Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Emergency Medicine 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Cephalexin | Case report

Complications of subcutaneous penile modifications: a discussion of emergency department presentations and management

Authors: Cali L. Kirkham, Stormy M. Monks, Scott B. Crawford

Published in: International Journal of Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Subcutaneous penile modifications (SPMs) are more prevalent in Southeast Asian culture and have been growing in popularity in Western culture. SPMs are often made of domino tiles, or other available pieces of plastic, shaved into a desired shape and placed in unsterile conditions. Previous literature indicates a high risk of infection and the need for surgical removal.

Case presentations

Seven patients presented to the emergency department in the Southwest border region with complications from SPMs. All the patients complained of pain, four presented with signs of infection, and four SPMs required removal in the emergency department. Removal consisted of a dorsal penile nerve block and making an incision over the SPM to remove the foreign body. Three of the patients had their SPMs done during a previous incarceration under unsterile conditions.

Conclusions

SPMs appear to be growing in popularity among Western culture, and emergency department health care providers should be aware of trends in body modifications as well as potential complications. The conditions in which SPMs are often placed pose a high risk for infection. In some cases, placement and/or removal of SPMs pose a risk of damage to the corpora, arteries, and nerves of the penis. In the absence of overt bleeding, or suggestion of neurologic injury, dorsally placed superficial foreign bodies of the penis may be amenable to emergency department removal.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fischer N, Hauser S, Brede O, Fisang C, Muller S. Implantation of artificial penile nodules--a review of literature. J Sex Med. 2010;7(11):3565–71.CrossRef Fischer N, Hauser S, Brede O, Fisang C, Muller S. Implantation of artificial penile nodules--a review of literature. J Sex Med. 2010;7(11):3565–71.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nguyen DP, Desai BK, Falgiani M. Visual diagnosis: pearling: a case study. Int J Emerg Med. 2011;4:74.CrossRef Nguyen DP, Desai BK, Falgiani M. Visual diagnosis: pearling: a case study. Int J Emerg Med. 2011;4:74.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stankov O, Ivanovski O, Popov Z. Artificial penile bodies-from Kama Sutra to modern times. J Sex Med. 2009;6(6):1543–8.CrossRef Stankov O, Ivanovski O, Popov Z. Artificial penile bodies-from Kama Sutra to modern times. J Sex Med. 2009;6(6):1543–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Vatsyayana. The Kamasutra. Benares: Jai Krishna-das-Haridas Gupta; 1929. Vatsyayana. The Kamasutra. Benares: Jai Krishna-das-Haridas Gupta; 1929.
5.
go back to reference Im-Em W, Siriratmongkhon K. Gender and pleasure: exploration of sex gadgets, penile implants and related beliefs in Thailand. 2nd Meeting of Gender and Sexuality Working Group. Jakarta: Australian National Univeristy; 2002. Im-Em W, Siriratmongkhon K. Gender and pleasure: exploration of sex gadgets, penile implants and related beliefs in Thailand. 2nd Meeting of Gender and Sexuality Working Group. Jakarta: Australian National Univeristy; 2002.
6.
go back to reference Thomson N, Sutcliffe CG, Sirirojn B, Sintupat K, Aramrattana A, Samuels A, et al. Penile modification in young Thai men: risk environments, procedures and widespread implications for HIV and sexually transmitted infections. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(3):195–7.CrossRef Thomson N, Sutcliffe CG, Sirirojn B, Sintupat K, Aramrattana A, Samuels A, et al. Penile modification in young Thai men: risk environments, procedures and widespread implications for HIV and sexually transmitted infections. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(3):195–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Armstrong ML, Caliendo C, Roberts AE. Genital piercings: what is known and what people with genital piercings tell us. Urol Nurs. 2006;26(4):173–9.PubMed Armstrong ML, Caliendo C, Roberts AE. Genital piercings: what is known and what people with genital piercings tell us. Urol Nurs. 2006;26(4):173–9.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Wilcher G. Artificial penile nodules — a forensic pathosociology perspective: four case reports. Med Sci Law. 2006;46(4):349–56.CrossRef Wilcher G. Artificial penile nodules — a forensic pathosociology perspective: four case reports. Med Sci Law. 2006;46(4):349–56.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sheth P, Finkelstein E, Campbell D, Danton GH. Imaging of foreign bodies in prisoners. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2015;36(1):28–38.CrossRef Sheth P, Finkelstein E, Campbell D, Danton GH. Imaging of foreign bodies in prisoners. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2015;36(1):28–38.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rinard K, Nelius T, Hogan L, Young C, Roberts AE, Armstrong ML. Cross-sectional study examining four types of male penile and urethral “play”. Urology. 2010;76(6):1326–33.CrossRef Rinard K, Nelius T, Hogan L, Young C, Roberts AE, Armstrong ML. Cross-sectional study examining four types of male penile and urethral “play”. Urology. 2010;76(6):1326–33.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hudak SJ, McGeady J, Shindel AW, Breyer BN. Subcutaneous penile insertion of domino fragments by incarcerated males in southwest United States prisons: a report of three cases. J Sex Med. 2012;9(2):632–4.CrossRef Hudak SJ, McGeady J, Shindel AW, Breyer BN. Subcutaneous penile insertion of domino fragments by incarcerated males in southwest United States prisons: a report of three cases. J Sex Med. 2012;9(2):632–4.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Marzouk E. Implantation of beads into the penile skin and its complications. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1990;24(3):167–9.CrossRef Marzouk E. Implantation of beads into the penile skin and its complications. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1990;24(3):167–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yap L, Butler T, Richters J, Malacova E, Wand H, Smith AM, et al. Penile implants among prisoners-a cause for concern? PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53065.CrossRef Yap L, Butler T, Richters J, Malacova E, Wand H, Smith AM, et al. Penile implants among prisoners-a cause for concern? PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53065.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Flynn RM, Jain S. A domino effect? The spread of implantation of penile foreign bodies in the prison system. Urology Case Reports. 2014;2(2):63–4.CrossRef Flynn RM, Jain S. A domino effect? The spread of implantation of penile foreign bodies in the prison system. Urology Case Reports. 2014;2(2):63–4.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference El-Taher AM, Aboul-Ella HA, Sayed MA, Gaafar AA. Management of penile fracture. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2004;56(5):1138–40.CrossRef El-Taher AM, Aboul-Ella HA, Sayed MA, Gaafar AA. Management of penile fracture. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2004;56(5):1138–40.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Everett ED, Dellinger P, Goldstein EJC, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(10):1373–406.CrossRef Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Everett ED, Dellinger P, Goldstein EJC, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(10):1373–406.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Complications of subcutaneous penile modifications: a discussion of emergency department presentations and management
Authors
Cali L. Kirkham
Stormy M. Monks
Scott B. Crawford
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Emergency Medicine / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1865-1372
Electronic ISSN: 1865-1380
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-019-0241-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

International Journal of Emergency Medicine 1/2019 Go to the issue