Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Genetic and maternal predictors of cognitive and behavioral trajectories in females with fragile X syndrome

Authors: Laura del Hoyo Soriano, Angela John Thurman, Danielle Jenine Harvey, W. Ted Brown, Leonard Abbeduto

Published in: Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is caused by a mutation in the FMR1 gene on the X chromosome, leading to decreased levels of FMR1 protein (FMRP), which causes the array of neuropsychological impairments that define FXS. Because FXS is an X-linked condition, fewer females display FXS and females with FXS are more mildly affected than males, on average. However, there is a considerable variability in terms of severity of affectedness among females with FXS. The current study was designed to investigate potential genetic (FMRP level and ratio of affected to total chromosomes) and environmental factors (maternal psychological distress and closeness in the mother–child relationship) influencing the cognitive (fluid and crystallized intelligence) and behavioral (anxiety and withdrawal) phenotype of females with FXS.

Methods

We conducted a prospective 3-year longitudinal study of 16 females with FXS (with up to four assessments, each separated by a year) using an accelerated longitudinal design so that we had coverage of the age range of 10–15 years at study start and 13–18 at study end. We focused on both the level of functioning related to chronological age expectations (standard scores) and absolute change in skill (raw scores) over the 3-year period.

Results

At a cross-sectional level, fluid intelligence and crystallized intelligence were both predicted by a closer mother–child relationship and lower maternal psychological distress. However, only fluid intelligence was predicted by a lower ratio of affected to total chromosomes. Anxiety and withdrawal were predicted by a higher ratio of affected to total chromosomes. Withdrawal was also predicted by lower closeness in the mother–child relationship and higher maternal distress. In terms of longitudinal change, gains were observed in fluid and crystallized intelligence, whereas anxious and withdrawn behaviors remained stable over visits. Gains in fluid intelligence were solely predicted by FXS biomarkers (higher FMRP level and lower ratio of affected to total chromosomes), while gains in crystallized intelligence were not predicted by any of the biological and environmental variables.

Conclusions

Our results show that FXS biomarkers and maternal variables contribute differentially to the cognitive and behavioral features of the adolescent female with FXS. These findings can help in the design of treatment studies aimed at enhancing cognitive and behavioral abilities in the FXS population.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sherman S. Epidemiology. In: Hagerman RJ, Hagerman PJ, editors. Fragile X syndrome: diagnosis, treatment, and research. Johns Hopkins University Press; 2002. p. 136–68. Sherman S. Epidemiology. In: Hagerman RJ, Hagerman PJ, editors. Fragile X syndrome: diagnosis, treatment, and research. Johns Hopkins University Press; 2002. p. 136–68.
14.
go back to reference Carroll JB. Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993.CrossRef Carroll JB. Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Horn JL, Cattell RB. Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences. J Educ Psychol. 1966;57(5):253–70.CrossRefPubMed Horn JL, Cattell RB. Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences. J Educ Psychol. 1966;57(5):253–70.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Hagerman RJ, Jackson C, Amiri K, Silverman a C, O’Connor R, Sobesky W. Girls with fragile X syndrome: physical and neurocognitive status and outcome. Pediatrics. 1992;89(3):395–400.PubMed Hagerman RJ, Jackson C, Amiri K, Silverman a C, O’Connor R, Sobesky W. Girls with fragile X syndrome: physical and neurocognitive status and outcome. Pediatrics. 1992;89(3):395–400.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Dyer-friedman J, Glaser B, Hessl D, Johnston C, Huffman LC, Taylor A, et al. Genetic and environmental influences on the cognitive outcomes of children with fragile X syndrome. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41:237–44.CrossRefPubMed Dyer-friedman J, Glaser B, Hessl D, Johnston C, Huffman LC, Taylor A, et al. Genetic and environmental influences on the cognitive outcomes of children with fragile X syndrome. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41:237–44.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Channell MM, Thurman AJ, Kover ST, Abbeduto L. Patterns of change in nonverbal cognition in adolescents with Down syndrome. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35:2933–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Channell MM, Thurman AJ, Kover ST, Abbeduto L. Patterns of change in nonverbal cognition in adolescents with Down syndrome. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35:2933–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Roid GH, Miller LJ. Leiter international performance scale–revised. Wood Dale: Stoelting; 1997. Roid GH, Miller LJ. Leiter international performance scale–revised. Wood Dale: Stoelting; 1997. 
44.
go back to reference Williams KT. Expressive vocabulary test (EVT-2). Circle Pines: American Service; 1997. Williams KT. Expressive vocabulary test (EVT-2). Circle Pines: American Service; 1997.
46.
go back to reference Achenbach T, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families; 2001. Achenbach T, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families; 2001.
54.
go back to reference Fisch GS, Carpenter N, Howard-Peebles PN, Holden JJA, Tarleton J, Simensen R. The course of cognitive-behavioral development in children with the FMR1 mutation, Williams-Beuren syndrome, and neurofibromatosis type 1: the effect of gender. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2010;152A(6) http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ajmg.a.33412. Fisch GS, Carpenter N, Howard-Peebles PN, Holden JJA, Tarleton J, Simensen R. The course of cognitive-behavioral development in children with the FMR1 mutation, Williams-Beuren syndrome, and neurofibromatosis type 1: the effect of gender. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2010;152A(6) http://​doi.​wiley.​com/​10.​1002/​ajmg.​a.​33412.
59.
go back to reference Greiff S, Wüstenberg S, Goetz T, Vainikainen M-P, Hautamäki J, Bornstein MH. A longitudinal study of higher-order thinking skills: working memory and fluid reasoning in childhood enhance complex problem solving in adolescence. Front Psychol. 2015;6(1060) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26283992 Greiff S, Wüstenberg S, Goetz T, Vainikainen M-P, Hautamäki J, Bornstein MH. A longitudinal study of higher-order thinking skills: working memory and fluid reasoning in childhood enhance complex problem solving in adolescence. Front Psychol. 2015;6(1060) http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​26283992
63.
go back to reference Reiss AL, Dant CC. The behavioral neurogenetics of fragile X syndrome: analyzing gene–brain–behavior relationships in child developmental psychopathologies. Dev Psychopathol. 2003;15:927–68.CrossRefPubMed Reiss AL, Dant CC. The behavioral neurogenetics of fragile X syndrome: analyzing gene–brain–behavior relationships in child developmental psychopathologies. Dev Psychopathol. 2003;15:927–68.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Genetic and maternal predictors of cognitive and behavioral trajectories in females with fragile X syndrome
Authors
Laura del Hoyo Soriano
Angela John Thurman
Danielle Jenine Harvey
W. Ted Brown
Leonard Abbeduto
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1866-1947
Electronic ISSN: 1866-1955
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-018-9240-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders 1/2018 Go to the issue