Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Imaging 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Metastasis | Technical advance

Quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using MIRADA RTx on CT scans: a feasibility study

Authors: B. G. Sibinga Mulder, P. Hendriks, T. R. Baetens, A. R. van Erkel, C. S. P. van Rijswijk, R. W. van der Meer, C. J. H. van de Velde, A. L. Vahrmeijer, J. S. D. Mieog, M. C. Burgmans

Published in: BMC Medical Imaging | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Compared to surgery, radiofrequency ablation(RFA) for colorectal liver metastasis(CRLM) is associated with higher local recurrence(LR) rates. A wide margin (at least 5 mm) is generally recommended to prevent LR, but the optimal method to assess ablation margins is yet to be established. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of CT-CT co-registration, using MIRADA software, in order to assess ablation margins of patients with CRLM.

Methods

In this retrospective study, pre- and post-ablation contrast-enhanced CT scans of 29 patients, treated with percutaneous RFA for a solitary CRLM, were co-registered. Co-registration was performed by two independent radiologist, based on venous structures in proximity to the tumor. Feasibility of CT-CT co-registration and inter-observer agreement for reproducibility and ablation margins was determined. Furthermore, the minimal ablation margin was compared with the occurrence of LR during follow-up.

Results

Co-registration was considered feasible in 18 patients (61% male, 63.1(±10.9) year), with a perfect inter-observer agreement for completeness of ablation: κ = 1.0(p < 0.001). And substantial inter-observer agreement for measurement of the minimal margin (≤ 0 mm, 1-5 mm, ≥ 5 mm): κ = 0.723(p-value < 0.001). LR occurred in eight of nine(88.9%) incompletely ablated CRLM and in one of the nine completely ablated CRLM(11.1%).

Conclusion

Co-registration using MIRADA is reproducible and potentially a valuable tool in defining technical success. Feasibility of co-registration of pre- and post-ablation CT scans is suboptimal if scans are not acquired concordantly. Co-registration may potentially aid in the prediction of LR after percutaneous ablation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McKay A, et al. Current role of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1192–201.CrossRef McKay A, et al. Current role of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1192–201.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sofocleous CT, et al. CT-guided radiofrequency ablation as a salvage treatment of colorectal cancer hepatic metastases developing after hepatectomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:755–61.CrossRef Sofocleous CT, et al. CT-guided radiofrequency ablation as a salvage treatment of colorectal cancer hepatic metastases developing after hepatectomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:755–61.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hamada A, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for colorectal liver metastases: prognostic factors in non-surgical candidates. Jpn J Radiol. 2012;30:567–74.CrossRef Hamada A, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for colorectal liver metastases: prognostic factors in non-surgical candidates. Jpn J Radiol. 2012;30:567–74.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lee JM, et al. Hepatic radiofrequency ablation using multiple probes: ex vivo and in vivo comparative studies of monopolar versus multipolar modes. Korean J Radiol. 2006;7:106–17.CrossRef Lee JM, et al. Hepatic radiofrequency ablation using multiple probes: ex vivo and in vivo comparative studies of monopolar versus multipolar modes. Korean J Radiol. 2006;7:106–17.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wang X, et al. Margin size is an independent predictor of local tumor progression after ablation of colon cancer liver metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36:166–75.CrossRef Wang X, et al. Margin size is an independent predictor of local tumor progression after ablation of colon cancer liver metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36:166–75.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yedururi S, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumor: subjective assessment of the perilesional vascular network on contrast-enhanced computed tomography before and after ablation can reliably predict the risk of local recurrence. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017;41:607–13.CrossRef Yedururi S, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumor: subjective assessment of the perilesional vascular network on contrast-enhanced computed tomography before and after ablation can reliably predict the risk of local recurrence. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017;41:607–13.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kim YS, et al. The minimal ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (> 2 and < 5 cm) needed to prevent local tumor progression: 3D quantitative assessment using CT image fusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:758–65.CrossRef Kim YS, et al. The minimal ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (> 2 and < 5 cm) needed to prevent local tumor progression: 3D quantitative assessment using CT image fusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:758–65.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Park J, et al. Value of nonrigid registration of pre-procedure MR with post-procedure CT after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40:873–83.CrossRef Park J, et al. Value of nonrigid registration of pre-procedure MR with post-procedure CT after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40:873–83.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Makino Y, et al. Feasibility of extracted-overlay fusion imaging for intraoperative treatment evaluation of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 2016;5:269–79.CrossRef Makino Y, et al. Feasibility of extracted-overlay fusion imaging for intraoperative treatment evaluation of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 2016;5:269–79.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference El-Gamal FEA, et al. Current trends in medical image registration and fusion. Egypt Inform J. 2016;17:99–124.CrossRef El-Gamal FEA, et al. Current trends in medical image registration and fusion. Egypt Inform J. 2016;17:99–124.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Roberts C. Modelling patterns of agreement for nominal scales. Stat Med. 2008;27:810–30.CrossRef Roberts C. Modelling patterns of agreement for nominal scales. Stat Med. 2008;27:810–30.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bhutiani N, et al. Impact of surgical margin clearance for resection of secondary hepatic malignancies. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:289–95.CrossRef Bhutiani N, et al. Impact of surgical margin clearance for resection of secondary hepatic malignancies. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:289–95.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Engstrand J, et al. Stereotactic CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of liver tumors with the use of high-frequency jet ventilation: an accuracy and procedural safety study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:193–200.CrossRef Engstrand J, et al. Stereotactic CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of liver tumors with the use of high-frequency jet ventilation: an accuracy and procedural safety study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:193–200.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using MIRADA RTx on CT scans: a feasibility study
Authors
B. G. Sibinga Mulder
P. Hendriks
T. R. Baetens
A. R. van Erkel
C. S. P. van Rijswijk
R. W. van der Meer
C. J. H. van de Velde
A. L. Vahrmeijer
J. S. D. Mieog
M. C. Burgmans
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Metastasis
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2342
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0360-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Medical Imaging 1/2019 Go to the issue