Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Persistency, medication prescribing patterns, and medical resource use associated with multiple sclerosis patients receiving oral disease-modifying therapies: a retrospective medical record review

Authors: Tara Nazareth, Howard S. Friedman, Prakash Navaratnam, Denise A. Herriott, John J. Ko, Peri Barr, Rahul Sasane

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the US, the approved multiple sclerosis (MS) oral disease-modifying therapies (ODMTs) are fingolimod (FTY), teriflunomide (TFN), and dimethyl fumarate (DMF). FTY and TFN are recommended with once-daily doses with no up-titration, whereas DMF treatment is recommended twice-daily (BID) and is initiated with a 7-day starter dose of 120 mg BID before up-titration to the maintenance dose of 240 mg BID. Limited information exists regarding real-world ODMT prescribing patterns to aid physician/patient decision-making.

Methods

Eligible patients for this retrospective medical record review were ≥18 years, had one visit related to ODMT initiation (index visit), and ≥1 visit within 12 months before and after the index visit. Primary objectives were to assess post-index ODMT persistency (i.e., discontinuation), prescribing patterns (medication switching, dose up-titrations, dose reduction, re-starts, and add-ons) and medical resource utilization (office-visits, MRI procedures, and mobility indicators) at distinct time windows of 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Chi-square or Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests were used for 3-way ODMT group comparisons.

Results

Medical records of 293 MS-diagnosed patients using ODMTs were abstracted from 19 US-based neurology clinics between December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2014 (FTY: 101; DMF: 133; TFN: 59). Persistency rates among ODMT groups were similar. MS-related medication switching, dose reduction, re-starts, and add-ons were infrequently observed and were similar across ODMT groups. Of DMF patients with a confirmed starting dose of 120 mg BID with ≥12 months follow-up (n = 26), the percentage who were prescribed dose up-titrations to the recommended maintenance DMF dose was 23.1 % at 1–3 months, 26.9 % at 4–6 months, 42.3 % at 7–9 months, and 0 % at 10–12 months. There were no significant differences at any time window among the ODMT groups in the number of office visits or percent of patients receiving MRIs. Mobility indicator patterns (proportion of patients with abnormal gait, wheelchair use, etc.) were consistent over time.

Conclusions

There was no difference in persistency, prescribing patterns (medication switching, dose reduction, re-starts, and add-ons) or medical resource utilization (office-visits, MRI procedures, and mobility indicators) among the ODMTs. However, in a small sub-group of patients, delays of up to 9 months in DMF dose-up titration to the recommended maintenance dose were observed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bergvall N, Petrilla AA, Karkare SU, Lahoz R, Agashivala N, Pradhan A, et al. Persistence with and adherence to fingolimod compared with other disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a retrospective US claims database analysis. J Med Econ. 2014;17(10):696–707. doi:10.3111/13696998.2014.940422.CrossRefPubMed Bergvall N, Petrilla AA, Karkare SU, Lahoz R, Agashivala N, Pradhan A, et al. Persistence with and adherence to fingolimod compared with other disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a retrospective US claims database analysis. J Med Econ. 2014;17(10):696–707. doi:10.​3111/​13696998.​2014.​940422.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Halpern R, Agarwal S, Dembek C, Borton L, Lopez-Bresnahan M. Comparison of adherence and persistence among multiple sclerosis patients treated with disease-modifying therapies: a retrospective administrative claims analysis. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:73–84. doi:10.2147/PPA.S15702.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Halpern R, Agarwal S, Dembek C, Borton L, Lopez-Bresnahan M. Comparison of adherence and persistence among multiple sclerosis patients treated with disease-modifying therapies: a retrospective administrative claims analysis. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:73–84. doi:10.​2147/​PPA.​S15702.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Hupperts R, Ghazi-Visser L, Martins Silva A, Arvanitis M, Kuusisto H, Marhardt K, et al. The STAR Study: a real-world, international, observational study of the safety and tolerability of, and adherence to, serum-free subcutaneous interferon beta-1a in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Clin Ther. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.04.002.PubMed Hupperts R, Ghazi-Visser L, Martins Silva A, Arvanitis M, Kuusisto H, Marhardt K, et al. The STAR Study: a real-world, international, observational study of the safety and tolerability of, and adherence to, serum-free subcutaneous interferon beta-1a in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Clin Ther. 2014. doi:10.​1016/​j.​clinthera.​2014.​04.​002.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Fox RJ, Miller DH, Phillips JT, Hutchinson M, Havrdova E, Kita M, et al. Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 or glatiramer in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(12):1087–97. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1206328.CrossRefPubMed Fox RJ, Miller DH, Phillips JT, Hutchinson M, Havrdova E, Kita M, et al. Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 or glatiramer in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(12):1087–97. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa1206328.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Tecfidera. dimethyl fumarate. Cambridge: Biogen Idec Inc; 2015. Tecfidera. dimethyl fumarate. Cambridge: Biogen Idec Inc; 2015.
12.
go back to reference Gilenya. fingolimod. East Hanover: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2014. Gilenya. fingolimod. East Hanover: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2014.
13.
go back to reference Aubagio. teriflunomide. Cambridge: Genzyme Corporation; 2014. Aubagio. teriflunomide. Cambridge: Genzyme Corporation; 2014.
14.
go back to reference Kappos L, Gold R, Miller DH, Macmanus DG, Havrdova E, Limmroth V, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb study. Lancet. 2008;372(9648):1463–72. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61619-0.CrossRefPubMed Kappos L, Gold R, Miller DH, Macmanus DG, Havrdova E, Limmroth V, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb study. Lancet. 2008;372(9648):1463–72. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(08)61619-0.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gold R, Kappos L, Arnold DL, Bar-Or A, Giovannoni G, Selmaj K, et al. Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(12):1098–107. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1114287.CrossRefPubMed Gold R, Kappos L, Arnold DL, Bar-Or A, Giovannoni G, Selmaj K, et al. Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(12):1098–107. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa1114287.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Cohn S, Bermel R, Hara C, Hersh C, Fox RJ, Cohen J, et al. Comparative tolerability and efficacy of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2014;20 Suppl 1:300. Cohn S, Bermel R, Hara C, Hersh C, Fox RJ, Cohen J, et al. Comparative tolerability and efficacy of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2014;20 Suppl 1:300.
Metadata
Title
Persistency, medication prescribing patterns, and medical resource use associated with multiple sclerosis patients receiving oral disease-modifying therapies: a retrospective medical record review
Authors
Tara Nazareth
Howard S. Friedman
Prakash Navaratnam
Denise A. Herriott
John J. Ko
Peri Barr
Rahul Sasane
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Neurology / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0698-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Neurology 1/2016 Go to the issue