Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Who gets a family physician through centralized waiting lists?

Authors: Mylaine Breton, Astrid Brousselle, Antoine Boivin, Danièle Roberge, Raynald Pineault, Djamal Berbiche

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

North American patients are experiencing difficulties in securing affiliations with family physicians. Centralized waiting lists are increasingly being used in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries to improve access. In 2011, the Canadian province of Quebec introduced new financial incentives for family physicians’ enrolment of orphan patients through centralized waiting lists, the Guichet d’accès aux clientèles orphelines, with higher payments for vulnerable patients. This study analyzed whether any significant changes were observed in the numbers of patient enrolments with family physicians’ after the introduction of the new financial incentives. Prior to then, financial incentives had been offered for enrolment of vulnerable patients only and there were no incentives for enrolling non-vulnerable patients. After 2011, financial incentives were also offered for enrolment of non-vulnerable patients, while those for enrolment of vulnerable patients were doubled.

Methods

A longitudinal quantitative analysis spanning a five-year period (2008–2013) was performed using administrative databases covering all patients enrolled with family physicians through centralized waiting lists in the province of Quebec (n = 494,697 patients). Mixed regression models for repeated-measures were used.

Results

The number of patients enrolled with a family physician through centralized waiting lists more than quadrupled after the changes in financial incentives. Most of this increase involved non-vulnerable patients. After the changes, 70% of patients enrolled with a family physician through centralized waiting lists were non-vulnerable patients, most of whom had been referred to the centralized waiting lists by the physician who enrolled them, without first being registered in those lists or having to wait because of their priority level.

Conclusion

Centralized waiting lists linked to financial incentives increased the number of family physicians’ patient enrolments. However, although vulnerable patients were supposed to be given precedence, physicians favoured enrolment of healthier patients over those with greater health needs and higher assessed priority. These results suggest that introducing financial incentives without appropriate regulations may lead to opportunistic use of the incentive system with unintended policy consequences.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kringos DS, Boerma W, van der Zee J, Groenewegen P. Europe’s strong primary care systems are linked to better population health but also to higher health spending. Health Aff. 2013;32(4):686–94.CrossRef Kringos DS, Boerma W, van der Zee J, Groenewegen P. Europe’s strong primary care systems are linked to better population health but also to higher health spending. Health Aff. 2013;32(4):686–94.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pan American Health Organization. Renewing Primary Health Care in the Americas: A Position Paper of the Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO). Washingtion, D.C.: PAHO HQ Library Cataloguing–in–Publication; 2007. Pan American Health Organization. Renewing Primary Health Care in the Americas: A Position Paper of the Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO). Washingtion, D.C.: PAHO HQ Library Cataloguing–in–Publication; 2007.
4.
go back to reference Romanow RJ. Building on Values: The Future of Health Care in Canada. Final Report. Ottawa: Government of Canada, Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada; 2002. Romanow RJ. Building on Values: The Future of Health Care in Canada. Final Report. Ottawa: Government of Canada, Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada; 2002.
5.
go back to reference Clair M. Les solutions émergentes: Rapport et recommandations. Québec: Gouvernement de Québec, Commission d’étude sur les services de santé et les services sociaux; 2000. Clair M. Les solutions émergentes: Rapport et recommandations. Québec: Gouvernement de Québec, Commission d’étude sur les services de santé et les services sociaux; 2000.
6.
go back to reference Mazankowski D. A Framework for Reform: Report of the Premier’s Advisory Council on Health. Edmonton: Government of Alberta, Premier’s Advisory Council on Health for Alberta; 2011. Mazankowski D. A Framework for Reform: Report of the Premier’s Advisory Council on Health. Edmonton: Government of Alberta, Premier’s Advisory Council on Health for Alberta; 2011.
7.
go back to reference Sinclair D. Looking Back, Looking Forward: The Ontario Health Services Restructuring Commission (1996-2000). A Legacy Report. Toronto: Ontario Health Services Restructuring Commission; 2000. Sinclair D. Looking Back, Looking Forward: The Ontario Health Services Restructuring Commission (1996-2000). A Legacy Report. Toronto: Ontario Health Services Restructuring Commission; 2000.
8.
go back to reference Fyke KJ. Caring for Medicare: Sustaining a Quality System. Regina: Government of Saskatchewan, Commission on Medicare; 2001. Fyke KJ. Caring for Medicare: Sustaining a Quality System. Regina: Government of Saskatchewan, Commission on Medicare; 2001.
9.
go back to reference Kirby MJL, LeBreton M. The Health of Canadians - The Federal Role. Final Report. Volume 6: Recommendations for Reform. Ottawa: Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology; 2002. Kirby MJL, LeBreton M. The Health of Canadians - The Federal Role. Final Report. Volume 6: Recommendations for Reform. Ottawa: Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology; 2002.
10.
go back to reference Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty M. Access, affordability, and insurance complexity are often worse in the United States compared to 10 other countries. Health Affairs Web. 2013;32(2):2205–15.CrossRef Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty M. Access, affordability, and insurance complexity are often worse in the United States compared to 10 other countries. Health Affairs Web. 2013;32(2):2205–15.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Breton M, Ricard J, Walter N. Connecting orphan patients with family physicians: differences among Quebec’s access registries. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(9):921–2.PubMedPubMedCentral Breton M, Ricard J, Walter N. Connecting orphan patients with family physicians: differences among Quebec’s access registries. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(9):921–2.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Breton M, Gagne J, Gankpé F. Implementing centralized waiting lists for patients without a family physician in Quebec. Health Reform Observer. 2014;2(1):1–12. Breton M, Gagne J, Gankpé F. Implementing centralized waiting lists for patients without a family physician in Quebec. Health Reform Observer. 2014;2(1):1–12.
13.
go back to reference Sutherland JM, Repin N, Trafford CR. Reviewing the Potential Roles of Financial Incentives for Funding Healthcare in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement; 2012. Sutherland JM, Repin N, Trafford CR. Reviewing the Potential Roles of Financial Incentives for Funding Healthcare in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement; 2012.
14.
go back to reference Burns LR, Muller RW. Hospital-physician collaboration: landscape of economic integration and impact on clinical integration. Milbank Q. 2008;86(3):375–434.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Burns LR, Muller RW. Hospital-physician collaboration: landscape of economic integration and impact on clinical integration. Milbank Q. 2008;86(3):375–434.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Alshamsan R, Majeed A, Ashworth M, Car J, Millett C. Impact of pay for performance on inequalities in health care: systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15(3):178–84.CrossRefPubMed Alshamsan R, Majeed A, Ashworth M, Car J, Millett C. Impact of pay for performance on inequalities in health care: systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15(3):178–84.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Biller-Andorno N, Lee TH. Ethical physician incentives – from carrots and sticks to shared purpose. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(11):980–2.CrossRefPubMed Biller-Andorno N, Lee TH. Ethical physician incentives – from carrots and sticks to shared purpose. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(11):980–2.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Pomey M-P, Martin E, Forest P-G. Quebec’s family medicine groups: innovation and compromise in the reform of front-line care. Canadian Political Science Review. 2009;3:31–46. Pomey M-P, Martin E, Forest P-G. Quebec’s family medicine groups: innovation and compromise in the reform of front-line care. Canadian Political Science Review. 2009;3:31–46.
19.
go back to reference Breton M, Lévesque J-F, Pineault R, Hogg W. Primary care reform: can Quebec’s Family Medicine Group model benefit from the experience of Ontario’s Family Health Teams? Healthc Policy. 2011;7(2):E122–35.PubMedPubMedCentral Breton M, Lévesque J-F, Pineault R, Hogg W. Primary care reform: can Quebec’s Family Medicine Group model benefit from the experience of Ontario’s Family Health Teams? Healthc Policy. 2011;7(2):E122–35.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec. [Press Release] Services de médecine de famille de prise en charge et de suivi de la clientèle. Québec; 2008. Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec. [Press Release] Services de médecine de famille de prise en charge et de suivi de la clientèle. Québec; 2008.
21.
go back to reference Commissaire à la santé et au bien-être. L'expérience de soins des personnes présentant les plus grands besoins de santé : le Québec comparé - Résultats de l'enquête internationale sur les politiques de santé du Commonwealth Fund. Québec: Le Commissaire à la santé et au bien-être; 2011. Commissaire à la santé et au bien-être. L'expérience de soins des personnes présentant les plus grands besoins de santé : le Québec comparé - Résultats de l'enquête internationale sur les politiques de santé du Commonwealth Fund. Québec: Le Commissaire à la santé et au bien-être; 2011.
22.
go back to reference Glazier R, Redelmeier D. Building the patient-centered medical home in Ontario. JAMA. 2010;303(21):2186–7.CrossRefPubMed Glazier R, Redelmeier D. Building the patient-centered medical home in Ontario. JAMA. 2010;303(21):2186–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Léger PT. Physician Payment Mechanisms: Overview and Options for Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2011. p. 15. Léger PT. Physician Payment Mechanisms: Overview and Options for Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2011. p. 15.
24.
go back to reference Georges P. Liste d’attente: des patients écartés de façon arbitraire. Sun Media. Montreal: Le Journal de Montréal; 2013. Georges P. Liste d’attente: des patients écartés de façon arbitraire. Sun Media. Montreal: Le Journal de Montréal; 2013.
25.
go back to reference Portereau B. Les orphelins de la bureaucratie. L’Itineraire: Quebecor Media. Montreal; 2013. Portereau B. Les orphelins de la bureaucratie. L’Itineraire: Quebecor Media. Montreal; 2013.
26.
27.
go back to reference Lambrew JM, DeFriese GH, Carey TS, Ricketts TC, Biddle AK. The effects of having a regular doctor on access to primary care. Med Care. 1996;34(2):138–51.CrossRefPubMed Lambrew JM, DeFriese GH, Carey TS, Ricketts TC, Biddle AK. The effects of having a regular doctor on access to primary care. Med Care. 1996;34(2):138–51.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference McIsaac WJ, Fuller-Thomson E, Talbot Y. Does having regular care by a family physician improve preventive care? Can Fam Physician. 2001;47:70–6.PubMedPubMedCentral McIsaac WJ, Fuller-Thomson E, Talbot Y. Does having regular care by a family physician improve preventive care? Can Fam Physician. 2001;47:70–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Cheraghi-Sohi S, Hole AR, Mead N, McDonald R, Whalley D, Bower P, et al. What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients’ priorities. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(2):107–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cheraghi-Sohi S, Hole AR, Mead N, McDonald R, Whalley D, Bower P, et al. What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients’ priorities. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(2):107–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Glazier RH, Klein-Geltink J, Kopp A, Sibley LM. Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation. CMAJ. 2009;180(11):E72–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Glazier RH, Klein-Geltink J, Kopp A, Sibley LM. Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation. CMAJ. 2009;180(11):E72–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Pomey M-P, Forest P-G, Sanmartin C, Decoster C, Clavel N, Warren E, et al. Toward systematic reviews to understand the determinants of wait time management success to help decision-makers and managers better manage wait times. Implement Sci. 2013;8:61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pomey M-P, Forest P-G, Sanmartin C, Decoster C, Clavel N, Warren E, et al. Toward systematic reviews to understand the determinants of wait time management success to help decision-makers and managers better manage wait times. Implement Sci. 2013;8:61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Who gets a family physician through centralized waiting lists?
Authors
Mylaine Breton
Astrid Brousselle
Antoine Boivin
Danièle Roberge
Raynald Pineault
Djamal Berbiche
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-014-0220-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Primary Care 1/2015 Go to the issue