Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Primary Care
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

The receipt of information by family physicians about their patient’s emergency department visits: a record linkage study of electronic medical records to health administrative data

Authors: Liisa Jaakkimainen, Hannah Chung, Hong Lu, Bogdan Pinzaru, Elisa Candido

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Canadians are known to be frequent users of emergency department (ED) care. However, the exchange of information from ED visits to family physicians (FPs) is not well known. Our objectives were to determine whether Canadian FPs received information about their patient’s ED visit and the patient characteristics related to the receipt of ED information.

Methods

This study was a descriptive record linkage study of FP Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data linked to health administrative data. Our study cohort included patients who had at least one ED visit in 2010 or 2015 in Ontario, Canada. An ED visit could include a transfer to or from another ED. The receipt of information from an ED note was examined in relation to patient age, sex, neighbourhood income quintiles, rurality and comorbidity.

Results

There were 26,609 patients in 2010 and 50,541 patients in 2015 with at least one ED visit. In 2010, 53.3% of FPs received an ED note for patients having a single ED visit compared to 41.0% in 2015. For patients with multiple ED visits, 58.2% of FPs received an ED note in 2010 compared to 45.7% in 2015. FPs were more likely to receive an ED note for patients not living in low income neighbourhoods, older patients, patients living in small urban areas and for patients having moderate comorbidity. FPs were less likely to receive a note for patients living in rural areas.

Conclusions

Community-based FPs are more likely to get information after an ED visit for their older and sicker patients. However, FPs do not receive any information from EDs for over half their patients. Electronic health record technologies and their adoption by ED providers need to improve the seamless transfer of information about the care provided in EDs to FPs in the community.
Literature
1.
Osborn R, Squires D, Doty MM, Sarnak DO, Schneider EC. New Survey of 11 Countries, U.S. Adults Still Struggle with Access to and Affordability of Health Care. Health Affairs Web First. 2016;35:2327–36.CrossRef
2.
3.
4.
5.
Mian O, Pong R. Does better access to FPs decrease the likelihood of emergency department use? Results from the primary care access survey. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(11):e658–66.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
van den Berg MJ, van Loenen T, Westert GP. Accessible and continuous primary care may help reduce rates of emergency department use. An international survey in 34 countries. Fam Pract. 2016;33(1):42–50.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Kiran T, Moineddin R, Kopp A, Frymire E, Glazier RH. Emergency department use and enrollment in a medical home providing after-hours care. Ann Fam Med. 2018;16(5):419–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Palmer E, Leblanc-Duchin D, Murray J, Atkinson P. Emergency department use. Is frequent use associated with a lack of primary care provider? Can Fam Physician. 2014;60:e223–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Chan BT, Ovens HJ. Frequent users of emergency departments. Do they also use family physicians' services? Can Fam Physician. 2002;48:1654–60.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297(8):831–41.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
Moore C, Wisnivesky J, Williams S, McGinn T. Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(8):646–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
van Walraven C, Seth R, Austin PC, Laupacis A. Effect of discharge summary availability during post-discharge visits on hospital readmission. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(3):186–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
16.
17.
18.
Schull MJ. Making aftercare more than an afterthought: patient follow-up after emergency department discharge in Ontario. Healthcare Q. 2014;17(2):11–3.CrossRef
19.
McCusker J, Roberge D, Vadeboncoeur A, Verdon J. Safety of discharge of seniors from the emergency department to the community. Healthcare Quarterly. 2009;12(Special Issue):24–32.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
Tiedemann M. Legal and Social Affairs Division. Parliament and Information Research Services. The Canada Health Act-An Overview (Background Paper). Publication No. 2019–54-E. Ottawa: Library of Parliament, Canada ©; 2020.
22.
Jaakkimainen L, Schultz SE, Klein-Geltink JE, Thiruchelvam D, Kopp A. Ambulatory physician Care for Adults and Guttman a, Schultz SE, Jaakkimainen L. primary Care for Children. In: Jaakkimainen L, Upshur R, Klein-Geltink JE, Leong a, Maaten S, Schultz SE, Wang L, editors. Primary Care in Ontario: ICES atlas. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2006.
23.
Glazier RH, Hutchison B, Kopp A. Comparison of Family Health Teams to Other Ontario Primary Care Models, 2004/05 to 2011/12. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2015. ISBN: 978–1–926850-56-6 (Online)
24.
25.
26.
Jaakkimainen L, Bayoumi I, Glazier R, Premji K, Kiran T, Khan S, et al. Development and validation of an algorithm using health administrative data to define patient attachment to primary care providers. J Health Organ Manag. 2021;35(6):733–43. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1108/​JHOM-05-2020-0171.
27.
Stiell A, Forster AJ, Stiell IG, van Walraven C. Prevalence of information gaps in the emergency department and the effect on patient outcomes. CMAJ. 2003;169(10):1023–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Patients First: Action Plan for Health Care. 2015.
29.
30.
Canadian Institute for Health Information. How Canada compares: results from the commonwealth Fun’s 2019 international health policy survey of primary care physicians – accessible report. Ottawa: CIHI; 2020.
31.
Jaakkimainen RL, Bronskill SE, Tierney MC, Herrmann N, Green D, Young J, et al. Identification of physician-diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias in population-based administrative data: a validation study using family physicians’ electronic medical records. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;54:337–49.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zhang H, Candido E, Wilton AS, Duchen R, Jaakkimainen L, Wodchis W, et al. Identifying transitional high cost users from unstructured patient profile written by primary care physicians. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2020;25:127–38 Epub 2020 Jan 1.PubMed
33.
Jaakkimainen RL, Glazier R, Barnsley J, Salkeld E, Lu H, Tu K. Waiting to see the specialist: patient and provider characteristics of wait times from primary to specialty care. BMC Family Pract. 2014;15:16.CrossRef
34.
Tu K, Widdifield J, Young J, Oud W, Ivers N, Butt D, et al. Are family physicians comprehensively using electronic medical records such that the data can be used for secondary purposes? A Canadian perspective. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015;15:67 PMID 26268511.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
36.
Li G, Lau JT, McCarthy ML, Schull MJ, Vermeulen M, Kelen GD. Emergency department utilization in the United States and Ontario. Canada Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(6):582–4 Epub 2007 Apr 30.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Denny K, Davidson MJ. Area-based socio-economic measures as tools for health disparities research, policy and planning. Can J Public Health. 2012;103(8):S4–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Kralj B. Measuring “rurality” for purposes of health-care planning: an empirical measure for Ontario. Toronto: Ontario Medical Review; 2000.
39.
40.
Austin PC, Daly PA, Tu JV. A multicenter study of the coding accuracy of hospital discharge administrative data for patients admitted to cardiac care units in Ontario. Am Heart J. 2002;144:290–6.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Gershon AS, Wang C, Guan J, Vasilevska-Ristovska J, Cicutto L, To T. Identifying patients with physician-diagnosed asthma in health administrative databases. Can Respir J. 2009;16:183–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Gershon AS, Wang C, Guan J, Vasilevska-Ristovska J, Cicutto L, To T. Identifying individuals with physician diagnosed COPD in health administrative databases. COPD. 2009;6(5):388–94.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Schultz SE, Rothwell DM, Chen Z, Tu K. Identifying cases of congestive heart failure from administrative data: a validation study using primary care patient records. Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2013;33(3):160–6.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Lipscombe LL, Hwee J, Webster L, Shah BR, Booth GL, Tu K. Identifying diabetes cases from administrative data: a population-based validation study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Tu K, Lipscombe LL, Chen ZL. For the CHEP outcomes research taskforce. Prevalence and incidence of hypertension from 1995 to 2005: a population-based study. CMAJ. 2008;178(11):1429–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Steele L, Glazier R, Lin E, Evans M. Using administrative data to measure ambulatory mental health service provision in primary care. Med Care. 2004;42:960–5.CrossRefPubMed
47.
48.
SAS Enterprise Guide version 7.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
49.
50.
Rosenfield D, Harvey G, Jessa K. Implementing electronic medical records in Canadian emergency departments. CJEM. 2019;21(1):15–7.CrossRefPubMed
51.
52.
Metadata
Title
The receipt of information by family physicians about their patient’s emergency department visits: a record linkage study of electronic medical records to health administrative data
Authors
Liisa Jaakkimainen
Hannah Chung
Hong Lu
Bogdan Pinzaru
Elisa Candido
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01582-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Primary Care 1/2021 Go to the issue

Research article

General practitioners’ experiences of emergency care and treatment planning in England: a focus group study

Research

Effect of a price display intervention on laboratory test ordering behavior of general practitioners

Research article

Social prescribing for people with complex needs: a realist evaluation

Research article

Shared decision making and patient-centeredness for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care—results of the cluster-randomised controlled DEBATE trial

Research

The influence of a MOBile-based video Instruction for Low back pain (MOBIL) on initial care decisions made by primary care providers: a randomized controlled trial

Research article

Prepared and highly committed despite the risk of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional survey of primary care physicians’ concerns and coping strategies in Singapore