Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Development of a tool to measure women’s perception of respectful maternity care in public health facilities

Authors: Ephrem D. Sheferaw, Teka Z. Mengesha, Solomon B. Wase

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Maternal mortality continues to be the biggest challenge facing Ethiopia and other developing countries. Although progress has been made in making maternity services available closer to the community, the rate of deliveries attended by skilled birth attendants has remained very low. Absence of respectful maternity care (RMC) is believed to have contributed to low utilization of facility delivery services. This study outlines steps undertaken to construct and validate a scale that measures women’s perception of respectful maternity care provided in health facilities.

Methods

An inductive item generation process that included a literature review and in-depth interviews with labor and delivery clients, followed by an expert review, assured face validity and content validity of the tool. A draft RMC scale with 37 items and two additional measures of global satisfaction items, measured on a five-point Likert scale, were administered to a developmental sample of 509 postnatal care clients visiting facilities immediately after childbirth to 7 weeks postpartum. IBM SPSS 20 was used to perform exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using principal component analysis (PCA) with oblique rotation method.

Results

The final RMC scale with 15 items was loaded on four components. The extracted components were labeled as friendly care, abuse-free care, timely care, and discrimination-free care. The final RMC scale correlated strongly with the global satisfaction measures, indicating criterion-related validity of the scale. Content-related validity was assured by the process of item generation. Construct validity of the RMC scale was confirmed by high average factor loading of the four components ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 and low correlation between the components. Stability of the scale was confirmed by running PCA in a randomly selected split sample of 320 samples from the validation sample. The final 15-item scale showed an adequate reliability with α = 0.845.

Conclusion

The 15-item RMC scale is a valid and reliable measure of women’s perception of RMC received in health facilities. We recommend that health facilities use the RMC scale in urban public health facilities and that other researchers conduct further exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in different geographic areas.
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization (WHO). Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2013 estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, the World Bank and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: WHO; 2014. World Health Organization (WHO). Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2013 estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, the World Bank and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
2.
go back to reference Central Statistical Agency [Ethiopia] and ICF International. Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2011. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Calverton, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Agency and ICF International; 2012 Central Statistical Agency [Ethiopia] and ICF International. Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2011. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Calverton, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Agency and ICF International; 2012
3.
go back to reference Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth: report of a landscape analysis. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: USAID-TRAction Project, Harvard School of Public Health and University Research Corporation, LLC; 2010. Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth: report of a landscape analysis. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: USAID-TRAction Project, Harvard School of Public Health and University Research Corporation, LLC; 2010.
4.
go back to reference Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program (MCHIP). Cultural barriers to seeking maternal health care in Ethiopia: a review of the literature. Addis Ababa: Jhpiego; 2012. Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program (MCHIP). Cultural barriers to seeking maternal health care in Ethiopia: a review of the literature. Addis Ababa: Jhpiego; 2012.
5.
go back to reference Ross-Davie M. Measuring the quantity and quality of midwifery support of women during labour and childbirth: the development and testing of the ‘Supportive Midwifery in Labour Instrument’. Stirling, Scotland, UK: University of Stirling; 2012. Ross-Davie M. Measuring the quantity and quality of midwifery support of women during labour and childbirth: the development and testing of the ‘Supportive Midwifery in Labour Instrument’. Stirling, Scotland, UK: University of Stirling; 2012.
6.
go back to reference World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, UNFPA. Women-friendly health services: experiences in maternal care. Mexico City: WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA; 1999. World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, UNFPA. Women-friendly health services: experiences in maternal care. Mexico City: WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA; 1999.
8.
go back to reference Moore M, Armbruster D, Graeff J, Copeland R. Assessing the “caring” behaviors of skilled maternity care providers during labor and delivery: experience from Kenya and Bangladesh. Washington, DC: The CHANGE Project; 2002. Moore M, Armbruster D, Graeff J, Copeland R. Assessing the “caring” behaviors of skilled maternity care providers during labor and delivery: experience from Kenya and Bangladesh. Washington, DC: The CHANGE Project; 2002.
9.
go back to reference World Health Organization (WHO). The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth: WHO statement. Geneva: WHO; 2014. World Health Organization (WHO). The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth: WHO statement. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
10.
go back to reference Sawyer A, Ayers S, Abbott J, Gyte G, Rabe H, Duley L. Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sawyer A, Ayers S, Abbott J, Gyte G, Rabe H, Duley L. Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Kruk ME, Kujawski S, Mbaruku G, Ramsey K, Moyo W, Freedman LP. Disrespectful and abusive treatment during facility delivery in Tanzania: a facility and community survey. Health Policy Plan. 2014;1–8. Kruk ME, Kujawski S, Mbaruku G, Ramsey K, Moyo W, Freedman LP. Disrespectful and abusive treatment during facility delivery in Tanzania: a facility and community survey. Health Policy Plan. 2014;1–8.
12.
go back to reference Warren C, Njuki R, Abuya T, Ndwuga C, Maingi G, Serwanga J, et al. Study protocol for promoting respectful maternity care initiative to assess, measure and design interventions to reduce disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Warren C, Njuki R, Abuya T, Ndwuga C, Maingi G, Serwanga J, et al. Study protocol for promoting respectful maternity care initiative to assess, measure and design interventions to reduce disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assess Res Eval. 2005;10(7):1–9. Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assess Res Eval. 2005;10(7):1–9.
14.
go back to reference MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods. 1999;4:84–99.CrossRef MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods. 1999;4:84–99.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage; 2003. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage; 2003.
17.
go back to reference Netemeyer RG, Sharma S, Bearden WO. Scaling procedures: issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage Publications; 2003.CrossRef Netemeyer RG, Sharma S, Bearden WO. Scaling procedures: issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage Publications; 2003.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference de Gruijter DN, van der Kamp LJ. Statistical test theory for the behavioral sciences. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2008. de Gruijter DN, van der Kamp LJ. Statistical test theory for the behavioral sciences. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2008.
19.
go back to reference Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon; 2007. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon; 2007.
Metadata
Title
Development of a tool to measure women’s perception of respectful maternity care in public health facilities
Authors
Ephrem D. Sheferaw
Teka Z. Mengesha
Solomon B. Wase
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0848-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016 Go to the issue