Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Equitable resourcing of primary health care in remote communities in Australia’s Northern Territory: a pilot study

Authors: John Wakerman, Lisa Sparrow, Susan L Thomas, John S Humphreys, Mike Jones

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Improved Primary Health Care (PHC) utilisation is central to reducing the unacceptable morbidity and mortality rates characterising populations living in remote communities. Despite poorer health, significant inequity characterises the funding of PHC services in Australia’s most remote areas. This pilot study sought to ascertain what funding is required to ensure equitable access to sustainable, high quality primary health care irrespective of geographical remoteness of communities.

Methods

High performing remote Primary Health Care (PHC) services were selected using improvement measures from the Australian Primary Care Collaboratives Program and validated by health experts. Eleven PHC services provided data relating to the types of services provided, level of service utilisation, human resources, operating and capital expenses. A further four services that provide visiting PHC to remote communities provided information on the level and cost of these services. Demographic data for service catchment areas (including estimated resident population, age, Indigenous status, English spoken at home and workforce participation) were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics 2011 census. Formal statistical inference (p-values) were derived in the linear regression via the nonparametric bootstrap.

Results

A direct linear relationship was observed between the total cost of resident PHC services and population, while cost per capita decreased with increasing population. Services in smaller communities had a higher number of nursing staff per 1000 residents and provided more consultations per capita than those in larger communities. The number of days of visiting services received by a community each year also increased with population. A linear regression with bootstrapped statistical inference predicted a significant regression equation where the cost of resident services per annum is equal to $1,251,893.92 + ($1698.83 x population) and the cost of resident and visiting services is equal to $1,378,870.85 + ($2600.00 x population).

Conclusions

The research findings provide empirical evidence based on real costs to guide funding for remote PHC services that takes into account the safety and equity requirements for a minimum viable service. This method can be used as a transparent, coordinated approach to ensure the equitable delivery of sustainable, high quality PHC in remote communities. This will in turn contribute to improved health outcomes.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision. Report on Government services volume 2: health; community services; housing and homelessness. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2013. Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision. Report on Government services volume 2: health; community services; housing and homelessness. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2013.
3.
go back to reference Zhao Y, Connors C, Lee AH, Liang W. Relationship between primary care visits and hospital admissions in remote indigenous patients with diabetes: a multivariate spline regression model. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;108(1):106–12.CrossRefPubMed Zhao Y, Connors C, Lee AH, Liang W. Relationship between primary care visits and hospital admissions in remote indigenous patients with diabetes: a multivariate spline regression model. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;108(1):106–12.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian health expenditure by remoteness - a comparison of remote, regional and city health expenditure, Health and welfare expenditure series. Canberra: AIHW; 2010. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian health expenditure by remoteness - a comparison of remote, regional and city health expenditure, Health and welfare expenditure series. Canberra: AIHW; 2010.
7.
go back to reference Moran M, Porter D, Curth-Bibb J. Funding indigenous organisations: improving governance performance through innovations in public finance management in remote Australia. Issues paper no 11. Canberra: AIHW and Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies; 2014. Moran M, Porter D, Curth-Bibb J. Funding indigenous organisations: improving governance performance through innovations in public finance management in remote Australia. Issues paper no 11. Canberra: AIHW and Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies; 2014.
8.
go back to reference Alford K. Economic value of aboriginal community controlled health services. Canberra: National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation Press Club; 2014. Alford K. Economic value of aboriginal community controlled health services. Canberra: National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation Press Club; 2014.
9.
go back to reference KPMG. Funding options to reform the distribution of OATSIH primary health care funding - consultation paper. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing Government Advisory Services; 2012. KPMG. Funding options to reform the distribution of OATSIH primary health care funding - consultation paper. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing Government Advisory Services; 2012.
10.
go back to reference Wilson J. Remote area aboriginal health services managers: key practice challenges. Aust J Rural Health. 2001;9(3):138–40.CrossRefPubMed Wilson J. Remote area aboriginal health services managers: key practice challenges. Aust J Rural Health. 2001;9(3):138–40.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wakerman J, Humphreys JS. Sustainable primary health care services in rural and remote areas: innovation and evidence. Aust J Rural Health. 2011;19(3):118–24.CrossRefPubMed Wakerman J, Humphreys JS. Sustainable primary health care services in rural and remote areas: innovation and evidence. Aust J Rural Health. 2011;19(3):118–24.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission: A healthier future for all Australians-final report of the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009. National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission: A healthier future for all Australians-final report of the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009.
14.
go back to reference National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. A healthier future for all Australians interim report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009. National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. A healthier future for all Australians interim report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009.
15.
go back to reference OECD. OECD reviews of health care quality: Australia 2015: raising standards. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015. OECD. OECD reviews of health care quality: Australia 2015: raising standards. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015.
16.
go back to reference Humphreys JS. Social provision and service delivery: problems of equity, health, and health care in rural Australia. Geoforum. 1988;19(3):323–38.CrossRef Humphreys JS. Social provision and service delivery: problems of equity, health, and health care in rural Australia. Geoforum. 1988;19(3):323–38.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference World Health Organisation. World Health Statistics 2016: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. Geneva: WHO publishing; 2016. World Health Organisation. World Health Statistics 2016: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. Geneva: WHO publishing; 2016.
18.
go back to reference OECD. OECD territorial reviews: Northern sparsely populated areas. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017. OECD. OECD territorial reviews: Northern sparsely populated areas. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017.
19.
go back to reference Humphreys J, Solarsh G. Populations at special health risk: rural populations, The international encyclopedia of public health. Volume 5. 2nd ed. Oxford: Academic Press; 2017. p. 599–608. Humphreys J, Solarsh G. Populations at special health risk: rural populations, The international encyclopedia of public health. Volume 5. 2nd ed. Oxford: Academic Press; 2017. p. 599–608.
24.
go back to reference Allen and Clarke. Evaluation of the Child health Check Initiative and the Expanding health service delivery Initiative: final report. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing; 2011. Allen and Clarke. Evaluation of the Child health Check Initiative and the Expanding health service delivery Initiative: final report. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing; 2011.
25.
go back to reference IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for windows. In., version 22 edn. IBM Corp: Armonk NY; 2013. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for windows. In., version 22 edn. IBM Corp: Armonk NY; 2013.
26.
go back to reference Ong KS, Carter R, Kelaher M, Anderson I. Differences in primary health care delivery to Australia's indigenous population: a template for use in economic evaluations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:307.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ong KS, Carter R, Kelaher M, Anderson I. Differences in primary health care delivery to Australia's indigenous population: a template for use in economic evaluations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:307.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference PHCRIS: Primary Health Care Funding Models. PHCRIS Research Roundup. 33 edn: PHCRIS; 2013. PHCRIS: Primary Health Care Funding Models. PHCRIS Research Roundup. 33 edn: PHCRIS; 2013.
29.
go back to reference Rice N, Smith P. Approaches to capitation and risk adjustment in health care: an international survey. York: The University of York Centre for Health Economics; 1999. Rice N, Smith P. Approaches to capitation and risk adjustment in health care: an international survey. York: The University of York Centre for Health Economics; 1999.
30.
go back to reference Segal L. A vision for primary care - funding and other system factors for optimising the primary care contribution to the community's. Adelaide: University of South Australia; 2008. Segal L. A vision for primary care - funding and other system factors for optimising the primary care contribution to the community's. Adelaide: University of South Australia; 2008.
31.
go back to reference SCRGSP (Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision). 2014 indigenous expenditure report. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2014. p. 2014. SCRGSP (Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision). 2014 indigenous expenditure report. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2014. p. 2014.
32.
go back to reference Mogyorosy Z, Smith P. The main methodological issues in costing health care services: a literature review. York UK: University of York, Centre for Health Economics; 2005. Mogyorosy Z, Smith P. The main methodological issues in costing health care services: a literature review. York UK: University of York, Centre for Health Economics; 2005.
33.
go back to reference Gador-Whyte AP, Wakerman J, Campbell D, Lenthall S, Struber J, Hope A, et al. Cost of best-practice primary care management of chronic disease in a remote aboriginal community. Med J Aust. 2014;200(11):663–6.CrossRefPubMed Gador-Whyte AP, Wakerman J, Campbell D, Lenthall S, Struber J, Hope A, et al. Cost of best-practice primary care management of chronic disease in a remote aboriginal community. Med J Aust. 2014;200(11):663–6.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference McDermott R, Beaver C, Zhao Y. Outcomes-based resource allocation for indigenous health services: a model for Northern Australia. Health Policy. 1997;39(1):69–78.CrossRefPubMed McDermott R, Beaver C, Zhao Y. Outcomes-based resource allocation for indigenous health services: a model for Northern Australia. Health Policy. 1997;39(1):69–78.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Peacock S, Segal L. Equity and the funding of Australian health services prospects for weighted capitation. Centre for Health Program Evaluation: West Heidelberg; 1999. Peacock S, Segal L. Equity and the funding of Australian health services prospects for weighted capitation. Centre for Health Program Evaluation: West Heidelberg; 1999.
37.
go back to reference Australian National Audit Office. Capacity development for indigenous service delivery: Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, Department of Education, employment, and workplace relations, Department of Health and Ageing. Commonwealth of Australia: Barton, A.C.T; 2012. Australian National Audit Office. Capacity development for indigenous service delivery: Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, Department of Education, employment, and workplace relations, Department of Health and Ageing. Commonwealth of Australia: Barton, A.C.T; 2012.
38.
go back to reference Russell DJ, Humphreys JS, Ward B, Chisholm M, Buykx P, McGrail M, et al. Helping policy-makers address rural health access problems. Aust J Rural Health. 2013;21(2):61–71.CrossRefPubMed Russell DJ, Humphreys JS, Ward B, Chisholm M, Buykx P, McGrail M, et al. Helping policy-makers address rural health access problems. Aust J Rural Health. 2013;21(2):61–71.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian health expenditure by remoteness: a comparison of remote, regional and city health expenditure, Health and welfare expenditure series no. 50. Cat. No. HWE 50. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2011. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian health expenditure by remoteness: a comparison of remote, regional and city health expenditure, Health and welfare expenditure series no. 50. Cat. No. HWE 50. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2011.
Metadata
Title
Equitable resourcing of primary health care in remote communities in Australia’s Northern Territory: a pilot study
Authors
John Wakerman
Lisa Sparrow
Susan L Thomas
John S Humphreys
Mike Jones
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0646-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Primary Care 1/2017 Go to the issue