Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Validity of gestational age estimates by last menstrual period and neonatal examination compared to ultrasound in Vietnam

Authors: Nicholas P. Deputy, Phuong H. Nguyen, Hoa Pham, Son Nguyen, Lynnette Neufeld, Reynaldo Martorell, Usha Ramakrishnan

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Accurate estimation of gestational age is important for both clinical and public health purposes. Estimates of gestational age using fetal ultrasound measurements are considered most accurate but are frequently unavailable in low- and middle-income countries. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of last menstrual period and Farr neonatal examination estimates of gestational age, compared to ultrasound estimates, in a large cohort of women in Vietnam.

Methods

Data for this analysis come from a randomized, placebo-controlled micronutrient supplementation trial in Vietnam. We analyzed 912 women with ultrasound and prospectively-collected last menstrual period estimates of gestational age and 685 women with ultrasound and Farr estimates of gestational age. We used the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test to assess differences in gestational age estimated by last menstrual period or Farr examination compared to ultrasound and computed the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) to quantify agreement between methods. We computed the Kappa coefficient (κ) to quantify agreement in preterm, term and post-term classification.

Results

The median gestational age estimated by ultrasound was 273.9 days. Gestational age was slightly overestimated by last menstrual period (median 276.0 days, P < 0.001) and more greatly overestimated by Farr examination (median 286.7 days, P < 0.001). Gestational age estimates by last menstrual period and ultrasound were moderately correlated (ICC = 0.78) and concordant (CCC = 0.63), whereas gestational age estimates by Farr examination and ultrasound were weakly correlated (ICC = 0.26) and concordant (CCC = 0.05). Last menstrual period and ultrasound estimates of gestational age were within ± 14 days for 88.4% of women; Farr and ultrasound estimates were within ± 14 days for 55.8% of women. Last menstrual period and ultrasound estimates of gestational age had higher agreement in term classification (κ = 0.41) than Farr and ultrasound (κ = 0.05).

Conclusion

In this study of women in Vietnam, we found last menstrual period provided a more accurate estimate of gestational age than the Farr examination when compared to ultrasound. These findings provide useful information about the utility and accuracy of different methods to estimate gestational age and suggest last menstrual period may be preferred over Farr examination in settings where ultrasound is unavailable.

Trial registration

The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov as NCT01665378 on August 13, 2012.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alexander GR, Tompkins ME, Petersen DJ, Hulsey TC, Mor J. Discordance between LMP-based and clinically estimated gestational age: implications for research, programs, and policy. Public Health Rep. 1995;110(4):395–402.PubMedPubMedCentral Alexander GR, Tompkins ME, Petersen DJ, Hulsey TC, Mor J. Discordance between LMP-based and clinically estimated gestational age: implications for research, programs, and policy. Public Health Rep. 1995;110(4):395–402.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Alexander GR, Allen MC. Conceptualization, measurement, and use of gestational age. I. Clinical and public health practice. J Perinatol. 1996;16(1):53–9.PubMed Alexander GR, Allen MC. Conceptualization, measurement, and use of gestational age. I. Clinical and public health practice. J Perinatol. 1996;16(1):53–9.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Lynch CD, Zhang J. The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21 Suppl 2:86–96.CrossRefPubMed Lynch CD, Zhang J. The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21 Suppl 2:86–96.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wegienka G, Baird DD. A comparison of recalled date of last menstrual period with prospectively recorded dates. J Women’s Health. 2005;14(3):248–52.CrossRef Wegienka G, Baird DD. A comparison of recalled date of last menstrual period with prospectively recorded dates. J Women’s Health. 2005;14(3):248–52.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dietz PM, England LJ, Callaghan WM, Pearl M, Wier ML, Kharrazi M. A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21 Suppl 2:62–71.CrossRefPubMed Dietz PM, England LJ, Callaghan WM, Pearl M, Wier ML, Kharrazi M. A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21 Suppl 2:62–71.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Alexander GR, de Caunes F, Hulsey TC, Tompkins ME, Allen M. Ethnic variation in postnatal assessments of gestational age: a reappraisal. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1992;6(4):423–33.CrossRefPubMed Alexander GR, de Caunes F, Hulsey TC, Tompkins ME, Allen M. Ethnic variation in postnatal assessments of gestational age: a reappraisal. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1992;6(4):423–33.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Latis GO, Simionato L, Ferraris G. Clinical assessment of gestational age in the newborn infant. Comparison of two methods. Early Hum Dev. 1981;5(1):29–37.CrossRefPubMed Latis GO, Simionato L, Ferraris G. Clinical assessment of gestational age in the newborn infant. Comparison of two methods. Early Hum Dev. 1981;5(1):29–37.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion no 611: method for estimating due date. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(4):863–6.CrossRef Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion no 611: method for estimating due date. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(4):863–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Gardosi J. Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(1 Pt 1):278–81.CrossRefPubMed Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Gardosi J. Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(1 Pt 1):278–81.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;8(3):178–85.CrossRefPubMed Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;8(3):178–85.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wang W, Alva S, Wang S, Fort A. Levels and trends in the use of maternal health services in developing countries. In: DHS Comparative Reports No. 26. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF Macro; 2011. Wang W, Alva S, Wang S, Fort A. Levels and trends in the use of maternal health services in developing countries. In: DHS Comparative Reports No. 26. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF Macro; 2011.
13.
go back to reference Rosenberg RE, Ahmed AS, Ahmed S, Saha SK, Chowdhury MA, Black RE, Santosham M, Darmstadt GL. Determining gestational age in a low-resource setting: validity of last menstrual period. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27(3):332–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Rosenberg RE, Ahmed AS, Ahmed S, Saha SK, Chowdhury MA, Black RE, Santosham M, Darmstadt GL. Determining gestational age in a low-resource setting: validity of last menstrual period. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27(3):332–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Neufeld LM, Haas JD, Grajeda R, Martorell R. Last menstrual period provides the best estimate of gestation length for women in rural Guatemala. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20(4):290–8.CrossRefPubMed Neufeld LM, Haas JD, Grajeda R, Martorell R. Last menstrual period provides the best estimate of gestation length for women in rural Guatemala. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20(4):290–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nguyen PH, Lowe AE, Martorell R, Nguyen H, Pham H, Nguyen S, Harding KB, Neufeld LM, Reinhart GA, Ramakrishnan U. Rationale, design, methodology and sample characteristics for the Vietnam pre-conceptual micronutrient supplementation trial (PRECONCEPT): a randomized controlled study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:898.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nguyen PH, Lowe AE, Martorell R, Nguyen H, Pham H, Nguyen S, Harding KB, Neufeld LM, Reinhart GA, Ramakrishnan U. Rationale, design, methodology and sample characteristics for the Vietnam pre-conceptual micronutrient supplementation trial (PRECONCEPT): a randomized controlled study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:898.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Lohman T, Roche A, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1988. Lohman T, Roche A, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1988.
17.
go back to reference Cogill B. Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guide. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development, Washington, D.C. 2003. Cogill B. Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guide. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development, Washington, D.C. 2003.
18.
go back to reference Farr V, Mitchell RG, Neligan GA, Parkin JM. The definition of some external characteristics used in the assessment of gestational age in the newborn infant. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1966;8(5):507–11.CrossRefPubMed Farr V, Mitchell RG, Neligan GA, Parkin JM. The definition of some external characteristics used in the assessment of gestational age in the newborn infant. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1966;8(5):507–11.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Farr V, Kerridge DF, Mitchell RG. The value of some external characteristics in the assessment of gestational age at birth. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1966;8(6):657–60.PubMed Farr V, Kerridge DF, Mitchell RG. The value of some external characteristics in the assessment of gestational age at birth. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1966;8(6):657–60.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Papageorghiou AT, Kemp B, Stones W, Ohuma EO, Kennedy SH, Purwar M, Salomon LJ, Altman DG, Noble JA, Bertino E, et al. Ultrasound based gestational age estimation in late pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:719-26. Papageorghiou AT, Kemp B, Stones W, Ohuma EO, Kennedy SH, Purwar M, Salomon LJ, Altman DG, Noble JA, Bertino E, et al. Ultrasound based gestational age estimation in late pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:719-26.
21.
go back to reference McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(1):30–46.CrossRef McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(1):30–46.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–8.CrossRefPubMed Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45(1):255–68.CrossRefPubMed Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45(1):255–68.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135–60.CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135–60.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Nguyen PH, Addo OY, Young M, Gonzalez-Casanova I, Pham H, Truong T, Nguyen S, Martorell R, Ramakrishnan U. Patterns of fetal growth based on ultrasound measurement and its relationship to small for gestational age birth in rural Vietnam. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2016;30(3):256–66.CrossRefPubMed Nguyen PH, Addo OY, Young M, Gonzalez-Casanova I, Pham H, Truong T, Nguyen S, Martorell R, Ramakrishnan U. Patterns of fetal growth based on ultrasound measurement and its relationship to small for gestational age birth in rural Vietnam. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2016;30(3):256–66.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Sunjoh F, Njamnshi AK, Tietche F, Kago I. Assessment of gestational age in the Cameroonian newborn infant: a comparison of four scoring methods. J Trop Pediatr. 2004;50(5):285–91.CrossRefPubMed Sunjoh F, Njamnshi AK, Tietche F, Kago I. Assessment of gestational age in the Cameroonian newborn infant: a comparison of four scoring methods. J Trop Pediatr. 2004;50(5):285–91.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Jehan I, Zaidi S, Rizvi S, Mobeen N, McClure EM, Munoz B, Pasha O, Wright LL, Goldenberg RL. Dating gestational age by last menstrual period, symphysis-fundal height, and ultrasound in urban Pakistan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;110(3):231–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jehan I, Zaidi S, Rizvi S, Mobeen N, McClure EM, Munoz B, Pasha O, Wright LL, Goldenberg RL. Dating gestational age by last menstrual period, symphysis-fundal height, and ultrasound in urban Pakistan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;110(3):231–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Villar J, Altman DG, Purwar M, Noble JA, Knight HE, Ruyan P, Cheikh Ismail L, Barros FC, Lambert A, Papageorghiou AT, et al. The objectives, design and implementation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. BJOG. 2013;120 Suppl 2:9–26. v.CrossRefPubMed Villar J, Altman DG, Purwar M, Noble JA, Knight HE, Ruyan P, Cheikh Ismail L, Barros FC, Lambert A, Papageorghiou AT, et al. The objectives, design and implementation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. BJOG. 2013;120 Suppl 2:9–26. v.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kalish RB, Thaler HT, Chasen ST, Gupta M, Berman SJ, Rosenwaks Z, Chervenak FA. First- and second-trimester ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):975–8.CrossRefPubMed Kalish RB, Thaler HT, Chasen ST, Gupta M, Berman SJ, Rosenwaks Z, Chervenak FA. First- and second-trimester ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):975–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Validity of gestational age estimates by last menstrual period and neonatal examination compared to ultrasound in Vietnam
Authors
Nicholas P. Deputy
Phuong H. Nguyen
Hoa Pham
Son Nguyen
Lynnette Neufeld
Reynaldo Martorell
Usha Ramakrishnan
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1192-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017 Go to the issue