Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Primary Care
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Impact of financial incentives on alcohol intervention delivery in primary care: a mixed-methods study

Authors: Amy O’Donnell, Catherine Haighton, David Chappel, Colin Shevills, Eileen Kaner

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Local and national financial incentives were introduced in England between 2008 and 2015 to encourage screening and brief alcohol intervention delivery in primary care. We used routine Read Code data and interviews with General Practitioners (GPs) to assess their impact.

Methods

A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study was conducted in 16 general practices representing 106,700 patients and 99 GPs across two areas in Northern England. Data were extracted on screening and brief alcohol intervention delivery for 2010-11 and rates were calculated by practice incentive status. Semi-structured interviews with 14 GPs explored which factors influence intervention delivery and recording in routine consultations.

Results

Screening and brief alcohol intervention rates were higher in financially incentivised compared to non-incentivised practices. However absolute rates were low across all practices. Rates of short screening test administration ranged from 0.05% (95% CI: 0.03-0.08) in non-incentivised practices to 3.92% (95% CI: 3.70-4.14) in nationally incentivised practices. For the full AUDIT, rates were also highest in nationally incentivised practices (3.68%, 95% CI: 3.47-3.90) and lowest in non-incentivised practices (0.17%, 95% CI: 0.13-0.22). Delivery of alcohol interventions was highest in practices signed up to the national incentive scheme (9.23%, 95% CI: 8.91-9.57) and lowest in non-incentivised practices (4.73%, 95% CI: 4.50-4.96). GP Interviews highlighted a range of influences on alcohol intervention delivery and subsequent recording including: the hierarchy of different financial incentive schemes; mixed belief in the efficacy of alcohol interventions; the difficulty of codifying complex conditions; and GPs’ beliefs about patient-centred practice.

Conclusions

Financial incentives have had some success in encouraging screening and brief alcohol interventions in England, but levels of recorded activity remain low. To improve performance, future policies must prioritise alcohol prevention work within the quality and outcomes framework, and address the values, attitudes and beliefs that shape how GPs’ provide care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Funk M, Wutzke S, Kaner E, Anderson P, Pas L, McCormick R et al (2005) A multicountry controlled trial of strategies to promote dissemination and implementation of brief alcohol intervention in primary health care: Findings of a world health organization collaborative study. J Stud Alcohol 66(3):379–88CrossRefPubMed
2.
Rehm J, Mathers C, Popova S, Thavorncharoensap M, Teerawattananon Y, Patra J (2009) Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. The Lancet 373:2223–33CrossRef
3.
Home Office (2012) The Government’s Alcohol Strategy. HM Government, London
4.
Goldstein MG, Whitlock EP, DePue J (2004) Multiple behavioral risk factor interventions in primary care: Summary of research evidence. American journal of preventive medicine 27(2, Supplement):61–79CrossRefPubMed
5.
O’Donnell A, Anderson P, Newbury-Birch D, Schulte B, Schmidt C (2014) Reimer J, et al. The impact of brief alcohol interventions in primary healthcare: A systematic review of reviews Alcohol and Alcoholism 49(1):66–78PubMed
6.
van Beurden I, Anderson P, Akkermans RP, Grol RP, Wensing M, Laurant MG (2012) Involvement of general practitioners in managing alcohol problems: a randomized controlled trial of a tailored improvement programme. Addiction 107(9):1601–11CrossRefPubMed
7.
Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M (1993) Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption II. Addiction 88:791–804CrossRefPubMed
8.
National Health Service. NHS Health Check Minimum Data Set (MDS): Standard Specification. London: NHS, 2009 July. Report No.: Contract No.: Draft Version No: 1.4
9.
NHS Employers. General Medical Services Contract 2014/15: Guidance and Audit Requirements. . London: BMA, NHS England & NHS Employers, 2014 Contract No.: NHS England Gateway reference: 01347
10.
Kontopantelis E, Springate DA, Ashworth M, Webb RT, Buchan IE, Doran T (2015) Investigating the relationship between quality of primary care and premature mortality in England: a spatial whole-population study. BMJ 350
11.
Gregory S (2009) General practice in England: An overview. The King's Fund, London
12.
Scott A, Sivey P, Ait Ouakrim D, Willenberg L, Naccarella L, Furler J, Young D. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(9). Art. No.: CD008451. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD008451.​pub2.
13.
Sermuga B, Ross-Degnan D, Avery A, Elliott R, Majumdar S, Zhang F et al (2011) Effect of pay for performance on the management and outcomes of hypertension in the United Kingdom: interrupted time series study. British Medical Journal 342:1–7
14.
Maisey S, Steel N, Marsh R, Gillam S, Fleetcroft R, Howe A (2008) Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study. Journal of health services research & policy 13(3):133–9CrossRef
15.
McDonald R, Harrison S, Checkland K, Campbell S, Roland M (2007) Impact of financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: ethnographic study. British Medical Journal 10(1136):1–6
16.
McDonald R, Roland M (2009) Pay for performance in primary care in England and California: comparison of unintended consequences. Annals of Family Medicine 7(2):121–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Powell A, Davies H, Thomson R (2003) Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls. Quality and Safety in Health Care 12:122–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Hrisos S, Eccles M, Francis J, Dickinson H, Kaner E, Beyer F et al (2009) Are there valid proxy measures of clinical behaviour? A systematic review. Implementation Science 4 (No. 37)
19.
Campbell S, Reeves D, Kontopantlis E, Middleton E, Sibbald B, Roland M (2007) Quality of Primary Care in England with the Introduction of Pay for Performance. The New England Journal of Medicine 357(2):181–90CrossRefPubMed
20.
Bevan G, Hood C (2006) What’s measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration 84(3):517–38CrossRef
21.
Hamilton FL, Laverty AA, Gluvajic D, Huckvale K, Car J, Majeed A et al (2013) Effect of financial incentives on delivery of alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) in primary care: longitudinal study. Journal of Public Health
22.
UK Terminology Centre (2008) Read codes clinical terms version 3: introduction and overview. NHS, London
23.
24.
25.
26.
Department of Health (2009) Alcohol care pathways. Department of Health, London
27.
Hodgson RJ, Alwyn T, John B, Thom B, Smith A (2002) The FAST Alcohol Screening Test. Alcohol & Alcoholism 37:61–6CrossRef
28.
Bush K, Kivlahan D, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA (1998) The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions (AUDIT-C). Archives of Internal Medicine 158(16):1789–95CrossRefPubMed
29.
Kaner E, Beyer F, Dickinson H, Pienaar E, Campbell F, Schlesinger C, et al. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007;Issue 2:CD004148.DOI:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD4148.​pub3.
30.
Wilson EB (1927) Probable inference, the law of succession and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 22:209–12CrossRef
31.
Roethlisberger F, Dickson W (1939) Management and the worker. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
32.
Ritchie J (2013) Jane Ritchie national centre for social research L, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R. Qualitative Research Practice. SAGE, London
33.
34.
35.
O’Donnell A, Haighton K, Chappel D, Shevills C, Kaner E (2013) Can routine data help evaluate the implementation of a brief alcohol intervention in primary health care? Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 35(S6):149A
36.
Purshouse R, Brennan A, Rafia R, Latimer N, Archer R, Angus C et al (2013) Modelling the Cost-Effectiveness of Alcohol Screening and Brief Interventions in Primary Care in England. Alcohol and Alcoholism 48(2):180–8CrossRefPubMed
37.
National Statistics (2015) Statistics on Alcohol: England, 2015. Health and Social Care Information Centre, London
38.
Lock C, Wilson G, Kaner E, Cassidy P, Christie M, Heather N (2009) A survey of general practitioners' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the prevention and management of alcohol-related problems: an update of a World Health Organisation survey ten years on. Alcohol Education and Research Council, London
39.
Down L, Metcalfe C, Avery K, Noble S, Lane JA, Neal DE et al (2009) Factors distinguishing general practitioners who more readily participated in a large randomized trial were identified. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62(1):67–73CrossRefPubMed
40.
Dresselhaus T, Peabody J, Lee M, Wang M, Luck J (2000) Measuring Compliance with Preventative Care Guidelines: Standardised Patients, Clinical Vignettes, and the Medical Record. Journal of General Internal Medicine 15:782–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Smith T, Noble M, Noble S, Wright G, McLennan D, Plunkett E (2015) The English indices of deprivation 2015: research report. Department for Communities and Local Government, London
42.
NEPHO (2006) Alcohol and health in North East England. North East Public Health Observatory, Stockton on Tees
43.
Lapham GT, Achtmeyer CE, Williams EC, Hawkins EJ, Kivlahan DR (2012) KA. B. Increased documented brief alcohol interventions with a performance measure and electronic decision support. Med Care 50(2):179–87CrossRefPubMed
44.
Michaud P, Fouilland P, Dewost AV, Abesdris J, de Rohan S, Toubal S et al (2007) Early screening and brief intervention among excessive alcohol users: mobilizing general practitioners in an efficient way. La Revue du praticien 57(11):1219–26PubMed
45.
NHS Hammersmith and Fulham, Imperial College London (2009) Quality and outcomes framework plus: towards world class healthcare for all. NHS Hammersmith and Fulham 2009 / eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College, London
46.
Millett C, Majeed A, Huckvale C, Car J (2011) Going local: devolving national pay for performance programmes. BMJ 342
47.
May C, Rapley T, Moreira T, Finch T, Heaven B (2006) Technogovernance: Evidence, subjectivity, and the clinical encounter in primary care medicine. Social Science & Medicine 62(4):1022–30CrossRef
48.
Heeks R, Mundy D, Salazar A. 1999. University of Manchester, Why Health Care Information Systems Succeed or Fail. Information Systems for Public Sector Management Working Paper Series; No. 9. p. e001754.
49.
Swinglehurst D, Greenhalgh T, Roberts C. Computer templates in chronic disease management: ethnographic case study in general practice. BMJ Open. 2012;2(6).
50.
Chew-Graham CA, Hunter C, Langer S, Stenhoff A, Drinkwater J, Guthrie EA et al (2013) How QOF is shaping primary care review consultations: a longitudinal qualitative study. BMC Family Practice 14(1):1–7CrossRef
51.
Thorlby R, Maybin J (2010) A high-performing NHS?: A review of progress 1997-2010. The King's Fund, London
52.
53.
54.
Newcastle Gateshead CCG (2015) Practice Engagement Programme (PEP) 2015-2016: Primary Care Quality Indicators Definitions and supporting information. Newcastle Gateshead CCG, Newcastle upon Tyne
55.
NHS Employers, BMA,NHS England (2014) Technical requirements for 2014/15 GMS contract changes. NHS England Gateway reference: 02000. NHS Employers, London
56.
Metadata
Title
Impact of financial incentives on alcohol intervention delivery in primary care: a mixed-methods study
Authors
Amy O’Donnell
Catherine Haighton
David Chappel
Colin Shevills
Eileen Kaner
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0561-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Primary Care 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Dizziness in older people: at risk of shared therapeutic nihilism between patient and physician. A qualitative study

Research article

Impact of the primary care curriculum and its teaching formats on medical students’ perception of primary care: a cross-sectional study

Research article

The differential diagnosis of tiredness: a systematic review

Research article

The respiratory research agenda in primary care in Portugal: a Delphi study

Research article

Evaluating the scripts and thresholds of general practitioners for diagnosing heart failure in elderly people

Research article

What influences general practitioners’ use of exercise for patients with chronic knee pain? Results from a national survey