Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Study protocol

Optimising personal continuity for older patients in general practice: a study protocol for a cluster randomised stepped wedge pragmatic trial

Authors: Lex J. J. Groot, Henk J. Schers, Jako S. Burgers, Francois G. Schellevis, Martin Smalbrugge, Annemarie A. Uijen, Peter M. van de Ven, Henriëtte E. van der Horst, Otto R. Maarsingh

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Continuity of care, in particular personal continuity, is a core principle of general practice and is associated with many benefits such as a better patient-provider relationship and lower mortality. However, personal continuity is under pressure due to changes in society and healthcare. This affects older patients more than younger patients. As the number of older patients will double the coming decades, an intervention to optimise personal continuity for this group is highly warranted.

Methods

Following the UK Medical Research Council framework for complex Interventions, we will develop and evaluate an intervention to optimise personal continuity for older patients in general practice. In phase 0, we will perform a literature study to provide the theoretical basis for the intervention. In phase I we will define the components of the intervention by performing surveys and focus groups among patients, general practitioners, practice assistants and practice nurses, concluded by a Delphi study among members of our group. In phase II, we will test and finalise the intervention with input from a pilot study in two general practices. In phase III, we will perform a stepped wedge cluster randomised pragmatic trial. The primary outcome measure is continuity of care from the patients’ perspective, measured by the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures are level of implementation, barriers and facilitators for implementation, acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. In phase IV, we will establish the conditions for large-scale implementation.

Discussion

This is the first study to investigate an intervention for improving personal continuity for older patients in general practice. If proven effective, our intervention will enable General practitioners to improve the quality of care for their increasing population of older patients. The pragmatic design of the study will enable evaluation in real-life conditions, facilitating future implementation.

Trial registration number

Netherlands Trial Register, trial NL8132. Registered 2 November 2019.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
5.
go back to reference Schers H, Maat C, van de Ven C, van den Hoogen H, Grol R, van den Bosch W. General practitioners’ views on continuity of care. Huisarts Wet. 2002;45(9):450–4.CrossRef Schers H, Maat C, van de Ven C, van den Hoogen H, Grol R, van den Bosch W. General practitioners’ views on continuity of care. Huisarts Wet. 2002;45(9):450–4.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schers H, Webster S, van den Hoogen H, Avery A, Grol R, van den Bosch W. Continuity of care in general practice: a survey of patients' views. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52(479):459–62.PubMedPubMedCentral Schers H, Webster S, van den Hoogen H, Avery A, Grol R, van den Bosch W. Continuity of care in general practice: a survey of patients' views. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52(479):459–62.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Pereira Gray D, Sidaway-Lee K, White E, Thorne A, Evans P. Improving continuity: THE clinical challenge. InnovAiT. 2016;9(10):11.CrossRef Pereira Gray D, Sidaway-Lee K, White E, Thorne A, Evans P. Improving continuity: THE clinical challenge. InnovAiT. 2016;9(10):11.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Björkelund C, Maun A, Murante A, Hoffman K, De Maeseneer J, Farkas-Pall Z. Impact of continuity on quality of primary care: from the perspective of citizens’ preferences and multimorbidity – position paper of the European forum for primary care. Qual Prim Care. 2013;21(3):193–204.PubMed Björkelund C, Maun A, Murante A, Hoffman K, De Maeseneer J, Farkas-Pall Z. Impact of continuity on quality of primary care: from the perspective of citizens’ preferences and multimorbidity – position paper of the European forum for primary care. Qual Prim Care. 2013;21(3):193–204.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Cabana MD, Jee SH. Does continuity of care improve patient outcomes? J Fam Pract. 2004;53(12):974–80.PubMed Cabana MD, Jee SH. Does continuity of care improve patient outcomes? J Fam Pract. 2004;53(12):974–80.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Barker I, Steventon A, Deeny SR. Association between continuity of care in general practice and hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: cross sectional study of routinely collected, person level data. BMJ. 2017;356:j84.CrossRef Barker I, Steventon A, Deeny SR. Association between continuity of care in general practice and hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: cross sectional study of routinely collected, person level data. BMJ. 2017;356:j84.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Raddish M, Horn SD, Sharkey PD. Continuity of care: is it cost effective? Am J Manag Care. 1999;5(6):727–34.PubMed Raddish M, Horn SD, Sharkey PD. Continuity of care: is it cost effective? Am J Manag Care. 1999;5(6):727–34.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Wolinsky FD, Bentler SE, Liu L, Geweke JF, Cook EA, Obrizan M, et al. Continuity of care with a primary care physician and mortality in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65(4):421–8.CrossRef Wolinsky FD, Bentler SE, Liu L, Geweke JF, Cook EA, Obrizan M, et al. Continuity of care with a primary care physician and mortality in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65(4):421–8.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hill AP, Freeman GK: Promoting continuity of Care in General Practice. In. Edited by Practitioners TRCoG; 2011. Hill AP, Freeman GK: Promoting continuity of Care in General Practice. In. Edited by Practitioners TRCoG; 2011.
39.
go back to reference Brabers A, de Jong J. Toekomst van de huisartsenzorg Het perspectief van de burger: Nivel; 2019. Brabers A, de Jong J. Toekomst van de huisartsenzorg Het perspectief van de burger: Nivel; 2019.
41.
go back to reference Vis E, Kenens R, Duijkers B, Batengurg R, Keuper J. Cijfers uit de registratie van huisartsen, vol. 2020. Utrecht: Nivel; 2020. Vis E, Kenens R, Duijkers B, Batengurg R, Keuper J. Cijfers uit de registratie van huisartsen, vol. 2020. Utrecht: Nivel; 2020.
47.
go back to reference World Population Ageing 2013. In. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2013: 114. World Population Ageing 2013. In. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2013: 114.
48.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRef Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Uijen AA. Continuity of care. Perspective of the patient with a chronic illness; 2012. Uijen AA. Continuity of care. Perspective of the patient with a chronic illness; 2012.
52.
go back to reference Schers HJ. Continuity of care in general practice. Exploring the balance between personal and informational continuity; 2004. Schers HJ. Continuity of care in general practice. Exploring the balance between personal and informational continuity; 2004.
57.
go back to reference Freeman G, Anwar S, Dala A, Duncan J, Jiandani H, Osborne B et al: RCGP continuity of care toolkit - helping clinicians and practices maximise relationship continuity. In. Edited by RCGP; 2013. Freeman G, Anwar S, Dala A, Duncan J, Jiandani H, Osborne B et al: RCGP continuity of care toolkit - helping clinicians and practices maximise relationship continuity. In. Edited by RCGP; 2013.
58.
go back to reference Improving Patient Care. The Implementation of Change in Health Care. 2nd ed: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. Improving Patient Care. The Implementation of Change in Health Care. 2nd ed: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.
71.
go back to reference Patsopoulos N. A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011;13(2):217–24.CrossRef Patsopoulos N. A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011;13(2):217–24.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Optimising personal continuity for older patients in general practice: a study protocol for a cluster randomised stepped wedge pragmatic trial
Authors
Lex J. J. Groot
Henk J. Schers
Jako S. Burgers
Francois G. Schellevis
Martin Smalbrugge
Annemarie A. Uijen
Peter M. van de Ven
Henriëtte E. van der Horst
Otto R. Maarsingh
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01511-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Primary Care 1/2021 Go to the issue