Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

‘Elective caesarean section at 38–39 weeks gestation compared to > 39 weeks on neonatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study

Authors: Reihaneh Pirjani, Motahareh Afrakhteh, Mahdi Sepidarkish, Shahin Nariman, Mahboobeh Shirazi, Ashraf Moini, Ladan Hosseini

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study was conducted to compare neonatal complications in scheduled cesarean sections (CS) between 38 and 39 gestational weeks with CS performed after 39 gestational weeks in Iranian low -risk pregnant women.

Methods

In this cohort study, 2086 patients were enrolled based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The neonates were evaluated in terms of the following items: transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), sepsis, need for NICU hospitalization, birth weight, birth height, head circumference, and the first minute and fifth minute Apgar score. Several multiple logistic regression models were performed for each response variable (adverse outcome) separately.

Results

The incidence of NICU admission was significantly higher in neonates born at 38–39 gestational weeks than those who were born after 39 gestational weeks. No significant differences were found in the incidence of neonatal sepsis, TTN, and RDS between the two groups.

Conclusion

According to our study results, elective CS at 38–9 weeks’ gestation is associated with a higher rate of TTN and NICU admission in comparison with elective CS performed after 39 completed gestational weeks.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Phaloprakarn C, Tangjitgamol S, Manusirivithaya S. Timing of elective cesarean delivery at term and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes among Thai and other Southeast Asian pregnant women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42(8):936–43.CrossRefPubMed Phaloprakarn C, Tangjitgamol S, Manusirivithaya S. Timing of elective cesarean delivery at term and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes among Thai and other Southeast Asian pregnant women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42(8):936–43.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Glavind J, Uldbjerg N. Elective cesarean delivery at 38 and 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal risks. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(2):121–7.CrossRefPubMed Glavind J, Uldbjerg N. Elective cesarean delivery at 38 and 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal risks. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(2):121–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Doan E, Gibbons K, Tudehope D. The timing of elective caesarean deliveries and early neonatal outcomes in singleton infants born 37–41 weeks' gestation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;54(4):340–7.CrossRefPubMed Doan E, Gibbons K, Tudehope D. The timing of elective caesarean deliveries and early neonatal outcomes in singleton infants born 37–41 weeks' gestation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;54(4):340–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Spong CY. Defining “term” pregnancy: recommendations from the defining “term” pregnancy workgroup. JAMA. 2013;309(23):2445–6.CrossRefPubMed Spong CY. Defining “term” pregnancy: recommendations from the defining “term” pregnancy workgroup. JAMA. 2013;309(23):2445–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Glavind J, et al. Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120(9):1123–32.CrossRef Glavind J, et al. Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120(9):1123–32.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Matsuo K, et al. Is 38 weeks late enough for elective cesarean delivery? Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;100(1):90–1.CrossRef Matsuo K, et al. Is 38 weeks late enough for elective cesarean delivery? Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;100(1):90–1.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Balchin I, et al. Timing of planned cesarean delivery by racial group. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(3):659–66.CrossRefPubMed Balchin I, et al. Timing of planned cesarean delivery by racial group. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(3):659–66.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Terada K, et al. Timing of Elective Cesarean Singleton Delivery and Neonatal Respiratory Outcomes at a Japanese Perinatal Center. Journal of Nippon Medical School. 2014;81(4):285–8.CrossRefPubMed Terada K, et al. Timing of Elective Cesarean Singleton Delivery and Neonatal Respiratory Outcomes at a Japanese Perinatal Center. Journal of Nippon Medical School. 2014;81(4):285–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wilmink FA, et al. Neonatal outcome following elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks of gestation: a 7-year retrospective analysis of a national registry. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;202(3):250. e1–8.CrossRef Wilmink FA, et al. Neonatal outcome following elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks of gestation: a 7-year retrospective analysis of a national registry. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;202(3):250. e1–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Patel RR, et al. Does gestation vary by ethnic group? A London-based study of over 122 000 pregnancies with spontaneous onset of labour. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33(1):107–13.CrossRefPubMed Patel RR, et al. Does gestation vary by ethnic group? A London-based study of over 122 000 pregnancies with spontaneous onset of labour. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33(1):107–13.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Robinson CJ, et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes: a cost analysis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;202(6):632. e1–6.CrossRef Robinson CJ, et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes: a cost analysis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;202(6):632. e1–6.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Daniel S, et al. Comparison of fetal outcomes of emergency and elective caesarean sections in a teaching hospital in Kerala. Academic medical journal of India. 2014;2(1):32–6. Daniel S, et al. Comparison of fetal outcomes of emergency and elective caesarean sections in a teaching hospital in Kerala. Academic medical journal of India. 2014;2(1):32–6.
14.
go back to reference Smith GC, Pell JP, Bobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet. 2003;362(9398):1779–84.CrossRefPubMed Smith GC, Pell JP, Bobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet. 2003;362(9398):1779–84.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wood S, et al. The risk of unexplained antepartum stillbirth in second pregnancies following caesarean section in the first pregnancy. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(6):726–31.CrossRef Wood S, et al. The risk of unexplained antepartum stillbirth in second pregnancies following caesarean section in the first pregnancy. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(6):726–31.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tita AT, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Varner MW, et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and maternal perioperative outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(2 Pt 1):280–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tita AT, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Varner MW, et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and maternal perioperative outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(2 Pt 1):280–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Zanardo V, et al. Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean delivery. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93(5):643–7.CrossRefPubMed Zanardo V, et al. Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean delivery. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93(5):643–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
‘Elective caesarean section at 38–39 weeks gestation compared to > 39 weeks on neonatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study
Authors
Reihaneh Pirjani
Motahareh Afrakhteh
Mahdi Sepidarkish
Shahin Nariman
Mahboobeh Shirazi
Ashraf Moini
Ladan Hosseini
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1785-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018 Go to the issue