Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Experiences of gestational diabetes and gestational diabetes care: a focus group and interview study

Authors: Judith Parsons, Katherine Sparrow, Khalida Ismail, Katharine Hunt, Helen Rogers, Angus Forbes

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly common condition of pregnancy. It is associated with adverse fetal, infant and maternal outcomes, as well as an increased risk of GDM in future pregnancies and type 2 diabetes for both mother and offspring. Previous studies have shown that GDM can result in an emotionally distressing pregnancy, but there is little research on the patient experience of GDM care, especially of a demographically diverse UK population. The aim of this research was to explore the experiences of GDM and GDM care for a group of women attending a large diabetes pregnancy unit in southeast London, UK, in order to improve care.

Methods

Framework analysis was used to support an integrated analysis of data from six focus groups with 35 women and semi-structured interviews with 15 women, held in 2015. Participants were purposively sampled and were representative of the population being studied in terms of ethnicity, age, deprivation score and body mass index (BMI).

Results

We identified seven themes: the disrupted pregnancy, projected anxiety, reproductive asceticism, women as baby machines, perceived stigma, lack of shared understanding and postpartum abandonment. These themes highlight the often distressing experience of GDM. While most women were grateful for the intensive support they received during pregnancy, the costs to their personal autonomy were high. Women described feeling valued solely as a means to produce a healthy infant, and felt chastised if they failed to adhere to the behaviours required to achieve this. This sometimes had an enduring impact to the potential detriment of women’s long-term psychological and physical health.

Conclusions

This study reveals the experiences of a demographically diverse group of patients with GDM, reflecting findings from previous studies globally and extending analysis to the context of improving care. Healthcare delivery may need to be reoriented to improve the pregnancy experience and help ensure women are engaged and attentive to their own health, particularly after birth, without compromising clinical pregnancy outcomes. Areas for consideration in GDM healthcare include: improved management of emotional responses to GDM; a more motivational approach; rethinking the medicalisation of care; and improved postpartum care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Zhu Y, Zhang C. Prevalence of gestational diabetes and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes: a global perspective. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;16(1):7.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Ferrara A. Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(Supplement 2):S141–6.PubMedCrossRef
4.
HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;2008(358):1991–2002.
5.
Kim C, Berger DK, Chamany S. Recurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(5):1314–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Bellamy L, Casas J-P, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373(9677):1773–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Dabelea D, Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ. Effect of diabetes in pregnancy on offspring: follow-up research in the pima Indians. J Matern Fetal Med. 2000;9(1):83–8.PubMed
8.
Krishnaveni GV, Veena SR, Hill JC, Kehoe S, Karat SC, Fall CH. Intrauterine exposure to maternal diabetes is associated with higher adiposity and insulin resistance and clustering of cardiovascular risk markers in Indian children. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(2):402–4.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(24):2477–86.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Rowan JA, Hague WM, Gao W, Battin MR, Moore MP. Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(19):2003–15.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Carpenter MW, Ramin SM, Casey B, Wapner RJ, Varner MW, Rouse DJ, Thorp JM Jr. A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(14):1339–48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Hughes C. Empowerment: challenges during pregnancy. J Diabetes Nurs. 2007;11(8):288–94.
13.
Thomas H. Women's postnatal experience following a medically complicated pregnancy. Health Care Women Int. 2004;25(1):76–87.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Walker J. NICE guidance on diabetes in pregnancy: management of diabetes and its complications from preconception to the postnatal period. NICE clinical guideline 63. London, march 2008. Diabet Med. 2008;25(9):1025–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Parsons J, Ismail K, Amiel S, Forbes A. Perceptions among women with gestational diabetes. Qual Health Res. 2014;24(4):575–85.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Kaptein S, Evans M, McTavish S, Banerjee AT, Feig DS, Lowe J, Lipscombe LL. The subjective impact of a diagnosis of gestational diabetes among ethnically diverse pregnant women: a qualitative study. Can J Diabetes. 2015;39(2):117–22.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Morrison MK, Lowe JM, Collins CE. Australian women's experiences of living with gestational diabetes. Women Birth. 2014;27(1):52–7.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Leung AS, Garrett KY, Zheng SZ, Smith LA. Experience with patients with gestational diabetes established by the international association of the diabetes and pregnancy study groups. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:66S.CrossRef
19.
Ghaffari F, Salsali M, Rahnavard Z, Parvizy S. Compliance with treatment regimen in women with gestational diabetes: living with fear. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014;19(7 Suppl1):S103.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Jarvie R. Lived experiences of women with co-existing BMI≥ 30 and gestational diabetes mellitus. Midwifery. 2017 Jun 30;49:79–86.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Van Ryswyk E, Middleton P, Shute E, Hague W, Crowther C. Women's views and knowledge regarding healthcare seeking for gestational diabetes in the postpartum period: a systematic review of qualitative/survey studies. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;110(2):109–22.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Lie M, Hayes L, Lewis-Barned N, May C, White M, Bell R. Preventing type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes: women's experiences and implications for diabetes prevention interventions. Diabet Med. 2013;30(8):986–93.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Hedderson MM, Darbinian JA, Ferrara A. Disparities in the risk of gestational diabetes by race-ethnicity and country of birth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2010;24(5):441–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Draffin CR, Alderdice FA, McCance DR, Maresh M, Harper MR, McSorley O, Holmes VA. Exploring the needs, concerns and knowledge of women diagnosed with gestational diabetes: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2016;40:141–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Lambert SD, Loiselle CG. Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(2):228–37.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Carey M. The group effect in focus groups: planning, implementing, and. Crit Issues Qual Res Methods. 1994;225.
27.
Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illn. 1994;16(1):103–21.CrossRef
28.
29.
Stokes D, Bergin R. Methodology or “methodolatry”? An evaluation of focus groups and depth interviews. Qual Mark Res Int J. 2006;9(1):26–37.CrossRef
30.
31.
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;2002(346):393–403.
32.
Silverman D. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: SAGE Publications Limited; 2013.
33.
Krueger RA, Casey MA. Designing and conducting focus group interviews. Soc Anal Selected Tools Tech. 2002;4(23):4–24.
34.
Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Limited; 2011.
35.
Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. Qual Res Companion. 2002;573(2002):305–29.
36.
Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):117.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Ward DJ, Furber C, Tierney S, Swallow V. Using framework analysis in nursing research: a worked example. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(11):2423–31.PubMed
38.
Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE Publications Limited; 2013.
39.
Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267(16):2221–6.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean?(or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681–92.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. New York: Guilford press; 2012.
42.
Furber CM, McGowan L. A qualitative study of the experiences of women who are obese and pregnant in the UK. Midwifery. 2011;27(4):437–44.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Figueroa Gray M, Hsu C, Kiel L, Dublin S. “It’s a Very Big Burden on Me”: Women’s Experiences Using Insulin for Gestational Diabetes. Matern Child Health J. 2017;(8):1678–685.
44.
Chaboyer W, Kendall E, Kendall M, Foster M. Transfer out of intensive care: a qualitative exploration of patient and family perceptions. Aust Crit Care. 2005;18(4):138–45.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Devsam BU, Bogossian FE, Peacock AS. An interpretive review of women's experiences of gestational diabetes mellitus: proposing a framework to enhance midwifery assessment. Women BIRTH. 2013;26(2):e69–76.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Hui AL, Sevenhuysen G, Harvey D, Salamon E. Stress and anxiety in women with gestational diabetes during dietary management. Diabetes Educ. 2014;40(5):668–77.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Carolan M. Women’s experiences of gestational diabetes self-management: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2013;29(6):637–45.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Poston L, Bell R, Croker H, Flynn AC, Godfrey KM, Goff L, Hayes L, Khazaezadeh N, Nelson SM, Oteng-Ntim E. Effect of a behavioural intervention in obese pregnant women (the UPBEAT study): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diab Endocrinol. 2015;3(10):767–77.CrossRef
49.
Kübler-Ross E. On death and dying: What the dying have to teach doctors, nurses, clergy and their own families. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd; 2009.
50.
Evans MK, O’Brien B. Gestational diabetes: the meaning of an at-risk pregnancy. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(1):66–81.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Berg M, Hotikasalo M-L. Pregnancy and diabetes-a hermeneutic phenomenological study of women's experiences. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2000;21(1):39–48.CrossRef
52.
Lupton D. ‘Precious cargo’: Foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Crit Public Health. 2012;22(3):329–40.CrossRef
53.
Petchesky RP. Fetal images: the power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. Fem Stud. 1987;13(2):263–92.CrossRef
54.
Ettorre E. A critical look at the new genetics: conceptualizing the links between reproduction, gender and bodies. Crit Public Health. 2002;12(3):237–50.CrossRef
55.
Mold F, Forbes A. Patients’ and professionals’ experiences and perspectives of obesity in health-care settings: a synthesis of current research. Health Expect. 2013;16(2):119–42.PubMedCrossRef
56.
57.
Sturges JE, Hanrahan KJ. Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: a research note. Qual Res. 2004;4(1):107–18.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Experiences of gestational diabetes and gestational diabetes care: a focus group and interview study
Authors
Judith Parsons
Katherine Sparrow
Khalida Ismail
Katharine Hunt
Helen Rogers
Angus Forbes
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1657-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Automated electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions for monitoring of pregnancy: feasibility and prospects

Research article

Handheld ultrasound to avert maternal and neonatal deaths in 2 regions of the Philippines: an iBuntis® intervention study

Research article

Decision-making for birth location among women in Pakistan: evidence from national survey

Research article

Development of a tailored strategy to improve postpartum hemorrhage guideline adherence

Research article

Reasons for non-participation in malformation scans in Denmark: a cohort study

Research article

Dietary practices and associated factors during pregnancy in northwestern Ethiopia