Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Coding algorithms for defining Charlson and Elixhauser co-morbidities in Read-coded databases

Authors: David Metcalfe, James Masters, Antonella Delmestri, Andrew Judge, Daniel Perry, Cheryl Zogg, Belinda Gabbe, Matthew Costa

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Comorbidity measures, such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and Elixhauser Method (EM), are frequently used for risk-adjustment by healthcare researchers. This study sought to create CCI and EM lists of Read codes, which are standard terminology used in some large primary care databases. It also aimed to describe and compare the predictive properties of the CCI and EM amongst patients with hip fracture (and matched controls) in a large primary care administrative dataset.

Methods

Two researchers independently screened 111,929 individual Read codes to populate the 17 CCI and 31 EM comorbidity categories. Patients with hip fractures were identified (together with age- and sex-matched controls) from UK primary care practices participating in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). The predictive properties of both comorbidity measures were explored in hip fracture and control populations using logistic regression models fitted with 30- and 365-day mortality as the dependent variables together with tests of equality for Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

There were 5832 CCI and 7156 EM comorbidity codes. The EM improved the ability of a logistic regression model (using age and sex as covariables) to predict 30-day mortality (AUROC 0.744 versus 0.686). The EM alone also outperformed the CCI (0.696 versus 0.601). Capturing comorbidities over a prolonged period only modestly improved the predictive value of either index: EM 1-year look-back 0.645 versus 5-year 0.676 versus complete record 0.695 and CCI 0.574 versus 0.591 versus 0.605.

Conclusions

The comorbidity code lists may be used by future researchers to calculate CCI and EM using records from Read coded databases. The EM is preferable to the CCI but only marginal gains should be expected from incorporating comorbidities over a period longer than 1 year.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.CrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, et al. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1):8–27.CrossRef Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, et al. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1):8–27.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Molto A, Dougados M. Comorbidity indices. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(5 Suppl 85):S-131–4. Molto A, Dougados M. Comorbidity indices. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(5 Suppl 85):S-131–4.
9.
go back to reference Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–9.CrossRef Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference D'Hoore W, Bouckaert A, Tilquin C. Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1429–33.CrossRef D'Hoore W, Bouckaert A, Tilquin C. Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1429–33.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–9.CrossRef Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(10):1075–9 discussion 81-90.CrossRef Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(10):1075–9 discussion 81-90.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Benson T. The history of the read codes: the inaugural James read memorial lecture 2011. Inform Prim Care. 2011;19(3):173–82.PubMed Benson T. The history of the read codes: the inaugural James read memorial lecture 2011. Inform Prim Care. 2011;19(3):173–82.PubMed
17.
go back to reference U.S. National Center for Health Statistics. International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2008. U.S. National Center for Health Statistics. International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2008.
18.
go back to reference Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Medical Dictionary. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2018. Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Medical Dictionary. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2018.
31.
go back to reference Cleves MA. From the help desk: comparing areas under receiver operating characteristic curves from two or more probit or logit models. Stata J. 2002;2(3):301–13.CrossRef Cleves MA. From the help desk: comparing areas under receiver operating characteristic curves from two or more probit or logit models. Stata J. 2002;2(3):301–13.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Coding algorithms for defining Charlson and Elixhauser co-morbidities in Read-coded databases
Authors
David Metcalfe
James Masters
Antonella Delmestri
Andrew Judge
Daniel Perry
Cheryl Zogg
Belinda Gabbe
Matthew Costa
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0753-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2019 Go to the issue