Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Cesarean deliveries and maternal weight retention

Authors: Kandice A. Kapinos, Olga Yakusheva, Marianne Weiss

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cesarean delivery accounts for nearly one-third of all births in the U.S. and contributes to an additional $38 billion in healthcare costs each year. Although Cesarean delivery has a long record of improving maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity, increased utilization over time has yielded public health concerns and calls for reductions. Observational evidence suggests Cesarean delivery is associated with increased maternal postpartum weight, which may have significant implications for the obesity epidemic. Previous literature, however, typically does not address selection biases stemming from correlations of pre-pregnancy weight and reproductive health with Cesarean delivery.

Methods

We used fetal malpresentation as a natural experiment as it predicts Cesarean delivery but is uncorrelated with pre-pregnancy weight or maternal health. We used hospital administrative data (including fields used in vital birth record) from the state of Wisconsin from 2006 to 2013 to create a sample of mothers with at least two births. Using propensity score methods, we compared maternal weight prior to the second pregnancy of mothers who delivered via Cesarean due to fetal malpresentation to mothers who deliver vaginally.

Results

We found no evidence that Cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy causally leads to greater maternal weight, BMI, or movement to a higher BMI classification prior to the second pregnancy.

Conclusions

After accounting for correlations between pre-pregnancy weight, gestational weight gain, and mode of delivery, there is no evidence of a causal link between Cesarean delivery and maternal weight retention.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Among first-time mothers with a term malpresenting fetus, 92% delivered via Cesarean in 2013 based on the authors’ calculations using the 2013 National Vital Statistics Systems births data.
 
2
Restricting the sample to mothers who deliver full-term (between 37 and 42 weeks of gestation) yields similar results to those presented here.
 
3
Based on authors’ calculations using the National Vital Statistics System births data for 2013, 3.34% of all births were delivered via Cesarean due to malpresentation.
 
4
Authors’ calculations using the 2013 NVSS births data. We note that a few states are missing presentation information for a small fraction of births with the exception of Virginia (missing about 50%) and Wyoming (missing on 100%).
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK, Curtin SC. Births: Preliminary data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(6):1–19. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK, Curtin SC. Births: Preliminary data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(6):1–19.
2.
3.
go back to reference Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean Delivery: Background, Trends, and Epidemiology. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30(5):235–41.CrossRefPubMed Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean Delivery: Background, Trends, and Epidemiology. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30(5):235–41.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Osterman MJ, Martin JA. Changes in cesarean delivery rates by gestational age: United States. NCHS Data Brief. 1996–2011;2013(124):1–8. Osterman MJ, Martin JA. Changes in cesarean delivery rates by gestational age: United States. NCHS Data Brief. 1996–2011;2013(124):1–8.
5.
go back to reference Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO Statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123:667-70. Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO Statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123:667-70.
6.
go back to reference Thompson JF, Roberts CL, Currie M, Ellwood DA. Prevalence and persistence of health problems after childbirth: associations with parity and method of birth. Birth. 2002;29(2):83–94.CrossRefPubMed Thompson JF, Roberts CL, Currie M, Ellwood DA. Prevalence and persistence of health problems after childbirth: associations with parity and method of birth. Birth. 2002;29(2):83–94.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Declercq E, Barger M, Cabral HJ, Evans SR, Kotelchuck M, Simon C, Weiss J, Heffner LJ. Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(3):669–77.CrossRefPubMed Declercq E, Barger M, Cabral HJ, Evans SR, Kotelchuck M, Simon C, Weiss J, Heffner LJ. Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(3):669–77.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph K, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Can Med Assoc J. 2007;176(4):455–60.CrossRef Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph K, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Can Med Assoc J. 2007;176(4):455–60.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sanchez-Ramos L, Wells T, Adair C, Arcelin G, Kaunitz A, Wells D. Route of breech delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;73(1):7–14.CrossRef Sanchez-Ramos L, Wells T, Adair C, Arcelin G, Kaunitz A, Wells D. Route of breech delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;73(1):7–14.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Weiss JL, Malone FD, Emig D, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Saade G, Eddleman K, Carter SM, Craigo SD, et al. Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate–a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(4):1091–7.CrossRefPubMed Weiss JL, Malone FD, Emig D, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Saade G, Eddleman K, Carter SM, Craigo SD, et al. Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate–a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(4):1091–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Chu SY, Kim SY, Schmid CH, Dietz PM, Callaghan WM, Lau J, Curtis KM. Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2007;8(5):385–94.CrossRefPubMed Chu SY, Kim SY, Schmid CH, Dietz PM, Callaghan WM, Lau J, Curtis KM. Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2007;8(5):385–94.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Viswanathan M, Siega-Riz AM, Moos MK, Deierlein A, Mumford S, Knaack J, Thieda P, Lux LJ, Lohr KN. Outcomes of maternal weight gain. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2008;168:1–223. Viswanathan M, Siega-Riz AM, Moos MK, Deierlein A, Mumford S, Knaack J, Thieda P, Lux LJ, Lohr KN. Outcomes of maternal weight gain. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2008;168:1–223.
13.
go back to reference Rosenberg TJ, Garbers S, Lipkind H, Chiasson MA. Maternal obesity and diabetes as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences among 4 racial/ethnic groups. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(9):1545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rosenberg TJ, Garbers S, Lipkind H, Chiasson MA. Maternal obesity and diabetes as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences among 4 racial/ethnic groups. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(9):1545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Hemminki E, Shelley J, Gissler M. Mode of delivery and problems in subsequent births: A register-based study from Finland. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):169–77.CrossRefPubMed Hemminki E, Shelley J, Gissler M. Mode of delivery and problems in subsequent births: A register-based study from Finland. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):169–77.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine: Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. In. Edited by Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL: Institute of Medicine, National Research Council; 2009. Institute of Medicine: Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. In. Edited by Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL: Institute of Medicine, National Research Council; 2009.
16.
go back to reference Li N, Liu E, Guo J, Pan L, Li B, Wang P, Liu J, Wang Y, Liu G, Baccarelli AA, et al. Maternal prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on pregnancy outcomes. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82310.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li N, Liu E, Guo J, Pan L, Li B, Wang P, Liu J, Wang Y, Liu G, Baccarelli AA, et al. Maternal prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on pregnancy outcomes. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82310.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Barber EL, Lundsberg L, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Contributing indications to the rising cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barber EL, Lundsberg L, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Contributing indications to the rising cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Kominiarek MA, Zhang J, VanVeldhuisen P, Troendle J, Beaver J, Hibbard JU. Contemporary labor patterns: the impact of maternal body mass index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(3):244. e241-244.e248CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kominiarek MA, Zhang J, VanVeldhuisen P, Troendle J, Beaver J, Hibbard JU. Contemporary labor patterns: the impact of maternal body mass index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(3):244. e241-244.e248CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Cedergren MI. Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(2):219–24.CrossRefPubMed Cedergren MI. Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(2):219–24.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Linné Y, Dye L, Barkeling B, Rössner S. Long-Term Weight Development in Women: A 15-Year Follow-up of the Effects of Pregnancy. Obes Res. 2004;12(7):1166–78.CrossRefPubMed Linné Y, Dye L, Barkeling B, Rössner S. Long-Term Weight Development in Women: A 15-Year Follow-up of the Effects of Pregnancy. Obes Res. 2004;12(7):1166–78.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rooney BL, Schauberger CW. Excess pregnancy weight gain and long-term obesity: One decade later. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(2):245–52.PubMed Rooney BL, Schauberger CW. Excess pregnancy weight gain and long-term obesity: One decade later. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(2):245–52.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Truven Health Analytics. The Cost of Having a Baby in the United States. In: Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform; 2013. Truven Health Analytics. The Cost of Having a Baby in the United States. In: Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform; 2013.
23.
go back to reference American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. In: Committee Opinion; 2013. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. In: Committee Opinion; 2013.
24.
go back to reference Arulkumaran S: Malpresentation, malposition, cephalopelvic disproportion and obstetric procedures. Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetric and Gynaecology Edmonds DK (ed) 8th Edition John Wiley and Sons LTD 2012:311–325. Arulkumaran S: Malpresentation, malposition, cephalopelvic disproportion and obstetric procedures. Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetric and Gynaecology Edmonds DK (ed) 8th Edition John Wiley and Sons LTD 2012:311–325.
25.
go back to reference Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR, Collaborative TBT. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–83.CrossRefPubMed Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR, Collaborative TBT. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–83.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Berhan Y, Haileamlak A: The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned Caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies. BJOG 2015:n/a-n/a. Berhan Y, Haileamlak A: The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned Caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies. BJOG 2015:n/a-n/a.
27.
go back to reference Jensen VM, Wüst M. Can Caesarean section improve child and maternal health? The case of breech babies. J Health Econ. 2015;39:289–302.CrossRefPubMed Jensen VM, Wüst M. Can Caesarean section improve child and maternal health? The case of breech babies. J Health Econ. 2015;39:289–302.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):235.CrossRef American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):235.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Luterkort M, Persson PH, Weldner BM. Maternal and fetal factors in breech presentation. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64(1):55–9.PubMed Luterkort M, Persson PH, Weldner BM. Maternal and fetal factors in breech presentation. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64(1):55–9.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Fruscalzo A, Londero AP, Salvador S, Bertozzi S, Biasioli A, Della Martina M, Driul L, Marchesoni D. New and old predictive factors for breech presentation: our experience in 14 433 singleton pregnancies and a literature review. J Mater-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(2):167–72.CrossRef Fruscalzo A, Londero AP, Salvador S, Bertozzi S, Biasioli A, Della Martina M, Driul L, Marchesoni D. New and old predictive factors for breech presentation: our experience in 14 433 singleton pregnancies and a literature review. J Mater-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(2):167–72.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Rayl J, Gibson PJ, Hickok DE. A population-based case-control study of risk factors for breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(1 Pt 1):28–32.CrossRefPubMed Rayl J, Gibson PJ, Hickok DE. A population-based case-control study of risk factors for breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(1 Pt 1):28–32.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Hickok DE, Gordon DC, Milberg JA, Williams MA, Daling JR. The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(3):851–2.CrossRefPubMed Hickok DE, Gordon DC, Milberg JA, Williams MA, Daling JR. The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(3):851–2.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Westgren M, Edvall H, Nordstrom L, Svalenius E, Ranstam J. Spontaneous cephalic version of breech presentation in the last trimester. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92(1):19–22.CrossRefPubMed Westgren M, Edvall H, Nordstrom L, Svalenius E, Ranstam J. Spontaneous cephalic version of breech presentation in the last trimester. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92(1):19–22.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Ben-Rafael Z, Seidman DS, Recabi K, Bider D, Mashiach S. Uterine anomalies. A retrospective, matched-control study. J Reprod Med. 1991;36(10):723–7.PubMed Ben-Rafael Z, Seidman DS, Recabi K, Bider D, Mashiach S. Uterine anomalies. A retrospective, matched-control study. J Reprod Med. 1991;36(10):723–7.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Michalas SP. Outcome of pregnancy in women with uterine malformation: evaluation of 62 cases. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1991;35(3):215–9.CrossRefPubMed Michalas SP. Outcome of pregnancy in women with uterine malformation: evaluation of 62 cases. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1991;35(3):215–9.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Sekulic S, Ilincic M, Radeka G, Novakov-Mikic A, Simic S, Podgorac J, Kekovic G. Breech presentation and the cornual-fundal location of the placenta. Croatian Med J. 2013;54(2):198–202.CrossRef Sekulic S, Ilincic M, Radeka G, Novakov-Mikic A, Simic S, Podgorac J, Kekovic G. Breech presentation and the cornual-fundal location of the placenta. Croatian Med J. 2013;54(2):198–202.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Mostello D, Chang JJ, Bai F, Wang J, Guild C, Stamps K, Leet TL. Breech presentation at delivery: a marker for congenital anomaly? J Perinatol. 2014;34(1):11–5.CrossRefPubMed Mostello D, Chang JJ, Bai F, Wang J, Guild C, Stamps K, Leet TL. Breech presentation at delivery: a marker for congenital anomaly? J Perinatol. 2014;34(1):11–5.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Soernes T, Bakke T. The length of the human umbilical cord in vertex and breech presentations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;154(5):1086–7.CrossRefPubMed Soernes T, Bakke T. The length of the human umbilical cord in vertex and breech presentations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;154(5):1086–7.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41–55.CrossRef Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41–55.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cesarean deliveries and maternal weight retention
Authors
Kandice A. Kapinos
Olga Yakusheva
Marianne Weiss
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1527-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017 Go to the issue