Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gynecological Surgery 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Laparoscopy | Original Article

Preclinical evaluation of a new robot-assisted surgical system for use in gynecology minimal access surgery

Authors: Marcus Carey, Anish Bali, Ivilina Pandeva, Ashish Pradhan, Mark Slack

Published in: Gynecological Surgery | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Robot-assisted laparoscopy has been developed to overcome some of the important limitations of conventional laparoscopy. In particular, the provision of stable magnified three-dimensional vision, tremor filtering, motion scaling, and articulated instruments with robot-assisted surgery has the potential to enable more surgeons to perform more complex surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of a new robot-assisted surgical system (Versius, CMR Surgical, Cambridge, UK) for gynecologic procedures in a preclinical setting. Cadaveric sessions were conducted to evaluate the ability of the system to complete all surgical steps required for a robot-assisted total laparoscopy hysterectomy. A live animal (porcine) model was used to assess the system in performing oviduct removal as a surrogate for robot-assisted total laparoscopy hysterectomy. Procedures were performed by experienced gynecologic surgeons, supported by a surgical team. The precise surgical steps conducted to conclude that the procedures could be fully completed were systematically recorded, as well as instruments used and endoscope angle. In total, six gynecologic procedures were performed in cadavers by four surgeons; 16/17 procedures were completed successfully. Positioning of the ports and bedside units reflected the surgeons’ preferred laparoscopic setup and enabled good surgical access and reach, as exemplified by the high procedure completion rate. Oviduct removal procedures performed in pigs were all completed successfully by a single surgeon. This preclinical study of a new robot-assisted surgical system for gynecologic procedures demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the system in cadaver and porcine models. Further studies are required to assess its clinical utility.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Powell F, Khaund A (2016) Laparoscopy and laparoscopic surgery. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine 26:297–303CrossRef Powell F, Khaund A (2016) Laparoscopy and laparoscopic surgery. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine 26:297–303CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lawrie TA, Liu H, Lu D et al (2019) Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Lawrie TA, Liu H, Lu D et al (2019) Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
3.
go back to reference Lee J, Asher V, Nair A et al (2018) Comparing the experience of enhanced recovery programme for gynaecological patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open gynaecological surgery: a prospective study. Perioperative Medicine 7:15CrossRef Lee J, Asher V, Nair A et al (2018) Comparing the experience of enhanced recovery programme for gynaecological patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open gynaecological surgery: a prospective study. Perioperative Medicine 7:15CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nieboer TE, Spaanderman ME, Bongers MY et al (2010) Gynaecologists estimate and experience laparoscopic hysterectomy as more difficult compared with abdominal hysterectomy. Gynecol Surg 7:359–363CrossRef Nieboer TE, Spaanderman ME, Bongers MY et al (2010) Gynaecologists estimate and experience laparoscopic hysterectomy as more difficult compared with abdominal hysterectomy. Gynecol Surg 7:359–363CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jauffret C, Lambaudie E, Esterni B et al (2016) Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology surgery: team training and impact on morbidity. Clin Surg 1:1112 Jauffret C, Lambaudie E, Esterni B et al (2016) Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology surgery: team training and impact on morbidity. Clin Surg 1:1112
6.
go back to reference Cela V, Freschi L, Simi G et al (2013) Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome. Surg Endosc 27:2638–2643CrossRef Cela V, Freschi L, Simi G et al (2013) Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome. Surg Endosc 27:2638–2643CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cela V, Marrucci E, Angioni S et al (2018) Robot-assisted laparoscopic single-site hysterectomy: our experience and multicentric comparison with single-port laparoscopy. Minerva Ginecol 70:621–628CrossRef Cela V, Marrucci E, Angioni S et al (2018) Robot-assisted laparoscopic single-site hysterectomy: our experience and multicentric comparison with single-port laparoscopy. Minerva Ginecol 70:621–628CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Claerhout F, Verguts J, Werbrouck E et al (2014) Analysis of the learning process for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: identification of challenging steps. Int Urogynecol J 25:1185–1191CrossRef Claerhout F, Verguts J, Werbrouck E et al (2014) Analysis of the learning process for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: identification of challenging steps. Int Urogynecol J 25:1185–1191CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fuchs Weizman N, Maurer R, Einarsson JI et al (2015) Survey on barriers to adoption of laparoscopic surgery. Journal of surgical education 72:985–994CrossRef Fuchs Weizman N, Maurer R, Einarsson JI et al (2015) Survey on barriers to adoption of laparoscopic surgery. Journal of surgical education 72:985–994CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sinha R, Swarnasree G, Rupa B et al (2019) Laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uteri: outcomes and techniques. J Minim Access Surg 15:8–13CrossRef Sinha R, Swarnasree G, Rupa B et al (2019) Laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uteri: outcomes and techniques. J Minim Access Surg 15:8–13CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Haya N, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al (2018) Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: CD013105 Haya N, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al (2018) Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: CD013105
12.
go back to reference Bouquet de Joliniere J, Librino A, Dubuisson J-B, et al (2016) Robotic surgery in gynecology. Frontiers in Surgery 3: eCollection 2016 Bouquet de Joliniere J, Librino A, Dubuisson J-B, et al (2016) Robotic surgery in gynecology. Frontiers in Surgery 3: eCollection 2016
13.
go back to reference Orady M, Hrynewych A, Nawfal AK et al (2012) Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 16:542CrossRef Orady M, Hrynewych A, Nawfal AK et al (2012) Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 16:542CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Corrado G, Mereu L, Bogliolo S, et al (2019) Comparison between single-site and multiport robot-assisted hysterectomy in obese patients with endometrial cancer: an Italian multi-institutional study. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS: e2066 Corrado G, Mereu L, Bogliolo S, et al (2019) Comparison between single-site and multiport robot-assisted hysterectomy in obese patients with endometrial cancer: an Italian multi-institutional study. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS: e2066
15.
go back to reference Buderath P, Aktas B, Heubner M et al (2015) Robot-assisted hysterectomy: a critical evaluation. Robot Surg Res Rev 2:51–58 Buderath P, Aktas B, Heubner M et al (2015) Robot-assisted hysterectomy: a critical evaluation. Robot Surg Res Rev 2:51–58
16.
go back to reference Hares L, Roberts P, Marshall K et al (2019) Using end-user feedback to optimize the design of the Versius Surgical System, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery. BMJ Surgery, Interventions & Health Technologies 1:e000019CrossRef Hares L, Roberts P, Marshall K et al (2019) Using end-user feedback to optimize the design of the Versius Surgical System, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery. BMJ Surgery, Interventions & Health Technologies 1:e000019CrossRef
17.
go back to reference McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB et al (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112CrossRef McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB et al (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Haig F, Chitty K, Medeiros A, et al (2020) Usability assessment of Versius, a minimally invasive robot-assisted surgical device. BMJ Surgery, Interventions & Health Technologies: In press Haig F, Chitty K, Medeiros A, et al (2020) Usability assessment of Versius, a minimally invasive robot-assisted surgical device. BMJ Surgery, Interventions & Health Technologies: In press
19.
go back to reference Hirst A, Philippou Y, Blazeby J et al (2019) No Surgical innovation without evaluation: evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations. Ann Surg 269:211–220CrossRef Hirst A, Philippou Y, Blazeby J et al (2019) No Surgical innovation without evaluation: evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations. Ann Surg 269:211–220CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nair R, Killicoat K, Ind TE (2016) Robotic surgery in gynaecology. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 18:221–229CrossRef Nair R, Killicoat K, Ind TE (2016) Robotic surgery in gynaecology. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 18:221–229CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Stefanidis D, Yonce TC, Green JM et al (2013) Cadavers versus pigs: which are better for procedural training of surgery residents outside the OR? Surgery 154:34–37CrossRef Stefanidis D, Yonce TC, Green JM et al (2013) Cadavers versus pigs: which are better for procedural training of surgery residents outside the OR? Surgery 154:34–37CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preclinical evaluation of a new robot-assisted surgical system for use in gynecology minimal access surgery
Authors
Marcus Carey
Anish Bali
Ivilina Pandeva
Ashish Pradhan
Mark Slack
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Gynecological Surgery / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1613-2076
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-020-01069-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Gynecological Surgery 1/2020 Go to the issue