Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research article

General practitioners’ experiences of emergency care and treatment planning in England: a focus group study

Authors: Caroline J. Huxley, Karin Eli, Claire A. Hawkes, Gavin D. Perkins, Rob George, Frances Griffiths, Anne-Marie Slowther

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Emergency Care and Treatment Plans are recommended for all primary care patients in the United Kingdom who are expected to experience deterioration of their health. The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) was developed to integrate resuscitation decisions with discussions about wider goals of care. It summarises treatment recommendations discussed and agreed between patients and their clinicians for a future emergency situation and was designed to meet the needs of different care settings. Our aim is to explore GPs’ experiences of using ReSPECT and how it transfers across the primary care and secondary care interface.

Methods

We conducted five focus groups with GPs in areas being served by hospitals in England that have implemented ReSPECT. Participants were asked about their experience of ReSPECT, how they initiate ReSPECT-type conversations, and their experiences of ReSPECT-type recommendations being communicated across primary and secondary care. Focus groups were transcribed and analysed using Thematic Analysis.

Results

GPs conceptualise ReSPECT as an end of life planning document, which is best completed in primary care. As an end of life care document, completing ReSPECT is an emotional process and conversations are shaped by what a ‘good death’ is thought to be. ReSPECT recommendations are not always communicated or transferable across care settings. A focus on the patient’s preferences around death, and GPs’ lack of specialist knowledge, could be a barrier to completion of ReSPECT that is transferable to acute settings.

Conclusion

Conceptualising ReSPECT as an end of life care document suggests a difference in how general practitioners understand ReSPECT from its designers. This impacts on the transferability of ReSPECT recommendations to the hospital setting.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fritz Z, Slowther A, Perkins G. Resuscitation policy should focus on the patient, not the decision. BMJ. 2017;356:j813.CrossRef Fritz Z, Slowther A, Perkins G. Resuscitation policy should focus on the patient, not the decision. BMJ. 2017;356:j813.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hawkes CA, Fritz Z, Deas G, et al. Development of the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT). Resuscitation. 2020;148:98–107.CrossRef Hawkes CA, Fritz Z, Deas G, et al. Development of the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT). Resuscitation. 2020;148:98–107.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Perkins G, Griffiths F, Slowther A, et al. Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resusitation (DNACPR) decisions: evidence synthesis. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2016;4. Perkins G, Griffiths F, Slowther A, et al. Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resusitation (DNACPR) decisions: evidence synthesis. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2016;4.
4.
go back to reference Cohn S, Fritz Z, Frankau J, Laroche C, Fuld J. Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation orders in acute medical settings: a qualitative study. QJM. 2013;106:165–77.CrossRef Cohn S, Fritz Z, Frankau J, Laroche C, Fuld J. Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation orders in acute medical settings: a qualitative study. QJM. 2013;106:165–77.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference McAdam C, Barton A, Bull P, Rai G. An audit of nurses’ views on DNR decisions in 1989 and 2003. Br J Nurs. 2005;14:1061–5.CrossRef McAdam C, Barton A, Bull P, Rai G. An audit of nurses’ views on DNR decisions in 1989 and 2003. Br J Nurs. 2005;14:1061–5.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Freeman K, Field R, Perkins G. Variation in local trust Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) policies: a review of 48 English healthcare trusts. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e006517.CrossRef Freeman K, Field R, Perkins G. Variation in local trust Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) policies: a review of 48 English healthcare trusts. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e006517.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Clements M, Fuld J, Fritz Z. Documentation of resuscitation decision-making: a survey of practice in the United Kingdom. Resuscitation. 2014;85:606–11.CrossRef Clements M, Fuld J, Fritz Z. Documentation of resuscitation decision-making: a survey of practice in the United Kingdom. Resuscitation. 2014;85:606–11.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mockford C, Fritz Z, George R, et al. Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) orders: a systematic review of the barriers and facilitators of decision-making and implementation. Resuscitation. 2015;88:99–113.CrossRef Mockford C, Fritz Z, George R, et al. Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) orders: a systematic review of the barriers and facilitators of decision-making and implementation. Resuscitation. 2015;88:99–113.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fritz Z, Malyon A, Frankau J, et al. The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders: a mixed methods evaluation of the effects on clinical practice and patient care. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70977.CrossRef Fritz Z, Malyon A, Frankau J, et al. The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders: a mixed methods evaluation of the effects on clinical practice and patient care. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70977.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fritz Z, Fuld J, Haydock S, Palmer C. Interpretation and intent: a study of the (mis) understanding of DNAR orders in a teaching hospital. Resuscitation. 2010;81:1138–41.CrossRef Fritz Z, Fuld J, Haydock S, Palmer C. Interpretation and intent: a study of the (mis) understanding of DNAR orders in a teaching hospital. Resuscitation. 2010;81:1138–41.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Omega: The National Association of End of Life Care. End of life care in primary care: 2009 national snapshot – executive summary. 2009. Omega: The National Association of End of Life Care. End of life care in primary care: 2009 national snapshot – executive summary. 2009.
12.
go back to reference Miller S, Dorman S. Resuscitation decisions for patients dying in the community: a qualitative interview study of general practitioner perspectives. Palliat Med. 2014;28:1053–61.CrossRef Miller S, Dorman S. Resuscitation decisions for patients dying in the community: a qualitative interview study of general practitioner perspectives. Palliat Med. 2014;28:1053–61.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Terry G, Hayfield N, Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. In: Willig C, Rogers WS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. London: Sage; 2017. p. 17–37.CrossRef Terry G, Hayfield N, Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. In: Willig C, Rogers WS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. London: Sage; 2017. p. 17–37.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pitcher D, Fritz Z, Wang M, Spiller J. Emergency care and resuscitation plans. BMJ. 2017;356:j876.CrossRef Pitcher D, Fritz Z, Wang M, Spiller J. Emergency care and resuscitation plans. BMJ. 2017;356:j876.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Eli K, Ochieng C, Hawkes C, et al. Secondary care consultant clinicians’ experiences of conducting emergency care and treatment planning conversations in England: an interview-based analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e031633.CrossRef Eli K, Ochieng C, Hawkes C, et al. Secondary care consultant clinicians’ experiences of conducting emergency care and treatment planning conversations in England: an interview-based analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e031633.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cottrell L, Duggleby W. The, “good death”: an integrative literature review. Palliat Support Care. 2016;14:686–712.CrossRef Cottrell L, Duggleby W. The, “good death”: an integrative literature review. Palliat Support Care. 2016;14:686–712.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
General practitioners’ experiences of emergency care and treatment planning in England: a focus group study
Authors
Caroline J. Huxley
Karin Eli
Claire A. Hawkes
Gavin D. Perkins
Rob George
Frances Griffiths
Anne-Marie Slowther
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01486-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Primary Care 1/2021 Go to the issue