Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Primary Care
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Patient satisfaction with a teleradiology service in general practice

Authors: Jac J. W. M. Jacobs, Rianne Ekkelboom, Jan P. A. M. Jacobs, Thys van der Molen, Robbert Sanderman

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Accessibility to secondary health services is not always easy for patients who live at a great distance of hospital. In these circumstances, transferring diagnostic tools and treatment options to primary care could prove beneficial for patients. To do so, the quality of medical care and the costs and benefits of the approach need to be assessed. However, the patient perspective is equally important, offering important insights.

Methods

In a cross-sectional study we investigate the satisfaction of patients toward a new teleradiology facility offered a general practice on Ameland, an island in the Netherlands.
A questionnaire was created based on the Dutch version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire III and completed by all patients after receiving an x-ray in primary care between June 1, 2007 and June 1, 2009. Those who received more than one x-ray in that period were included only once. The technical and interpersonal skills of doctors were rated out the sum score of the questionnaire namely 25 and 30, respectively. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the differences between the means of the satisfaction subscales and the patient characteristics.

Results

The response proportion was after reminder 65 % (381/587 patients). Satisfaction with the technical skills of the doctor providing the teleradiology service was 22.4 ± 3.7, while satisfaction with the interpersonal skills of the doctor during the diagnostic phase was 26.8 ± 3.8. Island residents, the elderly, and those with no history of trauma were more satisfied with the technical and interpersonal aspects of the consultation than non-residents, younger patients, and those with a history of trauma.

Conclusion

Patients in the island community of Ameland experienced high levels of satisfaction with the teleradiology service offered in primary care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Wistow G. Decentralisation from acute to home care settings in England. Health Policy. 1997;41:suppl:91–108.CrossRef
2.
Robberts E, Mays N. Can primary care and community based models of emergency care substitute for the Hospital Accident and Emergency (A & E) Department? Health Policy. 1998;44(3):191–214.CrossRef
3.
Starfield B, Shi L. Policy relevant determinants of health: an international perspective. Health Policy. 2002;60(3):201–18.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Norum J, Pedersen S, Stormer J, Rumpsfeld M, Stormao A, Janissen N, Sunde H, Ingebrigtsen T, Larsen ML. Prioritisation of telemedicine services for large scale implementation in Norway. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13:185–92.
5.
Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79:736–71.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Mun SK, Tohne WG, Platenberg RC, Choi I. Teleradiology and emerging business models. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(6):271–5.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Johansen I. Experience with teleradiology in general practice in Oppland. Idsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2000;120(16):1896–8.
8.
Knop FK, Staunting JA. The benefits of diagnostic imaging in general practice. Ugeskr Laeger. 2006;2:794–8.
9.
Backman W, Bendel D, Rakhit R. The telecardiology revolution: improving the management of cardiac disease in primary care. J R Soc Med. 2010;103:442–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
van der Heijden JP, de Keizer NF, Bos JD, Spuls PI, Witkamp L. Teledermatology applied following patient selection by general practitioner in daily practice improves efficiency and quality of care at lower costs. Br J Dermat. 2011;165:1058–65.CrossRef
11.
Jacobs JJWM, Jacobs JPAM, Wiersma D, Sanderman R. Teleradiology in the general practice at Ameland: a benefit cost analysis (Dutch). Ned Tijdschr Geneesk. 2012;156:A5428.
12.
Jacobs JJWM, Jacobs JPAM, van Sonderen F, van der Molen T, Sanderman R. Fracture diagnostics, unnecessary travel and treatment: a comparative study before and after the introduction of teleradiology in a remote general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Marshall GN, Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB. The structure of patient satisfaction with outpatient medical care. Psychol Assess. 1993;5(4):477–83.CrossRef
14.
Aoki N, Dunn K, Johnson-Throop KA, Turley JP. Outcomes and methods in telemedicine evaluation. Telemed J E Health. 2003;9(4):393–401.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Whitten P, Love B. Patient and provider satisfaction with the use of telemedicine: overview and rationale for cautious enthusiasm. J Postgrad Med. 2005;51(4):294–300.PubMed
16.
17.
Whited JD, Hall RP, Foy ME, Marbrey LE, Grambow SC, Dudley TK, Datta SK, Simel DL, Oddone EZ. Patient and clinician satisfaction with a store-and-forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J E Health. 2004;10(4):422–31.
18.
19.
Demiris G, Speedie SM, Hicks LL. Assessment of patients’ acceptance of and satisfaction with teledermatology. J Med Syst. 2004;28(6):575–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Iseli MA, Kunz R, Blozik E. Instruments to assess patient satisfaction after teleconsultation and triage: a systematic review. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014;8:893–907.
21.
Grogan S, Norman P, Willits D, Porter I. Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services. Qual Health Care. 2000;9(4):210–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Rahmquist M. Patient satisfaction in relation to age, health status and other background factors: a model for comparisons of care units. Int J Qual Health Care. 2001;13(5):385–90.CrossRef
23.
Campbell JL, Ramsay J, Green J. Age, sex, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients’ assessments of primary health care. Qual Health Care. 2001;10:90–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Jung HP, Baerveldt C, Olesen F, Grol R, Wensing M. Patient characteristics as predictors of primary health care preferences: a systematic literature analysis. Health Expect. 2003;6:160–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Howard M, Goertzen J, Hutchison B, Kaczorowski J, Morris K. Patient satisfaction with care for urgent health problems: a survey of family practice patients. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(5):419–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Hagedoorn M, Uijl SG, Van Sonderen E, Ranchor A, Grol BMF, Otter R, Krol B, Van den Heuvel W, Sanderman R. Structure and reliability of Ware’s patient satisfaction questionnaire III. Patients’ satisfaction with oncological care in the Netherlands. Med Care. 2003;41(2):254–63.
27.
Salisbury C, Wallace M, Montgomery AA. Patients ‘experience and satisfaction in primary care: secondary analysis using multilevel modelling. BMJ. 2010;341:c5004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Delnoij D, Ten Asbroek G, Arah O, De Koning J, Stam P, Poll A, Vriens B, Schmidt P, Klazinga N. Made In USA: The Import of American Consumer Assessment of Health Plan Surveys (CAHPS) into the Dutch Social Insurance System. Eur J Public Health. 2006;16(6):652–9.
29.
Hankins M, Fraser A, Hodson A, Hooley C, Smith H. Measuring patient satisfaction for the quality and outcomes framework. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:737–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Damman OC, Hendriks M, Sixma HJ. Towards more patient centered healthcare: a new consumer quality index instrument to assess patients’ experiences with breast care. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:1569–77.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Berendsen AJ, Groenier KH, De Jong GM, Meyboom-de Jong B, Van der Veen WJ, Dekker J, De Waal MWM, Schuling J. Assessment of patient’s experiences across the interface between primary and secondary care: consumer quality index continuum of care. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77:123–7.
32.
Meuwissen LE, De Bakker DH. Consumer quality’-index ‘general practice care’ measures patients’ experiences and compares general practices with each other (Dutch). Ned Tijdschr Geneesk. 2009;153:A180.
Metadata
Title
Patient satisfaction with a teleradiology service in general practice
Authors
Jac J. W. M. Jacobs
Rianne Ekkelboom
Jan P. A. M. Jacobs
Thys van der Molen
Robbert Sanderman
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0418-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Primary Care 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Medically unexplained physical symptoms and work functioning over 2 years: their association and the influence of depressive and anxiety disorders and job characteristics

Research article

Perceptions of primary care staff on a regional data quality intervention in Australian general practice: a qualitative study

Erratum

Erratum to: Scoring and psychometric validation of the ‘Determinants of Intentions to Vaccinate’ (DIVA©) questionnaire

Research article

Severity and management of psoriasis within primary care

Erratum

Erratum to: A qualitative study of perceived needs and factors associated with the quality of care for common mental disorders in patients with chronic diseases: the perspective of primary care clinicians and patients

Research article

An explorative qualitative study on acceptability of physical activity assessment instruments among primary care professionals in southern Sydney