Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Breast Cancer | Research

Family interaction among young Chinese breast cancer survivors

Authors: Jiehui Xu, Xiyi Wang, Mengjie Chen, Yiwen Shi, Yun Hu

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Family interaction is an important factor contributing to the quality of survivorship among breast cancer survivors. The dearth of studies involving young females with breast cancer has limited the understanding of family interaction in this increasingly large population.

Methods

The aim of this study was to explore family interaction patterns among young Chinese breast cancer survivors. We conducted in-depth interviews with seventeen young breast cancer survivors (YBCSs) in China between May 2019 and December 2019. A content analysis was performed to identify the characteristics of family interaction in this population. Conceptualizations of feminism and social support were used to guide the data analysis.

Results

Family interaction patterns were categorized into 5 domains from the perceptions of Chinese YBCSs: (1) adjustment of parenthood (changes in child-rearing approaches, perception of children’s care) (2) ambivalence towards intimacy (desire for intimate relationships, perceived relationship insecurity); (3) concerns regarding fertility; (4) return to work (coping with gratitude and guilt by working, readapting to family and society by working); (5) activation of the support system in a large family (instrumental support from core family members, instrumental, informational, and appraisal support from relatives).

Conclusions

The study provides a deeper understanding of the interactions between young breast cancer survivors and their family members in China. These findings can support health professionals in developing female-sensitive, culturally specific interventions to assist Chinese YBCSs and their families in increasing positive interactions and family resilience as well as quality of life. In addition, the findings are highly applicable to other female cancer survivors and their vulnerable families exposed to similar social and cultural contexts.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Ward E, Sherman R, Henley J, Jemal A, Siegel D, Feuer E, Firth A, Kohler B, Scott S, Ma J et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1999–2015, Featuring Cancer in Men and Women ages 20–49. J Natl Cancer Institute. 2019;111:1279–97. Ward E, Sherman R, Henley J, Jemal A, Siegel D, Feuer E, Firth A, Kohler B, Scott S, Ma J et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1999–2015, Featuring Cancer in Men and Women ages 20–49. J Natl Cancer Institute. 2019;111:1279–97.
4.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30.
5.
go back to reference Li T, Mello-Thoms C, Brennan PC. Descriptive epidemiology of breast cancer in China: incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;159(3):395–406.CrossRef Li T, Mello-Thoms C, Brennan PC. Descriptive epidemiology of breast cancer in China: incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;159(3):395–406.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ashing KT, George M, Jones V. Health-related quality of life and care satisfaction outcomes: Informing psychosocial oncology care among Latina and African-American young breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2018;27(4):1213–20.CrossRef Ashing KT, George M, Jones V. Health-related quality of life and care satisfaction outcomes: Informing psychosocial oncology care among Latina and African-American young breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2018;27(4):1213–20.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fu J, Wu L, Fu W, Tan Y, Xu T, Hong Z, Wang F, Li S. How Young Is Too Young in Breast Cancer?—Young Breast Cancer Is Not a Unique Biological Subtype. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(1):e25–39.CrossRef Fu J, Wu L, Fu W, Tan Y, Xu T, Hong Z, Wang F, Li S. How Young Is Too Young in Breast Cancer?—Young Breast Cancer Is Not a Unique Biological Subtype. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(1):e25–39.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Paluch-Shimon S, Pagani O, Partridge AH, Bar-Meir E, Fallowfield L, Fenlon D, Friedman E, Gelmon K, Gentilini O, Geraghty J, et al. Second international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY2). The Breast. 2016;26:87–99.CrossRef Paluch-Shimon S, Pagani O, Partridge AH, Bar-Meir E, Fallowfield L, Fenlon D, Friedman E, Gelmon K, Gentilini O, Geraghty J, et al. Second international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY2). The Breast. 2016;26:87–99.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chen W, Sun K, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S, Xia C, Yang Z, Li H, Zou X-N, He J. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2014. Chin J Cancer Res. 2018;30:1–12.CrossRef Chen W, Sun K, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S, Xia C, Yang Z, Li H, Zou X-N, He J. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2014. Chin J Cancer Res. 2018;30:1–12.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Li J, Humphreys K, Eriksson M, Dar H, Brandberg Y, Hall P, Czene K. Worse quality of life in young and recently diagnosed breast cancer survivors compared with female survivors of other cancers: A cross-sectional study. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(11):2415–25.CrossRef Li J, Humphreys K, Eriksson M, Dar H, Brandberg Y, Hall P, Czene K. Worse quality of life in young and recently diagnosed breast cancer survivors compared with female survivors of other cancers: A cross-sectional study. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(11):2415–25.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Yabroff KR, Alfano CM, Jemal A, Kramer JL, Siegel RL. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(5):363–385. Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Yabroff KR, Alfano CM, Jemal A, Kramer JL, Siegel RL. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(5):363–385.
13.
go back to reference Cohee AA, Bigatti SM, Shields CG, Johns SA, Stump T, Monahan PO, Champion VL. Quality of Life in Partners of Young and Old Breast Cancer Survivors. Cancer Nurs. 2018;41(6):491–7.CrossRef Cohee AA, Bigatti SM, Shields CG, Johns SA, Stump T, Monahan PO, Champion VL. Quality of Life in Partners of Young and Old Breast Cancer Survivors. Cancer Nurs. 2018;41(6):491–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Williams F, Jeanetta SC. Lived experiences of breast cancer survivors after diagnosis, treatment and beyond: qualitative study. Health Expect. 2016;19(3):631–42.CrossRef Williams F, Jeanetta SC. Lived experiences of breast cancer survivors after diagnosis, treatment and beyond: qualitative study. Health Expect. 2016;19(3):631–42.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Li Y, Wang K, Yin Y, Li Y, Li S. Relationships between family resilience, breast cancer survivors’ individual resilience, and caregiver burden: A cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;88:79–84.CrossRef Li Y, Wang K, Yin Y, Li Y, Li S. Relationships between family resilience, breast cancer survivors’ individual resilience, and caregiver burden: A cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;88:79–84.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Faccio F, Renzi C, Giudice AV, Pravettoni G. Family Resilience in the Oncology Setting: Development of an Integrative Framework. Front Psychol. 2018;9:666–666.CrossRef Faccio F, Renzi C, Giudice AV, Pravettoni G. Family Resilience in the Oncology Setting: Development of an Integrative Framework. Front Psychol. 2018;9:666–666.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Li Y, Qiao Y, Luan X, Li S, Wang K. Family resilience and psychological well-being among Chinese breast cancer survivors and their caregivers. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019;28(2):e12984. Li Y, Qiao Y, Luan X, Li S, Wang K. Family resilience and psychological well-being among Chinese breast cancer survivors and their caregivers. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019;28(2):e12984.
18.
go back to reference Üzar-Özçeti̇n YS, Dursun Sİ. Quality of life, caregiver burden, and resilience among the family caregivers of cancer survivors. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020;48:101832. Üzar-Özçeti̇n YS, Dursun Sİ. Quality of life, caregiver burden, and resilience among the family caregivers of cancer survivors. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020;48:101832.
19.
go back to reference Levine EG, Yoo GJ, Aviv C. Predictors of Quality of Life among Ethnically Diverse Breast Cancer Survivors. Appl Res Qual Life. 2017;12(1):1–16.CrossRef Levine EG, Yoo GJ, Aviv C. Predictors of Quality of Life among Ethnically Diverse Breast Cancer Survivors. Appl Res Qual Life. 2017;12(1):1–16.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ungar M. Varied Patterns of Family Resilience in Challenging Contexts. J Marital Fam Ther. 2016;42(1):19–31.CrossRef Ungar M. Varied Patterns of Family Resilience in Challenging Contexts. J Marital Fam Ther. 2016;42(1):19–31.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sloman L, Sturman E. The Impact of Winning and Losing on Family Interactions: A Biological Approach to Family Therapy. Canadian journal of psychiatry Revue canadienne de psychiatrie. 2012;57:643–8.CrossRef Sloman L, Sturman E. The Impact of Winning and Losing on Family Interactions: A Biological Approach to Family Therapy. Canadian journal of psychiatry Revue canadienne de psychiatrie. 2012;57:643–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Jones RA, Taylor AG, Bourguignon C, Steeves R, Fraser G, Lippert M, Theodorescu D, Mathews H, Kilbridge KL. Family interactions among African American prostate cancer survivors. Fam Community Health. 2008;31(3):213–20.CrossRef Jones RA, Taylor AG, Bourguignon C, Steeves R, Fraser G, Lippert M, Theodorescu D, Mathews H, Kilbridge KL. Family interactions among African American prostate cancer survivors. Fam Community Health. 2008;31(3):213–20.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–40.CrossRef Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–40.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Weber RP. Basic Content Analysis. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications; 1990.CrossRef Weber RP. Basic Content Analysis. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications; 1990.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sechiyama K: Patriarchy in East Asia: A Comparative Sociology of Gender: Brill; 2013. Sechiyama K: Patriarchy in East Asia: A Comparative Sociology of Gender: Brill; 2013.
26.
go back to reference Mitchell J: Women's Estate, vol. 40: Penguin; 1971. Mitchell J: Women's Estate, vol. 40: Penguin; 1971.
27.
go back to reference Langford CPH, Bowsher J, Maloney JP, Lillis PP. Social support: a conceptual analysis. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25(1):95–100.CrossRef Langford CPH, Bowsher J, Maloney JP, Lillis PP. Social support: a conceptual analysis. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25(1):95–100.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks Ca Sage Tashakkori A & Teddlie C. 2014;36(100):129. Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks Ca Sage Tashakkori A & Teddlie C. 2014;36(100):129.
29.
go back to reference Potter WJ, Levine-Donnerstein D. Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. J Appl Commun Res. 1999;27(3):258–84.CrossRef Potter WJ, Levine-Donnerstein D. Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. J Appl Commun Res. 1999;27(3):258–84.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kao TA, Caldwell CH. Family Efficacy within Ethnically Diverse Families: A Qualitative Study. Fam Process. 2017;56(1):217–33.CrossRef Kao TA, Caldwell CH. Family Efficacy within Ethnically Diverse Families: A Qualitative Study. Fam Process. 2017;56(1):217–33.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Etchegary H, Potter B, Perrier C, Wilson B. Cultural differences in family communication about inherited cancer: implications for cancer genetics research. J Cult Divers. 2013;20(4):195–201.PubMed Etchegary H, Potter B, Perrier C, Wilson B. Cultural differences in family communication about inherited cancer: implications for cancer genetics research. J Cult Divers. 2013;20(4):195–201.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Rogoff B: The Cultural Nature of Human Development, vol. 42; 2003. Rogoff B: The Cultural Nature of Human Development, vol. 42; 2003.
33.
go back to reference Im E-O, Ko Y, Hwang H, Chee W, Stuifbergen A, Lee H, Chee E. Asian American Midlife Women’s Attitudes Toward Physical Activity. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012;41(5):650–8.CrossRef Im E-O, Ko Y, Hwang H, Chee W, Stuifbergen A, Lee H, Chee E. Asian American Midlife Women’s Attitudes Toward Physical Activity. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012;41(5):650–8.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hofstede G: Culture's Consequences: International Differences In Work-Related Values, vol. 28; 1980. Hofstede G: Culture's Consequences: International Differences In Work-Related Values, vol. 28; 1980.
35.
go back to reference Guo K. For a Better Life: The Aspirations of Chinese Immigrants in Parenting. J Immigr Refug Stud. 2014;12(3):293–310.CrossRef Guo K. For a Better Life: The Aspirations of Chinese Immigrants in Parenting. J Immigr Refug Stud. 2014;12(3):293–310.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Xie S, Li H. ‘Tiger mom, panda dad’: a study of contemporary Chinese parenting profiles. Early Child Dev Care. 2019;189(2):284–300.CrossRef Xie S, Li H. ‘Tiger mom, panda dad’: a study of contemporary Chinese parenting profiles. Early Child Dev Care. 2019;189(2):284–300.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Yang L, Congzhou Y. Analysis of Sino-American Family Education Differences: Collectivistic or Individualistic?—Taking the Glass Castle as an Example. Int Educ Stud. 2018;11:51.CrossRef Yang L, Congzhou Y. Analysis of Sino-American Family Education Differences: Collectivistic or Individualistic?—Taking the Glass Castle as an Example. Int Educ Stud. 2018;11:51.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Xie S, Li H. Does tiger parenting work in contemporary China? Exploring the relationships between parenting profiles and preschoolers’ school readiness in a Chinese context. Early Child Dev Care. 2018;188(12):1826–42.CrossRef Xie S, Li H. Does tiger parenting work in contemporary China? Exploring the relationships between parenting profiles and preschoolers’ school readiness in a Chinese context. Early Child Dev Care. 2018;188(12):1826–42.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Boyle CC, Stanton AL, Ganz PA, Bower JE. Posttraumatic growth in breast cancer survivors: does age matter? Psychooncology. 2017;26(6):800–7.CrossRef Boyle CC, Stanton AL, Ganz PA, Bower JE. Posttraumatic growth in breast cancer survivors: does age matter? Psychooncology. 2017;26(6):800–7.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Yuan X, Wang J, Bender CM, Zhang N, Yuan C. Patterns of sexual health in patients with breast cancer in China: a latent class analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28(11):5147–56.CrossRef Yuan X, Wang J, Bender CM, Zhang N, Yuan C. Patterns of sexual health in patients with breast cancer in China: a latent class analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28(11):5147–56.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Ljungman L, Ahlgren J, Petersson L-M, Flynn KE, Weinfurt K, Gorman JR, Wettergren L, Lampic C. Sexual dysfunction and reproductive concerns in young women with breast cancer: Type, prevalence, and predictors of problems. Psychooncology. 2018;27(12):2770–7.CrossRef Ljungman L, Ahlgren J, Petersson L-M, Flynn KE, Weinfurt K, Gorman JR, Wettergren L, Lampic C. Sexual dysfunction and reproductive concerns in young women with breast cancer: Type, prevalence, and predictors of problems. Psychooncology. 2018;27(12):2770–7.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Lewis PE, Sheng M, Rhodes MM, Jackson KE, Schover LR. Psychosocial Concerns of Young African American Breast Cancer Survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2012;30(2):168–84.CrossRef Lewis PE, Sheng M, Rhodes MM, Jackson KE, Schover LR. Psychosocial Concerns of Young African American Breast Cancer Survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2012;30(2):168–84.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Fang S-Y, Lin Y-C, Chen T-C, Lin C-Y. Impact of marital coping on the relationship between body image and sexuality among breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(9):2551–9.CrossRef Fang S-Y, Lin Y-C, Chen T-C, Lin C-Y. Impact of marital coping on the relationship between body image and sexuality among breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(9):2551–9.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Snyder KA, Pearse W. Crisis, Social Support, and the Family Response: Exploring the Narratives of Young Breast Cancer Survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2010;28(4):413–31. Snyder KA, Pearse W. Crisis, Social Support, and the Family Response: Exploring the Narratives of Young Breast Cancer Survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2010;28(4):413–31.
45.
go back to reference Hall E: Beyond Culture. New York: Doubleday: Anchor Press; 1976. Hall E: Beyond Culture. New York: Doubleday: Anchor Press; 1976.
Metadata
Title
Family interaction among young Chinese breast cancer survivors
Authors
Jiehui Xu
Xiyi Wang
Mengjie Chen
Yiwen Shi
Yun Hu
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01476-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Primary Care 1/2021 Go to the issue