Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Validation of the Spanish version of mackey childbirth satisfaction rating scale

Authors: Pablo Caballero, Beatriz E. Delgado-García, Isabel Orts-Cortes, Joaquin Moncho, Pamela Pereyra-Zamora, Andreu Nolasco

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The “Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale” (MCSRS) is a complete non-validated scale which includes the most important factors associated with maternal satisfaction. Our primary purpose was to describe the internal structure of the scale and validate the reliability and validity of concept of its Spanish version MCSRS-E.

Methods

The MCSRS was translated into Spanish, back-translated and adapted to the Spanish population. It was then administered following a pilot test with women who met the study participant requirements. The scale structure was obtained by performing an exploratory factorial analysis using a sample of 304 women. The structures obtained were tested by conducting a confirmatory factorial analysis using a sample of 159 women. To test the validity of concept, the structure factors were correlated with expectations prior to childbirth experiences. McDonald’s omegas were calculated for each model to establish the reliability of each factor.
The study was carried out at four University Hospitals; Alicante, Elche, Torrevieja and Vinalopo Salud of Elche. The inclusion criteria were women aged 18–45 years old who had just delivered a singleton live baby at 38–42 weeks through vaginal delivery. Women who had difficulty speaking and understanding Spanish were excluded.

Results

The process generated 5 different possible internal structures in a nested model more consistent with the theory than other internal structures of the MCSRS applied hitherto. All of them had good levels of validation and reliability.

Conclusions

This nested model to explain internal structure of MCSRS-E can accommodate different clinical practice scenarios better than the other structures applied to date, and it is a flexible tool which can be used to identify the aspects that should be changed to improve maternal satisfaction and hence maternal health.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mira JJ, Aranaz J. Patient satisfaction as an outcome measure in health care. Med Clin (Barc). 2000;114 Suppl 3:26–33. Mira JJ, Aranaz J. Patient satisfaction as an outcome measure in health care. Med Clin (Barc). 2000;114 Suppl 3:26–33.
2.
go back to reference Bleich SN, Ozaltin E, Murray CK. How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patient experience? Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(4):271–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bleich SN, Ozaltin E, Murray CK. How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patient experience? Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(4):271–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Agu KA, Oqua D, Agada P, Ohiaeri SI, Adesina A, Abdulkareem MH, et al. Assessment of satisfaction with pharmaceutical services in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy in outpatient HIV treatment setting. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36(3):636–47.CrossRefPubMed Agu KA, Oqua D, Agada P, Ohiaeri SI, Adesina A, Abdulkareem MH, et al. Assessment of satisfaction with pharmaceutical services in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy in outpatient HIV treatment setting. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36(3):636–47.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mallinger JB, Griggs JJ, Shields CG. Patient-centered care and breast cancer survivors’ satisfaction with information. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57(3):342–9.CrossRefPubMed Mallinger JB, Griggs JJ, Shields CG. Patient-centered care and breast cancer survivors’ satisfaction with information. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57(3):342–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Brana-Marcos B, Carrera-Martinez D, De la Villa-Santovena M, Avanzas-Fernandez S, Gracia-Corbato M, Vegas-Pardavila E. Sociodemographic factors and satisfaction related to the care received by women with breast cancer. Multicentre study Rev Calid Asist. 2012;27(1):30–7.CrossRefPubMed Brana-Marcos B, Carrera-Martinez D, De la Villa-Santovena M, Avanzas-Fernandez S, Gracia-Corbato M, Vegas-Pardavila E. Sociodemographic factors and satisfaction related to the care received by women with breast cancer. Multicentre study Rev Calid Asist. 2012;27(1):30–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Salisbury C, Wallace M, Montgomery AA. Patients’ experience and satisfaction in primary care: secondary analysis using multilevel modelling. BMJ. 2010;341:c5004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Salisbury C, Wallace M, Montgomery AA. Patients’ experience and satisfaction in primary care: secondary analysis using multilevel modelling. BMJ. 2010;341:c5004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K. Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(4):609–20.CrossRefPubMed Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K. Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(4):609–20.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45(12):1829–43.CrossRefPubMed Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45(12):1829–43.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gill L, White L. A critical review of patient satisfaction. Leadersh Health Serv. 2009;22(1):8–19.CrossRef Gill L, White L. A critical review of patient satisfaction. Leadersh Health Serv. 2009;22(1):8–19.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Weisman E, Koch N. Special patient satisfaction issue. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1989;15(6):166–7.PubMed Weisman E, Koch N. Special patient satisfaction issue. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1989;15(6):166–7.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46(2):212–9.CrossRefPubMed Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46(2):212–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hodnett ED. Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5 Suppl Nature):S160–72.PubMed Hodnett ED. Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5 Suppl Nature):S160–72.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Mitchell PH, Ferketich S, Jennings BM. Quality health outcomes model. American Academy of Nursing Expert Panel on Quality Health Care. Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(1):43–6.CrossRefPubMed Mitchell PH, Ferketich S, Jennings BM. Quality health outcomes model. American Academy of Nursing Expert Panel on Quality Health Care. Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(1):43–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Murphy PA, Fullerton JT. Development of the Optimality Index as a new approach to evaluating outcomes of maternity care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35(6):770–8.CrossRefPubMed Murphy PA, Fullerton JT. Development of the Optimality Index as a new approach to evaluating outcomes of maternity care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35(6):770–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sandin Bojo AK, Hall-Lord ML, Axelsson O, Uden G, Wilde LB. Midwifery care: development of an instrument to measure quality based on the World Health Organization’s classification of care in normal birth. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(1):75–83.CrossRefPubMed Sandin Bojo AK, Hall-Lord ML, Axelsson O, Uden G, Wilde LB. Midwifery care: development of an instrument to measure quality based on the World Health Organization’s classification of care in normal birth. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(1):75–83.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sandin-Bojo AK, Kvist LJ. Care in labor: a Swedish survey using the Bologna Score. Birth. 2008;35(4):321–8.CrossRefPubMed Sandin-Bojo AK, Kvist LJ. Care in labor: a Swedish survey using the Bologna Score. Birth. 2008;35(4):321–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Smith LF. Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: dimensions, validity, and internal reliability. Qual Health Care. 2001;10(1):17–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith LF. Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: dimensions, validity, and internal reliability. Qual Health Care. 2001;10(1):17–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Lally JE, Murtagh MJ, Macphail S, Thomson R. More in hope than expectation: a systematic review of women’s expectations and experience of pain relief in labour. BMC Med. 2008;6:7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lally JE, Murtagh MJ, Macphail S, Thomson R. More in hope than expectation: a systematic review of women’s expectations and experience of pain relief in labour. BMC Med. 2008;6:7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Christiaens W, Bracke P. Assessment of social psychological determinants of satisfaction with childbirth in a cross-national perspective. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007;7:26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Christiaens W, Bracke P. Assessment of social psychological determinants of satisfaction with childbirth in a cross-national perspective. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007;7:26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Bryanton J, Gagnon AJ, Johnston C, Hatem M. Predictors of women’s perceptions of the childbirth experience. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37(1):24–34.CrossRefPubMed Bryanton J, Gagnon AJ, Johnston C, Hatem M. Predictors of women’s perceptions of the childbirth experience. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37(1):24–34.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Williams CE, Povey RC, White DG. Predicting women’s intentions to use pain relief medication during childbirth using the Theory of Planned Behaviour and Self-Efficacy Theory. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2008;26(3):168–79.CrossRef Williams CE, Povey RC, White DG. Predicting women’s intentions to use pain relief medication during childbirth using the Theory of Planned Behaviour and Self-Efficacy Theory. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2008;26(3):168–79.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Uribe C, Contreras A, Villarroel L, Rivera S, Bravo P, Cornejo M. Bienestar Materno durante el proceso de Parto: desarrollo y aplicación de una escala de medición. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2008;73(1):4–10.CrossRef Uribe C, Contreras A, Villarroel L, Rivera S, Bravo P, Cornejo M. Bienestar Materno durante el proceso de Parto: desarrollo y aplicación de una escala de medición. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2008;73(1):4–10.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Janssen PA, Dennis CL, Reime B. Development and psychometric testing of The Care in Obstetrics: Measure for Testing Satisfaction (COMFORTS) scale. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(1):51–60.CrossRefPubMed Janssen PA, Dennis CL, Reime B. Development and psychometric testing of The Care in Obstetrics: Measure for Testing Satisfaction (COMFORTS) scale. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(1):51–60.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ford E, Ayers S, Wright DB. Measurement of maternal perceptions of support and control in birth (SCIB). J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009;18(2):245–52.CrossRef Ford E, Ayers S, Wright DB. Measurement of maternal perceptions of support and control in birth (SCIB). J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009;18(2):245–52.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sawyer A, Ayers S, Abbott J, Gyte G, Rabe H, Duley L. Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sawyer A, Ayers S, Abbott J, Gyte G, Rabe H, Duley L. Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Siassakos D, Clark J, Sibanda T, Attilakos G, Jefferys A, Cullen L, et al. A simple tool to measure patient perceptions of operative birth. BJOG. 2009;116(13):1755–61.CrossRefPubMed Siassakos D, Clark J, Sibanda T, Attilakos G, Jefferys A, Cullen L, et al. A simple tool to measure patient perceptions of operative birth. BJOG. 2009;116(13):1755–61.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Christiaens W, Gouwy A, Bracke P. Does a referral from home to hospital affect satisfaction with childbirth? A cross-national comparison. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:109.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Christiaens W, Gouwy A, Bracke P. Does a referral from home to hospital affect satisfaction with childbirth? A cross-national comparison. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:109.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Christiaens W, Bracke P. Place of birth and satisfaction with childbirth in Belgium and the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2009;25(2):e11–9.CrossRefPubMed Christiaens W, Bracke P. Place of birth and satisfaction with childbirth in Belgium and the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2009;25(2):e11–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Mas-Pons R, Barona-Vilar C, Carregui-Vilar S, Ibanez-Gil N, Margaix-Fontestad L, Escriba-Aguir V. Women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: validation of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale. Gac Sanit. 2012;26(3):236–42.CrossRefPubMed Mas-Pons R, Barona-Vilar C, Carregui-Vilar S, Ibanez-Gil N, Margaix-Fontestad L, Escriba-Aguir V. Women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: validation of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale. Gac Sanit. 2012;26(3):236–42.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Ferrando PJ, Lorenzo-Seva U. Unrestricted item factor analysis and some relations with Item Response Theory. 2013 Ferrando PJ, Lorenzo-Seva U. Unrestricted item factor analysis and some relations with Item Response Theory. 2013
31.
go back to reference Beck CT, Bernal H, Froman RD. Methods to document semantic equivalence of a translated scale. Res Nurs Health. 2003;26(1):64–73.CrossRefPubMed Beck CT, Bernal H, Froman RD. Methods to document semantic equivalence of a translated scale. Res Nurs Health. 2003;26(1):64–73.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Casas Anguita J, Ramon Repullo Labrador J, Pereira Candel J. Measurements of quality of life related with health. Basic concepts and cultural adaptation. Med Clin (Barc). 2001;116(20):789–96.CrossRef Casas Anguita J, Ramon Repullo Labrador J, Pereira Candel J. Measurements of quality of life related with health. Basic concepts and cultural adaptation. Med Clin (Barc). 2001;116(20):789–96.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lomax RG, Schumaker RE. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Routledge Academic, 2012. p.33–53. Lomax RG, Schumaker RE. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Routledge Academic, 2012. p.33–53.
34.
go back to reference Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando PJ. FACTOR: a computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behav Res Methods. 2006;38(1):88–91.CrossRefPubMed Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando PJ. FACTOR: a computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behav Res Methods. 2006;38(1):88–91.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Lorenzo-Seva U. Promin: A method for oblique factor rotation. Multivariate Behav Res. 1999;34(3):347–65.CrossRef Lorenzo-Seva U. Promin: A method for oblique factor rotation. Multivariate Behav Res. 1999;34(3):347–65.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Lorenzo-Seva U. A factor simplicity index. Psychometrika. 2003;68(1):49–60.CrossRef Lorenzo-Seva U. A factor simplicity index. Psychometrika. 2003;68(1):49–60.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Reckase M. Test theory: A unified treatment. Appl Psychol Meas. 2000;24(2):187–9.CrossRef Reckase M. Test theory: A unified treatment. Appl Psychol Meas. 2000;24(2):187–9.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference McDonald Roderick P. Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1999. McDonald Roderick P. Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1999.
40.
go back to reference Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):1–36.CrossRef Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):1–36.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Lomax RG, Schumaker RE. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Routledge Academic, 2012. p.73–123. Lomax RG, Schumaker RE. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Routledge Academic, 2012. p.73–123.
43.
go back to reference Peters GJY. The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: why and how to abandon Cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality. European Health Psychol. 2014;16(2):56–69. Peters GJY. The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: why and how to abandon Cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality. European Health Psychol. 2014;16(2):56–69.
44.
go back to reference Keszei AP, Novak M, Streiner DL. Introduction to health measurement scales. J Psychosom Res. 2010;68(4):319–23.CrossRefPubMed Keszei AP, Novak M, Streiner DL. Introduction to health measurement scales. J Psychosom Res. 2010;68(4):319–23.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(1):1.CrossRef Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(1):1.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Walker KF, Wilson P, Bugg GJ, Dencker A, Thornton JG. Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1.CrossRef Walker KF, Wilson P, Bugg GJ, Dencker A, Thornton JG. Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validation of the Spanish version of mackey childbirth satisfaction rating scale
Authors
Pablo Caballero
Beatriz E. Delgado-García
Isabel Orts-Cortes
Joaquin Moncho
Pamela Pereyra-Zamora
Andreu Nolasco
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0862-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016 Go to the issue