Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Comparison of birth certificates and hospital-based birth data on pregnancy complications in Los Angeles and Orange County, California

Authors: Nekisa Haghighat, Maogui Hu, Olivier Laurent, Judith Chung, Peter Nguyen, Jun Wu

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The incidence of both gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia is on the rise; however, these pregnancy complications may not be systematically reported. This study aimed to examine differences in reporting of preeclampsia and gestational diabetes between hospital records and birth certificate data, and to determine if such differences vary by maternal socioeconomic status indicators.

Methods

We obtained over 70,000 birth records from 2001 to 2006 from the perinatal research database of the Memorial Care system, a network of four hospitals in Los Angeles and Orange Counties, California. Memorial birth records were matched to corresponding state birth certificate records and analyzed to determine differential rates of reporting of preeclampsia and diabetes. Additionally, the influence of maternal socioeconomic factors on the reported incidence of such adverse pregnancy outcomes was analyzed. Socioeconomic factors of interest included maternal education levels, race, and type of health insurance (private or public).

Results

It was found that the birth certificate data significantly underreported the incidence of both preeclampsia (1.38 % vs. 3.13 %) and diabetes (1.97 % vs. 5.56 %) when compared to Memorial data. For both outcomes of interest, the degree of underreporting was significantly higher among women with lower education levels, among Hispanic women compared to Non-Hispanic White women, and among women with public health insurance.

Conclusion

The Memorial Care database is a more reliable source of information than birth certificate data for analyzing the incidence of preeclampsia and diabetes among women in Los Angeles and Orange Counties, especially for subpopulations of lower socioeconomic status.
Literature
1.
Committee on Practice B-O. Practice Bulletin No. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 Pt 1):406–16.
2.
Chen Y, Quick WW, Yang W, Zhang Y, Baldwin A, Moran J, et al. Cost of gestational diabetes mellitus in the United States in 2007. Popul Health Manag. 2009;12(3):165–74.CrossRefPubMed
3.
DeSisto CL, Kim SY, Sharma AJ. Prevalence estimates of gestational diabetes mellitus in the United States, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2007–2010. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
5.
Coghill AE, Hansen S, Littman AJ. Risk factors for eclampsia: a population-based study in Washington State, 1987–2007. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(6):553. e551-557.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Lydon-Rochelle MT, Holt VL, Cardenas V, Nelson JC, Easterling TR, Gardella C, et al. The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):125–34.CrossRefPubMed
8.
DiGiuseppe DL, Aron DC, Ranbom L, Harper DL, Rosenthal GE. Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information. Matern Child Health J. 2002;6(3):169–79.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Boulet SL, Shin M, Kirby RS, Goodman D, Correa A. Sensitivity of birth certificate reports of birth defects in Atlanta, 1995–2005: effects of maternal, infant, and hospital characteristics. Public Health Rep. 2011;126(2):186–94.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Piper JM, Mitchel EF Jr, Snowden M, Hall C, Adams M, Taylor P. Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137(7):758–68.PubMed
11.
Northam S, Knapp TR. The reliability and validity of birth certificates. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35(1):3–12.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Bilano VL, Ota E, Ganchimeg T, Mori R, Souza JP. Risk factors of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and its adverse outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a WHO secondary analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e91198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Coonrod DV, Hickok DE, Zhu K, Easterling TR, Daling JR. Risk factors for preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: a population-based cohort study. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(5 Pt 1):645–50.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Parazzini F, Bortolus R, Chatenoud L, Restelli S, Ricci E, Marozio L, et al. Risk factors for pregnancy-induced hypertension in women at high risk for the condition. Italian Study of Aspirin in Pregnancy Group. Epidemiology. 1996;7(3):306–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Sibai BM, Gordon T, Thom E, Caritis SN, Klebanoff M, McNellis D, et al. Risk factors for preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women: a prospective multicenter study. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172(2 Pt 1):642–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Bo S, Menato G, Bardelli C, Lezo A, Signorile A, Repetti E, et al. Low socioeconomic status as a risk factor for gestational diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2002;28(2):139–40.PubMed
18.
Clausen T, Oyen N, Henriksen T. Pregnancy complications by overweight and residential area. A prospective study of an urban Norwegian cohort. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(5):526–33.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Schneider S, Hoeft B, Freerksen N, Fischer B, Roehrig S, Yamamoto S, et al. Neonatal complications and risk factors among women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(3):231–7.PubMed
20.
AlKasseh AS, Zaki NM, Aljeesh YI, Soon LK. Risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus in the refugee population in Gaza Strip: a case–control study. East Mediterr Health J. 2014;19 Suppl 3:S12–8.PubMed
21.
Dode MA, Santos IS. Risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus in the birth cohort in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, 2004. Cad Saúde Pública. 2009;25(5):1141–52.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Berkowitz GS, Lapinski RH, Wein R, Lee D. Race/ethnicity and other risk factors for gestational diabetes. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135(9):965–73.PubMed
23.
Cullinan J, Gillespie P, Owens L, Avalos G, Dunne F. Is there a socioeconomic gradient in the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus? Ir Med J. 2012;105(5 Suppl):21–3.PubMed
24.
Joseph KS, Liston RM, Dodds L, Dahlgren L, Allen AC. Socioeconomic status and perinatal outcomes in a setting with universal access to essential health care services. CMAJ. 2007;177(6):583–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Khan R, Ali K, Khan Z. Socio-demographic Risk Factors of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Pak J Med Sci. 2013;29(3):843–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Janghorbani M, Stenhouse E, Jones R, Millward B. Is neighbourhood deprivation a risk factor for gestational diabetes mellitus? Diabet Med. 2006;23(3):313–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Brown HL, Chireau MV, Jallah Y, Howard D. The “Hispanic paradox”: an investigation of racial disparity in pregnancy outcomes at a tertiary care medical center. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(2):197. e191-197; discussion 197 e197-199.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Bertolotto A, Corfini M, Ghio A, Resi V, Lencioni C, Lacaria E, et al. Is maternal educational level a risk factor for gestational diabetes in Caucasian women? Diabet Med. 2012;29(3):416–7.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Wu J, Ren C, Delfino RJ, Chung J, Wilhelm M, Ritz B. Association between local traffic-generated air pollution and preeclampsia and preterm delivery in the south coast air basin of California. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(11):1773–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Laurent O, Hu J, Li L, Cockburn M, Escobedo L, Kleeman MJ, et al. Sources and contents of air pollution affecting term low birth weight in Los Angeles County, California, 2001–2008. Environ Res. 2014;134:488–95.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Staum P. Fuzzy Matching using the COMPGED Function In: North East SAS Users Group: 2007; West Nyack, NY: Paul Waldron Consulting.
32.
Baumeister L, Marchi K, Pearl M, Williams R, Braveman P. The validity of information on “race” and “Hispanic ethnicity” in California birth certificate data. Health Serv Res. 2000;35(4):869–83.PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Vinikoor LC, Messer LC, Laraia BA, Kaufman JS. Reliability of variables on the North Carolina birth certificate: a comparison with directly queried values from a cohort study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2010;24(1):102–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Braveman P, Pearl M, Egerter S, Marchi K, Williams R. Validity of insurance information on California birth certificates. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(5):813–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Watkins ML, Edmonds L, McClearn A, Mullins L, Mulinare J, Khoury M. The surveillance of birth defects: the usefulness of the revised US standard birth certificate. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(5):731–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Dobie SA, Baldwin LM, Rosenblatt RA, Fordyce MA, Andrilla CH, Hart LG. How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies. Matern Child Health J. 1998;2(3):145–54.CrossRefPubMed
37.
38.
Starr P, Starr S. Reinventing vital statistics. The impact of changes in information technology, welfare policy, and health care. Public Health Rep. 1995;110(5):534–44.PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Wier L, Witt E, Burgess J, Elixhauser A. Hospitalizations related to diabetes in pregnancy, 2008: statistical brief# 102. 2006
40.
Bell ML, Ebisu K. Environmental inequality in exposures to airborne particulate matter components in the United States. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(12):1699–704.PubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Tian N, Xue J, Barzyk TM. Evaluating socioeconomic and racial differences in traffic-related metrics in the United States using a GIS approach. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2013;23(2):215–22.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of birth certificates and hospital-based birth data on pregnancy complications in Los Angeles and Orange County, California
Authors
Nekisa Haghighat
Maogui Hu
Olivier Laurent
Judith Chung
Peter Nguyen
Jun Wu
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0885-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Reluctance to care for patients with HIV or hepatitis B / C in Japan

Erratum

Erratum to: CONCEPTT: Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Women with Type 1 Diabetes in Pregnancy Trial: A multi-center, multi-national, randomized controlled trial - Study protocol

Research article

First trimester serum placental growth factor and hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin are associated with pre-eclampsia: a case control study

Research article

Effects of simvastatin, rosuvastatin and pravastatin on soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) and soluble endoglin (sENG) secretion from human umbilical vein endothelial cells, primary trophoblast cells and placenta

Study protocol

Maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and lactation to prevent acute respiratory infections in infancy in Dhaka, Bangladesh (MDARI trial): protocol for a prospective cohort study nested within a randomized controlled trial

Research article

Effect of pregnancy intention, postnatal depressive symptoms and social support on early childhood stunting: findings from India