NPC/CBS. National population and housing census 2011 (village development committee/municipality). Vol 02. 2012.
29.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Lewis JR& J, editor. Sage Publications; 2003. 199–262 p. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Lewis JR& J, editor. Sage Publications; 2003. 199–262 p.
31.
go back to reference Munyi CW. Past and Present Perceptions Towards Disability: A Historical Perspective. Disabil Stud Q. 2012;32:2.CrossRef Munyi CW. Past and Present Perceptions Towards Disability: A Historical Perspective. Disabil Stud Q. 2012;32:2.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sukhramani N, Verma S. Disability as diversity: the Indian perception. In: Lutz R, editor. Diversity and respect - problems of perception in the global agenda for social work. Oldenburg: Paulo Freire Verlag; 2013. p. 109–22. Sukhramani N, Verma S. Disability as diversity: the Indian perception. In: Lutz R, editor. Diversity and respect - problems of perception in the global agenda for social work. Oldenburg: Paulo Freire Verlag; 2013. p. 109–22.
33.
go back to reference The World Bank. People with disabilities in India : from commitments to outcomes: World Bank; 2007. The World Bank. People with disabilities in India : from commitments to outcomes: World Bank; 2007.
34.
go back to reference Allu Jeevan Rao MS and NR. Awareness of & Attitudes to Disability in Rural and Urban Communities of Andhra Pradesh, India -- A Comparative Study. Int J Disabil Community Rehabil. 2003;2:1. Allu Jeevan Rao MS and NR. Awareness of & Attitudes to Disability in Rural and Urban Communities of Andhra Pradesh, India -- A Comparative Study. Int J Disabil Community Rehabil. 2003;2:1.
38.
go back to reference Dalal AK. Social interventions to moderate discriminatory attitudes: the case of the physically challenged in India. Psychol Health Med. 2006;11(3):374–82.CrossRef Dalal AK. Social interventions to moderate discriminatory attitudes: the case of the physically challenged in India. Psychol Health Med. 2006;11(3):374–82.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference UNESCAP. Disablity livelihood and poverty in Asia and the Pacific. In: Krairiksh N, editor. : ESCAP Social Development Division; 2012. p. 1–43. UNESCAP. Disablity livelihood and poverty in Asia and the Pacific. In: Krairiksh N, editor. : ESCAP Social Development Division; 2012. p. 1–43.
41.
go back to reference Mehrotra N. Disability, gender and caste intersections in indian economy. Disabil Intersecting Statuses. Res Soc Sci Disabil. 2013;7:295–324.CrossRef Mehrotra N. Disability, gender and caste intersections in indian economy. Disabil Intersecting Statuses. Res Soc Sci Disabil. 2013;7:295–324.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Societal attitude and behaviours towards women with disabilities in rural Nepal: pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood
Authors
Hridaya R. Devkota
Maria Kett
Nora Groce
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2171-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2019 Go to the issue