Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Emergency Medicine 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Screening for frailty among older emergency department visitors: Validation of the new FRESH-screening instrument

Authors: Eklund Kajsa, Wilhelmson Katarina, Landahl Sten, Ivanoff-Dahlin Synneve

Published in: BMC Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The identification of frail older persons in different health care settings is widely seen as an important step in improving the healthcare system. Screening at an emergency department (ED) should be handled in just a few minutes without the use of tests or measurements. The FRESH-screening was developed for this purpose. This study’s aim was to evaluate the FRESH-screening and its construct validity; also assessed were the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for frailty screening.

Methods

The study had a cross-sectional design. A total of 161 elderly people who sought care at the emergency department at Mölndal Hospital were included. Inclusion criteria were ages ≥80 years or ages 65–79 with at least one chronic disease and dependence in at least one daily living activity. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated to describe the accuracy of the FRESH-screening in identifying those with frailty, as assessed by eight frailty indicators. Sensitivity and specificity were both set at a minimum of 80 %, and a percentage sum ≥150 of the sensitivity and positive prediction was considered a measure of excellent value.

Result

Both sensitivity and specificity were high (81 % and 80 %, respectively) when comparing the four questions of the FRESH-screening against the eight frailty indicators. The percentage sum of sensitivity and positive prediction was 173 (81 % + 92 %), thus exceeding the 150 cutoff.

Conclusion

This study shows the FRESH-screening to be of excellent clinical value. Additionally, the clinical experience is that the instrument is simple and rapid to use, takes only a few minutes to administer, and requires minimal energy input by older persons.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rouge Bugat ME et al. Detecting frailty in primary care: a major challenge for primary care physicians. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13:669–72.CrossRefPubMed Rouge Bugat ME et al. Detecting frailty in primary care: a major challenge for primary care physicians. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13:669–72.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Baitar A et al. Evaluation of the Groningen Frailty Indicator and the G8 questionnaire as screening tools for frailty in older patients with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol. 2013;4:32–8.CrossRefPubMed Baitar A et al. Evaluation of the Groningen Frailty Indicator and the G8 questionnaire as screening tools for frailty in older patients with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol. 2013;4:32–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rubenstein L, Siu A, Wieland D. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: Toward understanding its efficacy. Aging. 1989;1:87–98.PubMed Rubenstein L, Siu A, Wieland D. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: Toward understanding its efficacy. Aging. 1989;1:87–98.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Rodriguez-Manas L et al. Searching for an operational definition of frailty: a Delphi method based consensus statement: the frailty operative definition-consensus conference project. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68:62–7.CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez-Manas L et al. Searching for an operational definition of frailty: a Delphi method based consensus statement: the frailty operative definition-consensus conference project. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68:62–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fried LP et al. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:255–63.CrossRefPubMed Fried LP et al. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:255–63.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Fried LP et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:146–56.CrossRef Fried LP et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:146–56.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Klein BE et al. Relationship of measures of frailty to visual function: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2003;101:191–200.PubMedPubMedCentral Klein BE et al. Relationship of measures of frailty to visual function: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2003;101:191–200.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Eklund K et al. One-year outcome of frailty indicators and activities of daily living following the randomised controlled trial: “Continuum of care for frail older people”. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eklund K et al. One-year outcome of frailty indicators and activities of daily living following the randomised controlled trial: “Continuum of care for frail older people”. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Collard RM et al. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:1487–92.CrossRefPubMed Collard RM et al. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:1487–92.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Fassbender K et al. Cost trajectories at the end of life: the Canadian experience. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38:75–80.CrossRefPubMed Fassbender K et al. Cost trajectories at the end of life: the Canadian experience. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38:75–80.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK. A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16:601–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK. A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16:601–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Pialoux T, Goyard J, Lesourd B. Screening tools for frailty in primary health care: a systematic review. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012;12:189–97.CrossRefPubMed Pialoux T, Goyard J, Lesourd B. Screening tools for frailty in primary health care: a systematic review. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012;12:189–97.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1999. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1999.
17.
go back to reference Wilson JMG, Jungner G. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Public health papers, no 34. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1968. Wilson JMG, Jungner G. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Public health papers, no 34. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1968.
18.
go back to reference Wilhelmson K et al. Design of a randomized controlled study of a multi-professional and multidimensional intervention targeting frail elderly people. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11:24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilhelmson K et al. Design of a randomized controlled study of a multi-professional and multidimensional intervention targeting frail elderly people. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11:24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Dahlin-Ivanoff S et al. Elderly persons in the risk zone. Design of a multidimensional, health promoting, randomized three-armed controlled trial for “prefrail” people of 80+ years living at home. BMC Geriatr. 2010;10:27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dahlin-Ivanoff S et al. Elderly persons in the risk zone. Design of a multidimensional, health promoting, randomized three-armed controlled trial for “prefrail” people of 80+ years living at home. BMC Geriatr. 2010;10:27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Mathiowetz V et al. Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:69–72.PubMed Mathiowetz V et al. Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:69–72.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Tibblin G et al. “The Goteborg quality of life instrument” - an assessment of well-being and symptoms among men born 1913 and 1923. Methods and validity. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1990;1:33–8. Tibblin G et al. “The Goteborg quality of life instrument” - an assessment of well-being and symptoms among men born 1913 and 1923. Methods and validity. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1990;1:33–8.
22.
go back to reference Berg KO et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992;83 Suppl 2:7–11. Berg KO et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992;83 Suppl 2:7–11.
23.
go back to reference Peterson MJ et al. Physical activity as a preventative factor for frailty: The health, aging, and body composition study. J Gerontology - Series A Biol Scienc Med Scienc. 2009;64:61–8.CrossRef Peterson MJ et al. Physical activity as a preventative factor for frailty: The health, aging, and body composition study. J Gerontology - Series A Biol Scienc Med Scienc. 2009;64:61–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98.CrossRefPubMed Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Avlund K, Schultz-Larsen K, Davidsen M. Tiredness in daily activities at age 70 as a predictor of mortality during the next 10 years. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:323–33.CrossRefPubMed Avlund K, Schultz-Larsen K, Davidsen M. Tiredness in daily activities at age 70 as a predictor of mortality during the next 10 years. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:323–33.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Sonn U, Asberg KH. Assessment of activities of daily living in the elderly. A study of a population of 76-year-olds in Gothenburg, Sweden. Scand J Rehab Med. 1991;23:193–202. Sonn U, Asberg KH. Assessment of activities of daily living in the elderly. A study of a population of 76-year-olds in Gothenburg, Sweden. Scand J Rehab Med. 1991;23:193–202.
27.
28.
go back to reference Williams RM. Frequent emergency department use in Sweden: implications for emergency medicine in the United States. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37:627–9.CrossRefPubMed Williams RM. Frequent emergency department use in Sweden: implications for emergency medicine in the United States. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37:627–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference LaCalle E, Rabin E. Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56:42–8.CrossRefPubMed LaCalle E, Rabin E. Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56:42–8.CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
go back to reference Overcash JA et al. The abbreviated comprehensive geriatric assessment (aCGA): a retrospective analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;54:129–36.CrossRefPubMed Overcash JA et al. The abbreviated comprehensive geriatric assessment (aCGA): a retrospective analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;54:129–36.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Saliba D et al. The Vulnerable Elders Survey: a tool for identifying vulnerable older people in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:1691–9.CrossRefPubMed Saliba D et al. The Vulnerable Elders Survey: a tool for identifying vulnerable older people in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:1691–9.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Bellera CA et al. Screening older cancer patients: first evaluation of the G-8 geriatric screening tool. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2166–72.CrossRefPubMed Bellera CA et al. Screening older cancer patients: first evaluation of the G-8 geriatric screening tool. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2166–72.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Hamaker ME et al. Frailty screening methods for predicting outcome of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:437–44.CrossRef Hamaker ME et al. Frailty screening methods for predicting outcome of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:437–44.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Ebrahimi Z et al. Health despite frailty: exploring influences on frail older adults’ experiences of health. Geriatr Nurs. 2013;34:289–94.CrossRefPubMed Ebrahimi Z et al. Health despite frailty: exploring influences on frail older adults’ experiences of health. Geriatr Nurs. 2013;34:289–94.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Kenig J et al. Six screening instruments for frailty in older patients qualified for emergency abdominal surgery. Arch Geron Geriatr. 2015;61:437–42.CrossRef Kenig J et al. Six screening instruments for frailty in older patients qualified for emergency abdominal surgery. Arch Geron Geriatr. 2015;61:437–42.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Samaras N et al. Older patients in the emergency department: a review. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56:261–9.CrossRefPubMed Samaras N et al. Older patients in the emergency department: a review. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56:261–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Screening for frailty among older emergency department visitors: Validation of the new FRESH-screening instrument
Authors
Eklund Kajsa
Wilhelmson Katarina
Landahl Sten
Ivanoff-Dahlin Synneve
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-227X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-016-0087-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Emergency Medicine 1/2016 Go to the issue