Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Dignity and respect during pregnancy and childbirth: a survey of the experience of disabled women

Authors: Jenny Hall, Vanora Hundley, Bethan Collins, Jillian Ireland

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the increasing number of women with disability globally becoming pregnant, there is currently limited research about their experiences. A national survey of women’s experience of dignity and respect during pregnancy and childbirth raised concerns about the possibility of women with disability having unequal care with overall less choice and control. To address this further we conducted a study to explore the experiences of dignity and respect in childbirth of women with disability.

Methods

The study involved a self-selecting, convenience sample of 37 women who had given birth in the United Kingdom and Ireland and had completed an internet-based survey. Women were identified through online networks and groups of and for disabled parents and for people with specific medical conditions. Data were collected using an online survey tool. Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Thematic analysis was used for open questions.

Results

Despite generally positive responses, just over half of the group of women expressed dissatisfaction with care provision. Only 19% thought that reasonable adjustments or accommodations had been made for them (7/37). When reasonable adjustments were not in place, participants’ independence and dignity were undermined. More than a quarter of women felt they were treated less favourably because of their disability (10/37, 27%). At all points in the pregnancy continuum more than a quarter of women felt their rights were either poorly or very poorly respected; however this was greatest in the postnatal period (11/35, 31%). In addition, more than half of the women (20/36, 56%) felt that maternity care providers did not have appropriate awareness of or attitudes to disability.

Conclusions

Women’s experiences of dignity and respect in childbirth revealed that a significant proportion of women felt their rights were poorly respected and that they were treated less favourably because of their disability. This suggests that there is a need to look more closely at individualised care. It was also evident that more consideration is required to improve attitudes of maternity care providers to disability and services need to adapt to provide reasonable adjustments to accommodate disability, including improving continuity of carer.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Redshaw M, Malouf R, Gao H, Gray R. Women with disability: the experience of maternity care during pregnancy, labour and birth and the postnatal period. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013;13:174.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Redshaw M, Malouf R, Gao H, Gray R. Women with disability: the experience of maternity care during pregnancy, labour and birth and the postnatal period. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013;13:174.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Šumilo D, Kurinczuk JJ, Redshaw ME, Gray R. Prevalence and impact of disability in women who had recently given birth in the UK. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2012;12(3):12. Šumilo D, Kurinczuk JJ, Redshaw ME, Gray R. Prevalence and impact of disability in women who had recently given birth in the UK. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2012;12(3):12.
6.
go back to reference S United States Public Health Service. Surgeon general’s call to action to improve the health and wellness of persons with disabilities. Office of the Surgeon General, Rockville, MD: Public Health Service; 2005. S United States Public Health Service. Surgeon general’s call to action to improve the health and wellness of persons with disabilities. Office of the Surgeon General, Rockville, MD: Public Health Service; 2005.
7.
go back to reference Thomas C, Curtis P. Having a baby: some disabled women's reproductive experiences. Midwifery. 1997;13(4):202–9.CrossRefPubMed Thomas C, Curtis P. Having a baby: some disabled women's reproductive experiences. Midwifery. 1997;13(4):202–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
10.
go back to reference Malouf R, Redshaw M, Kurinczuk JJ, Gray R. Systematic review of heath care interventions to improve outcomes for women with disability and their family during pregnancy, birth and postnatal period. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14(1):31. Malouf R, Redshaw M, Kurinczuk JJ, Gray R. Systematic review of heath care interventions to improve outcomes for women with disability and their family during pregnancy, birth and postnatal period. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14(1):31.
11.
go back to reference Bradbury-Jones C, Breckenridge JP, Devaney J, Duncan F, Kroll T, Lazenbatt A, et al. Priorities and strategies for improving disabled women's access to maternity services when they are affected by domestic abuse: a multi-method study using concept maps. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth. 2015;15:1–17.CrossRef Bradbury-Jones C, Breckenridge JP, Devaney J, Duncan F, Kroll T, Lazenbatt A, et al. Priorities and strategies for improving disabled women's access to maternity services when they are affected by domestic abuse: a multi-method study using concept maps. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth. 2015;15:1–17.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Walsh-Gallagher D, Sinclair M, Mc CR. The ambiguity of disabled women's experiences of pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood: a phenomenological understanding. Midwifery. 2012;28:156–62.CrossRefPubMed Walsh-Gallagher D, Sinclair M, Mc CR. The ambiguity of disabled women's experiences of pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood: a phenomenological understanding. Midwifery. 2012;28:156–62.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Walsh-Gallagher D, Mc Conkey R, Sinclair M, Clarke R. Normalising birth for women with a disability: the challenges facing practitioners. Midwifery. 2013;29:294–9.CrossRefPubMed Walsh-Gallagher D, Mc Conkey R, Sinclair M, Clarke R. Normalising birth for women with a disability: the challenges facing practitioners. Midwifery. 2013;29:294–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Huberman AM, Miles MB. The qualitative researcher's companion: thousand oaks: Sage; 2002. Huberman AM, Miles MB. The qualitative researcher's companion: thousand oaks: Sage; 2002.
19.
go back to reference Malouf R, Henderson J, Redshaw M. Access and quality of maternity care for disabled women during pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period in England: data from a national survey. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7) Malouf R, Henderson J, Redshaw M. Access and quality of maternity care for disabled women during pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period in England: data from a national survey. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7)
20.
go back to reference Bethlehem J. Selection Bias in web surveys. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique. 2010;2:161. Bethlehem J. Selection Bias in web surveys. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique. 2010;2:161.
21.
go back to reference Lowe L. NK. Dignity in childbirth. Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing. JOGNN. 2014;43(2):137–8.CrossRefPubMed Lowe L. NK. Dignity in childbirth. Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing. JOGNN. 2014;43(2):137–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Dignity and respect during pregnancy and childbirth: a survey of the experience of disabled women
Authors
Jenny Hall
Vanora Hundley
Bethan Collins
Jillian Ireland
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1950-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018 Go to the issue