Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Quality of care provided in two Scottish rural community maternity units: a retrospective case review

Authors: Sara Denham, Tracy Humphrey, Ruth Taylor

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Women in Scotland with uncomplicated pregnancies are encouraged by professional bodies and national guidelines to access community based models of midwife-led care for their labour and birth. The evidence base for these guidelines relates to comparisons of predominantly urban birth settings in England. There appears to be little evidence available about the quality of the care during the antenatal, birth and post birth periods available for women within the Scottish Community Maternity Unit (CMU) model.
The research aim was to explore the safety and effectiveness of the maternity services provided at two rural Community Maternity Units in Scotland, both 40 miles by main road access from a tertiary obstetric unit.

Methods

Following appropriate NHS and University ethical approval, an anonymous retrospective review of consecutive maternity records for all women who accessed care at the CMUs over a 12 month period (June 2011 to May 2012) was undertaken in 2013 -14. Data was extracted using variables chosen to provide a description of the socio-demographics of the cohort and the process and outcomes of the care provided. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Regarding effectiveness, the correct care pathway was allocated to 97.5% of women, early access to antenatal care achieved by 95.7% of women, 94.8% of women at one CMU received continuity of carer and 78.6% of those clinically eligible accessed care in labour. 11.9% were appropriately transferred to obstetrician-led care antenatally and 16.9% were transferred in labour. All women received one-to one care in labour and 67.1% of babies born at the CMUs were breastfed at birth.
Regarding safety, severe morbidity for women was rare, perineal trauma of 3rd degree tear occurred for 0.3% of women and 1.0% experienced an episiotomy. Severe post partum haemorrhage occurred for 0.3% of women. Babies admitted to the Neonatal unit were discharged within 48 hrs.

Conclusion

These findings support the recommendations of professional bodies and national guidelines. Maternity service provision at rural CMUs achieved a consistently high standard of safety and effectiveness when measured against national standards and international evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Royal College of Obstetricians And Gynaecologists. High Quality Women’s Health Care: A proposal for change. 2011a. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/highqualitywomenshealthcareproposalforchange.pdf Accessed 8 June 2017 Royal College of Obstetricians And Gynaecologists. High Quality Women’s Health Care: A proposal for change. 2011a. https://​www.​rcog.​org.​uk/​globalassets/​documents/​guidelines/​highqualitywomen​shealthcarepropo​salforchange.​pdf Accessed 8 June 2017
4.
go back to reference Symon A, Winter C, Cochrane L. Exploration of preterm birth rates associated with different models of antenatal midwifery care in Scotland: unmatched retrospective cohort analysis. Midwifery. 2015;31(6):590–6.CrossRefPubMed Symon A, Winter C, Cochrane L. Exploration of preterm birth rates associated with different models of antenatal midwifery care in Scotland: unmatched retrospective cohort analysis. Midwifery. 2015;31(6):590–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Birthplace in England Collaborative Group (BECG). Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. British medical Journal. 2011. http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d7400. Accessed 16 Sept 2016. Birthplace in England Collaborative Group (BECG). Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. British medical Journal. 2011. http://​www.​bmj.​com/​content/​343/​bmj.​d7400. Accessed 16 Sept 2016.
6.
go back to reference Tucker J, Keiger A, Bryers H, Caldow J, Farmer J, Hundley V, et al. Sustainable maternity service provision in remote and rural Scotland: implementing and evaluating maternity care models for remote and rural Scotland. Dumfries: RARARI Project Board for Maternity Services; 2006. Tucker J, Keiger A, Bryers H, Caldow J, Farmer J, Hundley V, et al. Sustainable maternity service provision in remote and rural Scotland: implementing and evaluating maternity care models for remote and rural Scotland. Dumfries: RARARI Project Board for Maternity Services; 2006.
7.
go back to reference Tucker J, McVicar A, Pitchforth E, Farmer J, Bryers H. Maternity care models in a remote and rural network: assessing clinical appropriateness and outcome indicators. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2010;19:83–9.CrossRefPubMed Tucker J, McVicar A, Pitchforth E, Farmer J, Bryers H. Maternity care models in a remote and rural network: assessing clinical appropriateness and outcome indicators. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2010;19:83–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cheyne, H., Abhyankar, P. and McCourt, C. Empowering change: realist evaluation of a Scottish government programme to support normal birth. Midwifery. 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.07.018. Accessed 15 Oct 2016. Cheyne, H., Abhyankar, P. and McCourt, C. Empowering change: realist evaluation of a Scottish government programme to support normal birth. Midwifery. 2013. http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​midw.​2013.​07.​018. Accessed 15 Oct 2016.
11.
go back to reference Scottish Government. The healthcare quality strategy for NHS Scotland. 2010. http//www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/311667/0098354.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2016. Scottish Government. The healthcare quality strategy for NHS Scotland. 2010. http//www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/311667/0098354.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2016.
12.
go back to reference Scottish Government. A Refreshed framework for maternity care in Scotland. 2011. http//www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2011/02/11122123/2. Accessed 20 Oct 2016. Scottish Government. A Refreshed framework for maternity care in Scotland. 2011. http//www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2011/02/11122123/2. Accessed 20 Oct 2016.
17.
go back to reference Rogers C, Harman J, Selo-Ojeme D. Perceptions of birth in a stand-alone centre compared to other options. British Journal of Midwifery. 2011;19(4):237–44.CrossRef Rogers C, Harman J, Selo-Ojeme D. Perceptions of birth in a stand-alone centre compared to other options. British Journal of Midwifery. 2011;19(4):237–44.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pilley-Edwards N. Birthing autonomy Women’s experiences of planning home births. Abingdon: Routledge Publishing; 2005. Pilley-Edwards N. Birthing autonomy Women’s experiences of planning home births. Abingdon: Routledge Publishing; 2005.
19.
go back to reference Coxon, K., Sandall, J. and Fulop, N. To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health Risk and Society. 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2013.859231. Accesssed 14 Sept 2016. Coxon, K., Sandall, J. and Fulop, N. To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health Risk and Society. 2014. http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​13698575.​2013.​859231. Accesssed 14 Sept 2016.
20.
go back to reference Hoang, H., Le, Q. and Ogden, K. Women’s maternity care needs and related service models in rural areas: a comprehensive systematic review of qualitative evidence. Women and Birth 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2014.06.005. Accessed 20 Oct 2016. Hoang, H., Le, Q. and Ogden, K. Women’s maternity care needs and related service models in rural areas: a comprehensive systematic review of qualitative evidence. Women and Birth 2014 http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​wombi.​2014.​06.​005. Accessed 20 Oct 2016.
21.
go back to reference Grigg C, Tracy S, Dallenbach R, Kensington M, Schmied V. An exploration of influences on women’s birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the evaluating maternity units study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014; http://www.biomedicalcentral.com/1471-2393/14/210. Accessed 20 Sept 2016 Grigg C, Tracy S, Dallenbach R, Kensington M, Schmied V. An exploration of influences on women’s birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the evaluating maternity units study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014; http://​www.​biomedicalcentra​l.​com/​1471-2393/​14/​210. Accessed 20 Sept 2016
22.
go back to reference Pitchforth E, Watson V, Tucker J, Ryan M, van Teijlingen E, Farmer J, et al. Models of intrapartum care and women’s trade-offs in remote and rural Scotland: a mixed-methods study. An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2008;115(5):560–9. Pitchforth E, Watson V, Tucker J, Ryan M, van Teijlingen E, Farmer J, et al. Models of intrapartum care and women’s trade-offs in remote and rural Scotland: a mixed-methods study. An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2008;115(5):560–9.
24.
go back to reference Overgaard C. Moller A. Ferger-Gron M. Knudsen L. Sandall J. Freestanding midwifery unit versus obstetric unit: a matched cohort study of outcomes in low-risk women. Br Med J 2011. http//www.bmjopen.bmj.com/content/1/2/e000262.full.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2016. Overgaard C. Moller A. Ferger-Gron M. Knudsen L. Sandall J. Freestanding midwifery unit versus obstetric unit: a matched cohort study of outcomes in low-risk women. Br Med J 2011. http//www.bmjopen.bmj.com/content/1/2/e000262.full.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2016.
25.
go back to reference Mander R, Melender H. Choice in maternity: rhetoric, reality and resistance. Midwifery. 2007;25:637–48.CrossRef Mander R, Melender H. Choice in maternity: rhetoric, reality and resistance. Midwifery. 2007;25:637–48.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gottvall K, Waldenstrom U, Tingstig C, Grunewald C. 2011. In-hospital birth centre with the same medical guidelines as standard care: a comparative study of obstetric interventions and outcomes. Birth. 2011;38(2):120–7.CrossRefPubMed Gottvall K, Waldenstrom U, Tingstig C, Grunewald C. 2011. In-hospital birth centre with the same medical guidelines as standard care: a comparative study of obstetric interventions and outcomes. Birth. 2011;38(2):120–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Monk A. Tracy M. Foureur M. Grigg C. Tracy S. Evaluating midwifery units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in new South Wales, Australia BMJ Open 2014;4:e006252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006252. Accessed 16 Oct 2016. Monk A. Tracy M. Foureur M. Grigg C. Tracy S. Evaluating midwifery units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in new South Wales, Australia BMJ Open 2014;4:e006252 http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjopen-2014-006252. Accessed 16 Oct 2016.
28.
go back to reference Ireland J, Bryers H, van Teijlingen E, Hundley V, Farmer J, Harris F, et al. Competencies and skills for remote and rural maternity care: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58920:105–15. Ireland J, Bryers H, van Teijlingen E, Hundley V, Farmer J, Harris F, et al. Competencies and skills for remote and rural maternity care: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58920:105–15.
29.
go back to reference Mercer J, Erickson-Owens A, Graves B, Mumford-Haley M. Evidence-based practices for the fetal to newborn transition. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007;52(3):262–72.CrossRefPubMed Mercer J, Erickson-Owens A, Graves B, Mumford-Haley M. Evidence-based practices for the fetal to newborn transition. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007;52(3):262–72.CrossRefPubMed
32.
34.
go back to reference Royal College of Midwives. Normal birth, maximising normality through pregnancy birth and the postnatal period. 2015. http://betterbirths.rcm.org.uk/normal-births/ Accessed 8 June 2017. Royal College of Midwives. Normal birth, maximising normality through pregnancy birth and the postnatal period. 2015. http://​betterbirths.​rcm.​org.​uk/​normal-births/​ Accessed 8 June 2017.
37.
go back to reference Walsh D. Improving maternity services: small is beautiful- lessons from a birth centre. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing; 2007. Walsh D. Improving maternity services: small is beautiful- lessons from a birth centre. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing; 2007.
38.
go back to reference McCourt, C., Rance, S., Rayment, J. and Sandall, J. Birthplace qualitative Organisational case studies: how maternity care systems may affect the provision of care in different birth settings. Birthplace in England research programme. Final report part 6. NIHR Service delivery and organisation Programme. 2011.http://www.netscc.ac.uk/netscc/hsdr/files/project/SDO_FR6_08-1604-140_V02.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2016. McCourt, C., Rance, S., Rayment, J. and Sandall, J. Birthplace qualitative Organisational case studies: how maternity care systems may affect the provision of care in different birth settings. Birthplace in England research programme. Final report part 6. NIHR Service delivery and organisation Programme. 2011.http://​www.​netscc.​ac.​uk/​netscc/​hsdr/​files/​project/​SDO_​FR6_​08-1604-140_​V02.​pdf.​ Accessed 20 Nov 2016.
39.
go back to reference Hawley G, Jackson C, Hepworth J, Wilkinson S. Sharing of clinical data in a maternity setting: how do paper hand held records and electronic health records compare for completeness? BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:650.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hawley G, Jackson C, Hepworth J, Wilkinson S. Sharing of clinical data in a maternity setting: how do paper hand held records and electronic health records compare for completeness? BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:650.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference MacFarlane A. Rocca-Ihenacho L. Turner L. Survey of women’s experiences of care in a new freestanding midwifery unit in an inner city area of London, England: 2. Specific aspects of care. Midwifery 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.05.008. MacFarlane A. Rocca-Ihenacho L. Turner L. Survey of women’s experiences of care in a new freestanding midwifery unit in an inner city area of London, England: 2. Specific aspects of care. Midwifery 2014. http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​midw.​2014.​05.​008.
41.
go back to reference McCutcheon R, Brown D. A qualitative exploration of women's experiences and reflections upon giving birth at home. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2012;10(1):23–8. McCutcheon R, Brown D. A qualitative exploration of women's experiences and reflections upon giving birth at home. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2012;10(1):23–8.
42.
go back to reference Burns E, Boulton M, Cluett E, Cornelius V, Smith L. Characteristics, interventions and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study. Birth. 2012;39(3):192–202.CrossRefPubMed Burns E, Boulton M, Cluett E, Cornelius V, Smith L. Characteristics, interventions and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study. Birth. 2012;39(3):192–202.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Scottish Executive Health Department. Implementing a framework for maternity Services in Scotland – report of the expert group on acute maternity services (EGAMS). 2002. http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2003/01/16018/15750 Accessed 8 June 2017. Scottish Executive Health Department. Implementing a framework for maternity Services in Scotland – report of the expert group on acute maternity services (EGAMS). 2002. http://​www.​gov.​scot/​Publications/​2003/​01/​16018/​15750 Accessed 8 June 2017.
Metadata
Title
Quality of care provided in two Scottish rural community maternity units: a retrospective case review
Authors
Sara Denham
Tracy Humphrey
Ruth Taylor
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1374-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017 Go to the issue