Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Identifying enablers and barriers to individually tailored prescribing: a survey of healthcare professionals in the UK

Authors: Joanne Reeve, Nicky Britten, Richard Byng, Jo Fleming, Janet Heaton, Janet Krska

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many people now take multiple medications on a long-term basis to manage health conditions. Optimising the benefit of such polypharmacy requires tailoring of medicines use to the needs and circumstances of individuals. However, professionals report barriers to achieving this in practice. In this study, we examined health professionals’ perceptions of enablers and barriers to delivering individually tailored prescribing.

Methods

Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) informed an on-line survey of health professionals’ views of enablers and barriers to implementation of Individually Tailored Prescribing (ITP) of medicines. Links to the survey were sent out through known professional networks using a convenience/snowball sampling approach. Survey questions sought to identify perceptions of supports/barriers for ITP within the four domains of work described by NPT: sense making, engagement, action and monitoring. Analysis followed the framework approach developed in our previous work.

Results

Four hundred and nineteen responses were included in the final analysis (67.3% female, 32.7% male; 52.7% nurse prescribers, 19.8% pharmacists and 21.8% GPs). Almost half (44.9%) were experienced practitioners (16+ years in practice); around one third reported already routinely offering ITP to their patients. GPs were the group least likely to recognise this as consistent usual practice. Findings revealed general support for the principles of ITP but significant variation and inconsistency in understanding and implementation in practice. Our findings reveal four key implications for practice: the need to raise understanding of ITP as a legitimate part of professional practice; to prioritise the work of ITP within the range of individual professional activity; to improve the consistency of training and support for interpretive practice; and to review the impact of formal and informal monitoring processes on practice.

Conclusion

The findings will inform the ongoing development of our new complex intervention (PRIME Prescribing) to support the individual tailoring of medicines needed to address problematic polypharmacy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Denford, Frost, Dieppe, Cooper, Britten. Individualisation of drug treatments for patients with long-term conditions: a review of concepts. BMJ Open 2014;4: e004172. Denford, Frost, Dieppe, Cooper, Britten. Individualisation of drug treatments for patients with long-term conditions: a review of concepts. BMJ Open 2014;4: e004172.
3.
go back to reference Stehlik J, Taylor D. And an ARB makes nine: polypharmacy in patients with heart failure. Cleve Clin J Med. 2004;71:674–6.CrossRefPubMed Stehlik J, Taylor D. And an ARB makes nine: polypharmacy in patients with heart failure. Cleve Clin J Med. 2004;71:674–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Krska J, Katusiime B, Corlett SA. Validation of an instrument to measure patient experiences of medicines use: the living with medicines questionnaire (LMQ). Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:671–279.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Krska J, Katusiime B, Corlett SA. Validation of an instrument to measure patient experiences of medicines use: the living with medicines questionnaire (LMQ). Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:671–279.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Reeve J, Cooper L. Rethinking how we understand individual health care needs for people living with long term conditions: a qualitative study. Health and Soc Care Community. 2016;24:27–38.CrossRef Reeve J, Cooper L. Rethinking how we understand individual health care needs for people living with long term conditions: a qualitative study. Health and Soc Care Community. 2016;24:27–38.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gallacher K, May CR, Monitori VM, Mair FS. Understanding patient experiences of treatment burden in chronic heart failure using normalisation process theory. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:235–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gallacher K, May CR, Monitori VM, Mair FS. Understanding patient experiences of treatment burden in chronic heart failure using normalisation process theory. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:235–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Milton JC, Jackson SH. 2007. Inappropriate polypharmacy, reducing the burden of multiple medication. Clin Med. 2007;7:514–7.CrossRef Milton JC, Jackson SH. 2007. Inappropriate polypharmacy, reducing the burden of multiple medication. Clin Med. 2007;7:514–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pound, Britten, Morgan, Yardley, Pope et al Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:133–155. Pound, Britten, Morgan, Yardley, Pope et al Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:133–155.
13.
go back to reference Townsend A, Wyke S, Hunt K. Self-managing and managing self: practical and moral dilemmas in accounts of living with chronic illness. Chronic Illn. 2006;2:185–94.CrossRefPubMed Townsend A, Wyke S, Hunt K. Self-managing and managing self: practical and moral dilemmas in accounts of living with chronic illness. Chronic Illn. 2006;2:185–94.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lindsay S. Prioritizing illness: lessons in self-managing multiple chronic diseases. Can J Sociol. 2009;34:983–1002. Lindsay S. Prioritizing illness: lessons in self-managing multiple chronic diseases. Can J Sociol. 2009;34:983–1002.
15.
go back to reference Reeve J, Dowrick C, Freeman G, Gunn J, Mair F, May C, Mercer S, Palmer V, Howe A, Irving G, Shiner A, Watson J. Examining the practice of generalist expertise: a qualitative study identifying constraints and solutions. JRSM Short Rep. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1177/2042533313510155. Reeve J, Dowrick C, Freeman G, Gunn J, Mair F, May C, Mercer S, Palmer V, Howe A, Irving G, Shiner A, Watson J. Examining the practice of generalist expertise: a qualitative study identifying constraints and solutions. JRSM Short Rep. 2013; https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​2042533313510155​.
16.
go back to reference Fleming J, Patel P, Tristram S, Reeve J. The fall and rise of generalism: perceptions of generalist practice amongst medical students (Letter). Education for Primary Care. 2017;28(4) Fleming J, Patel P, Tristram S, Reeve J. The fall and rise of generalism: perceptions of generalist practice amongst medical students (Letter). Education for Primary Care. 2017;28(4)
19.
go back to reference Gabbay J, le May A. Practice based evidence for healthcare: clinical mindlines. New York: Routledge; 2011. Gabbay J, le May A. Practice based evidence for healthcare: clinical mindlines. New York: Routledge; 2011.
20.
go back to reference Sinnott C, Mercer SW, Payne RA, Duerden M, Bradley CP, Byrne M. Improving medication management in multimorbidity: development of the MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And Decision making (MY COMRADE)intervention using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Implement Sci. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0322-1. Sinnott C, Mercer SW, Payne RA, Duerden M, Bradley CP, Byrne M. Improving medication management in multimorbidity: development of the MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And Decision making (MY COMRADE)intervention using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Implement Sci. 2015; https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13012-015-0322-1.
23.
go back to reference Reeve J, Dickenson M, Harris J, Ranson E, Donhnhammar U, Cooper L, Krska J, Byng R, Britten N. Solutions to problematic polypharmacy: learning from the expertise of patients. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65:319–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reeve J, Dickenson M, Harris J, Ranson E, Donhnhammar U, Cooper L, Krska J, Byng R, Britten N. Solutions to problematic polypharmacy: learning from the expertise of patients. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65:319–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Reeve J, Cooper L, Harrington S, Rosbottom P, Watkins J. Developing, delivering and evaluating primary mental health care: the co-production of a new complex intervention. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:470.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reeve J, Cooper L, Harrington S, Rosbottom P, Watkins J. Developing, delivering and evaluating primary mental health care: the co-production of a new complex intervention. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:470.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Reeve J. Supporting expert generalist practice: the SAGE consultation model. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;35:207–8.CrossRef Reeve J. Supporting expert generalist practice: the SAGE consultation model. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;35:207–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Identifying enablers and barriers to individually tailored prescribing: a survey of healthcare professionals in the UK
Authors
Joanne Reeve
Nicky Britten
Richard Byng
Jo Fleming
Janet Heaton
Janet Krska
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0705-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Primary Care 1/2018 Go to the issue