Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Care | Research article

Regional anaesthesia is associated with less patient satisfaction compared to general anaesthesia following distal upper extremity surgery: a prospective double centred observational study

Authors: Wouter Droog, Sanne E. Hoeks, G. Peter van Aggelen, D-Yin Lin, J. Henk Coert, Robert Jan Stolker, Eilish M. Galvin

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient satisfaction is a well-established indicator to evaluate the quality of medical care and there is an increasing support for the use of patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) to evaluate satisfaction. To anesthetize the upper limb for surgery, both general and regional plexus anaesthesia are appropriate techniques. However, the best technique in the anaesthesiologist’s perspective might not necessarily result in the highest patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is to investigate patient satisfaction following general and regional anaesthesia, and to identify areas where anaesthesiologists can focus on improving patient care.

Methods

Patients scheduled for elective distal upper extremity surgery under either general or regional plexus anaesthesia were prospectively included. On the first postoperative day, patient satisfaction and main reason for dissatisfaction with the anaesthesia technique were investigated during a telephone interview.

Results

Of the 243 patients included in the current study, 79.8% report being “fully satisfied” with their anaesthesia technique. 32.1% of the patients who received regional anaesthesia reported not feeling “fully satisfied”. This figure is 5.5% following general anaesthesia. Main reason for dissatisfaction following regional anaesthesia are reported as “insufficient anaesthesia prior to surgery”, and “the discomfort of having a long-lasting insensate extremity postoperatively”.

Conclusions

Following regional plexus anaesthesia, a third of the patients are not “fully satisfied”. To optimize patient satisfaction following regional anaesthesia techniques, we advocate stronger focus on patient counselling preoperatively, addressing the issues of block failure and prolonged postoperative sensory and motor block.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wu CL, Naqibuddin M, Fleisher LA. Measurement of patient satisfaction as an outcome of regional anesthesia and analgesia: a systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26:196–208.PubMed Wu CL, Naqibuddin M, Fleisher LA. Measurement of patient satisfaction as an outcome of regional anesthesia and analgesia: a systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26:196–208.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Teunkens A, Vanhaecht K, Vermeulen K, Fieuws S, Van de Velde M, Rex S, Bruyneel L. Measuring satisfaction and anesthesia related outcomes in a surgical day care center: a three-year single-center observational study. J Clin Anesth. 2017;43:15–23.CrossRef Teunkens A, Vanhaecht K, Vermeulen K, Fieuws S, Van de Velde M, Rex S, Bruyneel L. Measuring satisfaction and anesthesia related outcomes in a surgical day care center: a three-year single-center observational study. J Clin Anesth. 2017;43:15–23.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Royse CF, Chung F, Newman S, Stygall J, Wilkinson DJ. Predictors of patient satisfaction with anesthesia and surgery care: a cohort study using the postoperative quality of recovery scale. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30:106–10.CrossRef Royse CF, Chung F, Newman S, Stygall J, Wilkinson DJ. Predictors of patient satisfaction with anesthesia and surgery care: a cohort study using the postoperative quality of recovery scale. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30:106–10.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education. 2017;17:137–44.CrossRef Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education. 2017;17:137–44.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Myles PS, Williams DL, Hendrata M, Anderson H, Weeks AM. Patient satisfaction after anesthesia and surgery: results of a prospective survey of 10,811 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84:6–10.CrossRef Myles PS, Williams DL, Hendrata M, Anderson H, Weeks AM. Patient satisfaction after anesthesia and surgery: results of a prospective survey of 10,811 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84:6–10.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. BMJ. 1974;2:656–9.CrossRef Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. BMJ. 1974;2:656–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain), numeric rating scale for pain (NRS pain), McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), chronic pain grade scale (CPGS), short Form-36 bodily pain scale (SF-36 BPS), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(Suppl 11):S240–52.CrossRef Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain), numeric rating scale for pain (NRS pain), McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), chronic pain grade scale (CPGS), short Form-36 bodily pain scale (SF-36 BPS), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(Suppl 11):S240–52.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Coyle TT, Helfrick JF, Gonzalez ML, Andresen RV, Perrott DH. Office-based ambulatory anesthesia: factors that influence patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction with deep sedation/general anesthesia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:163–72.CrossRef Coyle TT, Helfrick JF, Gonzalez ML, Andresen RV, Perrott DH. Office-based ambulatory anesthesia: factors that influence patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction with deep sedation/general anesthesia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:163–72.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cooper K, Kelley H, Carrithers J. Perceptions of side effects following axillary block used for outpatient surgery. Reg Anesth. 1995;20:212–6.PubMed Cooper K, Kelley H, Carrithers J. Perceptions of side effects following axillary block used for outpatient surgery. Reg Anesth. 1995;20:212–6.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Klein SM, Buckenmaier CC 3rd. Ambulatory surgery with long acting regional anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2002;68(833–41):841–7. Klein SM, Buckenmaier CC 3rd. Ambulatory surgery with long acting regional anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2002;68(833–41):841–7.
11.
go back to reference Droog W, Lin DY, Huisman JS, Franssen FA, van Aggelen GP, Coert JH, Galvin EM. Individual duration of axillary brachial plexus block is unpredictable: a prospective double centered observational study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017;83:1146–51.PubMed Droog W, Lin DY, Huisman JS, Franssen FA, van Aggelen GP, Coert JH, Galvin EM. Individual duration of axillary brachial plexus block is unpredictable: a prospective double centered observational study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017;83:1146–51.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Barnett SF, Alagar RK, Grocott MP, Giannaris S, Dick JR, Moonesinghe SR. Patient-satisfaction measures in anesthesia: qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:452–78.CrossRef Barnett SF, Alagar RK, Grocott MP, Giannaris S, Dick JR, Moonesinghe SR. Patient-satisfaction measures in anesthesia: qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:452–78.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Capuzzo M, Gilli G, Paparella L, Gritti G, Gambi D, Bianconi M, Giunta F, Buccoliero C, Alvisi R. Factors predictive of patient satisfaction with anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:435–42.CrossRef Capuzzo M, Gilli G, Paparella L, Gritti G, Gambi D, Bianconi M, Giunta F, Buccoliero C, Alvisi R. Factors predictive of patient satisfaction with anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:435–42.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Regional anaesthesia is associated with less patient satisfaction compared to general anaesthesia following distal upper extremity surgery: a prospective double centred observational study
Authors
Wouter Droog
Sanne E. Hoeks
G. Peter van Aggelen
D-Yin Lin
J. Henk Coert
Robert Jan Stolker
Eilish M. Galvin
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0789-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2019 Go to the issue