Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Determination of ED50 and time to effectiveness for intrathecal hydromorphone in laboring patients using Dixon’s up-and-down sequential allocation method

Authors: Vikas O’Reilly-Shah, Grant C Lynde

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With the increasing occurrence of drug shortages, understanding the pharmacokinetics of alternative intrathecal opioid administration has gained importance. In particular, additional data are needed to comprehensively evaluate the analgesic properties of intrathecal hydromorphone in the laboring patient. In a phase 2 clinical trial, we set out to determine the median effective dose (ED50) and time to effectiveness for this drug in this population.

Methods

Using Dixon’s up-and-down sequential allocation method, twenty women presenting for labor analgesia were prospectively enrolled. A combined spinal-epidural technique was used to deliver the determined dose of intrathecal hydromorphone. Visual analog pain scores were obtained assessing peak pain scores during serial uterine contractions. Effective pain relief was defined as achieving a pain score of less than or equal to 3 out of 10. The dose was deemed to be ineffective if the patient failed to achieve this level of relief after 30 min.

Results

The ED50 of hydromorphone in our population was 10.9 μg (95% confidence interval 5.6–16.2 μg). Amongst patients for whom the dose was effective, the median time to pain relief was 24 min. One patient experienced both nausea and pruritus. No other complications were noted.

Conclusion

Due to the prolonged time to onset, hydromorphone cannot be recommended in favor of substantively better alternatives such as sufentanil and fentanyl.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.​gov registration number: NCT01598506.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Deer TR, Prager J, Levy R, Rathmell J, Buchser E, Burton A, et al. Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2012: recommendations for the management of pain by intrathecal (intraspinal) drug delivery: report of an interdisciplinary expert panel. Neuromodulation. 2012;15:436–64 discussion 464–6.CrossRef Deer TR, Prager J, Levy R, Rathmell J, Buchser E, Burton A, et al. Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2012: recommendations for the management of pain by intrathecal (intraspinal) drug delivery: report of an interdisciplinary expert panel. Neuromodulation. 2012;15:436–64 discussion 464–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hess PE. What’s new in clinical obstetric anesthesia in 2015? Int J Obstet Anesth. 2017;32:54–63.CrossRef Hess PE. What’s new in clinical obstetric anesthesia in 2015? Int J Obstet Anesth. 2017;32:54–63.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Akkamahadevi P, Srinivas H, Siddesh A, Kadli N. Comparison of efficacy of sufentanil and fentanyl with low-concentration bupivacaine for combined spinal epidural labour analgesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2012;56:365–9.CrossRef Akkamahadevi P, Srinivas H, Siddesh A, Kadli N. Comparison of efficacy of sufentanil and fentanyl with low-concentration bupivacaine for combined spinal epidural labour analgesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2012;56:365–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Vasudevan A, Snowman CE, Sundar S, Sarge TW, Hess PE. Intrathecal morphine reduces breakthrough pain during labour epidural analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:241–5.CrossRef Vasudevan A, Snowman CE, Sundar S, Sarge TW, Hess PE. Intrathecal morphine reduces breakthrough pain during labour epidural analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:241–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Boswell MV. Lipid solubility and epidural opioid efficacy. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:427–8.CrossRef Boswell MV. Lipid solubility and epidural opioid efficacy. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:427–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mhyre JM, Hong RW, Greenfield MLVH, Pace NL, Polley LS. The median local analgesic dose of intrathecal bupivacaine with hydromorphone for labour: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:1061–9.CrossRef Mhyre JM, Hong RW, Greenfield MLVH, Pace NL, Polley LS. The median local analgesic dose of intrathecal bupivacaine with hydromorphone for labour: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:1061–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dixon WJ. The Up-and-Down Method for Small Samples. J Am Stat Assoc. 1965;60:967–78.CrossRef Dixon WJ. The Up-and-Down Method for Small Samples. J Am Stat Assoc. 1965;60:967–78.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stylianou M, Flournoy N. Dose finding using the biased coin up-and-down design and isotonic regression. Biometrics. 2002;58:171–7.CrossRef Stylianou M, Flournoy N. Dose finding using the biased coin up-and-down design and isotonic regression. Biometrics. 2002;58:171–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Durham SD, Flournoy N, Rosenberger WF. A random walk rule for phase I clinical trials. Biometrics. 1997;53:745–60.CrossRef Durham SD, Flournoy N, Rosenberger WF. A random walk rule for phase I clinical trials. Biometrics. 1997;53:745–60.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lynde GC. Determination of ED50 of hydromorphone for postoperative analgesia following cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016;28:17–21.CrossRef Lynde GC. Determination of ED50 of hydromorphone for postoperative analgesia following cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016;28:17–21.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Conell-Price J, Evans JB, Hong D, Shafer S, Flood P. The development and validation of a dynamic model to account for the progress of labor in the assessment of pain. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1509–15 table of contents.CrossRef Conell-Price J, Evans JB, Hong D, Shafer S, Flood P. The development and validation of a dynamic model to account for the progress of labor in the assessment of pain. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1509–15 table of contents.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chaney MA. Side effects of intrathecal and epidural opioids. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42:891–903.CrossRef Chaney MA. Side effects of intrathecal and epidural opioids. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42:891–903.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lee Y-S, Park Y-C, Kim J-H, Kim W-Y, Yoon S-Z, Moon M-G, et al. Intrathecal hydromorphone added to hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after knee arthroscopic surgery: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012;29:17–21.CrossRef Lee Y-S, Park Y-C, Kim J-H, Kim W-Y, Yoon S-Z, Moon M-G, et al. Intrathecal hydromorphone added to hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after knee arthroscopic surgery: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012;29:17–21.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Georges P, Lavand’homme P. Intrathecal hydromorphone instead of the old intrathecal morphine: the best is the enemy of the good? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012;29:3–4.CrossRef Georges P, Lavand’homme P. Intrathecal hydromorphone instead of the old intrathecal morphine: the best is the enemy of the good? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012;29:3–4.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hodgson PS, Neal JM, Pollock JE, Liu SS. The neurotoxicity of drugs given intrathecally (spinal). Anesth Analg. 1999;88:797–809.CrossRef Hodgson PS, Neal JM, Pollock JE, Liu SS. The neurotoxicity of drugs given intrathecally (spinal). Anesth Analg. 1999;88:797–809.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Johansen MJ, Satterfield WC, Baze WB, Hildebrand KR, Gradert TL, Hassenbusch SJ. Continuous Intrathecal Infusion of Hydromorphone: Safety in the Sheep Model and Clinical Implications. Pain Med. 2004;5:14–25.CrossRef Johansen MJ, Satterfield WC, Baze WB, Hildebrand KR, Gradert TL, Hassenbusch SJ. Continuous Intrathecal Infusion of Hydromorphone: Safety in the Sheep Model and Clinical Implications. Pain Med. 2004;5:14–25.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference DeBalli P, Breeen TW. Intrathecal opioids for combined spinal-epidural analgesia during labour. CNS Drugs. 2003;17:889–904.CrossRef DeBalli P, Breeen TW. Intrathecal opioids for combined spinal-epidural analgesia during labour. CNS Drugs. 2003;17:889–904.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pace NL, Stat. M, Stylianou MP. Advances in and Limitations of Up-and-down Methodology. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:144–52.CrossRef Pace NL, Stat. M, Stylianou MP. Advances in and Limitations of Up-and-down Methodology. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:144–52.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Palmer CM, Van Maren G, Nogami WM, Alves D. Bupivacaine Augments Intrathecal Fentanyl for Labor Analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:84–89.CrossRef Palmer CM, Van Maren G, Nogami WM, Alves D. Bupivacaine Augments Intrathecal Fentanyl for Labor Analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:84–89.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chestnut DH, Polley LS, Tsen LC, Wong CA. Labor and Vaginal Delivery. Chestnut’s Obstetric Anesthesia: Principles and Practice. 2009:359–60.CrossRef Chestnut DH, Polley LS, Tsen LC, Wong CA. Labor and Vaginal Delivery. Chestnut’s Obstetric Anesthesia: Principles and Practice. 2009:359–60.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Determination of ED50 and time to effectiveness for intrathecal hydromorphone in laboring patients using Dixon’s up-and-down sequential allocation method
Authors
Vikas O’Reilly-Shah
Grant C Lynde
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0603-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2018 Go to the issue