Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

Tight or less tight glycaemic targets for women with gestational diabetes mellitus for reducing maternal and perinatal morbidity? (TARGET): study protocol for a stepped wedge randomised trial

Authors: Caroline A. Crowther, Jane M. Alsweiler, Ruth Hughes, Julie Brown, for the Target Study Group

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is strongly associated with significant adverse maternal and perinatal health outcomes that have lifelong consequences. Treatment for women with GDM aims to normalise maternal blood glucose concentrations to reduce these adverse health risks. Target recommendations for glycaemic control in women with GDM vary amongst international organisations. All their recommendations rely on consensus, as there have been no published randomised trials that compare different intensities of glucose control in women with GDM. The TARGET Trial aims to determine whether tighter targets for glycaemic control in women with GDM compared with less tight targets, reduce maternal and perinatal morbidity without adverse health consequences.

Methods/design

Using a stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial the 10 participating hospitals will be randomised to the timing of the change from the less tight to the tighter glycaemic target period. During the less tight target period, all health professionals at the hospital will aim to use the less tight glycaemic targets for treatment of women with GDM (fasting plasma glucose < 5.5 mmol/L; 1 h postprandial < 8.0 mmol/L; 2 h postprandial < 7.0 mmol/L). During the tighter target period all health professionals at the hospital will aim to use the tighter glycaemic targets for treatment of women with GDM (fasting plasma glucose ≤5.0 mmol/L, 1 h postprandial ≤7.4 mmol/L; 2 h postprandial ≤6.7 mmol/L). The primary study outcome is large for gestational age infant (birth weight > 90th centile). A sample size of 1080 participants will detect a treatment difference of 6% in the proportion of large for gestational age babies from 13% with less tight glycaemic targets to 7% with tighter targets, assuming an intra-cluster correlation coefficient of 0.05.

Discussion

The TARGET Trial will provide high-level evidence of direct relevance for clinical practice. If tighter treatment targets for women with GDM clearly result in significantly fewer large for gestational age infants and less adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes then they should be recommended for women with GDM. This would be of great importance to these women, their children, health services and communities.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry - ACTRN 12615000282583.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alberti K, Zimmet P. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus: World Health Organisation report. Diabet Med. 1998;15(7):539–53.CrossRef Alberti K, Zimmet P. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus: World Health Organisation report. Diabet Med. 1998;15(7):539–53.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cheung NW, Byth K. Population health significance of gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(7):2005–9.CrossRef Cheung NW, Byth K. Population health significance of gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(7):2005–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (UK). Diabetes in Pregnancy: Management of Diabetes and its Complications from Preconception to the Postnatal Period. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2008. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (UK). Diabetes in Pregnancy: Management of Diabetes and its Complications from Preconception to the Postnatal Period. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2008.
4.
go back to reference Sacks DA, Hadden DR, Maresh M, Deerochanawong C, Dyer AR, Metzger BE, et al. For the HAPO study cooperative research group. Frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus at collaborating centers based on IADPSG consensus panel-recommended criteria: the hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome (HAPO) study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:526–8.CrossRef Sacks DA, Hadden DR, Maresh M, Deerochanawong C, Dyer AR, Metzger BE, et al. For the HAPO study cooperative research group. Frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus at collaborating centers based on IADPSG consensus panel-recommended criteria: the hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome (HAPO) study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:526–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ministry of Health. Guideline for the screening, diagnosis and treatment of women with gestational diabetes in New Zealand - Ministry of Health; 2014. Ministry of Health. Guideline for the screening, diagnosis and treatment of women with gestational diabetes in New Zealand - Ministry of Health; 2014.
7.
go back to reference Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS. The Australian carbohydrate intolerance study in pregnant women (ACHOIS) trial group. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(24):2477–86.CrossRef Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS. The Australian carbohydrate intolerance study in pregnant women (ACHOIS) trial group. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(24):2477–86.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Antoniou G, Baghurst P, Robinson JS. Screening for gestational diabetes: the effect of varying blood glucose definitions in the prediction of adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;47(4):307–12.CrossRef Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Antoniou G, Baghurst P, Robinson JS. Screening for gestational diabetes: the effect of varying blood glucose definitions in the prediction of adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;47(4):307–12.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Boney CM, Verma A, Tucker R, Vohr BR. Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics. 2005;115(3):e290–6.CrossRef Boney CM, Verma A, Tucker R, Vohr BR. Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics. 2005;115(3):e290–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference The HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(19):1991–2002.CrossRef The HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(19):1991–2002.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Catalano PM, Thomas A, Huston-Presley L, Amini SB. Increased fetal adiposity: a very sensitive marker of abnormal in utero development. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(6):1698–704.CrossRef Catalano PM, Thomas A, Huston-Presley L, Amini SB. Increased fetal adiposity: a very sensitive marker of abnormal in utero development. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(6):1698–704.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Franks PW, Looker HC, Kobes S, Touger L, Tataranni PA, Hanson RL, et al. Gestational glucose tolerance and risk of type 2 diabetes in young Pima Indian offspring. Diabetes. 2006;55(2):460–5.CrossRef Franks PW, Looker HC, Kobes S, Touger L, Tataranni PA, Hanson RL, et al. Gestational glucose tolerance and risk of type 2 diabetes in young Pima Indian offspring. Diabetes. 2006;55(2):460–5.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Carpenter MW, Ramin SM, Casey B, et al. For the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of child and human development maternal-fetal medicine units. A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(14):1339–48.CrossRef Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Carpenter MW, Ramin SM, Casey B, et al. For the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of child and human development maternal-fetal medicine units. A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(14):1339–48.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, Chen R, Rosenn B, Hod M, Langer O. Diurnal glycemic profile in obese and normal weight non-diabetic pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:949–53.CrossRef Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, Chen R, Rosenn B, Hod M, Langer O. Diurnal glycemic profile in obese and normal weight non-diabetic pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:949–53.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hernandez TL, Friedman JE, Van Pelt RE, Barbour LA. Patterns of Glycemia in Normal pregnancy: should the current therapeutic targets be challenged? Diabetes Care. 2011;34(7):1660–8.CrossRef Hernandez TL, Friedman JE, Van Pelt RE, Barbour LA. Patterns of Glycemia in Normal pregnancy: should the current therapeutic targets be challenged? Diabetes Care. 2011;34(7):1660–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Prutsky GJ, Domecq JP, Wang Z, Carranza Leon BG, Elraiyah T, Nabhan M, et al. Glucose targets in pregnant women with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(11):4319–24.CrossRef Prutsky GJ, Domecq JP, Wang Z, Carranza Leon BG, Elraiyah T, Nabhan M, et al. Glucose targets in pregnant women with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(11):4319–24.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Metzger BE, Buchanan TA, Coustan DR, de Leiva A, Dunger DB, Hadden DR, et al. Summary and recommendations of the fifth international workshop-conference on gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(Suppl 2):S251–60.CrossRef Metzger BE, Buchanan TA, Coustan DR, de Leiva A, Dunger DB, Hadden DR, et al. Summary and recommendations of the fifth international workshop-conference on gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(Suppl 2):S251–60.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Network SIG. Management of diabetes. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2010. Network SIG. Management of diabetes. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2010.
19.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical Care in Diabetes - 2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Suppl 1):S11–66.CrossRef American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical Care in Diabetes - 2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Suppl 1):S11–66.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nankervis A, McIntyre HD, Moses R, Ross GP, Callaway L, Porter C, et al. For the Australasian Debetes in Pregnancy Society. Australasian Diabetes In Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) Consensus Guidelines for the Testing and Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Australia. 2013. Nankervis A, McIntyre HD, Moses R, Ross GP, Callaway L, Porter C, et al. For the Australasian Debetes in Pregnancy Society. Australasian Diabetes In Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) Consensus Guidelines for the Testing and Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Australia. 2013.
21.
go back to reference Hoffman L, Nolan C, Wilson JD, Oats JJ, Simmons D. Gestational diabetes mellitus--management guidelines. The Australasian diabetes in pregnancy society. Med J Aust. 1998;169(2):93–7.PubMed Hoffman L, Nolan C, Wilson JD, Oats JJ, Simmons D. Gestational diabetes mellitus--management guidelines. The Australasian diabetes in pregnancy society. Med J Aust. 1998;169(2):93–7.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Combs CA, Moses RG. Aiming at new targets to achieve Normoglycemia during pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(10):2331–2.CrossRef Combs CA, Moses RG. Aiming at new targets to achieve Normoglycemia during pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(10):2331–2.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference IADPSG Consensus Panel. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010;33(3):676–82. IADPSG Consensus Panel. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010;33(3):676–82.
24.
go back to reference Hussey M, Hughes J. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28(2):182–91.CrossRef Hussey M, Hughes J. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28(2):182–91.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mdege ND, Man M-S, Taylor CA, Torgerson DJ. Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(9):936–48.CrossRef Mdege ND, Man M-S, Taylor CA, Torgerson DJ. Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(9):936–48.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Woertman W. Stepped wedge designs could reduce the required sample size in cluster randomized trials. J Clini Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):752–8.CrossRef Woertman W. Stepped wedge designs could reduce the required sample size in cluster randomized trials. J Clini Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):752–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hughes J, Goldenberg RL, Wilfert CM, Valentine M, Mwinga KG, Guay LA, et al. Design of the HIV prevention trials network (HPTN) protocol 054: a cluster randomised crossover trial to evaluate combined access to Nevirapine in developing countries. UW Biostatistics Working Paper Series. 2003. Hughes J, Goldenberg RL, Wilfert CM, Valentine M, Mwinga KG, Guay LA, et al. Design of the HIV prevention trials network (HPTN) protocol 054: a cluster randomised crossover trial to evaluate combined access to Nevirapine in developing countries. UW Biostatistics Working Paper Series. 2003.
28.
go back to reference Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth charts for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:59.CrossRef Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth charts for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:59.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Brown CA, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge design: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:54.CrossRef Brown CA, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge design: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:54.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Tight or less tight glycaemic targets for women with gestational diabetes mellitus for reducing maternal and perinatal morbidity? (TARGET): study protocol for a stepped wedge randomised trial
Authors
Caroline A. Crowther
Jane M. Alsweiler
Ruth Hughes
Julie Brown
for the Target Study Group
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2060-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018 Go to the issue