Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 5/2007

Open Access 01-10-2007 | Research

Validation of a continuous, arterial pressure-based cardiac output measurement: a multicenter, prospective clinical trial

Authors: William T McGee, Jeffrey L Horswell, Joachim Calderon, Gerard Janvier, Tom Van Severen, Greet Van den Berghe, Lori Kozikowski

Published in: Critical Care | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The present study compared measurements of cardiac output by an arterial pressure-based cardiac output (APCO) analysis method with measurement by intermittent thermodilution cardiac output (ICO) via pulmonary artery catheter in a clinical setting.

Methods

The multicenter, prospective clinical investigation enrolled patients with a clinical indication for cardiac output monitoring requiring pulmonary artery and radial artery catheters at two hospitals in the United States, one hospital in France, and one hospital in Belgium. In 84 patients (69 surgical patients), the cardiac output was measured by analysis of the arterial pulse using APCO and was measured via pulmonary artery catheter by ICO; to establish a reference comparison, the cardiac output was measured by continuous cardiac output (CCO). Data were collected continuously by the APCO and CCO technologies, and at least every 4 hours by ICO. No clinical interventions were made as part of the study.

Results

For APCO compared with ICO, the bias was 0.20 l/min, the precision was ± 1.28 l/min, and the limits of agreement were -2.36 l/m to 2.75 l/m. For CCO compared with ICO, the bias was 0.66 l/min, the precision was ± 1.05 l/min, and the limits of agreement were -1.43 l/m to 2.76 l/m. The ability of APCO and CCO to assess changes in cardiac output was compared with that of ICO. In 96% of comparisons, APCO tracked the change in cardiac output in the same direction as ICO. The magnitude of change was comparable 59% of the time. For CCO, 95% of comparisons were in the same direction, with 58% of those changes being of similar magnitude.

Conclusion

In critically ill patients in the intensive care unit, continuous measurement of cardiac output using either APCO or CCO is comparable with ICO. Further study in more homogeneous populations may refine specific situations where APCO reliability is strongest.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gonzalez J, Delafosse C, Fartoukh M, Capderou A, Straus C, Zelter M, Derenne JP, Similowski T: Comparison of bedside measurement of cardiac output with the thermodilution method and the Fick method in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care 2003, 7: 171-178.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Gonzalez J, Delafosse C, Fartoukh M, Capderou A, Straus C, Zelter M, Derenne JP, Similowski T: Comparison of bedside measurement of cardiac output with the thermodilution method and the Fick method in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care 2003, 7: 171-178.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rapoport J, Teres D, Steingrub J, Higgins T, McGee W, Lemeshow S: Patient characteristics and ICU organizational factors that influence frequency of pulmonary artery catheterization. JAMA 2000, 283: 2559-2567.CrossRefPubMed Rapoport J, Teres D, Steingrub J, Higgins T, McGee W, Lemeshow S: Patient characteristics and ICU organizational factors that influence frequency of pulmonary artery catheterization. JAMA 2000, 283: 2559-2567.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hall JB: Use of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: was invention the mother of necessity? JAMA 2000, 283: 2577-2578.CrossRefPubMed Hall JB: Use of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: was invention the mother of necessity? JAMA 2000, 283: 2577-2578.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Berton C, Cholley B: Equipment review: new techniques for cardiac output measurement – oesophageal Doppler, Fick principle using carbon dioxide, and pulse contour analysis. Crit Care 2002, 6: 216-221.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Berton C, Cholley B: Equipment review: new techniques for cardiac output measurement – oesophageal Doppler, Fick principle using carbon dioxide, and pulse contour analysis. Crit Care 2002, 6: 216-221.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chaney JC, Derdak S: Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring for the intensivist: current and emerging technology. Crit Care Med 2002, 30: 2338-2345.CrossRefPubMed Chaney JC, Derdak S: Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring for the intensivist: current and emerging technology. Crit Care Med 2002, 30: 2338-2345.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Rhodes A, Sunderland R: Arterial pulse power analysis: the LiDCOplus system. In Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring. Edited by: Pinsky M, Payen D. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2005:183-192.CrossRef Rhodes A, Sunderland R: Arterial pulse power analysis: the LiDCOplus system. In Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring. Edited by: Pinsky M, Payen D. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2005:183-192.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Goedje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Faltchauser A, Lamm P, Reichart B: Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care 1999, 27: 2578-2579.CrossRef Goedje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Faltchauser A, Lamm P, Reichart B: Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care 1999, 27: 2578-2579.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pratt B, Roteliuk L, Hatib F, Frazier J, Wallen R: Calculating arterial pressure-based cardiac output (APCO) using a novel measurement and analysis method. Biomed Instrum Technol 2007, 41: 403-411.CrossRefPubMed Pratt B, Roteliuk L, Hatib F, Frazier J, Wallen R: Calculating arterial pressure-based cardiac output (APCO) using a novel measurement and analysis method. Biomed Instrum Technol 2007, 41: 403-411.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference de Vaal JB, de Wilde RB, van den Berg PC, Schreuder JJ, Jansen JR: Less invasive determination of cardiac output from the arterial pressure by aortic diameter-calibrated pulse contour. Br J Anaesth 2005, 95: 326-331.CrossRefPubMed de Vaal JB, de Wilde RB, van den Berg PC, Schreuder JJ, Jansen JR: Less invasive determination of cardiac output from the arterial pressure by aortic diameter-calibrated pulse contour. Br J Anaesth 2005, 95: 326-331.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Romano SM, Pistolesi M: Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med 2002, 30: 1834-1841.CrossRefPubMed Romano SM, Pistolesi M: Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med 2002, 30: 1834-1841.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wesseling KH, Jansen JR, Settels JJ, Schreuder JJ: Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol 1993, 74: 2566-2573.PubMed Wesseling KH, Jansen JR, Settels JJ, Schreuder JJ: Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol 1993, 74: 2566-2573.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Schmid ER, Schmidlin D, Tornic M, Seifert B: Continuous thermodilution cardiac output: clinical validation against a reference technique of known accuracy. Intensive Care Med 1999, 25: 166-172.CrossRefPubMed Schmid ER, Schmidlin D, Tornic M, Seifert B: Continuous thermodilution cardiac output: clinical validation against a reference technique of known accuracy. Intensive Care Med 1999, 25: 166-172.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Elkayam U, Berkley R, Azen S, Weber L, Geva B, Henry WL: Cardiac output by thermodilution technique. Effect of injectate's volume and temperature on accuracy and reproducibility in the critically ill patient. Chest 1983, 84: 418-422.CrossRefPubMed Elkayam U, Berkley R, Azen S, Weber L, Geva B, Henry WL: Cardiac output by thermodilution technique. Effect of injectate's volume and temperature on accuracy and reproducibility in the critically ill patient. Chest 1983, 84: 418-422.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nilsson LB, Nilsson JC, Skovgaard LT, Berthelsen PG: Thermodilution cardiac output – are three injections enough? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004, 48: 1322-1327.CrossRefPubMed Nilsson LB, Nilsson JC, Skovgaard LT, Berthelsen PG: Thermodilution cardiac output – are three injections enough? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004, 48: 1322-1327.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, i: 307-310.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, i: 307-310.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dhingra VK, Fenwick JC, Walley KR, Chittock DR, Ronco JJ: Lack of agreement between thermodilution and Fick cardiac output in critically ill patients. Chest 2002, 122: 990-997.CrossRefPubMed Dhingra VK, Fenwick JC, Walley KR, Chittock DR, Ronco JJ: Lack of agreement between thermodilution and Fick cardiac output in critically ill patients. Chest 2002, 122: 990-997.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG: Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995, 346: 1085-1087.CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG: Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995, 346: 1085-1087.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Critchley LAH, Critchley JAJH: A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999, 15: 85-91.CrossRefPubMed Critchley LAH, Critchley JAJH: A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999, 15: 85-91.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sun Q, Rogiers P, Pauwels D, Vincent JL: Comparison of continuous thermodilution and bolus cardiac output measurements in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2002, 28: 1276-1280.CrossRefPubMed Sun Q, Rogiers P, Pauwels D, Vincent JL: Comparison of continuous thermodilution and bolus cardiac output measurements in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2002, 28: 1276-1280.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kothari N, Amaria T, Hegde A, Mandke A, Mandke NV: Measurement of cardiac output: comparison of four different methods. Ind J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003, 19: 163-168.CrossRef Kothari N, Amaria T, Hegde A, Mandke A, Mandke NV: Measurement of cardiac output: comparison of four different methods. Ind J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003, 19: 163-168.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Stetz CW, Miller RG, Kelly GE, Raffin TA: Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982, 126: 1001-1004.PubMed Stetz CW, Miller RG, Kelly GE, Raffin TA: Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982, 126: 1001-1004.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Jansen J, Schreuder JJ, Mulier J, Smith M, Settels J, Wesseling K: A comparison of cardiac output derived from the arterial pressure wave against thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 2001, 87: 212-222.CrossRefPubMed Jansen J, Schreuder JJ, Mulier J, Smith M, Settels J, Wesseling K: A comparison of cardiac output derived from the arterial pressure wave against thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 2001, 87: 212-222.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Orme RE, Pigott D, Mihm F: Measurement of cardiac output by transpulmonary arterial thermodilution using a long radial artery catheter. A comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution. Anaesthesia 2004, 59: 590-594.CrossRefPubMed Orme RE, Pigott D, Mihm F: Measurement of cardiac output by transpulmonary arterial thermodilution using a long radial artery catheter. A comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution. Anaesthesia 2004, 59: 590-594.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Validation of a continuous, arterial pressure-based cardiac output measurement: a multicenter, prospective clinical trial
Authors
William T McGee
Jeffrey L Horswell
Joachim Calderon
Gerard Janvier
Tom Van Severen
Greet Van den Berghe
Lori Kozikowski
Publication date
01-10-2007
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue 5/2007
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6125

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

Critical Care 5/2007 Go to the issue