Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research article

The role of older patients’ goals in GP decision-making about medicines: a qualitative study

Authors: Kristie Rebecca Weir, Vasi Naganathan, Stacy M. Carter, Chun Wah Michael Tam, Kirsten McCaffery, Carissa Bonner, Debbie Rigby, Andrew J. McLachlan, Jesse Jansen

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To optimise medication use in older people, it is recommended that clinicians evaluate evidence on potential benefits and harms of medicines in light of the patients’ overall health, values and goals. This suggests general practitioners (GPs) should attempt to facilitate patient involvement in decision-making. In practice this is often challenging. In this qualitative study, we explored GPs’ perspectives on the importance of discussing patients’ goals and preferences, and the role patient preferences play in medicines management and prioritisation.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs from Australia (n = 32). Participants were purposively sampled to recruit GPs with variation in experience level and geographic location. Transcribed audio-recordings of interviews were coded using Framework Analysis.

Results

The results showed that most GPs recognised some value in understanding older patients’ goals and preferences regarding their medicines. Most reported some discussions of goals and preferences with patients, but often this was initiated by the patient. Practical barriers were reported such as limited time during busy consultations to discuss issues beyond acute problems. GPs differed on the following main themes: 1) definition and perception of patients’ goals, 2) relationship with the patient, 3) approach to medicines management and prioritisation. We observed that GPs preferred one of three different practice patterns in their approach to patients’ goals in medicines decisions: 1) goals and preferences considered lower priority – ‘Directive’; 2) goals seen as central – ‘Goal-oriented’; 3) goals and preferences considered but not explicitly elicited – ‘Tacit’.

Conclusions

This study explores how GPs differ in their approach to eliciting patients’ goals and preferences, and how these differences are operationalised in the context of older adults taking multiple medicines. Although there are challenges in providing care that aligns with patients’ goals and preferences, this study shows how complex decisions are made between GPs and their older patients in clinical practice. This work may inform future research that investigates how GPs can best incorporate the priorities of older people in decision-making around medicines. Developing practical support strategies may assist clinicians to involve patients in discussions about their medicines.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
7.
go back to reference Farrell B, Mangin D. Deprescribing is an essential part of good prescribing. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99:7–9.PubMed Farrell B, Mangin D. Deprescribing is an essential part of good prescribing. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99:7–9.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Weir K, Nickel B, Naganathan V, Bonner C, McCaffery K, Carter SM, et al. Decision-making preferences and deprescribing: perspectives of older adults and companions about their medicines. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx138. Weir K, Nickel B, Naganathan V, Bonner C, McCaffery K, Carter SM, et al. Decision-making preferences and deprescribing: perspectives of older adults and companions about their medicines. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​geronb/​gbx138.
13.
go back to reference Petersen AW, Shah AS, Simmons SF, Shotwell MS, Jacobsen JML, Myers AP, et al. Shed-MEDS: pilot of a patient-centered deprescribing framework reduces medications in hospitalized older adults being transferred to inpatient postacute care. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098618781524. Petersen AW, Shah AS, Simmons SF, Shotwell MS, Jacobsen JML, Myers AP, et al. Shed-MEDS: pilot of a patient-centered deprescribing framework reduces medications in hospitalized older adults being transferred to inpatient postacute care. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​2042098618781524​.
14.
go back to reference Tinetti M, Dindo L, Smith CD, Blaum C, Costello D, Ouellet G, et al. Challenges and strategies in patients’ health priorities-aligned decision-making for older adults with multiple chronic conditions. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0218249.CrossRef Tinetti M, Dindo L, Smith CD, Blaum C, Costello D, Ouellet G, et al. Challenges and strategies in patients’ health priorities-aligned decision-making for older adults with multiple chronic conditions. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0218249.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vermunt N, Elwyn G, Westert G, Harmsen M, Olde Rikkert M, Meinders M. Goal setting is insufficiently recognised as an essential part of shared decision-making in the complex care of older patients: a framework analysis. BMC Fam Pract. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0966-z. Vermunt N, Elwyn G, Westert G, Harmsen M, Olde Rikkert M, Meinders M. Goal setting is insufficiently recognised as an essential part of shared decision-making in the complex care of older patients: a framework analysis. BMC Fam Pract. 2019. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12875-019-0966-z.
16.
go back to reference Bomhof-Roordink H, Gärtner FR, Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH. Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e031763.CrossRef Bomhof-Roordink H, Gärtner FR, Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH. Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e031763.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Entwistle VA, Watt IS. Treating patients as persons: a capabilities approach to support delivery of person-centered care. Am J Bioeth. 2013;13:29–39.CrossRef Entwistle VA, Watt IS. Treating patients as persons: a capabilities approach to support delivery of person-centered care. Am J Bioeth. 2013;13:29–39.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Epstein RM, Street RL. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:100–3.CrossRef Epstein RM, Street RL. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:100–3.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mosher HJ, Lund BC, Kripalani S, Kaboli PJ. Association of health literacy with medication knowledge, adherence, and adverse drug events among elderly veterans. J Health Commun. 2012;17:241–51.CrossRef Mosher HJ, Lund BC, Kripalani S, Kaboli PJ. Association of health literacy with medication knowledge, adherence, and adverse drug events among elderly veterans. J Health Commun. 2012;17:241–51.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Muscat DM, Shepherd HL, Hay L, Shivarev A, Patel B, McKinn S, et al. Discussions about evidence and preferences in real-life general practice consultations with older patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102:879–87.CrossRef Muscat DM, Shepherd HL, Hay L, Shivarev A, Patel B, McKinn S, et al. Discussions about evidence and preferences in real-life general practice consultations with older patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102:879–87.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE; 2013. Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE; 2013.
35.
go back to reference Driever EM, Stiggelbout AM, Brand PLP. Shared decision making: physicians’ preferred role, usual role and their perception of its key components. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103:77–82.CrossRef Driever EM, Stiggelbout AM, Brand PLP. Shared decision making: physicians’ preferred role, usual role and their perception of its key components. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103:77–82.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Fried TR, O'Leary J, Van Ness P, Fraenkel L. Inconsistency over time in the preferences of older persons with advanced illness for life-sustaining treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1007–14.CrossRef Fried TR, O'Leary J, Van Ness P, Fraenkel L. Inconsistency over time in the preferences of older persons with advanced illness for life-sustaining treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1007–14.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Mulley AG, Trimble C, Elwyn G. Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients’ preferences matter. BMJ. 2012;345:e6572.CrossRef Mulley AG, Trimble C, Elwyn G. Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients’ preferences matter. BMJ. 2012;345:e6572.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Casper GR, Brennan PF. Improving the quality of patient care: the role of patient preferences in the clinical record. In: Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care; 1993. Casper GR, Brennan PF. Improving the quality of patient care: the role of patient preferences in the clinical record. In: Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care; 1993.
40.
go back to reference Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Gould C, et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ. 2001;323:908–11.CrossRef Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Gould C, et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ. 2001;323:908–11.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Sonntag U, Wiesner J, Fahrenkrog S, Renneberg B, Braun V, Heintze C. Motivational interviewing and shared decision making in primary care. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87:62–6.CrossRef Sonntag U, Wiesner J, Fahrenkrog S, Renneberg B, Braun V, Heintze C. Motivational interviewing and shared decision making in primary care. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87:62–6.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Menear M, Garvelink MM, Adekpedjou R, Perez MMB, Robitaille H, Turcotte S, et al. Factors associated with shared decision making among primary care physicians: findings from a multicentre cross-sectional study. Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):212–21.CrossRef Menear M, Garvelink MM, Adekpedjou R, Perez MMB, Robitaille H, Turcotte S, et al. Factors associated with shared decision making among primary care physicians: findings from a multicentre cross-sectional study. Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):212–21.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Légaré F, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Cossi MJ, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(9)CD006732:1–148. Légaré F, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Cossi MJ, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(9)CD006732:1–148.
Metadata
Title
The role of older patients’ goals in GP decision-making about medicines: a qualitative study
Authors
Kristie Rebecca Weir
Vasi Naganathan
Stacy M. Carter
Chun Wah Michael Tam
Kirsten McCaffery
Carissa Bonner
Debbie Rigby
Andrew J. McLachlan
Jesse Jansen
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01347-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Primary Care 1/2021 Go to the issue