Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Comparison of VividTrac®, Airtraq®, King Vision®, Macintosh Laryngoscope and a Custom-Made Videolaryngoscope for difficult and normal airways in mannequins by novices

Authors: Szilárd Rendeki, Dóra Keresztes, Gábor Woth, Ákos Mérei, Martin Rozanovic, Mátyás Rendeki, József Farkas, Diána Mühl, Bálint Nagy

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Direct laryngoscopy remains the gold standard for endotracheal intubation and is preferred by experienced operators. However, an increasing number of reports currently support videolaryngoscopy, particularly for novice users. The widespread use of videolaryngoscopy may be limited due to financial limitations, especially in low-income countries. Therefore, affordable single-use scopes are now becoming increasingly popular. We sought to compare these new scopes with direct laryngoscopes and the previously tested videolaryngoscopes in mannequins by novices.

Methods

Fifty medical students were recruited to serve as novice users. Following brief, standardized training, students were asked to execute endotracheal intubation with each of the devices, including the Airtraq®, a custom-made videolaryngoscope, the King Vision®, the Macintosh laryngoscope and the VividTrac®, on an airway trainer (Laerdal Airway Management Trainer®) in normal and difficult airway scenarios. We evaluated the time to and the proportion of successful intubation, the best view of the glottis, esophageal intubation, dental trauma and user satisfaction.

Results

We observed no differences in esophageal intubation. However, intubation-related times, the view of the glottis and operator satisfaction were significantly better throughout the study with the commercial videolaryngoscopes. In comparison, the custom-made videolaryngoscope performance proved to be similar to that of the Macintosh laryngoscope. The VividTrac® performance was similar (P > 0.05) or significantly better than that of the King Vision® in both scenarios.

Conclusions

Based upon our results, the Airtraq®, King Vision® and VividTrac® were superior to the Macintosh laryngscope in both normal and difficult airway scencarios for novice users. In particular, our study is the first to report that the VividTrac® shows promise for further clinical evaluation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR, et al. Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(1):23–7.CrossRefPubMed Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR, et al. Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(1):23–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Pieters BMA, Wilbers NER, Huijzer M, Winkens B, van Zundert AAJ. Comparison of seven videolaryngoscopes with the Macintosh laryngoscope in manikins by experienced and novice personnel. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(5):556–64.CrossRefPubMed Pieters BMA, Wilbers NER, Huijzer M, Winkens B, van Zundert AAJ. Comparison of seven videolaryngoscopes with the Macintosh laryngoscope in manikins by experienced and novice personnel. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(5):556–64.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rothfield KP, Russo SG. Videolaryngoscopy: should it replace direct laryngoscopy? a pro-con debate. J Clin Anesth. 2012;24(7):593–7.CrossRefPubMed Rothfield KP, Russo SG. Videolaryngoscopy: should it replace direct laryngoscopy? a pro-con debate. J Clin Anesth. 2012;24(7):593–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ray DC, Billington C, Kearns PK, et al. A comparison of McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice users: a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(11):1207–10.CrossRefPubMed Ray DC, Billington C, Kearns PK, et al. A comparison of McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice users: a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(11):1207–10.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Healy DW, Maties O, Hovord D, Kheterpal S. A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2012;12:32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Healy DW, Maties O, Hovord D, Kheterpal S. A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2012;12:32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Cohen Y, Rubinstein RM, Berkenstadt H. A Do-It-Yourself videolaryngoscope for under 25$ - a solution for lower income countries? Anesth Analg. 2016;123(3S):680–1.CrossRef Cohen Y, Rubinstein RM, Berkenstadt H. A Do-It-Yourself videolaryngoscope for under 25$ - a solution for lower income countries? Anesth Analg. 2016;123(3S):680–1.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Niforopoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Demestiha T, Koudouna E, Xanthos T. Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54(9):1050–61.CrossRefPubMed Niforopoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Demestiha T, Koudouna E, Xanthos T. Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54(9):1050–61.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Karippacheril JG, Umesh G, Ramkumar V. Inexpensive video-laryngoscopy guided intubation using a personal computer: initial experience of a novel technique. J Clin Monit Comput. 2014;28(3):261–4.CrossRefPubMed Karippacheril JG, Umesh G, Ramkumar V. Inexpensive video-laryngoscopy guided intubation using a personal computer: initial experience of a novel technique. J Clin Monit Comput. 2014;28(3):261–4.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cierniak M, Timler D, Wieczorek A, Sekalski P, Borkowska N, Gaszynski T. The comparison of the technical parameters in endotracheal intubation devices: the Cmac, the Vividtrac, the McGrath Mac and the Kingvision. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30(4):379–87.CrossRefPubMed Cierniak M, Timler D, Wieczorek A, Sekalski P, Borkowska N, Gaszynski T. The comparison of the technical parameters in endotracheal intubation devices: the Cmac, the Vividtrac, the McGrath Mac and the Kingvision. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30(4):379–87.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Malik MA, O’Donoghue C, Carney J, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Comparison of the Glidescope(R), the Pentax AWS(R), and the Truview EVO2(R) with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthetists: a manikin study. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(1):128–34.CrossRefPubMed Malik MA, O’Donoghue C, Carney J, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Comparison of the Glidescope(R), the Pentax AWS(R), and the Truview EVO2(R) with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthetists: a manikin study. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(1):128–34.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Maharaj CH, Costello JF, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the AirtraqR and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(7):671–7.CrossRefPubMed Maharaj CH, Costello JF, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the AirtraqR and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(7):671–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference ATLS Subcommittee, American College of Surgeons’ Committee on Trauma, International ATLS working group. Advanced trauma life support (ATLS®): the ninth edition. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(5):1363–6. ATLS Subcommittee, American College of Surgeons’ Committee on Trauma, International ATLS working group. Advanced trauma life support (ATLS®): the ninth edition. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(5):1363–6.
13.
go back to reference Levitan RM, Ochroch EA, Kush S, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5(9):919–23.CrossRefPubMed Levitan RM, Ochroch EA, Kush S, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5(9):919–23.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hayashi K, Suzuki A, Sugawara A, Kurosawa A, Takahata O, Iwasaki H. Intubation training survey using four types of laryngoscopes among medical students: a comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscopes, Miller laryngoscopes, Airtraq, and Pentax-AWS Airwayscope. Masui. 2011;60(3):389–94.PubMed Hayashi K, Suzuki A, Sugawara A, Kurosawa A, Takahata O, Iwasaki H. Intubation training survey using four types of laryngoscopes among medical students: a comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscopes, Miller laryngoscopes, Airtraq, and Pentax-AWS Airwayscope. Masui. 2011;60(3):389–94.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh Blade versus GlideScope. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(1):32–7.CrossRefPubMed Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh Blade versus GlideScope. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(1):32–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Konrad C, Schüpfer G, Wietlisbach M, Gerber H. Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: Is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesth Analg. 1998;86(3):635–9.CrossRefPubMed Konrad C, Schüpfer G, Wietlisbach M, Gerber H. Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: Is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesth Analg. 1998;86(3):635–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Johnson C, Roberts JT. Clinical competence in the performance of fiberoptic laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation: a study of resident instruction. J Clin Anesth. 1989;1(5):344–9.CrossRefPubMed Johnson C, Roberts JT. Clinical competence in the performance of fiberoptic laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation: a study of resident instruction. J Clin Anesth. 1989;1(5):344–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Maharaj CH, Costello J, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Retention of tracheal intubation skills by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(3):272–8.CrossRefPubMed Maharaj CH, Costello J, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Retention of tracheal intubation skills by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(3):272–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Akihisa Y, Maruyama K, Koyama Y, Yamada R, Ogura A, Andoh T. Comparison of intubation performance between the King Vision and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice personnel: a randomized, crossover manikin study. J Anesth. 2014;28(1):51–7.CrossRefPubMed Akihisa Y, Maruyama K, Koyama Y, Yamada R, Ogura A, Andoh T. Comparison of intubation performance between the King Vision and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice personnel: a randomized, crossover manikin study. J Anesth. 2014;28(1):51–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hirabayashi Y, Seo N. Airtraq optical laryngoscope: tracheal intubation by novice laryngoscopists. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(2):112–3.CrossRefPubMed Hirabayashi Y, Seo N. Airtraq optical laryngoscope: tracheal intubation by novice laryngoscopists. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(2):112–3.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference van Zundert A, Pieters B, Doerges V, Gatt S. Videolaryngoscopy allows a better view of the pharynx and larynx than classic laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(6):1014–5.CrossRefPubMed van Zundert A, Pieters B, Doerges V, Gatt S. Videolaryngoscopy allows a better view of the pharynx and larynx than classic laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(6):1014–5.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Liu Z-J, Yi J, Guo W-J, Ma C, Huang Y-G. Comparison of McGrath series 3 and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway by inexperienced anesthetists: a randomized study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(2):e2514.CrossRef Liu Z-J, Yi J, Guo W-J, Ma C, Huang Y-G. Comparison of McGrath series 3 and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway by inexperienced anesthetists: a randomized study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(2):e2514.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ochroch EA, Hollander JE, Kush S, Shofer FS, Levitan RM. Assessment of laryngeal view: percentage of glottic opening score vs Cormack and Lehane grading. Can J Anaesth. 1999;46(10):987–90.CrossRefPubMed Ochroch EA, Hollander JE, Kush S, Shofer FS, Levitan RM. Assessment of laryngeal view: percentage of glottic opening score vs Cormack and Lehane grading. Can J Anaesth. 1999;46(10):987–90.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Nasim S, Maharaj CH, Butt I, et al. Comparison of the Airtraq® and Truview®laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by advanced paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation in manikins. BMC Emerg Med. 2009;9(1):2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nasim S, Maharaj CH, Butt I, et al. Comparison of the Airtraq® and Truview®laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by advanced paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation in manikins. BMC Emerg Med. 2009;9(1):2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Liu EHC, Goy RWL, Tan BH, Asai T. Tracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a randomized trial of the Airway Scope and the GlideScope. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(3):446–51.CrossRefPubMed Liu EHC, Goy RWL, Tan BH, Asai T. Tracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a randomized trial of the Airway Scope and the GlideScope. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(3):446–51.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Ruetzler K, Imach S, Weiss M, Haas T, Schmidt AR. Vergleich von fünf Videolaryngoskopen und direkter konventioneller Laryngoskopie. Anaesthesist. 2015;64(7):513–9.CrossRefPubMed Ruetzler K, Imach S, Weiss M, Haas T, Schmidt AR. Vergleich von fünf Videolaryngoskopen und direkter konventioneller Laryngoskopie. Anaesthesist. 2015;64(7):513–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of VividTrac®, Airtraq®, King Vision®, Macintosh Laryngoscope and a Custom-Made Videolaryngoscope for difficult and normal airways in mannequins by novices
Authors
Szilárd Rendeki
Dóra Keresztes
Gábor Woth
Ákos Mérei
Martin Rozanovic
Mátyás Rendeki
József Farkas
Diána Mühl
Bálint Nagy
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0362-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2017 Go to the issue