Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Imaging 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Osteoblastic lesion screening with an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in CT-images

Authors: Hannes Seuss, Peter Dankerl, Alexander Cavallaro, Michael Uder, Matthias Hammon

Published in: BMC Medical Imaging | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To evaluate screening and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of osteoblastic rib lesions using an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in CT-images.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed the CT-data of 60 consecutive prostate cancer patients by applying dedicated software enabling in-plane rib reading. Reading the conventional multiplanar reconstructions was considered to be the reference standard. To simulate clinical practice, the reader was given 10 s to screen for sclerotic rib lesions in each patient applying both approaches. Afterwards, every rib was evaluated individually with both approaches without a time limit. Sensitivities, specificities, positive/negative predictive values and the time needed for detection were calculated depending on the lesion’s size (largest diameter < 5 mm, 5–10 mm, > 10 mm).

Results

In 53 of 60 patients, all ribs were properly displayed in plane, in five patients ribs were partially displayed correctly, and in two patients none of the ribs were displayed correctly. During the 10-s screening approach all patients with sclerotic rib lesions were correctly identified reading the in-plane images (including the patients without a correct rib segmentation), whereas 14 of 23 patients were correctly identified reading conventional multiplanar images. Overall screening sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values were 100/27.0/46.0/100 %, respectively, for in-plane reading and 60.9/100/100/80.4 %, respectively, for multiplanar reading. Overall diagnostic (no time limit) sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values of in-plane reading were 97.8/92.8/74.6/99.5 %, respectively. False positive results predominantly occurred for lesions <5 mm in size.

Conclusions

In-plane reading of the ribs allows reliable detection of osteoblastic lesions for screening purposes. The limited specificity results from false positives predominantly occurring for small lesions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Roodman GD. Mechanisms of bone metastasis. N Engl J Med. 2004;15:1655–64.CrossRef Roodman GD. Mechanisms of bone metastasis. N Engl J Med. 2004;15:1655–64.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Heindel W, Gübitz R, Vieth V, Weckesser M, Schober O, Schäfers M. The diagnostic imaging of bone metastases. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111:741–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Heindel W, Gübitz R, Vieth V, Weckesser M, Schober O, Schäfers M. The diagnostic imaging of bone metastases. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111:741–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
4.
go back to reference Mundy GR. Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:584–93.CrossRefPubMed Mundy GR. Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:584–93.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Choi J, Raghavan M. Diagnostic imaging and image-guided therapy of skeletal metastases. Cancer Control. 2012;19:102–12.CrossRefPubMed Choi J, Raghavan M. Diagnostic imaging and image-guided therapy of skeletal metastases. Cancer Control. 2012;19:102–12.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kodaira M, Takahashi S, Yamada S, Ueda K, Mishima Y, Takeuchi K, Yamamoto N, Ishikawa Y, Yokoyama M, Saotome T, Terui Y, Hatake K. Bone metastasis and poor performance status are prognostic factors for survival of carcinoma of unknown primary site in patients treated with systematic chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1163–7.CrossRefPubMed Kodaira M, Takahashi S, Yamada S, Ueda K, Mishima Y, Takeuchi K, Yamamoto N, Ishikawa Y, Yokoyama M, Saotome T, Terui Y, Hatake K. Bone metastasis and poor performance status are prognostic factors for survival of carcinoma of unknown primary site in patients treated with systematic chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1163–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ketelsen D, Röthke M, Aschoff P, Merseburger AS, Lichy MP, Reimold M, Claussen CD, Schlemmer HP. Detection of bone metastasis of prostate cancer - comparison of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy, skeletal scintigraphy or positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT). Röfo. 2008;180:746–52.PubMed Ketelsen D, Röthke M, Aschoff P, Merseburger AS, Lichy MP, Reimold M, Claussen CD, Schlemmer HP. Detection of bone metastasis of prostate cancer - comparison of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy, skeletal scintigraphy or positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT). Röfo. 2008;180:746–52.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kalogeropoulou C, Karachaliou A, Zampakis P. Bone metastases. In: Radiologic evaluation of skeletal metastases: role of plain radiographs and computed tomography, Cancer metastasis biol treat, vol. 12. Netherlands: Springer; 2009. p. 119–36. Kalogeropoulou C, Karachaliou A, Zampakis P. Bone metastases. In: Radiologic evaluation of skeletal metastases: role of plain radiographs and computed tomography, Cancer metastasis biol treat, vol. 12. Netherlands: Springer; 2009. p. 119–36.
10.
go back to reference Hamaoka T, Madewell JE, Podoloff DA, Hortobagyi GN, Ueno NT. Bone imaging in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;15:2942–53.CrossRef Hamaoka T, Madewell JE, Podoloff DA, Hortobagyi GN, Ueno NT. Bone imaging in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;15:2942–53.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Krupinski EA. Computer-aided detection in clinical environment: benefits and challenges for radiologists. Radiology. 2004;231:7–9.CrossRefPubMed Krupinski EA. Computer-aided detection in clinical environment: benefits and challenges for radiologists. Radiology. 2004;231:7–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hamaoka T, Madewell JE, Podoloff DA, Hortobagyi GN, Ueno NT. Bone imaging in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2942–53.CrossRefPubMed Hamaoka T, Madewell JE, Podoloff DA, Hortobagyi GN, Ueno NT. Bone imaging in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2942–53.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Logothetis CJ, Lin SH. Osteoblasts in prostate cancer metastasis to bone. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:21–8.CrossRefPubMed Logothetis CJ, Lin SH. Osteoblasts in prostate cancer metastasis to bone. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:21–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Staal J, van Ginneken B, Viergever MA. Automatic rib segmentation and labeling in computed tomography scans using a general framework for detection, recognition and segmentation of objects in volumetric data. Med Image Anal. 2007;11:35–46.CrossRefPubMed Staal J, van Ginneken B, Viergever MA. Automatic rib segmentation and labeling in computed tomography scans using a general framework for detection, recognition and segmentation of objects in volumetric data. Med Image Anal. 2007;11:35–46.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ziyue X, Bagci U, Jonsson C, Jain S, Mollura DJ. Efficient ribcage segmentation from CT scans using shape features. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:2899–902. Ziyue X, Bagci U, Jonsson C, Jain S, Mollura DJ. Efficient ribcage segmentation from CT scans using shape features. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:2899–902.
Metadata
Title
Osteoblastic lesion screening with an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in CT-images
Authors
Hannes Seuss
Peter Dankerl
Alexander Cavallaro
Michael Uder
Matthias Hammon
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2342
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-016-0141-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Medical Imaging 1/2016 Go to the issue