Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Primary Care
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care

Authors: Milena Paneque, Daniela Turchetti, Leigh Jackson, Peter Lunt, Elisa Houwink, Heather Skirton

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

At least 10 % of patients seen in primary care are said to have a condition in which genetics has an influence. However, patients at risk of genetic disease may not be recognised, while those who seek advice may not be referred or managed appropriately. Primary care practitioners lack knowledge of genetics and genetic testing relevant for daily practice and feel inadequate to deliver genetic services. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate genetics educational interventions in the context of primary care.

Methods

Following the process for systematic reviews developed by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, we conducted a search of five relevant electronic databases. Primary research papers were eligible for inclusion if they included data on outcomes of interventions regarding genetics education for primary care practitioners. The results from each paper were coded and grouped under themes.

Results

Eleven studies were included in the review. The five major themes identified inductively (post hoc) were: prior experience, changes in confidence, changes in knowledge, changes in practice, satisfaction and feedback. In five of the studies, knowledge of practitioners was improved following the educational programmes, but this tended to be in specific topic areas, while practitioner confidence improved in six studies. However, there was little apparent change to practice.

Conclusions

There are insufficient studies of relevant quality to inform educational interventions in genetics for primary care practitioners. Educational initiatives should be assessed using changes in practice, as well as in confidence and knowledge, to determine if they are effective in causing significant changes in practice in genetic risk assessment and appropriate management of patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Global Genes™. Rare Diseases: Facts and Statistics. 2015. Available at: Accessed 16 September 2015.
2.
3.
Burke SMM, Stone A, Bennett C, Thomas H, Farndon P. Developing a curriculum statement based on clinical practice: genetics in primary care. British Journal of General Practice. 2009;59:99–103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Baars MJH, Henneman L, Ten Kate LP. Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem. Genetics In Medicine: Official Journal Of The American College Of Medical Genetics. 2005;7(9):605–10.CrossRef
5.
6.
Rahimzadeh V, Bartlett G. Genetics and primary care: where are we headed? Journal Of Translational Medicine. 2014;12:238–8.
7.
8.
Acheson LS, Stange KC, Zyzanski S. Clinical genetics issues encountered by family physicians. Genetics In Medicine: Official Journal Of The American College Of Medical Genetics. 2005;7(7):501–8.CrossRef
9.
Houwink EJ, van Luijk SJ, Henneman L, van der Vleuten C, Jan Dinant G, Cornel MC. Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives. BMC Family Practice. 2011;12:5–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Houwink EJF, Henneman L, Westerneng M, et al. Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study. Genetics In Medicine: Official Journal Of The American College Of Medical Genetics. 2012;14(3):323–9.CrossRef
11.
Burke S, Martyn M, Thomas H, Farndon P. The development of core learning outcomes relevant to clinical practice: identifying priority areas for genetics education for non-genetics specialist registrars. Clinical Medicine (London, England). 2009;9(1):49–52.CrossRef
12.
Julian-Reynier C, Nippert I, Calefato J-M, et al. Genetics in clinical practice: general practitioners’ educational priorities in European countries. Genetics In Medicine: Official Journal Of The American College Of Medical Genetics. 2008;10(2):107–13.CrossRef
13.
Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225–30.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Weinreich SS, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Rijmen F, Cornel MC, de Kinderen M, Plass AMC. Raising awareness of carrier testing for hereditary haemoglobinopathies in high-risk ethnic groups in the Netherlands: a pilot study among the general public and primary care providers. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:338–8.
15.
Kirkpatrick D. Evaluation of training. Training and Development Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967.
16.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2009.
17.
Thomson Reuters. Endnote X7©. New York: US; 2016.
18.
19.
Guttmacher AE, Collins FS. Welcome to the genomic era. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003;349(10):996–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. Journal Of Psychiatric Research. 2011;45(5):626–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Kmet LM, Lee RC, Cook LS. Standard Quality Assessment Criteria For Evaluating Primary Research Papers From A Variety Of Fields. Canada: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research; 2004; ISBN: 1-896956-71-XX (Online).
23.
Moore DE. A framework for outcomes evaluation in the continuing professional development of physicians. In: Davis DBBFR, editor. The continuing professional development of physicians: from research to practice. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2003.
24.
Bethea J, Qureshi N, Drury N, Guilbert P. The impact of genetic outreach education and support to primary care on practitioner’s confidence and competence in dealing with familial cancers. Community Genetics. 2008;11(5):289–94.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Carroll JC, Rideout AL, Wilson BJ, et al. Genetic education for primary care providers: improving attitudes, knowledge, and confidence. Canadian Family Physician Médecin De Famille Canadien. 2009;55(12):e92–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Carroll JC, Wilson BJ, Allanson J, et al. GenetiKit: a randomized controlled trial to enhance delivery of genetics services by family physicians. Family Practice. 2011;28(6):615–23.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Clyman JC, Nazir F, Tarolli S, Black E, Lombardi RQ, Higgins JJ. The impact of a genetics education program on physicians’ knowledge and genetic counseling referral patterns. Medical Teacher. 2007;29(6):e143–50.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Emery J, Morris H, Goodchild R, et al. The GRAIDS Trial: a cluster randomised controlled trial of computer decision support for the management of familial cancer risk in primary care. British Journal Of Cancer. 2007;97(4):486–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Houwink EJF, Muijtjens AMM, van Teeffelen SR, et al. Effectiveness of oncogenetics training on general practitioners’ consultation skills: a randomized controlled trial. Genetics In Medicine: Official Journal Of The American College Of Medical Genetics. 2014;16(1):45–52.CrossRef
30.
Houwink EJF. Sustained effects of online genetics education: a randomized controlled trial on oncogenetics. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2014;22:310–6.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Laberge A-M, Fryer-Edwards K, Kyler P, Lloyd-Puryear MA, Burke W. Long-term outcomes of the “Genetics in Primary Care” faculty development initiative. Family Medicine. 2009;41(4):266–70.PubMed
32.
Metcalfe S, Seipolt M, Aitken M, Flouris A. Educating general practitioners about prenatal testing: approaches and challenges. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2005;25(7):592–601.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Srinivasan J, Rowett E, Dharni N, Bhatt H, Day M, Chu CE. Improving access to cancer genetics services in primary care: socio-economic data from North Kirklees. Familial Cancer. 2007;6(2):197–203.CrossRef
34.
Wilson BJ, Torrance N, Mollison J, et al. Cluster randomized trial of a multifaceted primary care decision-support intervention for inherited breast cancer risk. Family Practice. 2006;23(5):537–44.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Wilson BJ, Torrance N, Mollison J, et al. Improving the referral process for familial breast cancer genetic counselling: findings of three randomised controlled trials of two interventions. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England). 2005;9(3):iii.
36.
Thomson O'Brien MA, Oxman AD, Davis DA, et al. Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.
37.
Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274:700–5.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Kern DE, Thomas PA, Howard DM, Bass EB. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998.
39.
Trinidad SB, Fryer-Edwards K, Crest A, Kyler P, Lloyd-Puryear MA, Burke W. Educational needs in genetic medicine: primary care perspectives. Community Genetics. 2008;11(3):160–5.PubMed
40.
Adam C. Berger, Samuel G. Johnson, Sarah HB, Steve O, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Improving Genetics Education in Graduate and Continuing Health Professional Education: Workshop Summary. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2015. www.​nap.​edu.
41.
Rinke ML, Mikat-Stevens N, Saul R, Driscoll A, Healy J, Tarini BA. Genetic services and attitudes in primary care pediatrics. American Journal Of Medical Genetics Part A. 2014;164A(2):449–55.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Burke W, Acheson L, Botkin J, et al. Genetics in primary care: a USA faculty development initiative. Community Genetics. 2002;5(2):138–46.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care
Authors
Milena Paneque
Daniela Turchetti
Leigh Jackson
Peter Lunt
Elisa Houwink
Heather Skirton
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0483-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Primary Care 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

‘Potentially inappropriate or specifically appropriate?’ Qualitative evaluation of general practitioners views on prescribing, polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people

Research article

‘Gearing Up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: a systematic review and conceptual framework

Research article

Feasibility of alcohol screening among patients receiving opioid treatment in primary care

Research article

Predictors of weight loss in young adults who are over-weight or obese and have psychosocial problems: a post hoc analysis

Research article

Prescribing differences in family practice for diabetic patients in Germany according to statutory or private health insurance: the case of DPP-4-inhibitors and GLP-1-agonists

Research article

The burden of cardiovascular morbidity in a European Mediterranean population with multimorbidity: a cross-sectional study