Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Differences in proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes: assessing health and functional status among medicare beneficiaries

Authors: Minghui Li, Ilene Harris, Z. Kevin Lu

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Proxy responses are very common when surveys are conducted among the elderly or disabled population. Outcomes reported by proxy may be systematically different from those obtained from patients directly. The objective of the study is to examine the presence, direction, and magnitude of possible differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes in health and functional status measures among Medicare beneficiaries.

Methods

This study is a pooled cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries from 2006 to 2011. Survey respondents can respond to the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey either by themselves or via proxies. Health and functional status was assessed across five domains: physical, affective, cognitive, social, and sensory status. Propensity score matching was used to get matched pairs of patient-reports and proxy-reports.

Results

After applying the propensity score matching, the study identified 7,780 person-years of patient-reports paired with 7,780 person-years of proxy-reports. Except for the sensory limitation, differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes were present in physical, affective, cognitive, and social limitations. Compared to patient-reports, a question regarding survey respondents’ difficulties in managing money was associated with the largest proxy response bias (relative risk, RR = 3.83). With few exceptions, the presence, direction, and magnitude of differences between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes did not vary much in the subgroup analysis.

Conclusions

When there is a difference between proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes, proxies tended to report more health and functional limitations among the elderly and disabled population. The extent of proxy response bias depended on the domain being tested and the nature of the question being asked. Researchers should accept proxy reports for sensory status and objective, observable, or easy questions. For physical, affective, cognitive, or social status and private, unobservable, or complex questions, proxy-reported outcomes should be used with caution when patient-reported outcomes are not available.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Neumann PJ, Araki SS, Gutterman EM. The use of proxy respondents in studies of older adults: lessons, challenges, and opportunities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(12):1646–54.CrossRefPubMed Neumann PJ, Araki SS, Gutterman EM. The use of proxy respondents in studies of older adults: lessons, challenges, and opportunities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(12):1646–54.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Parsons JA, Baum S, Johnson TP. Inclusion of disabled populations in social surveys: review and recommendations. Survey Research Laboratory; 2000. Parsons JA, Baum S, Johnson TP. Inclusion of disabled populations in social surveys: review and recommendations. Survey Research Laboratory; 2000.
3.
go back to reference Todorov A, Kirchner C. Bias in proxies' reports of disability: data from the National Health Interview Survey on disability. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(8):1248–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Todorov A, Kirchner C. Bias in proxies' reports of disability: data from the National Health Interview Survey on disability. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(8):1248–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Wedig GJ. Health status and the demand for health. Results on price elasticities. J Health Econ. 1988;7(2):151–63.CrossRefPubMed Wedig GJ. Health status and the demand for health. Results on price elasticities. J Health Econ. 1988;7(2):151–63.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lubitz J, Cai L, Kramarow E, Lentzner H. Health, life expectancy, and health care spending among the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(11):1048–55.CrossRefPubMed Lubitz J, Cai L, Kramarow E, Lentzner H. Health, life expectancy, and health care spending among the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(11):1048–55.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Magaziner J, Bassett SS, Hebel JR, Gruber-Baldini A. Use of proxies to measure health and functional status in epidemiologic studies of community-dwelling women aged 65 years and older. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143(3):283–92.CrossRefPubMed Magaziner J, Bassett SS, Hebel JR, Gruber-Baldini A. Use of proxies to measure health and functional status in epidemiologic studies of community-dwelling women aged 65 years and older. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143(3):283–92.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Magaziner J, Zimmerman SI, Gruber-Baldini AL, Hebel JR, Fox KM. Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status. Comparison with self-reports and observations of performance. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146(5):418–28.CrossRefPubMed Magaziner J, Zimmerman SI, Gruber-Baldini AL, Hebel JR, Fox KM. Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status. Comparison with self-reports and observations of performance. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146(5):418–28.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Elliott MN, Beckett MK, Chong K, Hambarsoomians K, Hays RD. How do proxy responses and proxy-assisted responses differ from what Medicare beneficiaries might have reported about their health care? Health Serv Res. 2008;43(3):833–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elliott MN, Beckett MK, Chong K, Hambarsoomians K, Hays RD. How do proxy responses and proxy-assisted responses differ from what Medicare beneficiaries might have reported about their health care? Health Serv Res. 2008;43(3):833–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Ellis BH, Bannister WM, Cox JK, Fowler BM, Shannon ED, Drachman D, et al. Utilization of the propensity score method: an exploratory comparison of proxy-completed to self-completed responses in the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ellis BH, Bannister WM, Cox JK, Fowler BM, Shannon ED, Drachman D, et al. Utilization of the propensity score method: an exploratory comparison of proxy-completed to self-completed responses in the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference D'Agostino Jr RB. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17(19):2265–81.CrossRefPubMed D'Agostino Jr RB. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17(19):2265–81.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kautter J, Khatutsky G, Pope GC, Chromy JR, Adler GS. Impact of nonresponse on Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey estimates. Health Care Financ Rev. 2006;27(4):71–93.PubMedPubMedCentral Kautter J, Khatutsky G, Pope GC, Chromy JR, Adler GS. Impact of nonresponse on Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey estimates. Health Care Financ Rev. 2006;27(4):71–93.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Rassen JA, Shelat AA, Myers J, Glynn RJ, Rothman KJ, Schneeweiss S. One-to-many propensity score matching in cohort studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21 Suppl 2:69–80.CrossRefPubMed Rassen JA, Shelat AA, Myers J, Glynn RJ, Rothman KJ, Schneeweiss S. One-to-many propensity score matching in cohort studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21 Suppl 2:69–80.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Baser O. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching. Value Health. 2006;9(6):377–85.CrossRefPubMed Baser O. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching. Value Health. 2006;9(6):377–85.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gibson-Davis CM, Foster EM. A cautionary tale: Using propensity scores to estimate the effect of food stamps on food insecurity. Social Service Review. 2006;80(1):93–126.CrossRef Gibson-Davis CM, Foster EM. A cautionary tale: Using propensity scores to estimate the effect of food stamps on food insecurity. Social Service Review. 2006;80(1):93–126.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis. 2007;15(3):199–236.CrossRef Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis. 2007;15(3):199–236.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Differences in proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes: assessing health and functional status among medicare beneficiaries
Authors
Minghui Li
Ilene Harris
Z. Kevin Lu
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0053-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2015 Go to the issue