Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Study protocol

Building the skills and confidence of early childhood educators to work with parents: study protocol for the Partnering with Parents cluster randomised controlled trial

Authors: Zvezdana Petrovic, Olivia Clayton, Jan Matthews, Catherine Wade, Lina Tan, Denny Meyer, Antony Gates, Alex Almendingen, Warren Cann

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the early years of life, the benefits of parental engagement in children’s learning are well documented. Early childhood educators are a potentially effective source of support, having opportunity to engage with parents on key issues related to children’s learning and development. Educators report a need for more practical strategies for building positive partnerships with the parents of children in their care. To address this need, we have developed a practice support system, Partnering with Parents, to guide educators in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) through practical strategies for working with parents. Partnering with Parents is designed to be embedded in everyday service delivery.

Methods

Using a cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) with intervention and wait-list control groups, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of the Partnering with Parents practice support system under normal service conditions. The intervention is being trialled in ECEC services across Victoria, Australia. Services in the intervention group implemented the 10-week intervention before the control group commenced the intervention. Educators and parents of children attending the participating services are taking part in evaluating the intervention by completing questionnaires online at three time points (before, immediately after, and 3 months after the intervention group received the intervention).

Results

One hundred eighteen educators and 302 parents recruited from 19 participating ECEC services have consented to take part in the trial.

Conclusions

There is considerable potential for ECEC services to improve everyday interactions with parents and potentially child outcomes, by implementing this practice support model. Future research in this field can examine long-term effects of improving the parent-educator relationship. The intervention has potential to be widely embedded in educator training or professional development.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12619000488​101. Prospectively registered 25 March 2019.
Footnotes
1
Please note that the term ‘parent’ is intended in an inclusive way to refer to the person who is in the ‘parenting role’ (i.e., mother, father, other care), regardless of their biological relationship to the child. We also use the term ‘parenting’ to refer to what parents do when fulfilling the task of nurturing and caring for children.
 
2
Parenting Research Centre. Exploratory report: collaborating with families: practice support model for the early childhood education and care sector. Unpublished report, Melbourne, Australia. 2016.
 
Literature
1.
Keating DP, Hertzman C. Developmental health and the wealth of nations: social, biological, and educational dynamics: New York: Guilford press; 1999.
2.
McCain MN, Mustard JF. Early years study: reversing the real brain drain. Final report. The Founders’ Network: Toronto, ON; 1999.
3.
Shonkoff JP, Meisels SJ. Handbook of early childhood intervention: Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University press; 2000.CrossRef
4.
Nitecki E. Integrated school-family partnerships in preschool: building quality involvement through multidimensional relationships. Sch Community J. 2015;25(2):195–219.
5.
Rouse E, O'Brien D. Mutuality and reciprocity in parent–teacher relationships: understanding the nature of partnerships in early childhood education and care provision. Australas J Early Childhood. 2017;42(2):45–52.CrossRef
6.
Kuhn M, Marvin CA, Knoche LL. In it for the long haul: parent–teacher partnerships for addressing preschool children’s challenging behaviors. Top Early Child Spec Educ. 2017;37(2):81–93.CrossRef
7.
Akbari E, McCuaig K. Early childhood education report 2014. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education; 2014.
8.
Rodriguez ET, Tamis-LeMonda CS. Trajectories of the home learning environment across the first 5 years: associations with children’s vocabulary and literacy skills at prekindergarten. Child Dev. 2011;82(4):1058–75.CrossRef
9.
Sammons P, Toth K, Sylva K, Melhuish E, Siraj I, Taggart B. The long-term role of the home learning environment in shaping students’ academic attainment in secondary school. Journal of Children's Services. 2015;10(3):189–201.CrossRef
10.
Niklas F, Schneider W. Home learning environment and development of child competencies from kindergarten until the end of elementary school. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2017;49:263–74.CrossRef
11.
Tamis-LeMonda CS, Luo R, McFadden KE, Bandel ET, Vallotton C. Early home learning environment predicts children’s 5th grade academic skills. Appl Dev Sci. 2019;23(2):153–69.CrossRef
12.
13.
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. Victorian Early Years Learning and Development Framework: For children from birth to eight years. Melbourne: Early Childhood Strategy Division, Department of Education and Early Childhood Development and Victorian Curriculum Assessment Authority; 2016.
14.
Department of Education, Employment, and Workplace Relations. Belonging, Being & Becoming: educator's guide to the Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Canberra: Council of Australian Governments; 2009a.
15.
Department of Education, Employment, and Workplace Relations. My time, Our place: Framework for School Age Care in Australia. Canberra: Council of Australian Governments; 2009b.
16.
Pascoe SM, Brennan D. Lifting our game: report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools through early childhood interventions: Melbourne: Victorian Government; 2017.
17.
Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG. CONSORT Group. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012;345:e5661.CrossRef
18.
Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Makuch RW, Brass LM, Horwitz RI. Stratified randomization for clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(1):19–26.CrossRef
19.
Randomness and Integrity Services Ltd. True Random Number Service. Dublin (Ireland): 2019 [cited 2019 Apr 17]. Available from: www.​random.​org.
20.
Giallo R, Treyvaud K, Matthews J, Kienhuis M. Making the transition to primary school: an evaluation of a transition program for parents. Aust J Educ Dev Psychol. 2010;10:1–17.
21.
Wade C, Matthews J, Bent CA, Neill E, Petrovic Z, Fisher J, et al. Parenting today: a state-wide representative survey of contemporary parenting experiences. Child Aust. 2018;43(1):77–85.CrossRef
22.
Hamilton VE, Matthews JM, Crawford SB. Development and preliminary validation of a parenting self-regulation scale:“me as a parent”. J Child Fam Stud. 2015;24(10):2853–64.CrossRef
23.
Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. London: Routledge; 2016.
24.
Senn S. Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1994;13(17):1715–26.CrossRef
25.
Adams G, Gulliford MC, Ukoumunne OC, Eldridge S, Chinn S, Campbell MJ. Patterns of intra- cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(8):785–94.CrossRef
26.
Brookes ST, Whitely E, Egger M, Smith GD, Mulheran PA, Peters TJ. Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses;: power and sample size for the interaction test. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(3):229–36.CrossRef
27.
Seaman SR, White IR. Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data. Stat Methods Med Res. 2013;22(3):278–95.CrossRef
28.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Building the skills and confidence of early childhood educators to work with parents: study protocol for the Partnering with Parents cluster randomised controlled trial
Authors
Zvezdana Petrovic
Olivia Clayton
Jan Matthews
Catherine Wade
Lina Tan
Denny Meyer
Antony Gates
Alex Almendingen
Warren Cann
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0846-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research article

Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Research article

A comparison of the statistical performance of different meta-analysis models for the synthesis of subgroup effects from randomized clinical trials

Research article

Correcting for misclassification and selection effects in estimating net survival in clinical trials

Research article

Comparison of a time-varying covariate model and a joint model of time-to-event outcomes in the presence of measurement error and interval censoring: application to kidney transplantation

Research article

Evidence-based sizing of non-inferiority trials using decision models

Research article

A review and synthesis of frameworks for engagement in health research to identify concepts of knowledge user engagement