Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Critical Care
Published in: Critical Care 3/2004

Open Access 01-06-2005 | Research

Case mix, outcome and activity for obstetric admissions to adult, general critical care units: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database

Authors: David A Harrison, James A Penny, Steve M Yentis, Samia Fayek, Anthony R Brady

Published in: Critical Care | Special Issue 3/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Risk prediction scores usually overestimate mortality in obstetric populations because mortality rates in this group are considerably lower than in others. Studies examining this effect were generally small and did not distinguish between obstetric and nonobstetric pathologies. We evaluated the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II model in obstetric admissions to critical care units contributing to the ICNARC Case Mix Programme.

Methods

All obstetric admissions were extracted from the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database of 219,468 admissions to UK critical care units from 1995 to 2003 inclusive. Cases were divided into direct obstetric pathologies and indirect or coincidental pathologies, and compared with a control cohort of all women aged 16–50 years not included in the obstetric categories. The predictive ability of APACHE II was evaluated in the three groups. A prognostic model was developed for direct obstetric admissions to predict the risk for hospital mortality. A log-linear model was developed to predict the length of stay in the critical care unit.

Results

A total of 1452 direct obstetric admissions were identified, the most common pathologies being haemorrhage and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. There were 278 admissions identified as indirect or coincidental and 22,938 in the nonpregnant control cohort. Hospital mortality rates were 2.2%, 6.0% and 19.6% for the direct obstetric group, the indirect or coincidental group, and the control cohort, respectively. Cox regression calibration analysis showed a reasonable fit of the APACHE II model for the nonpregnant control cohort (slope = 1.1, intercept = -0.1). However, the APACHE II model vastly overestimated mortality for obstetric admissions (mortality ratio = 0.25). Risk prediction modelling demonstrated that the Glasgow Coma Scale score was the best discriminator between survival and death in obstetric admissions.

Conclusion

This study confirms that APACHE II overestimates mortality in obstetric admissions to critical care units. This may be because of the physiological changes in pregnancy or the unique scoring profile of obstetric pathologies such as HELLP syndrome. It may be possible to recalibrate the APACHE II score for obstetric admissions or to devise an alternative score specifically for obstetric admissions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Lewinsohn G, Herman A, Leonov Y, Klinowski E: Critically ill obstetrical patients: outcome and predictability. Crit Care Med 1994, 22: 1412-1414.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Scarpinato L: Critically ill obstetric patients: outcomes and predictability using the new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) in a 314 bed community hospital [abstract]. Intensive Care Med 1995, 21: S105.
3.
Tang LC, Kwok AC, Wong AY, Lee YY, Sun KO, So AP: Critical care in obstetrical patients: an eight-year review. Chin Med J (Engl) 1997, 110: 936-941.
4.
Karnad DR, Lapsia V, Krishnan A, Salvi VS: Prognostic factors in obstetric patients admitted to an Indian intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2004, 32: 1294-1299. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000128549.72276.00CrossRefPubMed
5.
Koch KA, Rodeffer HD, Sanchez-Ramos L: Critically ill obstetrical patients: Outcome and predictability [abstract]. Crit Care Med 1988, 16: a409.CrossRef
6.
Bhagwanjee S, Paruk F, Moodley J, Muckart DJ: Intensive care unit morbidity and mortality from eclampsia: evaluation of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and the Glasgow Coma Scale score. Crit Care Med 2000, 28: 120-124. 10.1097/00003246-200001000-00020CrossRefPubMed
7.
El-Solh AA, Grant BJB: A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for critically ill obstetric patients. Chest 1996, 110: 1299-1304.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Harrison DA, Brady AR, Rowan K: Case mix, outcome and length of stay for admissions to adult, general critical care units in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Case Mix Programme Database. Crit Care 2004, 8: R99-R111. 10.1186/cc2834PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
Young JD, Goldfrad C, Rowan K: Development and testing of a hierarchical method to code the reason for admission to intensive care units: the ICNARC Coding Method. Br J Anaesth 2001, 87: 543-548. 10.1093/bja/87.4.543CrossRefPubMed
10.
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE: APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985, 13: 818-829.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Rowan KM: Outcome comparisons of intensive care units in Great Britain and Ireland using the APACHE II method. In DPhil thesis. Oxford: University of Oxford; 1992.
12.
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982, 143: 29-36.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S: Goodness-of-fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. Commun Stat 1980, A9: 1043-1069.CrossRef
14.
Cox DR: Two further applications for a method of binary regression. Biometrika 1958, 45: 562-565.CrossRef
15.
Akaike H: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Control 1974, 19: 716-723. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705CrossRef
16.
Ambler G, Brady AR, Royston P: Simplifying a prognostic model: a simulation study based on clinical data. Stat Med 2002, 21: 3803-3822. 10.1002/sim.1422CrossRefPubMed
17.
Hazelgrove JF, Price C, Pappachan VJ, Smith GB: Multicenter study of obstetric admissions to 14 intensive care units in southern England. Crit Care Med 2001, 29: 770-775. 10.1097/00003246-200104000-00016CrossRefPubMed
18.
Umo-Etuk J, Lumley J, Holdcroft A: Critically ill parturient women and admission to intensive care: a 5-year review. Int J Obstet Anesth 1996, 5: 79-84. 10.1016/S0959-289X(96)80001-XCrossRefPubMed
19.
Wheatley E, Farkas A, Watson D: Obstetric admissions to an intensive therapy unit. Int J Obstet Anesth 1996, 5: 221-224. 10.1016/S0959-289X(96)80040-9CrossRefPubMed
20.
Margarson M, Dob D, Yentis SM: A retrospective survey of obsetric admissions to the intensive care unit. Int J Obstet Anesth 1998, 7: 205-206.
21.
Panchal S, Arria AM, Harris AP: Intensive care utilization during hospital admission for delivery: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes in a statewide population. Anesthesiology 2000, 92: 1537-1544. 10.1097/00000542-200006000-00009CrossRefPubMed
22.
Mabie WC, Sibai BM: Treatment in an obstetric intensive care unit. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990, 162: 1-4.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Lapinsky SE, Kruczynski K, Seaward GR, Farine D, Grossman RF: Critical care management of the obstetric patient. Can J Anaesth 1997, 44: 325-329.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Taylor R, Richards GA: Critically ill obstetric and gynaecological patients in the intensive care unit. S Afr Med J 2000, 90: 1140-1144.PubMed
25.
Okafor UV, Aniebue U: Admission pattern and outcome in critical care obstetric patients. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004, 13: 164-166. 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.04.002CrossRefPubMed
26.
Heinonen S, Tyrväinen E, Saarikoski S, Ruokonen E: Need for maternal critical care in obstetrics: a population-based analysis. Int J Obstet Anesth 2002, 11: 260-264. 10.1054/ijoa.2002.0985CrossRefPubMed
27.
Mirghani HM, Hamed M, Ezimokhai M, Weerasinghe DSL: Pregnancy-related admissions to the intensive care unit. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004, 13: 82-85. 10.1016/j.ijoa.2003.10.004CrossRefPubMed
28.
Demirkiran O, Dikmen Y, Utku T, Urkmez S: Critically ill obstetric patients in the intensive care unit. Int J Obstet Anesth 2003, 12: 266-270. 10.1016/S0959-289X(02)00197-8CrossRefPubMed
29.
Cheng C, Raman S: Intensive care use by critically ill obstetric patients: a five-year review. Int J Obstet Anesth 2003, 12: 89-92. 10.1016/S0959-289X(02)00154-1CrossRefPubMed
30.
Arabi Y, Goraj R, Horsfall D, Itani M, Djazmati W, Armstrong D, McIntyre R: Scoring systems in obstetric patients requiring intensive care in Saudi Arabia: a ten-year review [abstract]. Chest 1999, 16: 286S.
31.
Gilbert TT, Smulian JC, Martin AA, Ananth CV, Scorza W, Scardella AT: Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit: outcomes and severity of illness. Obstet Gynecol 2003, 102: 897-903. 10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00767-1CrossRefPubMed
32.
Gopalan PD, Muckart DJJ: The critically ill obstetric patient: what 's the score? Int J Obstet Anesth 2004, 13: 144-145. 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.04.005CrossRefPubMed
33.
Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB: Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996, 15: 361-387. Publisher Full Text 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4CrossRefPubMed
34.
Metadata
Title
Case mix, outcome and activity for obstetric admissions to adult, general critical care units: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database
Authors
David A Harrison
James A Penny
Steve M Yentis
Samia Fayek
Anthony R Brady
Publication date
01-06-2005
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue Special Issue 3/2004
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3542